This objective and fresh look at the history of science over the past 130+ years of physics is a must for anyone's bookshelf:
To support the author, please purchase it directly from his website if possible.
Otherwise you can purchase it via Amazon:
https://www.amazon.com/Dynamic-Ether-Cosmic-Space-Correcting/dp/0997405716
See also James DeMeo's presentation from the "2019 Energy Science &
Technology Conference":
https://emediapress.com/jamesdemeo/orgone/
James DeMeo has some interesting things to say about this paper when it was shared with him in relation to his research: Stunning Research RE-AFFIRMS Ether's Existence - Parkhomov: Deviations from Beta Radioactivity Exponential Drop
Note his comment on the video:
Very good, excellent research, glad you mentioned Kervran's work also. My only criticism is, based upon 50 years of experimental and theoretical investigations of similar unusual properties of space, is that with the neutrino theory, and dark matter theory, we expose a deeper cosmic substrate or continuum, being misinterpreted as "particles". Consider how they are detected, with small light flashes in large water tanks or ice material, using PMTs. Or as with the San Grosso DAMA project, light flashes in NaI(Tl) crystal scintillators. So the abundance or decline in a cyclical manner of those "particle" phenomena is, at its basic nature, increases or decreases in light flashes inside properly sensitive matter, in darkened environments where sensitive PMTs can pick it up. Such realizations led me to re-examine older theory on the cosmic ether of space, and to find the original Michelson-Morley experiment did get a positive result, by their own original 1887 report, with a maximum value of from 5 to 7.5 km/sec ether-drift velocity. Dayton Miller did the same, over four seasonal epochs, with variability in interferometer detections of from around 9 to over 11 kim/sec. These variabilities in ether motion, determined by light speed variations in interferometers, were sufficient to trouble Einstein, who said if they were confirmed (which they were) his theory would collapse "like a house of cards". And so it did, but few dare to examine that history and so we see an endless bit of fudging and refinements to a set of basically flawed physical and astrophysical theories, all resting upon misinterpretations and historical distortions of the interferometer experiments, which never got "null", and hence of light flashes detected by sensitive PMTs. This is fundamental also for radioactive decay detections, as GM tubes or crystal scintillators are the instruments of choice, both of which could be influenced by variations in the density or excitation state of the same cosmic medium once spoken about by the early physics of the 20th Century -- the cosmic ether of space. I submit, what is being detected in this excellent work is the same. And the cosmic directions implied by the variability runs across a sidereal vector centered more or less on the Earth's perihelion and aphelion, or ~5-6 hrs sidereal to ~17-18 hrs sidereal. That is confirmed also by the Bernabei DAMA project's "dark matter wind" determinations, but also and more fundamentally so, by the ether-drift experiments of Dayton Miller. Also with the mung-bean lunar cycle and biological cycle sidereal-hour experiments of American biologist Frank Brown. Also the Italian chemist Giorgio Piccardi's studies on precipitation rates and phase changes of ordinary chemical reactions. And by the heretic American scientist (chronically slandered in the MSM, books burned in Europe and America, died in prison on false charges) Wilhelm Reich. If all that is of interest, and it should be, see my introductory article on this on Principia Scientific International: https://principia-scientific.org/part-1-the-dynamic-ether-of-cosmic-space-correcting-a-major-error-in-modern-science/ Thanks for posting your important YouTube summary. James DeMeo, PhD
Dr. DeMeo separately notes:
I noticed the annual cycle of radioactive decay rate variations (Parkhomov Table 1) runs on average across the same sidereal hours as identified in the ether-drift experiments, and generally along the same as the 17 other common axes identified in my Dynamic Ether book. A general high period of decay-rates at Jan-March, close to Miller's low ether-drift velocity, and a July-Sept period of low decay-rates close to Miller's high ether-drift velocity. (DeMeo, Table 11, fig 75, p.248)
There are other researchers in the USA who have done work on deviations in decay-rate constants, but none I know to have done it so systematically over months to identify a seasonal or sidereal variation. Reich also got severely deviant radioactive decay events in his Oranur Experiment, which used the orgone (ether) accumulator. Some work on similarities in histograms of rad-decay daily count rates from identical isotope samples monitored with identical equipment but in different laboratories. Of course, this is all denied by the mainstreamers. In many ways, Russian science is ahead of the English speaking world on these matters. Like Sputnik, I fear we will be surprised by future major discoveries not accepted here, but applied dramatically there. (Ie, Robert Goddard's rocket.)
Had I known of this previously, it would have demanded another section in my book on radioactive decay variations, and boosted the findings to 18 common axes!
However, Parkhomov's paper appears to confine his explanations into standard theory, more or less, embracing standard models of neutrinos and "dark matter".
