Stunning Research RE-AFFIRMS Ether's Existence - Parkhomov: Deviations from Beta Radioactivity Exponential Drop

I found a very interesting quote a few days back from someone working in the alternative physics / ether studies field regarding some remarkable research by Alexander Parkhomov entitled "Deviations from Beta Radioactivity Exponential Drop" that appears to be confirmatory towards the concept of the ether:

"This stunning research demonstrates that something arriving at the planet's surface and modulated by local gravitational effects (planetary alignments) DIRECTLY effects the beta decay of all radiative decay on earth. It's real and measurable. The implication extends past the fact that radiative decay is not purely probabilistic (that alone should rock you) but also that some previously unknown inbound 'material' us evidentially present. Ether .... ?

The description contains the following contents:

Deviations from Beta Radioactivity Exponential Drop
A. G. Parkhomov - Lomonosov Moscow State University
Journal of Modern Physics, 2011

Other paper with data on K-Ca

Potassium to Calcium is a beta decay.

The Detection of K-Ca Transmutation in the Mixture of K and Hydride Chemicals
LU Gong-xuan, ZHANG Xu-qiang, ZHEN Wen-long
Journal of Molecular Catalysts - China, 2019
Paper: (PDF)

Conclusion: We finds some exotic and interesting results about potassium transmutation to calcium in the mixture containing K+ and H-. The results showed K+ concentration is gradually decreasing, while the Ca2+ concentration is gradually increasing in the mixture dispersion. Those results indicate that some of calcium elements in nature might originate from K-Ca transmutation through LENR under very mild conditions, which might be related to the yield of H-. Besides, we can make some predictions if the formation of K-Ca transmutation follows the mechanism of the combination of K+ and H- baryon. One can achieve the element transmutation of some light nucleus to a little bit heavy nucleus base on the H- baryon, such as transmutation from Na to Mg, Mn to Fe, or Cs to Ba under mild conditions. These reactions can help us further understand the Ca formation and loss mechanism in our body and remove dangerous nuclear waste like 137Cs. We realize those discoveries may raise some questions and arguments.

NOTE: In the Jean-Paul Biberian (JPB) literature review, Rudolf Hauschka (1891–1969) observed a weight differential of over 1% between full moon (+0.54%) and new moon (0.58%)

Kanan Deep, MSc & Raj Mittal, PhD
Nuclear Science Laboratories, Physics Department, Punjabi University, India
European Scientific Journal March 2014

Conclusion: The present measurements on mung bean sprouts, an isolated 2-3 days process, were found to be affected by the moon in terms of potassium nutrient of the sprouts. Sprouts are vital component of a human diet and the natural process of transmutation in sprouts gives sprouted food improved digestibility and nutritional qualities, therefore, it can be said that the moon’s activity marks its influence on nutritional value of sprouts. All these outcomes are in tune with the earlier

Neutrino Ensemble properties – Cambridge Ultrasonics
David R Andrews, First draft 30th April 2005
De Broglie wavelength calculation. Condensates. Electromagnetism. Special relativity

@Soretna , to me the best takeaway from your post is how this information validates the almost "magical" Kervran effect (discovered by Louis Kervran) , wherein hens are able to TRANSMUTE (yes , you read that right) , Potassium in their diet , into Calcium , that too at body temperature !

It's the only way hens could lay eggs , with SO much of Calcium in their egg shells . If they didn't have this amazing capability , their very bones would be leached of ALL it's Calcium , to make the shells of the eggs they lay , thus killing them off in a matter of few days after laying those eggs .

***Also , sea creatures that have Calcium rich shells are somehow able to "incredibly" transmute Potassium , Magnesium , Sodium etc. , present in seawater , in the form of dissolved salts , into Calcium (at ambient temperature) to make their heavy protective shells.

However , if you ask any mainstream physicist about Kervran effect ,they would say "it's simply impossible" , because such transmutation of Potassium to Calcium can only take place at a temperature of MILLIONS of degrees celsius , that too - inside the thermonuclear cores of stars :))

Even human bodies have this magical ability of being able to "synthesize" Magnesium
(yes !!) , possibly from Sodium , again at body temperature . Such feats of living organisms make such a mockery of mainstream theory , that it's not even funny !

Our Universe , including all the stars in it , run on "COLD FUSION" (as validated by the Electric Universe Theory) and the Kervran effect that occurs inside living organisms , is THE best example of that :-

Adept Alchemy by Robert A. Nelson.
Part II. Chapter 8. Biological Transmutations.
Back to Adept alchemy contents.

Chapter 8

Biological Transmutations

L. Kervran, &c.

Long before the discovery of "cold fusion" by Pons and Fleischman, other scientists had variously found phenomenal evidence of non-radioactive, low-energy transmutation of light elements in plant, animals and minerals. These reactions have come to be known as "biological transmutations" or "nuclido-biological reactions". This class of nuclear reactions is of great importance to the progress of human knowledge in the fields of physics, cosmology, biology, geology, ecology, medicine, nutrition and agriculture. The exact mechanisms of biological transmutations remain unknown, though a few theories have been proposed to explain them. Biological transmutations exist and cannot be denied; they are the very core of living nature, which could not function without them.

The study of biological transmutation can be said to have begun in the 17th century with the famous experiment by von Helmont, who grew a willow tree in a clay vase with 200 pounds of soil. After 5 years, he dried the soil and found that its weight had decreased by only 2 ounces: "Water alone had, therefore, been sufficient to produce 160 pounds of wood, bark and roots" (plus fallen leaves which he did not weigh). Presumably, there were some minerals in the water he fed to the tree. Nowadays we know that plants form carbohydrates from atmospheric carbon dioxide, but their mineral content is derived from soil, not air. It may be possible, however, that the ORMEs (Orbitally Rearranged Monoatomic Elements), discovered by David Hudson in the 1980s, exist in the atmosphere and are utilized by plants.

In 1799, the French chemist Vauquelin became intrigued by the quantity of lime which hens excrete every day. He isolated a hen and fed it a pound of oats which were analyzed for lime (CaO). Vauquelin analyzed the eggs and feces and found five times more Ca was excreted than was consumed. He concluded that lime had been created, but could not figure out how it happened.

In 1822, the English physiologist Prout studied the increase of calcium carbonate inside incubating chicken eggs, and was able to show that it was not contributed by the shell.

In 1831, Choubard germinated watercress seeds in clean glass vessels and showed that the sprouts contained minerals which did not previously exist in the seeds.

In 1844, Vogel also found evidence of biological transmutation. J.J. Berzelius reported the experiment in his Treatise on Mineral, Plant and Animal Chemistry (1849):

He sprouted seeds of cress... in crushed glass deprived of sulfate or of any other sulfurous compound; he watered them with distilled water, covered them with a glass cloche and analyzed the air of the room, so as to determine the sulfur... A few months later, the adult plants with ripe seeds, were dried and burnt with a mixture of potassium nitrate and potassium carbonate; the result was that a quantity of sulfuric acid double that which was contained in the seeds was produced. These experiments demonstrate that either sulfur is not a simple element or that the source which produced the sulfur has remained unknown, despite all the care which had been taken to discover it... (1)

Circa 1850, Lauwes and Gilbert observed an inexplicable variation in the amount of magnesium in the ashes of plants.

