I just thought I would let you all know that in the March 2001 issue of wired, there is an article with diagrams showing and mentioning Hollow Earth theory. I have not tyet read it, but it is not hit-piece decrying us as a bunch of whacko's or what have you, but seems to be scientific and objective in nature. Check it out.
-Eric
Eric,
I am not familiar with this magazine Wired at all- what´s it about?
It would be hard for me to get my paws on it down here in Brazil. Can
anybody pass anything on about the article?
What is the magazine´s circulation?
Dharma/Dean
issue of wired, there is an article with diagrams showing and
mentioning Hollow Earth theory. I have not tyet read it, but it is
not hit-piece decrying us as a bunch of whacko's or what have you,
but seems to be scientific and objective in nature. Check it out.
-Eric
It's a e-magazine, the first one there was, I believe, out of Microsoft
headquarters itself but supposedly under the exclusive direction of its
publisher/editor, an independent journalist formerly of The Republic
magazine, I believe. See:
Nimueh
P.S. Didn't see any related article. Ran a search on HE, didn't see article.
Let us know if anyone finds that article referred to. Thanks.
Nimueh
Now I think that's not the website for the e-zine.
I found the following:
http://www.usubscribe.com/detail.cfm?id=52510
which offers a subscription at $12/yr. I think this is the magazine I was
referring to.
Maybe someone else knows more about accessing it.
Nimueh
Is it this article?
Master of the Universe
Neal Adams reinvented Batman, revived the X-Men, and reshaped the comic book world. His bold new vision: Forget continental drift. Forget E = mc2. Planet Earth is growing - fast.
By Jeffrey M. O'Brien
Knowledge of orgone/soft particles helps us to account for geological
processes which otherwise don't have a credible explanation. This is
true in general, but especially so if we want to understand how a
hollow configuration could be. For example, conventional theory tells
us that the Earth's magnetic field originates in the molten core, and
that it expands and projects itself through the strata called the
athenosphere and all the way around the globe. The athenosphere is
comprised of molten rock, and magnetic properties cannot exist in the
presence of heat. So how does the magnetic field, generated in the
core, pass through hundreds of miles of heated rock? How could such a
huge magnetic field be generated from that point in the first place?
Here's Cater's remarks: " Scientist's are somewhat vague as to how a
magnetic field could extend 2,000 miles beyond an electric current.
It requires a very powerful current to produce even relatively weak
magnetic effects A VERY SHORT DISTANCE ABOVE THE FLOW. The electrical
resistence of iron, at the alleged temperatures of the core, would be
staggering. ..." Mr. Cater goes on, but you can see already that that
the traditional explanations for a magnetosphere are pathetic. And
how does molten lava rise up from the core? It would cool along the
way? The traditional explanation for the origin of lava is also
pathetic. They can't explain these phenomena, but they pass off
defective theory as it it were all but proven.
The soft particle understanding provides explanations which are at
least more congruent and cohesive than conventional theory. Soft
particles/orgone are very penetrating in relation to the Earth's
shell, especially when once they have been exposed to a little bit of
the redistribution process. The greater difference in frequency
allows them to be more penetrating. They also camouflage the harder
particles, which are the heat-giving ones. Soft particles lodge
themselves between continental plates along fault lines and build up
force in condenser-like fashion to power earthquakes, continenatl
drift and they even play a role in volcanic activity. When they break
aprt due to friction in the strata below, they brek up into their
constituent light bands including the visible light bands. This
accounts for the interior luminosity, interior vegetation,
agriculture, wild life, et cetera, and can even explain the
underground cities which are said to exist, like the ones the Aztecs
disappeared into when the Spaniards were on their trail, what to
speak of the Incas.
Soft particle processes, such as the camouflaging of hard particles
and the redistribution process open up whole new understandings to
take the place of absurd ones. In addition, they allow us to not only
defend ourselves but go on the offensive when others consider us to
be oversimplistic fools or new age nuts for believing in such legends
and myths. Instead of being brow beaten by the scientific community,
soft particle understandings allow us to almost laugh off criticism.