He also noted as an update to his book:
PS. A small correction was recently made in my Dynamic Ether book. On pages 53-54, in the chapter on Michelson-Morley, the page numbers given for the citations to their 1887 paper should all be 341, and not 281. Also on p.54, it should read "the Fresnel and Stokes arguments", and not "Foucault and Stokes". Otherwise all is well with it.
@Soretna , on a related note , please see this article putting the very existence of so called "Dark Matter" and "Dark Energy" , in doubt . Of course , without the support of these 2 "crutches" , there is no way for even the so called "Black Holes" to exist in this Universe:-
Kevin Pimbblet
On 12/1/17 at 8:18 AM EST
Example of a fractal. Created by Wolfgang Beyer with the program Ultra Fractal 3. Wolfgangbeyer
Share
Opinion Dark matter Dark energy Space Physics
This article was originally published on The Conversation . Read the original article.
Dark matter and dark energy are mysterious, unknown substances that are thought to make up more than 96 percent of the universe. While we may have never directly seen them, they beautifully explain how stars and galaxies move and how the universe is expanding. But a new study, published in The Astrophysical Journal , suggests they may not exist after all.
I have taught astronomy and astrophysics classes at various universities around the globe, and few topics spark as much excitement as dark matter and dark energy.
An introductory lecture on the subject will typically begin by looking at a pie chart of the mass and energy density of the universe. This demonstrates that, at the present day, regular atoms like hydrogen and helium make up only a few per cent of the universe.
Pie chart showing dark matter and dark energy. Ben Finney/CC
Approximately one quarter of the pie chart is dark matter. In brief, this is a form of matter that only seems to interact through gravitation. Several strands of evidence lend support to the existence of this form of matter. For example, we can see a gravitational pull of galaxy clusters and other structures in the universe. We know that the matter in such structures isn't enough to hold them together by gravity alone, meaning some additional invisible matter must be present to make them spin at the speeds observed.
Embarrassingly, the largest part of the pie chart is dark energy. This is a type of energy, or field, that causes an anti-gravity force on the universe itself—pushing it apart. Another way of thinking about it is that dark energy exerts a negative pressure. Rather than the universe just expanding at a constant rate, the expansion is accelerating as a consequence of dark energy.
We can tell that the universe is expanding in this way by looking at how fast galaxies move away from each other. And I have personally been involved in tests of dark energy, such as the WiggleZ survey. In this, our team measured the effect of dark energy using a novel "standard ruler" technique, which can estimate distances in the cosmos. This lead to the conclusion that dark energy is real.
The Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies. NASA
Suppose for a moment that both dark energy and dark matter are too strange a pill to swallow. What would the alternatives be? One way out would be to suppose that our understanding of the universe is at fault. Perhaps gravity and general relativity do not work in quite the way that we think they do.
In the same way that Newton's laws—which we long thought told the whole story about movement—are a simplification of the more complicated theory of relativity, perhaps our understanding of relativity is a simplification of something else? More fundamentally, perhaps we have made some error of judgement about the assumptions that underpin the equations we deal with? Maybe we need to modify the equations of gravitation?
The new study by André Maeder, an honorary astronomy professor at the University of Geneva, centers around something called "scale invariance." Scale invariance means that the properties of a given law of physics (or set of physical objects) do not change, even if we were to multiply their lengths or energies by some number. They are the same, independent of scale. As an example of a very specific type of scale invariance, think of a fractal. Even if we zoom in by some set magnification, the shape of the fractal will remain the same.
We could treat empty space itself as having this quality. In other words, empty space still has the properties of empty space, even if we zoom in or out—and its properties do not change if it's squashed or stretched. What Maeder finds is that if we treat empty space as being scale invariant, there may be no need for dark matter or dark energy at all.
This is different from what Einstein suggested—that empty space operates based on what's known as the cosmological constant, which is a form of dark energy. Space under these circumstances cannot be scale invariant in the same way. Many scientists implicitly and explicitly assume this is the correct description. Yet this means that dark energy and dark matter are still required and therefore new physics is needed to explain them.
Related Stories
Excitingly, Maeder's theory is testable. For example, we can observationally determine the rotation speed of galaxies and compare the data to the predictions made by his model of empty space. We can even examine the motion of galaxies inside clusters of galaxies to test if there is agreement with the model proposed.
Scientists only proposed dark matter to explain how galaxies and galaxy clusters move due to a gravitational pull. But what if space itself could make them move in this way? Thus far, the tests that Maeder describes are in agreement with the observations made.
However, there are many more tests that need to be run, Maeder has only investigated two galaxy clusters. And let's not forget the huge body of work suggesting that dark matter and dark energy do exist. Yet it is tantalising that, if the hypotheses that Maeder has put forward are correct, then it points to a large revision of our ideas about cosmology.