From 1875-1883, von Herzeele conducted 500 analyses which verified an increase in weight in the ashes of plants grown without soil in a controlled medium. He concluded that, "Plants are capable of effecting the transmutation of elements". His publications so outraged the scientific community of the time, they were removed from libraries. His writings were lost for more than 50 years until a collection was found in Berlin by Dr. Hauscka, who subsequently published von Herzeele's findings.

M. Baranger (Ecole Polytechnique, Paris) became intrigued with Von Herzeele's experiments, but he thought that the number of trials had been too limited and the precautions against error were insufficient. Baranger decided to repeat the experiments with all possible precautions and a very large number of cases which would allow a statistical study. His research project lasted four years and involved thousands of analyses. Baranger verified the content of P, K, and Ca of vetch seeds before and after germination in twice-distilled water to which pure calcium chloride was/was not added. Hundreds of lots of 7-10 grams each were selected, weighed to 1/100th milligram, and graded, then germinated in a controlled environment. The plants were tested by the methods described by A. Brunel-Tourcoin in his Practical Treatise of Plant Chemistry (1948). Baranger found a significant decrease in P in the Ca-series of tests. Non-germinated seeds and seeds germinated in the distilled water showed no significant change in their levels of K. Those seeds treated with CaCl2 showed a 10% increase in their K content.

None of the specialists who examined Baranger's work were able to find any experimental errors. Baranger concluded:

These results, obtained by taking all possible precautions, confirm the general conclusions proposed by V. Herzeele and lead one to think that under certain conditions the plants are capable of forming elements which did not exist before in the external environment.

[The practical consequences] cannot be underestimated... Certain plants would bring to the soil some elements useful for the growth of other plants; this would lead us especially to define and revise the current notions on fallows, rotations, mixed crop, fertilizers and the manuring of infertile soils. Nothing prevents us from thinking that certain plants are capable of producing rare elements of industrial importance....

In the sub-atomic field, the plant supplies us with an example of transformation which we are not capable of performing in the laboratory without bringing into action particles of high-energy... It seems that the theoretical consequences in the field of sub-atomic physics are not negligible.

In 1946, Henri Spindler, (Director of the Laboratoire Maritime de Dinard) investigated the origin of iodine in seaweed, and found that the algae Laminaria manufactured iodine out of water which contained none of the element. (15)

Prof. Perrault (Paris University) found that the hormone aldosterone provoked a transmutation of Na to K, which could be fatal to a patient; heart failure occurs when blood plasma K reaches approximately 350 mg/liter.

In 1959, Dr. Julien (Univ. of Besancon) proved that if tenches are put in water containing 14% NaCl, their production of KCl increases 36% within 4 hours. (5)

Louis Kervran (Univ. of Paris) was the most ardent researcher of biological transmutation, and his work in the field earned him a nomination for the Nobel Prize. Kervran elucidated several of these nuclear reactions and verified them:

The vital phenomenon is not of a chemical order... The nucleus of the atom in light elements is quite different from what nuclear physics regards as the average type, the latter having value only for the heavy elements... Nature moves particles from one nucleus to another ¾ particles such as hydrogen and oxygen nuclei and, in some cases, the nuclei of carbon and lithium. There is thus a transmutation... Biological transmutation is a phenomenon completely different from the atomic fissions or fusions of physics... it reveals a property of matter not seen prior to this work. (4, 7-13)

Kervran found that in nuclido-biological reactions, oxygen is always in the form of O, never O2; reactions with nitrogen occur only with N2, insofar as is known. The following reactions (shown in simplistic form) have been observed:

Na23 + H1 ® Mg24 Na23 + O16 ® K39 Na23 - O16 ® Li7

Na23 ® Li7 + O16 K39 + H1 ® Ca40 Mg24 + Li7 ® P31

Mg24 + O16 ® Ca40 F19 + O16 ® Cl35 C12 + Li7 ® F19

Cl35 ® C12 + Na23 Fe56 - H1 ® Mn55 2 O16 - H1 ® P31

O16 + O16 ® S32 2 N14 ® C12 + O16 N14 + Mg12 ® K19

Si28 + C12 ® Ca40 Si28 + C12 ® Ca40 P31 + H1 « S32

Costa de Beauregard (Research Director, Centre Nationale de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris) learned of Kervran's work in 1962 and began to correspond and meet with him. He offered the following observations and explanation for the processes:

All transmutations proposed by Kervran have two traits in common: (1) The initial and final nuclei differ by the addition or subtraction of a piece of matter, e.g., a proton (a hydrogen nucleus...), an alpha particle (a helium nucleus), a nucleus of oxygen or one of its isotopes, or perhaps some other familiar nuclei; (2) There is an energy excess or deficit in the order of 0.01 atomic mass units (a.m.u.)... or 20 electron masses, or 10 MeV, or 1.6 x 10-12 joules. The mass equivalent of this energy gap is of course needed in order to have the Lavoisier principle safe... This energy gap is very much larger than those occurring in chemical reactions. For example, if ... hens are indeed transmuting potassium into calcium (which is an exo-energetic reaction), the power they are radiating is so huge that it would, if in the luminous (electromagnetic) form, set everything on fire all around! [In energetic terms, such flux would be equal to 1015 MeV/cm2/second, or 160 watts/cm2.] Can we then imagine some sort of quasi-occult form into which the 'Kervran power gap' may be radiated (or from which it may be absorbed in the case of endo-energetic reactions)? No reasonable answer was available until... a bold theoretical assumption, due to Weinberg in 1967, turned out as experimentally true. Due to this 'neutral current hypothesis' we are allowed to write such nuclear reactions as:

p + v « p' + v' ; or: p + v « p' + v' ; or: p « p' + v + v

where p denotes a proton, v a neutrino, and v the anti-neutrino. We even have two sorts of neutrinos to play with: the electronic and the muonic one.

With this we can in principle handle the proton type of Kervran's reactions (and also the other one in analogous fashion. One of the two protons in the reaction would be a quasi-free one, that is one with only the trivial, chemical binding. The other one would be bound inside the nucleus. Of course we then have the problem of getting the proton, with its electric charge, through the potential barrier of the nucleus, by the so-called 'tunnel effect' (a typical effect of wave mechanics). But this is part of a problem already mentioned: Life playing the information game, the field being the nucleus, and the rules being those of the wavelike probability calculus... If the Kervran hen does radiate the power gap in the form of neutrinos and/or anti-neutrino, this will be done in the quietest fashion, and go on completely unnoticed.

Can we also handle in this way the endo-energetic reactions? Fortunately Nature provides us with an appropriate supply, because there are quite a few neutrinos and anti-neutrinos flying around us as part of the so-called cosmic rays. By another chance the upper limit of the energy per cosmic particle is so high that the 0.01 a.m.u. Kervran needs are very easily available.

Finally, like the proton or the a -particle, the neutrino or anti-neutrino is something abundantly available... which makes it convenient for use by Life.

On the other hand, the extremely 'weak interaction' of the neutrino with other particles, which we have just found so convenient for avoiding the adverse effects of the Kervran power gap, now... faces us with great hostility. For how are we to reconcile this with the hypothesis that the hen is a furious neutrino source...? How can we simultaneously explain that the poultry keeper, and indeed the hen itself, do not feel the neutrino Niagara and that the source of it is inside the egg factory of the hen?