The problem comes when someone asks us to justify the existence of
soft particles. I already mentioned how Cater refers to the
experiments of Wilhelm Reich with electroscopes and photographic
plates in chapter 18. And Baron Von Reichenbach employed people with
vision in the ultra violet in dark room experiments involving magnets.
Mr. Cater also reveals some of his reasoning in chapter 8 which is
also very convincing: " A principle that makes possible the
unification and understanding of a wide range of phenomena has been
known for thousands of years. It is one of the Hermetic axioms that
is part of esoteric teachings. It is usually stated " as above, so
below." This boils down to the basic idea that the same basic
principles underlie all phenomena and that all things interrelate in
some way. From this come the laws of cause and effect. IT FOLLOWS
THAT MUCH OF THE NATURE OF CAUSES CAN BE DEDUCED FROM ITS EFFECTS, OR
THAT MANY OF THE PROPERTIES OF THE UNSEEN CAN BE DETERMINED FROM THAT
WHICH IS SEEN.
...
Since the axiom suggests that the nature of ethers can be deduced by
certain aspects of our surroundings, the most logical one to consider
is that of a perfect gas. Although there must be certain differences
between a gas and the thers, there must be certain properties that
they have in common. An objject can travel through free space and
encounter no resistance. Yet, it does encounter resistence during an
acceleration. A similar pattern occurs during passage through a gas
or an atmosphere, but to a more pronounced degree. When inertia isn't
a major factor, a hollow object, for example, will experience great
resistance from the gas if thee is a great and sudden change in the
velocity. After it attains a given velocity, and this velocity
remains constant, The resistance is greatly reduced. Therefore, it is
logical to assume that the resistance exhibited by a given object is
due to the presence of a subtle medium which possesses some of the
properties of a perfect gas. If there were no medium present, it
would be difficult, if not impossible, to account for inertial
properties."
Thus thee are logical reasons to accept the existence of subtle
mediums which cannot be perceived directly through the matter of our
realm.
In the hierarchy of creation, it goes like this: Ethers combine to
form photons, which combine to form both hard and soft particles,
such as electrons and protons, which then combine to form atoms,
which combine to form molecules, which combine to form cells.
Unfortunately, matter formed of soft particles/orgone/prana is not
recognized by science. In relation to geological processes, this is
folly. Our own bodies are animated by pranas, the ethers behind them,
and ultimately the soul. In the same way, all the moving geological
processes are animated and prompted by underlying orgone physics, and
neither the geological processes of a hollow planet, nor of a solid
one, can be explained without taking soft particles into account. (
The hard particles in sunlight only penetrate a few meters, so where
does that leave us? )
Again, this is why I say that this list is special, because we
investigate on this level, and this is why I always urge you all to
purchase cater's book The Ultimate Reality. It is a really special
hollow Earth book.
Dharma/Dean
Members,
It has been concluded by the astronomical community that polar ice
caps on Venus are an impossibility because of the extreme heat, i.e.,
a 1,000 degree F atmosphere. Of course, if the Venera Nine probe
actually parachuted a lander to the surface, this couldn't be so,
because the parachute would have melted.
Mr. Cater adds other reasoning: " Other claims by NASA with regard to
Venus which are steeped in con-tradictions are those of the dense
clouds surrounding Venus consisting of sulphuric acid, and that the
surface temperature is about 1000° F. Early pictures of Venusian
terrain sent back by a probe which soft landed on the surface show a
landscape very similar to that of the earth or the Moon. Rocks were
shown with sharp edges and there was the usual evi-dence of normal
ground erosion. The type of erosion that would be pro-duced by a
combination of high concentrations of sulphuric acid and 1000° F
would reduce everything on the surface to a blob. The clouds on Venus
undoubtedly consist of a tremendous mantle of water vapor and
droplets, which would protect the surface and promote earthlike condi-
tions. "
The existence of orgone-rich atmospheres on the inner planets and the
Moon can offer evidence in favor of much cooler atmospheres, and
there is a lot implied by this, such as the existence of
civilisations and agriculture on these orbs.