While we are not there yet, ultimately, the pie chart of mass and energy density of the entire universe may need to be revisited to scrub out the two biggest parts! It's an exciting time to be a cosmologist.
Kevin Pimbblet is a senior lecturer in physics at the University of Hull.
Regards
Im reading this book based on a recommendation from Sidharta or Sorenta. This is pretty slow reading for me. Im half way through. Do they discuss ether in the context of gravity? Or, do they discuss gravity? Im missing that connection.
@thewaxter, this particular book is contextual (predominantly historical) in nature - very much setting the stage for expanding out. It gives a solid approach to understanding where physics went sideways ~130 years ago. It basically gives some context to springboard into some other areas. Personally I have some mixed feelings about Reich's work, but I still find it fascinating and potentially useful.
As far as gravity goes, this book is semi light in that although there is some discussion. If you generally understand various ether concepts, then it could be useful to jump into some other books.
Have you read anything from Paul LaViolette or looked at theories based on Le Sage's work from a few hundred years ago that are popping back up now? Have you viewed any of Robert Distinti's videos and research (he's currently working through his electrogravity paper that will be released in final form this summer)?
@thewaxter , @Soretna , this is a very important topic , so I am now adding one of my earlier posts onto this thread , because it is more relevant here (please do read the full article below , especially it's last 4 paragraphs within " " , that summarise Tesla's view) :-
**I agree with you that ether is one of the most important concepts in Physics , even though it was banished 130 years ago !
I am enclosing here a text about Tesla's belief in the existence of the Ether , his Dynamic theory of Gravity (as opposed to Einstein's theory of Relativity) . Tesla had strongly asserted that Einstein's concept about "curvature of spacetime" is a meaningless , illogical idea , not based on the reality of our Universe . Also , it goes without saying , that without the curvature of spacetime concept being correct - neither the so called "Black Holes" , nor the so called "Gravitational waves" can even exist in our Universe :))
Comming soon
[
](javascript:
Nikola Tesla reading Maxwell's volume "scientific papers", in front of the spiral coil of his high-frequency transformer at East Houston St. 46, New York (Not really Roger Boskovich's book, “Theoria Philosophiae Naturalis” as it appear in some sources).
When Tesla was 82, instead of speaking at a dinner party, he issued a written statement:
“I have worked out a dynamic theory of gravity in all details and hope to give this to the world very soon. It explains the causes of this force and the motions of heavenly bodies under its influence so satisfactorily that it will put an end to idle speculations and false conceptions, as that of curved space. According to the relativists, space has a tendency to curvature owing to an inherent property or presence of celestial bodies.
“Granting a semblance of reality to this fantastic idea, it is still very self-contradictory. Every action is accompanied by an equivalent reaction and the effects of the latter are directly opposite to those of the former. Supposing that the bodies act upon the surrounding space causing curvature of the same, it appears to my simple mind that the curved spaces must react on the bodies and, producing the opposite effects, straighten out the curves.
“Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible -However, even if it existed it would not explain the motions of the bodies as observed. Only the existence of a field of force can account for them and its assumption dispenses with space curvature. All literature on this subject is futile and destined to oblivion.”
Another prepared statement on his 81st birthday in July 10, 1937, critiquing Einstein's theory of relativity:
"Supposing that the bodies act upon the surrounding space causing curving of the same, it appears to my simple mind that the curved spaces must react on the bodies, and producing the opposite effects, straightening out the curves. Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible – But even if it existed it would not explain the motions of the bodies as observed. Only the existence of a field of force can account for the motions of the bodies as observed, and its assumption dispenses with space curvature. All literature on this subject is futile and destined to oblivion. So are all attempts to explain the workings of the universe without recognizing the existence of the ether and the indispensable function it plays in the phenomena.”
Pioneer Radio engineer gives viwes on power - New York Herald Tribune in 11 September 1932:
"I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can have no properties. It might as well be said that God has properties. He has not, but only attributes and these are of our own making. Of properties we can only speak when dealing with matter filling the space. To say that in the presence of large bodies space becomes curved is equivalent to stating that something can act upon nothing. I, for one, refuse to subscribe to such a view. "
[
](javascript:
Nikola Tesla's life (1856 - 1943) spanned two scientific periods: that of the 19th century which saw the universe as filled with an invisible matter, "the aether", and that of the 20th century which saw the universe as an empty vacuum with bits of matter in random motion. As an example of the difference between these two world views when the idea of the electron was proposed at the end of the 1800s it was then pictured as a spinning vortex of this aether that condensed into solid matter.