This is the very Gordian knot of the information game problem, the nuclear physics analogon, if you like, of the so-called catalysis problem of ordinary bio-chemistry. The only tentative answer that I can think of, one I deem quite acceptable in principle, is that what looks like a flat self-contradiction in the physical realm of 'blind statistical prediction', retarded waves and causality, is no more a contradiction at all if we assume that Life is playing with finality, advanced waves, and 'blind statistical retrodiction'... Life knows how to... induce probability decreasing processes. (2)

Kervran commented on that opinion in an unpublished manuscript:

For Costa de Beauregard, the apparent discordance with the postulate of the equivalence between mass and energy can be replaced by the postulate of emission-absorption of an occult mass bound to a particle of complete spin; it is thus that the neutrino with a 1/2 spin was invented... you would need a particle of complete spin with normally very weak interactions with matter, but 'catalyzed' biologically; it would not displease me, within this perspective, to try the classic 'graviton' with spins 2 or 0, or a non-classical neo-graviton with spins 2, 1, and 0...

Simply put, if an occult particle is emitted or absorbed in Kervran-type reactions, the conservation of angular momentum would require that it have a complete spin.

In letters to de Beauregard (20 January and 17 October 1873), Kervran noted:

This particle seems to have a mass of 0.011 a.m.u. or 1.8 x 10-26 gram in reactions with +H+...

I had not been speaking of energy, for here it was a question of an equivalence, not an identity... I prefer to hold to the notion, as measured at the mass spectrometer, of a difference of masses, for the problem of energy, in my reactions, can be written only in a very simplistic way by application to Einstein's law. There is certainly something else here, and therein lies the whole problem.

De Beauregard later noted:

In the terrestrial atmosphere there exists a particle in abundance with a rest mass m, and a maupertusien mass (or kinetic mass)... which is more than sufficient to assure the Kervran balances: the mu meson of cosmic rays...

It is quite admissible to conceive of it as absorbed, then, re-emitted during the course of a nuclear transition of the Kervran type which, moreover, implies a 'virtual neutrino' (emitted, then reabsorbed).

He also offered the logical possibility of a reaction with iN + 1H + nu = pN + nu'. In a letter of 31 December 1973, de Beauregard wrote:

There is a second important problem to solve. To get the H to fuse with the N there is an enormous barrier of repulsing electric potential to pass through. Evidently this is by the tunnel effect. The theory which I am working up ... thus unites aspects of the theory of beta disintegration... and the theory of alpha disintegration... Like you, I believe that the configuration of an atomic or molecular electron cloud has a real word to say on the subject.

In his response (7 January 1974), Kervran attributed the transmutations in plants in part to the power of enzymes:

In a Petri dish 9 cm. in diameter I started germinating 50 oat seeds. The culture continued for 6 weeks or 3.6 million seconds give or take a few ten thousands of seconds... The area of 'cosmic interaction' was 63 cm3... During this time on this surface 3.9 mg of K were transmuted into Ca; this must be ~ 6 x 1019 atoms of K transmuted in 3.6 x 106 seconds or 1.8 x 1013 atoms per second or 2.6 x 1011 per cm2/second. The proportion of K transmuted was ~ 46% in 6 weeks. This integration of results for the phenomenon is not constant: it is imperceptible during the first days when one witnesses the synthesis of enzymes which will provoke the transmutations; even at the end of a week the effect is hardly to be noticed. It develops rapidly during the 2nd and 3rd weeks, then slows down during the 4th week... The phenomenon seems to be asymptotic and at the end of the 6th week transmutation progresses only very slowly.. Which demonstrates yet once again that the action of the ambient is insufficient, that there is an energy regulated by the metabolism of the germination and growth which is at the origin of these transmutations... Obviously this calculation was one for a macro-section and not for the effective section... Moreover, there is in biology an important phenomenon which must not be overlooked: some molecules assemble in helix shapes (DNA and RNA for example). There are also some oriented assemblages which polarize light, most often to the left. These oriented constructions have an oriented electromagnetic field, and a molecule such as DNA can be compared to a solenoid in which charged particles (mu- for example) are somehow partly channeled in the interior, and thus concentrated...

De Beauregard made a suggestion:

The microorganisms responsible for the phenomenon would find in the natural radiation a sufficient store of neutrinos of 10 MeV and more than they need... A diminution of this alimentation would consist of an equal numerical flux of neutrinos of very low energy to be put in the free interstices of the natural distribution. It is a problem of the symmetric information... in which (in thermodynamic terms) the difference between the 'heat' gained from the hot source (high energy neutrinos) and that given to the cold source (low energy neutrinos) is converted not into work, but into internal energy, or into the rest mass of the machine, which is not cyclical... Analogous comments apply to the case... implying an absorption of a pair, neutrino and anti-neutrino, of an average energy of 5 MeV... [The reactions] avail themselves of an abundant hot source like a geyser (the neutrinos of average energy of the cosmic radiation within the atmosphere) and of an immense cold source like an ocean, 'Fermi's lake' of very low energy neutrinos.

Kervran also proposed a revolutionary theory about the genesis of coal and oil:

Coal comes from schists, fabricated in situ , by high compression that produced the reactions: Si ® C + O. If O could not escape, and was compressed as well, one would have O + O ® S, from which one gets sulfurous coals. If there was no deformation, the coal remains mixed with argil to produce ampelite.

The presence of carbon in metamorphic and silicate rocks, formed long before there was any vegetation on Earth, is a clear demontration:

Graphite cannot be of vegetal origin, in which case another origin must be found for it, and I propose the silicium of these Archaean rocks. As for diamonds... here, too, one observes the presence of silicates, thus of silicon... In this way one can explain why all coal deposits contain silicon (up to 20%, or even 40%, and more) which form 'ashes'. The great amounts of silicon might be an indication that the transmutation from Si to C + O was imperfect, incomplete.

Kervran claimed that petroleum was not formed from flesh or plants, but from the reaction Mg ® C + C at great depth. If water is present, the hydrogen combines with carbon, and the oxygen forms sulfur (O + O ® S), giving sulfurous oil. The Mg can come from a pocket of saline water when Na + H ® Mg. Otherwise, Mg also can come from Ca or from adjacent layers of dolomitic rock. Oil deposits in the Sahara have been found in pre-Carboniferous rocks (Devonian and Cambrian-Ordovician) and in dolomite. Usually there is no communication between layers of petroleum deposits of different composition which are widely separated by hundreds of meters of impermeable rock. Kervran concluded:

The whole problem of prospection should be thought out all over again.

In 1965, H. Komaki (Prof. of applied microbiology, Mukogawa Univ., Japan), published the results of his research, and suggested the probable occurrence of a nuclear reaction in the cells of Aspergillus niger , Penicillium chrys ., Saccromyces cerv ., and Torula utilis grown in potassium-deficient medium. His experiments revealed that P can be formed through the pathway: N + O in some two dozen strains of microorganisms cultured in P-deficient medium. (14)

In 1971, the Laboratory of the French Society of Agriculture sprouted rye seeds under controlled conditions, with these results:

Total Input in Seeds & Water | Output | Difference

Mg : 13.34 mg 3.20 -10.14 (-335%)

K : 7.36 16.67 +9.31 (+133%)

In 1971, J.E. Zundel studied the utilization of Ca by germinating grains and observed 54-616% augmentation of Ca. In another experiment, he grew 150 grains of oats in a controlled environment for 6 weeks. 1243 sprouts were analyzed by atomic absorption spectrophotometry for Mg and Ca. Potassium was analyzed by flame emission. The K was deficient by 0.033%, the Ca was 0.032% in excess, and Mg was 0.007% deficient. The variation of Mg was not significant, but the decrease in K equaled the increase of Ca. The increase in Ca was far greater than the margin of experimental error. (16)

In February 1977, Prof. J.A. Jungerman (Univ. of California, Davis) reported the results of an experiment with 4 growths of oat seedlings under carefully controlled conditions. Random samples of germinated seeds were analyzed by atomic absorption and X-ray fluorescence for Ca and K. He found no evidence of transmutation.