" Evidence shows that the Moon does not experience the extremes of
temperature one would expect from the long days and nights. This can
be readily accounted for by two factors: the extremely high
concentration of soft particles in the atmosphere and their degree of
stability. The particles that accumulate in the atmosphere are the
more stable ones. This means fewer disintegrations which release hard
electrons [ The ones that give off heat ] and also a tendency to
absorb excess hard electrons which are released. This blanket, along
with the dense atmosphere, tends to minimise the escape of heat from
the surface during the long nights. A similar process prevents
temperature extremes on Mars. Mars undoubtedly has a relatively thin
shell like the Moon since it does not seem to have large openings
into the hollow interior. The resulting high negative ion content
would prevent gravity from compressing its atmosphere to the extent
the Earth does its atmosphere. Consequently, the air density would
not drop off with increase in elevation as rapidly as it does on the
Earth. As a result, ideal temperatures and atmospheric densities
would exist at extreme elevations, as is shown on Olympus Mons at
about 75,000 feet. Similar conditions would exist on the Moon. [ And
Venus ]
Again, I don't feel that we have been given a realistic idea of the
planets in our solar system. Not only in terms of their hollow
configuration, but in tems of their surfaces, atmospheres and
temperatures and more. I feel that we should be careful about
accepting information from space agencies, as well as about limiting
ourselves to the parameters of modern physics. Really, wipe the slate
clean, throw off the blinders, get Cater's book and others like it,
and start all over again. Mike Mott has a fantastic book out on inner
shell realities, and David Hatcher Childress is another one who knows
what the real score is. Have any of you ever read Childress?
Dharma/Dean
Mike Malony,
There is a new article up on my Arctic page:
http://www.skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index5.html
Scroll down to the last one.
Dharma/Dean
Liz Eduards has some new suncruiser stuff up righ near the top of her
site.
Dharma/Dean
A decent background in astronomy is helpful for understanding the HET.
This is a good amateur astronomy site, Todd Gross the weatherman.
Click on astro-product reviews on the left:
Original subject: The ZR-1 article
Dean, I scrolled down, but I couldn't find your article.
Mike
Dean,
This is a pretty big magazine that deals with computers and technology. It is kind of a trendy magazine these days, and somewhat fashionable, but overall it is nice looking and does tend to do articles on avant garde research (usually internet/computer related). I'm sure you could order a copy online somewhere, try www.wired.com. I would scan it but I have no scanner.
-Eric
Thats the one.
-Eric
Mike,
I meant to scroll down on the Arctic page of my site:
http://www.skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index5.html
I am back online now with my own computer. I have about 600 e-mails to look
at- I'll be in touch.
YS,
Dharma/Dean
Sean,
About these weird animals, e.g. chupacabras, not being material- I can
believe it. Cater talks about " ethereal " forms being infused with
energies from our realm and becoming visible. Visible ghosts fall into this
category. The ability to do this at will smacks of mysticism.
"A material body can be rendered invisible and intangible, visible but
intangible, and invisible but tangible. The first state has already been
discussed. The matter in the second case has been dematerialized, but soft
electrons comprised of photons encompassing the visible range of light still
permeate the material and thus reflect visible Iight. This was mentioned in
Part III. The third case means that the soft electrons which make matter
visible have been driven out. Ultraviolet light of the right frequencies
will accomplish this. The energies which make matter invisible must be
applied continuously, otherwise the matter will become visible again since
the fundamental particles of matter continuously generate soft electrons."
These different states call to mind the concept of the invisible man ]"
I'll send around the mothman site again for all the new people. There is a
nice links section:
http://ufos.about.com/science/ufos/library/weekly/aa100200a.htm
Dharma/Dean
Doubtful there
Members,
It is reasonable to believe that UFOs are based underground- they don't have
to come from Zeta Piscium. Here is from Alien Identities:
Alien Identities, Dr. Richard L Thompson ( http://www.afn.org/~bvi ) relates
an underground abduction case where the underground base was accessed
through the sea by UFO:
" On the evening of Januray 3, 1979, Cardenas, his friend Fernando Marti,and
Marti's wife and 13 year old daughter were driving around on the outskirts
of Hialeah, looking for a pig they could buy for a roast. They were
unsuccessful, and on the way home their car engine quit.