Man's Greatest Achievement - by Nikola Tesla - New York American - July 6, 1930:
"The primary substance, thrown into infinitesimal whirls of prodigious velocity, becomes gross matter; the force subsiding, the motion ceases and matter disappears, reverting to the primary substance".
Mr. Tesla's vision: How the Electrician's Lamp of Aladdin May Construct New Worlds - by Nikola Tesla - New York Times - April 21, 1908:
"According to an adopted theory, every ponderable atom is differentiated from a tenuous (fragile, vague) fluid, filling all space merely by spinning motion, as a whirl of water in a calm lake. By being set in movement this fluid, the ether, becomes gross matter. Its movement arrested (halted) , the primary substance reverts to its normal state. It appears, then, possible for man through harnessed energy of the medium and suitable agencies for starting and stopping ether whirls to cause matter to form and disappear. At his command, almost without effort on his part, old worlds would vanish and new ones would spring into being. He could alter the size of this planet, control its seasons, adjust its distance from the sun, guide it on its eternal journey along any path he might choose, through the depths of the universe. He could make planets collide and produce his suns and stars, his heat and light; he could originate life in all its infinite forms. To cause at will the birth and death of matter would be man's grandest deed, which would give him the mastery of physical creation, make him fulfill his ultimate destiny."
The Transformation Of Matter - English Mechanic & World of Science - July 14, 1905
In the 19th Century, scientists Michael Farady, James Clerk Maxwell and Heinrich Hertz formulated a theory that described electromagnetic phenomena. This theory indicated that electric and magnetic forces resulted from the effect of electric and magnetic fields existing in space between electric charges. These electric charges were produced by the ether, which was thought to be able to exert electric forces on ordinary matter. Hertz showed that moving electromagnetic fields could break away from ordinary matter and propagate through the ether as independent electromagnetic waves carrying energy. These electromagnetic waves come in both visible and invisible forms. Hertz showed that visible light is one visible form of the electromagnetic wave. Invisible electromagnetic waves include radio waves, x-rays and microwaves. The concept of such waves moving through the ether can be likened to the waves that spread over a pond after a stone is thrown into the water. The ripples in the pond can be thought of as the equivalent of electromagnetic waves, and the still water as the equivalent of the ether. In a pond, the force of the stone hitting the water results in the ripples. One of the things puzzling the scientists of Einstein's time was what exactly caused the formation of electromagnetic fields whose independent movement resulted in the electromagnetic waves which they conceived of as moving through space.
The Michelson–Morley experiment was published in 1887 by Albert A. Michelson and Edward W. Morley and performed at what is now Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio. It compared the speed of light in perpendicular directions, in an attempt to detect the relative motion of matter through the stationary luminiferous aether ("aether wind"). The negative results are generally considered to be the first strong evidence against the then-prevalent aether theory, and initiated a line of research that eventually led to special relativity, in which the stationary aether concept has no role. The experiment has been referred to as "the moving-off point for the theoretical aspects of the Second Scientific Revolution".
On the book ‘Universe and Dr.Einstein’, by Lincoln Barnett, London, 1949, page 38 it can be read:
"Among those who pondered the enigma of the Michelson-Morley experiment was a young patent office examiner in Berne, named Albert Einstein. In 1905, when he was just twenty-six years old, he published a short paper suggesting an answer to the riddle in terms that opened up a new world of physical thought. He began by rejecting the ether theory and with it the whole idea of space as a fixed system or framework, absolutely at rest, within which it is possible to distinguish absolute from relative motion. The one indisputable fact established by the Michelson-Morley experiment was that the velocity of light in unaffected by the motion of the earth. Einstein seized on this as a revelation of universal law. If the velocity of light is constant regardless of the earth’s motion, he reasoned, it must be constant regardless of motion of any Sun, moon, star, meteor, or other syatem moving anywhere in universe. From this he drew a broader generalization, and asserted that the laws of nature are the same for alls uniformly moving system. This simple statement is the essence of Einstein’s Special theory of Relativity. It incorporates the Galilean Relativity Principle which states that mechanical laws are the same for all uniformly moving systems. But its phrasing is more comprehensive; for Einstein was thinking not only of mechanical laws laws but of the laws governing light and other electromagnetic phenomena. So he lumped them together in one fundamental postulate: all the phenomena of nature, all the law of nature, are the same for all systems that move uniformly relative to one another"
The ether was thought to be a backdrop at a state of absolute rest against which the movement of elements of the cosmos occurred. In his articles in 1905 Einstein didn't really fully rejected the existence of Ether. He only suggested a mathematical treatment of some relativistic problems. In 1920, after he developed the General relativity, he arrived to the conclusion that the ether should exist. This fact is of enormous importance, when citing the contributions of Albert Einstein. The Einstein statement from 1920 is missing in the scholar physics textbooks, where only his articles from 1905 are mentioned.