In 1978, Carolyn E. Damon (U.S. Customs Tech. Service Div.) ran tests for biological transmutation with Aspergillus terreus and Rhizopus nigricans , with negative results.

In 1978, Solomon Goldfein (U.S. Army Material Tech. Lab, Ft. Belvoir) studied the biological transmutation of 39K + 1H ® 40Ca. His analysis of thousands of references led him to conclude that the most promising approach to testing the theory of biological transmutation would involve an organic molecule with a central metal atom: the chelate Magnesium Adenosine Triphosphate (Mg-ATP). Goldfein postulated a conformational structure of a stack of Mg-ATP molecules forming a helical chain. The Mg-ATP chelate produces oscillating electrical currents which act as a micromini-cyclotron that accelerates hydrogen ions to relativistic speeds with sufficient potential to transmute an element to the next higher number. (3)

Research into the phenomenon of biological transmutation continues in obscurity, practically unknown to most scientists. It is to be hoped that the subject will become established as a popular, legitimate field of research which will yield rich harvests of knowledge.


I agree that this is an excellent observation. There is so much that we don't acknowledge that we really don't know. Both of these concepts could be pushed here, but I still believe the ether concept to be a bit of a higher priority holistically at this point - if one would have to choose (which we don't).

@Soretna , I agree with you that ether is one of the most important concepts in Physics , even though it was banished 130 years ago !

I am enclosing here a text about Tesla's belief in the existence of the Ether , his Dynamic theory of Gravity (as opposed to Einstein's theory of Relativity) . Tesla had strongly asserted that Einstein's concept about "curvature of spacetime" is a meaningless , illogical idea , not based on the reality of our Universe . Also , it goes without saying , that without the curvature of spacetime concept being correct - neither the so called "Black Holes" , nor the so called "Gravitational waves" can even exist in our Universe :))

Dynamic theory of gravity



Nikola Tesla reading Maxwell's volume "scientific papers", in front of the spiral coil of his high-frequency transformer at East Houston St. 46, New York (Not really Roger Boskovich's book, “Theoria Philosophiae Naturalis” as it appear in some sources).

When Tesla was 82, instead of speaking at a dinner party, he issued a written statement:

“I have worked out a dynamic theory of gravity in all details and hope to give this to the world very soon. It explains the causes of this force and the motions of heavenly bodies under its influence so satisfactorily that it will put an end to idle speculations and false conceptions, as that of curved space. According to the relativists, space has a tendency to curvature owing to an inherent property or presence of celestial bodies.

“Granting a semblance of reality to this fantastic idea, it is still very self-contradictory. Every action is accompanied by an equivalent reaction and the effects of the latter are directly opposite to those of the former. Supposing that the bodies act upon the surrounding space causing curvature of the same, it appears to my simple mind that the curved spaces must react on the bodies and, producing the opposite effects, straighten out the curves.

“Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible -However, even if it existed it would not explain the motions of the bodies as observed. Only the existence of a field of force can account for them and its assumption dispenses with space curvature. All literature on this subject is futile and destined to oblivion.”

Another prepared statement on his 81st birthday in July 10, 1937, critiquing Einstein's theory of relativity:

"Supposing that the bodies act upon the surrounding space causing curving of the same, it appears to my simple mind that the curved spaces must react on the bodies, and producing the opposite effects, straightening out the curves. Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible – But even if it existed it would not explain the motions of the bodies as observed. Only the existence of a field of force can account for the motions of the bodies as observed, and its assumption dispenses with space curvature. All literature on this subject is futile and destined to oblivion. So are all attempts to explain the workings of the universe without recognizing the existence of the ether and the indispensable function it plays in the phenomena.”

Pioneer Radio engineer gives viwes on power - New York Herald Tribune in 11 September 1932:

"I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can have no properties. It might as well be said that God has properties. He has not, but only attributes and these are of our own making. Of properties we can only speak when dealing with matter filling the space. To say that in the presence of large bodies space becomes curved is equivalent to stating that something can act upon nothing. I, for one, refuse to subscribe to such a view. "


Nikola Tesla's life (1856 - 1943) spanned two scientific periods: that of the 19th century which saw the universe as filled with an invisible matter, "the aether", and that of the 20th century which saw the universe as an empty vacuum with bits of matter in random motion. As an example of the difference between these two world views when the idea of the electron was proposed at the end of the 1800s it was then pictured as a spinning vortex of this aether that condensed into solid matter.

Man's Greatest Achievement - by Nikola Tesla - New York American - July 6, 1930:

"The primary substance, thrown into infinitesimal whirls of prodigious velocity, becomes gross matter; the force subsiding, the motion ceases and matter disappears, reverting to the primary substance".

Mr. Tesla's vision: How the Electrician's Lamp of Aladdin May Construct New Worlds - by Nikola Tesla - New York Times - April 21, 1908:

"According to an adopted theory, every ponderable atom is differentiated from a tenuous (fragile, vague) fluid, filling all space merely by spinning motion, as a whirl of water in a calm lake. By being set in movement this fluid, the ether, becomes gross matter. Its movement arrested (halted) , the primary substance reverts to its normal state. It appears, then, possible for man through harnessed energy of the medium and suitable agencies for starting and stopping ether whirls to cause matter to form and disappear. At his command, almost without effort on his part, old worlds would vanish and new ones would spring into being. He could alter the size of this planet, control its seasons, adjust its distance from the sun, guide it on its eternal journey along any path he might choose, through the depths of the universe. He could make planets collide and produce his suns and stars, his heat and light; he could originate life in all its infinite forms. To cause at will the birth and death of matter would be man's grandest deed, which would give him the mastery of physical creation, make him fulfill his ultimate destiny."

The Transformation Of Matter - English Mechanic & World of Science - July 14, 1905

In the 19th Century, scientists Michael Farady, James Clerk Maxwell and Heinrich Hertz formulated a theory that described electromagnetic phenomena. This theory indicated that electric and magnetic forces resulted from the effect of electric and magnetic fields existing in space between electric charges. These electric charges were produced by the ether, which was thought to be able to exert electric forces on ordinary matter. Hertz showed that moving electromagnetic fields could break away from ordinary matter and propagate through the ether as independent electromagnetic waves carrying energy. These electromagnetic waves come in both visible and invisible forms. Hertz showed that visible light is one visible form of the electromagnetic wave. Invisible electromagnetic waves include radio waves, x-rays and microwaves. The concept of such waves moving through the ether can be likened to the waves that spread over a pond after a stone is thrown into the water. The ripples in the pond can be thought of as the equivalent of electromagnetic waves, and the still water as the equivalent of the ether. In a pond, the force of the stone hitting the water results in the ripples. One of the things puzzling the scientists of Einstein's time was what exactly caused the formation of electromagnetic fields whose independent movement resulted in the electromagnetic waves which they conceived of as moving through space.

The Michelson–Morley experiment was published in 1887 by Albert A. Michelson and Edward W. Morley and performed at what is now Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio. It compared the speed of light in perpendicular directions, in an attempt to detect the relative motion of matter through the stationary luminiferous aether ("aether wind"). The negative results are generally considered to be the first strong evidence against the then-prevalent aether theory, and initiated a line of research that eventually led to special relativity, in which the stationary aether concept has no role. The experiment has been referred to as "the moving-off point for the theoretical aspects of the Second Scientific Revolution".