The two men testified that the lights and starter wouldn't work, and so they
got out and began to look under the hood. At this point, they suddenly saw
red and violet alternating lights reflecting off the engine and heard a
sound like 'many bees.' ... Filiberto felt paralyzed, and he began to rise
in the air shouting " Don't take me, don't take me." Later he recounted a
strange and elaborate story that began when he awoke to find himself
sitting, paralyzed, in the presence of a robot-like being and two men in
tight-fitting suits. ... Filiberto said the alien beings looked quite human.
They had elongated eyes with eyelashes, small flattened noses, long lipless
mouths, and light beards. They also wore a symbol on the right of their
chests, consisting of a serpent on a lazy X.
The story becomes even more extraordinary: The beings proceeded to take
Filiberto to an underground base, traveling beneath the sea at high speed
through a tunnel of " firmed water " that seemed to open in front of the
craft so that water did not touch it. At the base, he met a human who was
working with the aliens, and he was led through what seemed like a city."
Dr. Thompson goes on to relate that Filiberto had several experiences while
in this underground base accessed through the sea, some of them biological,
some of them suggestive of mind control, then he was finally dropped of
again on the surface.
Members,
Sean has brought up the idea that these weird animals can be manifestions in
our realms of beings who have subtle forms in subtler realms. Some very
subtle realms within the Earth were referred to in the book Etidorhpa:
http://www.skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index13.html
Here is a sample chapter from Alien Identities. Go to the red lettering and
notice " physical form or subtle form."
http://nersp.nerdc.ufl.edu/~ghi/aichap_ie4.html
Dharma/Dean
This ties right in with the human tendency toward swallowing
anything, whether it has a religious, techical, scientific (?) or
other flavoring, or like the tales of the ufonauts,
pseudo-technological trappings and symbols with subtle
pseudo-mythic or religious meanings.
Please note that there is always a great deal of effort put forth to
convince abductees, contactees, experiencers, witnesses, etc.
that the ufo entities of various types "come from somewhere
else." "We come from Zeta Reticuli," or Orion, Epsilon Bootes,
another star system, or whatever.....But the overwhelming
evidence would indicate that the UFO phenomenon is localized
to the region of the Earth, and this has been the case FOR
THOUSANDS OF YEARS. Not just TO the region of the Earth, but
OF the Earth. With the possible addition of our moon and Mars,
the Earth seems to be the primary source of encounters with,
and object of interest of, these beings. Earth is 'where the action
is," where the genetic wealth is, where the various battles
between different schools of thought, methods of interaction,
religions, philosophies, and quite possibly the "big mystery"
(spiritual truth or ultimate destiny) is to play out or to be revealed.
How can I say this? Simply because the evidence indicates that
this is the case. UFO entities are no strangers to manipulating
human religious tendencies or belief-systems (ALL systems)
and have done so repeatedly.
To quote from my own work briefly (THE DEEP DWELLERS):
"Yet the biology of all the different types or castes of abductors,
as horrific as it might appear to superstitious human eyes, is
essentially that of animal forms which are natural to the Earth:
mammalian and reptilian. Obviously, it is very important to these
beings that such a logical connection not be made. If there is
even a shred of truth to UFO abduction accounts, then it is more
than apparent that the abductors want their victims, and
humanity at large, to believe that they are from "somewhere
else." While humanity looks continually upward at enigmas in
the sky, what is transpiring beneath our very feet?"
My opinion/two cent's worth, of course.
--Mike
Also note that an earthly veterbrate template is almost always in
effect with such "alien" creatures: bipedal, two arms, two legs,
two eyes, one head, one central body or trunk, binocular
(predatory) vision or ocular placement, etc., etc. (only
occasionally insectoid, probably actually vertebrate as well, since
two arms and legs only are noted in these cases as well).
Logic and numbers would indicate that this pattern would simply
not repeat over and over throughout a universe as vast as ours.
The range of forms would have to be more numerous. Despite
the strangeness or outlandishness of their initial appearances,
UFO entities and abductors ("humanoids") are not so dissimilar
from human beings, with earthly animal characteristics often
described.
Unfortunately, people are gullible and tend to believe what they
are told, particularly when in the presence of the unknown, the
shocking, or the terrifying.
--Mike