Ether & Relativity - by Albert Einstein - University of Leiden - 5 May 1920:
"The ether of the general theory of relativity is a medium which is itself devoid of all mechanical and kinematical qualities, but helps to determine mechanical (and electromagnetic) events."
Albert Einstein in 1920:
“To deny ether is ultimately to assume that empty space has no physical quality whatever. The fundamental facts of quantum mechanics do not harmonize with this view.”
Ether and the Theory of Relativity - by Albert Einstein - Methuen & Co. Ltd, London, in 1922:
"How does it come about that alongside of the idea of ponderable matter, which is derived by abstraction from everyday life, the physicists set the idea of the existence of another kind of matter, the ether? The explanation is probably to be sought in those phenomena which have given rise to the theory of action at a distance, and in the properties of light which have led to the undulatory theory".
"Recapitulating, we may say that according to the general theory of relativity space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, there exists an ether. According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time (measuring-rods and clocks), nor therefore any space-time intervals in the physical sense. But this ether may not be thought of as endowed with the quality characteristic of ponderable media, as consisting of parts which may be tracked through time. The idea of motion may not be applied to it"
In 1920 Einstein said about ether corresponding with classical ether. But in his paper in 1924, named “Concerning the Aether”, Einstein explained the “aether of general relativity” is not absolute, because matter is influenced by the aether, just as matter influences the structure of the aether.
So the only similarity of this relativistic aether concept with the classical aether models lies in the presence of physical properties in space. Therefore, Einstein’s use of the word “aether” found little support in the scientific community, and played no role in the continuing development of modern physics.
An understanding of the ether is also important for understanding the theory of electromagnetic phenomena which preceded Einstein's theory of relativity.
Gravitational waves
In modern physics, gravitational waves are supposed to be ripples in the curvature of spacetime from a heavy moving object which propagate as waves, travelling outward from the source that radiate at the speed of light. Predicted in 1916 by Albert Einstein to exist on the basis of his theory of general relativity, gravitational waves theoretically transport energy as gravitational radiation. Sources of detectable gravitational waves could possibly include binary star systems composed of white dwarfs, neutron stars, or black holes.
These gravity waves behave in similar ways to many other types of waves. Tesla's greatest inventions were all based on the study of waves. He always considered sound, light, heat, X-rays and radio waves to be related phenomena that could be studied using the same sort of maths. For this reason there exist the possibility that Tesla had extended this thinking to gravity.
Thermodynamics
In physics, the law of conservation of energy states that the total energy of an isolated system remains constant—it is said to be conserved over time. Energy can neither be created nor destroyed; rather, it transforms from one form to another. For instance, chemical energy can be converted to kinetic energy in the explosion of a stick of dynamite. A consequence of the law of conservation of energy is that a perpetual motion machine of the first kind cannot exist. That is to say, no system without an external energy supply can deliver an unlimited amount of energy to its surroundings
The Eternal Source of Energy of the Universe , Origin and Intensity of Cosmic Rays - New York - October 13, 1932 and Prepared Statement of Tesla (For interview with press on 81st birthday observance):
"There is no more energy in matter than that received from the enviornment"
The followin list is a selection of quotes to gather some information which could be related with Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity. (comming soon)
Experiments with Alternate Currents of Very High Frequency and Their Application to Methods of Artificial Illumination - A lecture delivered before the AIEE (Columbia College) - May 20, 1891 and Presentation of the Edison Medal to Nikola Tesla: Minutes of the annual meeting of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, held at the Engineering Societies building - New York City - May 18, 1917::
"In how far we can understand the world around us is the ultimate thought of every student of nature. The coarseness of our senses prevents us from recognizing the ulterior construction of matter, and astronomy, this grandest and most positive of natural sciences, can only teach us something that happens, as it were, in our immediate neighborhood; of the remoter portions of the boundless universe, with its numberless stars and suns, we know nothing. But far beyond the limit of perception of our senses the spirit still can guide us, and so we may hope that even these unknown worlds -infinitely small and great—may in a measure become known to us. Still, even if this knowledge should reach us, the searching mind will find a barrier, perhaps forever unsurpassable, to the true recognition of that which seems to be, the mere appearance of which is the only and slender basis of all our philosophy".