On the book ‘Universe and Dr.Einstein’, by Lincoln Barnett, London, 1949, page 38 it can be read:

"Among those who pondered the enigma of the Michelson-Morley experiment was a young patent office examiner in Berne, named Albert Einstein. In 1905, when he was just twenty-six years old, he published a short paper suggesting an answer to the riddle in terms that opened up a new world of physical thought. He began by rejecting the ether theory and with it the whole idea of space as a fixed system or framework, absolutely at rest, within which it is possible to distinguish absolute from relative motion. The one indisputable fact established by the Michelson-Morley experiment was that the velocity of light in unaffected by the motion of the earth. Einstein seized on this as a revelation of universal law. If the velocity of light is constant regardless of the earth’s motion, he reasoned, it must be constant regardless of motion of any Sun, moon, star, meteor, or other syatem moving anywhere in universe. From this he drew a broader generalization, and asserted that the laws of nature are the same for alls uniformly moving system. This simple statement is the essence of Einstein’s Special theory of Relativity. It incorporates the Galilean Relativity Principle which states that mechanical laws are the same for all uniformly moving systems. But its phrasing is more comprehensive; for Einstein was thinking not only of mechanical laws laws but of the laws governing light and other electromagnetic phenomena. So he lumped them together in one fundamental postulate: all the phenomena of nature, all the law of nature, are the same for all systems that move uniformly relative to one another"

The ether was thought to be a backdrop at a state of absolute rest against which the movement of elements of the cosmos occurred. In his articles in 1905 Einstein didn't really fully rejected the existence of Ether. He only suggested a mathematical treatment of some relativistic problems. In 1920, after he developed the General relativity, he arrived to the conclusion that the ether should exist. This fact is of enormous importance, when citing the contributions of Albert Einstein. The Einstein statement from 1920 is missing in the scholar physics textbooks, where only his articles from 1905 are mentioned.

Ether & Relativity - by Albert Einstein - University of Leiden - 5 May 1920:

"The ether of the general theory of relativity is a medium which is itself devoid of all mechanical and kinematical qualities, but helps to determine mechanical (and electromagnetic) events."

Albert Einstein in 1920:

“To deny ether is ultimately to assume that empty space has no physical quality whatever. The fundamental facts of quantum mechanics do not harmonize with this view.”

Ether and the Theory of Relativity - by Albert Einstein - Methuen & Co. Ltd, London, in 1922:

"How does it come about that alongside of the idea of ponderable matter, which is derived by abstraction from everyday life, the physicists set the idea of the existence of another kind of matter, the ether? The explanation is probably to be sought in those phenomena which have given rise to the theory of action at a distance, and in the properties of light which have led to the undulatory theory".

"Recapitulating, we may say that according to the general theory of relativity space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, there exists an ether. According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time (measuring-rods and clocks), nor therefore any space-time intervals in the physical sense. But this ether may not be thought of as endowed with the quality characteristic of ponderable media, as consisting of parts which may be tracked through time. The idea of motion may not be applied to it"

In 1920 Einstein said about ether corresponding with classical ether. But in his paper in 1924, named “Concerning the Aether”, Einstein explained the “aether of general relativity” is not absolute, because matter is influenced by the aether, just as matter influences the structure of the aether.

So the only similarity of this relativistic aether concept with the classical aether models lies in the presence of physical properties in space. Therefore, Einstein’s use of the word “aether” found little support in the scientific community, and played no role in the continuing development of modern physics.

An understanding of the ether is also important for understanding the theory of electromagnetic phenomena which preceded Einstein's theory of relativity.

Gravitational waves

In modern physics, gravitational waves are supposed to be ripples in the curvature of spacetime from a heavy moving object which propagate as waves, travelling outward from the source that radiate at the speed of light. Predicted in 1916 by Albert Einstein to exist on the basis of his theory of general relativity, gravitational waves theoretically transport energy as gravitational radiation. Sources of detectable gravitational waves could possibly include binary star systems composed of white dwarfs, neutron stars, or black holes.

These gravity waves behave in similar ways to many other types of waves. Tesla's greatest inventions were all based on the study of waves. He always considered sound, light, heat, X-rays and radio waves to be related phenomena that could be studied using the same sort of maths. For this reason there exist the possibility that Tesla had extended this thinking to gravity.


In physics, the law of conservation of energy states that the total energy of an isolated system remains constant—it is said to be conserved over time. Energy can neither be created nor destroyed; rather, it transforms from one form to another. For instance, chemical energy can be converted to kinetic energy in the explosion of a stick of dynamite. A consequence of the law of conservation of energy is that a perpetual motion machine of the first kind cannot exist. That is to say, no system without an external energy supply can deliver an unlimited amount of energy to its surroundings

The Eternal Source of Energy of the Universe , Origin and Intensity of Cosmic Rays - New York - October 13, 1932 and Prepared Statement of Tesla (For interview with press on 81st birthday observance):

"There is no more energy in matter than that received from the enviornment"

The followin list is a selection of quotes to gather some information which could be related with Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity. (comming soon)

Experiments with Alternate Currents of Very High Frequency and Their Application to Methods of Artificial Illumination - A lecture delivered before the AIEE (Columbia College) - May 20, 1891 and Presentation of the Edison Medal to Nikola Tesla: Minutes of the annual meeting of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, held at the Engineering Societies building - New York City - May 18, 1917::

"In how far we can understand the world around us is the ultimate thought of every student of nature. The coarseness of our senses prevents us from recognizing the ulterior construction of matter, and astronomy, this grandest and most positive of natural sciences, can only teach us something that happens, as it were, in our immediate neighborhood; of the remoter portions of the boundless universe, with its numberless stars and suns, we know nothing. But far beyond the limit of perception of our senses the spirit still can guide us, and so we may hope that even these unknown worlds -infinitely small and great—may in a measure become known to us. Still, even if this knowledge should reach us, the searching mind will find a barrier, perhaps forever unsurpassable, to the true recognition of that which seems to be, the mere appearance of which is the only and slender basis of all our philosophy".

Mr. Tesla's vision: How the Electrician's Lamp of Aladdin May Construct New Worlds - by Nikola Tesla - New York Times - April 21, 1908:

"According to an adopted theory, every ponderable atom is differentiated from a tenuous (fragile, vague) fluid, filling all space merely by spinning motion, as a whirl of water in a calm lake. By being set in movement this fluid, the ether, becomes gross matter. Its movement arrested (halted) , the primary substance reverts to its normal state. It appears, then, possible for man through harnessed energy of the medium and suitable agencies for starting and stopping ether whirls to cause matter to form and disappear. At his command, almost without effort on his part, old worlds would vanish and new ones would spring into being. He could alter the size of this planet, control its seasons, adjust its distance from the sun, guide it on its eternal journey along any path he might choose, through the depths of the universe. He could make planets collide and produce his suns and stars, his heat and light; he could originate life in all its infinite forms. To cause at will the birth and death of matter would be man's grandest deed, which would give him the mastery of physical creation, make him fulfill his ultimate destiny."

