Yes I do believe that the axis of the earth could have moved. Flora Benton covered that very good in her book about how a pole shift would work in a hollow earth, "Hollow Earth Apocalypse" (1981). Using the theory she explains how new holes would form after a pole shift. Again because of the action forming the earth they would develop at the top and bottom... exactly.
The basic hollow earth theory of a spinning mass forming into a center sun and an outer crust because of the reactions of centrifugal force opposong gravity with the mass of the material forming at the equator cannot be changed or we are no longer talking about the hollow earth theory but some new theory that uses portions of the theory. The holes are formed (in the theory) because of the lack of mass at the top and bottom. I cannot understand how the holes formed if they did not follow this explanation.
Dennis
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Gottfried <kgwrld@...>
To: hollow earth < allplanets-hollow@ yahoogroups. com>
Sent: Wed, Oct 21, 2009 8:23 pm
Subject: RE: [allplanets- hollow] NO HOLES ON THE POLES
So you do not belief that the axis the earth turns on could not have changed since the earth formed? If this guy is correct in his calculations according to you there is no hole. I see no need to be tied to Gardner and Reed's original theory anyway. Being a purist may be honorable but new information has to be taken into account in the search for the opening. We have olaf and byrd entering an opening does that require the opening to be directly over the pole? As far as olaf is concerned it would seem that the opening be closer to than the current location of the pole. But what do I know....I am just a stupid worm saleman!
Stephen
To: allplanets-hollow@ yahoogroups. com
From: CrenshawDG@. ..
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:01:28 -0400
Subject: Re: [allplanets- hollow] NO HOLES ON THE POLES
Friends;
Moving the location of the hole-at-the- pole from the north magnetic pole has been a popular practice lately. The problem with moving the hole away from the exact center of our top of our globe, i.e., the north magnetic pole, is that it changes the whole explanation of the hollow earth theory as put forth by Gardner and Reed. In other words in order to move the hole you will have to change the hollow earth theory to answer the question of how a hollow planet with a hole-at-the- poles evolves. Of course, that's what they have been doing with the establishment theory for years. While new evidence has made them change the accepted theory time after time, that same evidence, when applied to the hollow earth theory remains the same.
Is it time to mess with the hollow earth theory? Should we join the "scientific" community and allow things that do not support our theory to change that theory? bottom line. In the Hollow Earth Theory, using the theory as put forth by the founders Marshall B. Gardner and William Reed the hole can be no where else except dead-center top and bottom of our planet. Period.
As I've said many times; If there ever was a hole-at-the- poles the powers that be would have used advanced technology to disguise then years ago because of the advances of humans ability to easily move around the planet. I noticed the band on travel without permission inside the polar areas was lifted around the time the [government controlled] GPS system was make affordable to anyone. I also believe it was shortly before the lifting of these bands that technology had "covered" over the holes.
Just my humble thoughts on the matter.
enjoy!
Dennis
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Gottfried <kgwrld@...>
To: hollow earth < allplanets-hollow@ yahoogroups. com>
Sent: Wed, Oct 21, 2009 7:30 pm
Subject: RE: [allplanets- hollow] NO HOLES ON THE POLES
I do not see how this is any proof at all....the alleged hole is not directly at the pole.
To: allplanets-hollow@ yahoogroups. com
From: majdca@...
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:23:09 -0700
Subject: Re: [allplanets- hollow] NO HOLES ON THE POLES
Hi Damir.
It´s very interesting that you show to us, and very good pictures, very thanks!
But I do not understand why you tell this afirmation based from argument:
"In last 24 hrs I was several times in e-mail contact withe a scientist Dr.R.G.W. who was for 1.5 years leader of a scientific program on Antarctica who assured me that he saw on both equinoxes the sun"rolling" on the horizon for 24 hrs or making 360 degrees."
It´s very logical for equinoxes to see the sun making rolling in 360 degrees for 24 hours rigth for all in the horizont... if you are at certain positions near the south or the north pole in these specific times at march or september... but it is not significant evidence to assure that there´s not any hole at poles... they could be stand in other position, and the holes could be in other position near the pole, not exactly in center... I do not understand why are you giving up...
regards
Miguel
--- On Wed, 10/21/09, Damir <pavicic.damir@ ...> wrote:
From: Damir <pavicic.damir@ ...>
Subject: [allplanets- hollow] NO HOLES ON THE POLES
To: allplanets-hollow@ yahoogroups. com
Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 6:04 PM
Hi to all the readers of this.
THERE ARE DEFINITELY NO HOLES ON THE POLES.
All of my work of last few years I could throw in the trash box unfortunately.
In last 24 hrs I was several times in e-mail contact withe a scientist Dr.R.G.W. who was for 1.5 years leader of a scientific program on Antarctica who assured me that he saw on both equinoxes the sun"rolling" on the horizon for 24 hrs or making 360 degrees.
That was enough for me to admit there is no holes on the poles.
This morning I found a video clip from south pole station's sun tracker for March 23 rd 2004 and it shows exactly that what the scientist told me.
Here is the link to that video clip:
http://gcrgweb.
sdsu.edu: 8080/penguin/ 2004/south_ pole_video_ clips.htm
With most regret I had to relate you this news
Capt. Damir Pavicic
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it now.
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it now.