Mr. Tesla's vision: How the Electrician's Lamp of Aladdin May Construct New Worlds - by Nikola Tesla - New York Times - April 21, 1908:
"According to an adopted theory, every ponderable atom is differentiated from a tenuous (fragile, vague) fluid, filling all space merely by spinning motion, as a whirl of water in a calm lake. By being set in movement this fluid, the ether, becomes gross matter. Its movement arrested (halted) , the primary substance reverts to its normal state. It appears, then, possible for man through harnessed energy of the medium and suitable agencies for starting and stopping ether whirls to cause matter to form and disappear. At his command, almost without effort on his part, old worlds would vanish and new ones would spring into being. He could alter the size of this planet, control its seasons, adjust its distance from the sun, guide it on its eternal journey along any path he might choose, through the depths of the universe. He could make planets collide and produce his suns and stars, his heat and light; he could originate life in all its infinite forms. To cause at will the birth and death of matter would be man's grandest deed, which would give him the mastery of physical creation, make him fulfill his ultimate destiny."
Nikola Tesla Talks Of The Future Of The Greatest Problems Now Confronting The Scientific World - New York Press - March 2, 1913
Q. What do you thing of radium and the prospect it opens for the future?
"My views on the subject are probably not in the agreement of those of many men of science who have devoted themselves to this branch of investigation. It may not be generally known that in my papers published in the electrical Rview in New Yorkvfrom 1896 to 1897, long before the discovery of Mm. Curie I demostrated the existence and described the salient properties of emanations of the same nature. My views were received with skepticism at that time, but I'm glad to say that now they are adopted in their enterity. I see no reason for changing the opinions I then expressed. The so-called radium emanations are not an insolated phenomenon, but are universal. There is, according to my ideas, no such element as radium or polonium, although spectral analisys, the theory of Mendeleff, and various experimental observations, support this modern view. I believe that as to this, scientific opinion is in error, as it was a century ago in assuming that there was such a substance as phlogiston concerned in combustion until Lavoisiere discovered oxigen. Similarly the radium manifestations are, in all probability, due to the action of a universal medium on certail volatile substance. Much of the spaculation based on Mm. Curie's is necesarilly erroneous, being in direct contradiction to well stablished principles. The claims of some enthusiasts that in radium lies the possibility of future power developement are nothing but a dream. But some fact is that we are in presence of new and wonderful effects the study of wich is leading us gradually to a better and deeper understanding of the mechanism of the universe".
Harnessing Nature - Can The Free Energy Of Space Be Utilized? - Scientific American - April 5, 1913
"Experiments conducted by Mr. Nikola Tesla with electromotlve forces of 2.000.000 volts have convinced him that if 100.000.000 volts could be produced it might be possible to break down the atomlc structure of any element and thus liberate a certain amount of energy. "But," he told the wrlter of this artlcle, “even lf the feat could be accomplished and suficient energy set free, there still remains the enormously dificult problem of devising a means of utillzing the energy ln a practical way."
Man's Greatest Achievement - by Nikola Tesla - New York American - July 6, 1930:
"The primary substance, thrown into infinitesimal whirls of prodigious velocity, becomes gross matter; the force subsiding, the motion ceases and matter disappears, reverting to the primary substance".
Tesla, 75, Predicts New Power Source - New York Times - July 5th, 1931
"When and where do you expect to make the official announcement of your new discoveries?" the inventor was asked.
"These discoveries," he replied, "did not come to me over night, but as the result of intense study and experimentation for nearly thirty-six years. I am naturally anxious to give the facts to the world as soon as possible, but I also wish to present them in a finished form. That may take a few months or a few years."
“The idea of atomic energy is illusionary but it has taken so powerful a hold on the minds, that although I have preached against it for twenty-five years, there are still some who believe it to be realizable.”
"I have disintegrated atoms in my experiments with a high potential vacuum tube I brought out in 1896, which I consider one of my best inventions. I have operated it with pressures ranging from 4,000,000 to 18,000,000 volts. More recently I have designed an apparatus for 50,000,000 volts which should produce many results of great scientific importance.
"But as to atomic energy, my experimental observations have shown that the process of disintegration is not accompanied by a liberation of such energy as might be expected from the present theories."
Statement of Tesla Relating to Force and Matter - Uknown - April 15, 1932:
The following is Tesla's statement relating to force and matter, to Einstein's theories, and Tesla's own theory of gravitation. Courtesy of Nikola Tesla Papers, Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Columbia University.
We read a great deal about matter being changed into force and force being changed into matter by the cosmic rays. This is absurd. It is the same as saying that the body can be changed into the mind, and the mind into the body. We know that the mind i's a functioning of the body, and in the same manner force is a function of matter. Without the body there can be no mind, without matter there can be no force.
Einstein has for years developed formulas explaining the mechanism of the cosmos. In doing this he overlooked an important factor, namely the fact that some of the heavenly bodies are increasing in distance from the sun. This is the same as writing a business letter and forgetting the subject you wish to write about. In order to explain this phenomenon Einstein has invented the quantity "lambda".
My theory of gravitation explains this phenomenon perfectly.