Nikola Tesla Talks Of The Future Of The Greatest Problems Now Confronting The Scientific World - New York Press - March 2, 1913

Q. What do you thing of radium and the prospect it opens for the future?

"My views on the subject are probably not in the agreement of those of many men of science who have devoted themselves to this branch of investigation. It may not be generally known that in my papers published in the electrical Rview in New Yorkvfrom 1896 to 1897, long before the discovery of Mm. Curie I demostrated the existence and described the salient properties of emanations of the same nature. My views were received with skepticism at that time, but I'm glad to say that now they are adopted in their enterity. I see no reason for changing the opinions I then expressed. The so-called radium emanations are not an insolated phenomenon, but are universal. There is, according to my ideas, no such element as radium or polonium, although spectral analisys, the theory of Mendeleff, and various experimental observations, support this modern view. I believe that as to this, scientific opinion is in error, as it was a century ago in assuming that there was such a substance as phlogiston concerned in combustion until Lavoisiere discovered oxigen. Similarly the radium manifestations are, in all probability, due to the action of a universal medium on certail volatile substance. Much of the spaculation based on Mm. Curie's is necesarilly erroneous, being in direct contradiction to well stablished principles. The claims of some enthusiasts that in radium lies the possibility of future power developement are nothing but a dream. But some fact is that we are in presence of new and wonderful effects the study of wich is leading us gradually to a better and deeper understanding of the mechanism of the universe".

Harnessing Nature - Can The Free Energy Of Space Be Utilized? - Scientific American - April 5, 1913

"Experiments conducted by Mr. Nikola Tesla with electromotlve forces of 2.000.000 volts have convinced him that if 100.000.000 volts could be produced it might be possible to break down the atomlc structure of any element and thus liberate a certain amount of energy. "But," he told the wrlter of this artlcle, “even lf the feat could be accomplished and suficient energy set free, there still remains the enormously dificult problem of devising a means of utillzing the energy ln a practical way."

Man's Greatest Achievement - by Nikola Tesla - New York American - July 6, 1930:

"The primary substance, thrown into infinitesimal whirls of prodigious velocity, becomes gross matter; the force subsiding, the motion ceases and matter disappears, reverting to the primary substance".

Tesla, 75, Predicts New Power Source - New York Times - July 5th, 1931

"When and where do you expect to make the official announcement of your new discoveries?" the inventor was asked.

"These discoveries," he replied, "did not come to me over night, but as the result of intense study and experimentation for nearly thirty-six years. I am naturally anxious to give the facts to the world as soon as possible, but I also wish to present them in a finished form. That may take a few months or a few years."

“The idea of atomic energy is illusionary but it has taken so powerful a hold on the minds, that although I have preached against it for twenty-five years, there are still some who believe it to be realizable.”

"I have disintegrated atoms in my experiments with a high potential vacuum tube I brought out in 1896, which I consider one of my best inventions. I have operated it with pressures ranging from 4,000,000 to 18,000,000 volts. More recently I have designed an apparatus for 50,000,000 volts which should produce many results of great scientific importance.

"But as to atomic energy, my experimental observations have shown that the process of disintegration is not accompanied by a liberation of such energy as might be expected from the present theories."

Statement of Tesla Relating to Force and Matter - Uknown - April 15, 1932:

The following is Tesla's statement relating to force and matter, to Einstein's theories, and Tesla's own theory of gravitation. Courtesy of Nikola Tesla Papers, Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Columbia University.

We read a great deal about matter being changed into force and force being changed into matter by the cosmic rays. This is absurd. It is the same as saying that the body can be changed into the mind, and the mind into the body. We know that the mind i's a functioning of the body, and in the same manner force is a function of matter. Without the body there can be no mind, without matter there can be no force.

Einstein has for years developed formulas explaining the mechanism of the cosmos. In doing this he overlooked an important factor, namely the fact that some of the heavenly bodies are increasing in distance from the sun. This is the same as writing a business letter and forgetting the subject you wish to write about. In order to explain this phenomenon Einstein has invented the quantity "lambda".

My theory of gravitation explains this phenomenon perfectly.

Tesla Cosmic Ray Motor May Transmit Power 'Round Earth - Brooklyn Eagle - July 10, 1932, John J. A. O'Neill:

"The attractive features of the Cosmic rays is their constancy. They shower down on us throughout the whole 24 hours, and if a plant is developed to use their power it will not require devices for storing energy as would be necessary with devices using wind, tide or sunlight."

"All of my investigations seem to point to the conclusion that they are small particles, each carrying so small a charge that we are justified in calling them neutrons. They move with great velocity, exceeding that of light.

"More than 25 years ago I began my efforts to harness the cosmic rays and I can now state that I have succeeded in operating a motive device by means of them."

Pioneer Radio Engineer Gives Views On Power - New York Herald Tribune - September 11, 1932:

As the general knowledge of this subject seems very limited, I may state, that even waves only one or two millimeters long, which I produced thirty-three years ago, provided that they carry sufficient energy, can be transmitted around the globe. This is not so much due to refraction and reflection as to the properties of a gaseous medium and certain peculiar action, which I shall explain some time in the future. At present it may be sufficient to call attention to an important fact in this connection, namely, that this bending of the beam projected from reflector does not affect in the least its behavior in other respects. As regards deflection in a horizontal plane, it acts just as though it were straight. To be explicit the horizontal deviations are comparatively slight. In a proposed ultrashort wave transmission, the vertical bending, far from being an advantage, is a serious drawback, as it increased greatly the liability of disturbances by obstacles at the earth's surface. The downward deflection always occurs, irrespective of wavelength, and also if the beam is thrown upward at an angle to the horizontal, and this tendency is, according to my finding, all the more pronounced the bigger the planet. On a body as large as the sun, it would be impossible to project a disturbance of this kind to any considerable distance except along the surface.

It might be inferred that I am alluding to the curvature of space supposed to exist according to the teachings of relativity, but nothing could be further from my mind. I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can have no properties. It might as well be said that God has properties. He has not, but only attributes and these are of our own making. Of properties we can only speak when dealing with matter filling the space. To say that in the presence of large bodies space becomes curved, is equivalent to stating that something can act upon nothing. I, for one, refuse to subscribe to such a view.

"There is no more energy in matter than that received from the enviornment"

"Light is a wave motion of definite velocity, determined by the elastic force and density of the medium. Cosmic rays are particles of matter, the speed of which depends on the propelling force and mass and may be much smaller or greater than that of light".

"The cosmic rays, generated during the maximum brightness of the star, may reach the place many centuries sooner or later than the light, according to their speed".

New York Sun, 12 July 1937, p. 6

The kinetic and potential energy of a body is the result of motion and determined by the product of its mass and the square of its velocity. Let the mass be reduced, the energy is reduced by the same proportion. If it be reduced to zero, the energy is likewise zero for any finite velocity.”

Comments: 30

  • #1 Marc J. Seifer ( Wednesday, 20 May 2015 16:27 ) Excellent compilation of material on Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity which I first just touched upon in Wizard: The Life & Times of Nikola Tesla, p. 424 and in more depth in Transcending the Speed of Light, chapters 4 and 5. See also my lecture in Tesla Magazine, October 2014, pp. 17-23.

  • #2 Daniel ( Wednesday, 09 September 2015 04:50 ) When will you updating the list of his speeches regarding his dynamic theory of gravity?

  • #3 Tesla research ( Sunday, 10 January 2016 23:13 ) Hello Marc. I'm glad to recive a comment from one of the most important biographers about Nikola Tesla. I still have to add many contents in this topic but there are so many articles to analize that I do it progressively. Please be wellcome to share any other information or to add some new contents. I still have so much work to do in this website.

  • #4 Tesla research ( Sunday, 10 January 2016 23:21 ) Hi Daniel. How are you? I add the contents progressively as I keep reading articles and information to analize. If you find any interesting article or information to add in this topic, please let me know.

  • #5 OB Roy ( Wednesday, 03 February 2016 22:47 ) Although it is said that Tesla was more practical than theoretical he evidently had sound theories behind his inventions. I believe he worked to.a mathematical model which is why he had no need of complex equations to develop his work. This mathematical model is represented by The model is evidently base 12.12.12, however it is incomplete and reflects the outer limitations of his research. I would be most grateful if you have any further information regarding this concept and any current research. OB

  • #6 don hill ( Thursday, 24 March 2016 22:24 ) TESLA’S ALL PERVASIVE ETHER
    This fits into my theory of particles for Particle Physics with my changes being oscillations containing the potential energy source and the gravity field of the mass traveling, INSTANTLY within its field PLUS the UNLIMITED speed of its mass.

  • #7 Miodrag Prokic ( Saturday, 26 March 2016 12:57 ) Please see my contribution, here:

  • #8 DON HILL ( Friday, 01 April 2016 03:33 ) ALL waves are produced through particles of MATTER. Ocean waves by contact with water. Sound waves through particles of air. Permanent waves through particles of hair. Electromagnetic waves through Planck sized particles trying to oscillate at (1.85×10^43/s)^2. Because of the density of the Aether, the vibrating particles are always in contact with eachf other. In ALL manner of matter from black-hole cores to particles oscillating in empty space. The halos around stars and galaxies prove Aether density increases with pressure and gravity is controlled by pressure "waves" these waves occupy approximately 100% of the universe. The Michelson Morley experiment PROVES that gravity and Aether travel together at the speed of the mass. Gravity "waves" are formed differently in every bit of the universe, instantly changing with the fields interacting gravity fields from nearby masses to distant stars and galaxies which .are extremely minute and the very LARGE masses colliding very quickly forming a slow modulation of that gravity signal. good luck on that.

  • #9 don hill ( Friday, 01 April 2016 22:03 ) Your explanation for errors in the The Michelson–Morley experiment performed over the spring and summer of 1887 goes to great lengths to prove it wrong. The rest may be acceptable but you base it on Einstein and Mathematical induction. If you can find movement of the SLIGHTEST AMOUNT, it does not prove the LACK of aether. Gravity and either are EVERYWHERE in the universe and gravity MODULATES the ether. The gravity of the earth is the PRIMARY source of ether and moves with the earth, instantaneously with the mass. We do not move through the mass but change the modulation of the ether as we move with it.
    This casts doubt on the rest of your theory if has any basis in einstein's wild theories and NOT ones he copied and claimed credit.
    FROM [email protected]
    please note my supposedly miss spelling of the professor because i aint that. My great grandkids think because i am so old I knew Newton.

  • #10 Teslaresearch ( Saturday, 02 April 2016 02:10 ) Hi Miodrag Prokic! Thankyou for sharing your theory. I already checked your document, but I obviosly still didn't read the whole document as it have more than 700 pages. But I'll comment to you as soon as I have free time to read it. It seems really interesting and I already have some questions for you.

  • #11 Teslaresearch ( Wednesday, 06 April 2016 00:31 ) Hi Don Hill! Thanks for commenting about it. My explanation is still very incomplete but my short explanation on the Michelson-Morley experiment cannot be wrong as it is something that really happened according to the modern science. Another thing is to be sure if it was correct or not. I'm not based on Einstein or any other scientist than Tesla in relation to the modern science. I'm just offering different objective points of view (without considering my opinion and without considering if they were wrong or right) and I keep adding information. It is not my fault if the experiments could be wrong and if this is the case I have to prove it with calculations/formula and experiments (or at least how to develop them) and it wouldn't be that easy. But I'm consciousness of what you have said.

If you check the other topics you will see that the website is only based on Tesla's interviews and articles in relation to the modern technology and science. I will try to add as much as possible of what you have said with the same method of the rest of the webpage. This is why I have added the comment bar of each topic.

Soon I will create another section to share some of my ideas. But I want to make a difference with Tesla's ideas even if they are very similar. It is a detrministic theory like that of Tesla and like that Miodrag Prokic (a few comments above). Maybe we could try to put some things together.

  • #12 don hill ( Tuesday, 19 April 2016 05:38 ) I believe you misunderstand my statements
    My theory is that the aerher is modulated by the mass of earth and from all directions the aether is the same.
    If you look at a galaxy, you can see a halo of aether, were the reflected light of the aerher increases as the aether DENSITY increases.
  • #13 Teslaresearch ( Tuesday, 19 April 2016 22:58 ) Sorry Don Hill. Thankyou very much for sharing your theory.
    I probably misunderstood your statement. It is just that lately I don't have enough free time to dedicate to the website as I would like and I have to read so much information to develop it. I reapeat to you that I will add as much as I can of your statements. You can offer any suggestion of how to add it in the content and it also would be interesting to develop some diagram and formula to get a clear idea of what you are explaining. As you can see, this section is still very incomplete and untidy.

As I told you I will create a section to share those theories and ideas and I'll have to organize it in some way to keep it tidy and clear.

  • #14 Teslaresearch ( Wednesday, 20 April 2016 00:48 ) I agree that there might exist the possibility of the aether moving at the same speed of the mass. I think that I already read something about this idea somewhere in internet but I should find the source. I will add a comment right now (you can tell me if you have any idea of how to improve it).

But it is also necessary to explain what the aether is supposed to be in reference to the microcosmos. I guess that it have to be related with those statements:

"The primary substance, thrown into infinitesimal whirls of prodigious velocity, becomes gross matter; the force subsiding, the motion ceases and matter disappears, reverting to the primary substance"

"There is no more energy in matter than that received from the enviornment"

"The kinetic and potential energy of a body is the result of motion and determined by the product of its mass and the square of its velocity"

"I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can have no properties."

Another controvertial thing that I have found in this topic is that Einstein also stated in some moment of his life that the aether is necessary (as you can read in the PDF), but then the modern sience say that Einstein didn't agree with the existence of the aether. So I really didn't know how to explain it. I guess that he changed his opinion after sometime, but then I should find some statement of him denying its existence.

  • #15 DON HILL ( Thursday, 21 April 2016 20:23 )
    Albert Einstein gave an address on 5 May 1920 at the University of Leiden. He chose as his topic Ether and the Theory of Relativity. .
    "The ether of the general theory of relativity is a medium which is itself devoid of all mechanical and kinematical qualities, but helps to determine mechanical (and electromagnetic) events." Albert Einstein , Ether & Relativity, 1920
  • #16 Teslaresearch ( Wednesday, 19 October 2016 04:20 ) Thankyou for your support Luiz M Neto. I haven't published the comment to avoid any discussion. I already talked with him by e-mail but If you want I can publish it.
  • #17 István Kocsis ( Saturday, 29 October 2016 00:00 ) Great compilation! To understand Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity, one shall understand the titel too. And it's coming from J.C.Mawell's work named A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field. If we replace the words electromagnetic, electric, magnetic with gravity we can deeper understand Tesla's work on that line:
    "The theory I propose may therefore be called a theory of the Electromagnetic Field,
    because it has to do with the space in the neighbourhood of the electric or magnetic bodies, and it may be called a Dynamical Theory, because it assumes that in that space there is matter in motion, by which the observed electromagnetic phenomena are produced." J.C.M.
  • #18 Tim G. Meloche ( Wednesday, 31 January 2018 19:01 ) Dear John,
    The principles of atomic gravity solve the issues of gravity! Academic vested interest in old outdated theories like general relativity is causing a lack of innovation in this area of scientific research.