Tesla Cosmic Ray Motor May Transmit Power 'Round Earth - Brooklyn Eagle - July 10, 1932, John J. A. O'Neill:
"The attractive features of the Cosmic rays is their constancy. They shower down on us throughout the whole 24 hours, and if a plant is developed to use their power it will not require devices for storing energy as would be necessary with devices using wind, tide or sunlight."
"All of my investigations seem to point to the conclusion that they are small particles, each carrying so small a charge that we are justified in calling them neutrons. They move with great velocity, exceeding that of light.
"More than 25 years ago I began my efforts to harness the cosmic rays and I can now state that I have succeeded in operating a motive device by means of them."
Pioneer Radio Engineer Gives Views On Power - New York Herald Tribune - September 11, 1932:
As the general knowledge of this subject seems very limited, I may state, that even waves only one or two millimeters long, which I produced thirty-three years ago, provided that they carry sufficient energy, can be transmitted around the globe. This is not so much due to refraction and reflection as to the properties of a gaseous medium and certain peculiar action, which I shall explain some time in the future. At present it may be sufficient to call attention to an important fact in this connection, namely, that this bending of the beam projected from reflector does not affect in the least its behavior in other respects. As regards deflection in a horizontal plane, it acts just as though it were straight. To be explicit the horizontal deviations are comparatively slight. In a proposed ultrashort wave transmission, the vertical bending, far from being an advantage, is a serious drawback, as it increased greatly the liability of disturbances by obstacles at the earth's surface. The downward deflection always occurs, irrespective of wavelength, and also if the beam is thrown upward at an angle to the horizontal, and this tendency is, according to my finding, all the more pronounced the bigger the planet. On a body as large as the sun, it would be impossible to project a disturbance of this kind to any considerable distance except along the surface.
It might be inferred that I am alluding to the curvature of space supposed to exist according to the teachings of relativity, but nothing could be further from my mind. I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can have no properties. It might as well be said that God has properties. He has not, but only attributes and these are of our own making. Of properties we can only speak when dealing with matter filling the space. To say that in the presence of large bodies space becomes curved, is equivalent to stating that something can act upon nothing. I, for one, refuse to subscribe to such a view.
"There is no more energy in matter than that received from the enviornment"
"Light is a wave motion of definite velocity, determined by the elastic force and density of the medium. Cosmic rays are particles of matter, the speed of which depends on the propelling force and mass and may be much smaller or greater than that of light".
"The cosmic rays, generated during the maximum brightness of the star, may reach the place many centuries sooner or later than the light, according to their speed".
New York Sun, 12 July 1937, p. 6
The kinetic and potential energy of a body is the result of motion and determined by the product of its mass and the square of its velocity. Let the mass be reduced, the energy is reduced by the same proportion. If it be reduced to zero, the energy is likewise zero for any finite velocity.”
Comments: 30
If you check the other topics you will see that the website is only based on Tesla's interviews and articles in relation to the modern technology and science. I will try to add as much as possible of what you have said with the same method of the rest of the webpage. This is why I have added the comment bar of each topic.
Soon I will create another section to share some of my ideas. But I want to make a difference with Tesla's ideas even if they are very similar. It is a detrministic theory like that of Tesla and like that Miodrag Prokic (a few comments above). Maybe we could try to put some things together.
As I told you I will create a section to share those theories and ideas and I'll have to organize it in some way to keep it tidy and clear.
But it is also necessary to explain what the aether is supposed to be in reference to the microcosmos. I guess that it have to be related with those statements:
"The primary substance, thrown into infinitesimal whirls of prodigious velocity, becomes gross matter; the force subsiding, the motion ceases and matter disappears, reverting to the primary substance"
"There is no more energy in matter than that received from the enviornment"
"The kinetic and potential energy of a body is the result of motion and determined by the product of its mass and the square of its velocity"
"I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can have no properties."
Another controvertial thing that I have found in this topic is that Einstein also stated in some moment of his life that the aether is necessary (as you can read in the PDF), but then the modern sience say that Einstein didn't agree with the existence of the aether. So I really didn't know how to explain it. I guess that he changed his opinion after sometime, but then I should find some statement of him denying its existence.
The principles of atomic gravity are 21 first century innovation in how the force of gravity actually works in nature. Until these proven principles are accepted in mainstream thinking, gravity will continue to impede advancement in innovation in many areas of scientific research. My part was to publish the principles the rest is up to the scientific community.
The fundamental principles of atomic gravity are the best
place to begin to understand how the force of gravity is transferred across the
entire observable universe. The 3 rules are so simple that students easily
understand the principles confirming the simplicity by which nature works.
The laws of atomic gravity interconnect the sciences and can
be applied to any area of research or study providing a perfect platform for
innovation.
Seeking a mathematically adept wizard or group ::
The three principles of atomic gravity which define how the
force of gravity works in quantum atoms are defined both visually and in mathematical
relationships and yet the equation eludes the brilliance behind the physics. A
mathematical mind is needed to claim the elusive equation of everything?
Can this be you?
If you are searching for a path to innovation within your
field of study or research or perhaps you are just a mathematical brainiac then
feel free to begin by exploring the google docs below.
Atomic Gravity Summary
Zero G flight at the Atomic Scale
If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of
giants.
— Sir Isaac Newton
Nature did not deem it her business to make the discovery of
her laws easy for us.
— Albert Einstein
Principles of atomic gravity are a Canadian innovation.
"Gravity is caused by the mass-energy density of space. This mass-energy density of space is determined by the square of the Wave-Amplitude and is always positive (squares are always positive). The Wave-Velocity is inversely proportional to the mass-energy density of space, the higher the mass-energy density of space, the slower the Wave-Velocity. As Matter and its resultant mass-energy density of space are always positive, this causes a slowing of In-Waves as they travel through other matter/wave-motions, and it is this property of Space that causes the natural ‘Gravitational’ attraction of all bodies, and explains why Gravity is always attractive."
https://www.spaceandmotion.com/Physics-Reality-Forces-Light-Gravity.htm
In the second one, I use Tesla's Ether, made of Etherons to explain the foundation of electromagnetism. In this approach, also based on Dirac's sea of electrons/positrons, one Etheron is in fact a pair of rotating electron/positron, which generates electric and magnetic fields.
From this approach, and using Bohr's quantification principle, I find again the formula of the energy of a photon h times frequency, and explains what is the potential vector i.e. A-field of electromagnetism.
28 - From Maxwell's equations to Nikola Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity - Part...
In the third video, starting with the discovery of scalar waves by Tesla, I use a modified version of Maxwell's equations published by physicist Koen Van Vlaenderen, and gives the meaning of the Lorenz gauge of electromagnetism, which leads us directly to the understanding of gravitation.
In this approach, gravity is proportional to the gradient of ether pressure P :
g=-(c² / P) grad P
From this equation, I find back Einstein's cosmological constant and the value of Ether pressure of the cosmology !!
29 - From Maxwell's equations to Nikola Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity - Part...
I'm now pushed to believe that c²/P is constant but not c !
In addition,
I think that, my mathematical formula 'Time Flow' explains mind with time relationship. Do I right ? Can you delve in this ?
In your opinion, discovery of a planet is more exciting. Or, as I've presented in the attached article, whether observing 'A very tiniest mass in the space, having completed its life, have been turning into energy' would be more exciting or not ? It is my belief that, this observation will be the proof of the General and the Special Theory of Relativity. This observation can be made only by NASA or ESA. I hope that I will be able to see this consequence while I'm still alive.
"They say much about the Einstein's theory now. According to Einstein the ether does not exist and many people agree with him. But it is a mistake in my opinion. Ether's opponents refer to the experiments of Michelson - Morley, who made attempts to detect the Earth's movement relative to the fixed - bed ether. These experiments failed, however it didn't mean the ether's non - existence. I always based as fact the existence of mechanical ether in my works and therefore I could achieve positive success." Nikola Tesla.
"What is the ether and why is it so difficult to detect it? I reflected on this matter for a seriously long time and here are the outcomes I have been led to: I think that all the contradictions about whether the ether exists or not are the result of wrong interpretation of ether's properties. The ether has always been presented as an aero - form environment [gaseous]. That was the essential mistake. The ether has a very strong density. It is known that of more dense a substance, the higher is the speed of wave propagation within it. When comparing acoustic speed in the air and the light speed I have drawn a conclusion that ether density is several thousand times higher than air density. It is not the ether that is aero - form [gaseous] but the material world is an aero - form to the ether!"
"A good example for such an interaction becomes apparent in gravitation, which should rather be named, universal compression. I think the material bodies do not gravitate between each other but it is the ether that makes one material body to press to another. We wrongly call this phenomenon gravitation. We can also feel ether's reaction when sudden acceleration or braking. The stars, planets and all the universe appeared from the ether when some part of it, due to certain reasons, became less dense."
"It can be compared with formation of blebs [air bubbles] in boiling water although such a comparison is only rough. The ether tries to return itself to its initial state by compressing our world, but intrinsic electric charge within material the world substance obstructs this. It is similar to that when the water compresses blebs [air bubbles] filled with hot water steam. Until the steam does get cold the water is unable to compress the bleb. With time, having lost the intrinsic electric charge, our world will be compressed with the ether and is going to turn into ether. Having come out of the ether once - so it will go back in to the ether." ( Nikola Tesla )