The principles of atomic gravity are 21 first century innovation in how the force of gravity actually works in nature. Until these proven principles are accepted in mainstream thinking, gravity will continue to impede advancement in innovation in many areas of scientific research. My part was to publish the principles the rest is up to the scientific community.

The fundamental principles of atomic gravity are the best
place to begin to understand how the force of gravity is transferred across the
entire observable universe. The 3 rules are so simple that students easily
understand the principles confirming the simplicity by which nature works.
The laws of atomic gravity interconnect the sciences and can
be applied to any area of research or study providing a perfect platform for

Seeking a mathematically adept wizard or group :::slight_smile:

The three principles of atomic gravity which define how the
force of gravity works in quantum atoms are defined both visually and in mathematical
relationships and yet the equation eludes the brilliance behind the physics. A
mathematical mind is needed to claim the elusive equation of everything?

Can this be you?

If you are searching for a path to innovation within your
field of study or research or perhaps you are just a mathematical brainiac then
feel free to begin by exploring the google docs below.

Atomic Gravity Summary

Zero G flight at the Atomic Scale

If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of

— Sir Isaac Newton

Nature did not deem it her business to make the discovery of
her laws easy for us.

— Albert Einstein

Principles of atomic gravity are a Canadian innovation.

  • #19 JJ ( Sunday, 18 March 2018 22:57 ) Dynamics of gravity and electromagnetism do appear to coincide with neurochemical constructs. Summing every force acting to appose gravitation cannot be calculated, but a constant may exist. What is that sum?

  • #20 Mohammad yahiya ( Monday, 06 August 2018 08:33 ) Theoretical concepts have been written with new ideas and with new theory.

  • #21 Victor ( Sunday, 30 September 2018 04:16 ) Thank you

  • #22 Vivekananda gowda p m ( Wednesday, 23 January 2019 12:55 ) I need more information about electromagnetism

  • #23 Jett kastle ( Sunday, 07 April 2019 13:57 ) I have no degree. I've tought myself allot of equations and calculations as well as applicable engineering of working devices albeit none overwhelmingly immpresive on a universal scale. I see so many similarities in all sciences even ones frowned on such as nuclear energy. I encourage all able or willing to read an apply yourself to every form of knowing in the universe as I am doing. Independently as well as alone. I study math art psychology astronomy physics English chemestry you kname it I'm trying to apply and gather untill somethig clics. Recently it's been vibration of an isolated medium to accelerate or decelorae cosmic particles to produce linear motion on all axis x y and z respectively. Id love thoughts,and shit I'll take scrutiny as well. Some big head tell me it I'm outside a my league or not

  • #24 Andy Steenberg ( Wednesday, 10 April 2019 02:24 ) The aether or ether, is plasma in its non liquid or non solid state.

  • #25 Steve ( Friday, 10 May 2019 14:51 )

"Gravity is caused by the mass-energy density of space. This mass-energy density of space is determined by the square of the Wave-Amplitude and is always positive (squares are always positive). The Wave-Velocity is inversely proportional to the mass-energy density of space, the higher the mass-energy density of space, the slower the Wave-Velocity. As Matter and its resultant mass-energy density of space are always positive, this causes a slowing of In-Waves as they travel through other matter/wave-motions, and it is this property of Space that causes the natural ‘Gravitational’ attraction of all bodies, and explains why Gravity is always attractive."

  • #26 Hayley Foss ( Monday, 03 June 2019 22:22 ) The tesla gravity theory makes since tornados are touching down in places they never had before mass flodings everywhere it makes so much since - 2019 June 3
  • #27 Chris Essonne ( Saturday, 09 November 2019 20:42 ) Please have a look to my study in 3 videos titled "From Maxwell's equations to Nikola Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity" where I demonstrate that gravity is the gradient of Ether pressure. The 3 videos are subtitled in English.
    First video gives basics on electromagnetism.

In the second one, I use Tesla's Ether, made of Etherons to explain the foundation of electromagnetism. In this approach, also based on Dirac's sea of electrons/positrons, one Etheron is in fact a pair of rotating electron/positron, which generates electric and magnetic fields.
From this approach, and using Bohr's quantification principle, I find again the formula of the energy of a photon h times frequency, and explains what is the potential vector i.e. A-field of electromagnetism.

In the third video, starting with the discovery of scalar waves by Tesla, I use a modified version of Maxwell's equations published by physicist Koen Van Vlaenderen, and gives the meaning of the Lorenz gauge of electromagnetism, which leads us directly to the understanding of gravitation.
In this approach, gravity is proportional to the gradient of ether pressure P :
g=-(c² / P) grad P
From this equation, I find back Einstein's cosmological constant and the value of Ether pressure of the cosmology !!

I'm now pushed to believe that c²/P is constant but not c !

In addition,
I think that, my mathematical formula 'Time Flow' explains mind with time relationship. Do I right ? Can you delve in this ?
In your opinion, discovery of a planet is more exciting. Or, as I've presented in the attached article, whether observing 'A very tiniest mass in the space, having completed its life, have been turning into energy' would be more exciting or not ? It is my belief that, this observation will be the proof of the General and the Special Theory of Relativity. This observation can be made only by NASA or ESA. I hope that I will be able to see this consequence while I'm still alive.

  • #29 AT ( Monday, 18 November 2019 05:07 ) More quotes by Nikola Tesla on gravity and ether:

"They say much about the Einstein's theory now. According to Einstein the ether does not exist and many people agree with him. But it is a mistake in my opinion. Ether's opponents refer to the experiments of Michelson - Morley, who made attempts to detect the Earth's movement relative to the fixed - bed ether. These experiments failed, however it didn't mean the ether's non - existence. I always based as fact the existence of mechanical ether in my works and therefore I could achieve positive success." Nikola Tesla.

"What is the ether and why is it so difficult to detect it? I reflected on this matter for a seriously long time and here are the outcomes I have been led to: I think that all the contradictions about whether the ether exists or not are the result of wrong interpretation of ether's properties. The ether has always been presented as an aero - form environment [gaseous]. That was the essential mistake. The ether has a very strong density. It is known that of more dense a substance, the higher is the speed of wave propagation within it. When comparing acoustic speed in the air and the light speed I have drawn a conclusion that ether density is several thousand times higher than air density. It is not the ether that is aero - form [gaseous] but the material world is an aero - form to the ether!"

"A good example for such an interaction becomes apparent in gravitation, which should rather be named, universal compression. I think the material bodies do not gravitate between each other but it is the ether that makes one material body to press to another. We wrongly call this phenomenon gravitation. We can also feel ether's reaction when sudden acceleration or braking. The stars, planets and all the universe appeared from the ether when some part of it, due to certain reasons, became less dense."

"It can be compared with formation of blebs [air bubbles] in boiling water although such a comparison is only rough. The ether tries to return itself to its initial state by compressing our world, but intrinsic electric charge within material the world substance obstructs this. It is similar to that when the water compresses blebs [air bubbles] filled with hot water steam. Until the steam does get cold the water is unable to compress the bleb. With time, having lost the intrinsic electric charge, our world will be compressed with the ether and is going to turn into ether. Having come out of the ether once - so it will go back in to the ether." ( Nikola Tesla )