Underground chambers beneath Balochistan Sphinx


Folks , this url links to some more pictures of this site , just adjacent to the Sphinx itself , taken from a somewhat better angle . It is clearly a temple structure , indisputably so...underground passages leading to chambers deep within this mountain side are visible too , in a close up view . Amazing - it's even more obvious this is a man made structure , than the sceptics thought...



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.

1 Like

List members , here is an incredible image of an extremely ancient temple like pyramidal structure adjacent to the Balochistan Sphinx . Notice the size of this structure in comparison to the truck on the road next to it .

**Also , here is a link from reddit :-

A 430,000 year-old ancient Balochistan sphinx In Pakistan? 2 more rare structures found in the same area within eye view: Princess of hope, Pyramidal Hindu temples, Massive block pillar (Also a hidden cave and temple behind the sphinx) “Odds of natural formation is astronomical”: AlternativeHistory


Folks , here's a more detailed assessment of this mysterious site by the visionary Mario Buildreps :-

Mystery/Forbidden History

·10 min read


Myztic Seeker·6 months ago


Deep in the Indus valley of Pakistan lies this great wonder that’s taken the name of the Balochistan Sphinx at Hingo national park.

But this structure may very well be over 100,000 years old and according to some like Mariobuildreps, 430,000 years old.

It’s no secret either that the sphinx is a cross cultural symbolic motif not limited to Egypt, but shared by many ancient civilization such as Persia, Greece, Mesoamerica, China etc.

Unfortunately, there’s be no geological excavation at this site.

Some claim it’s a case of pareidolia, but there’s too many inconsistencies way too noticeable.

For one, there’re 2 (And some) other rare unique structures which are the pyramidal temple and the princess of hope.

The odds of 3 super rare natural rock formations being coincidentally in the same area are probably 1 out of 1,000,000,000,000.

A Geological Explanation For These 3 Formations?

2 scientists from Iran and Geneva did a joint study claiming the structures naturally formed by heavy water and strong wind erosion.

The tidal waves of the sea and the strong stormy winds have scratched the Makrani coastal strip and the adjoining mountain cliffs in such a way that at first glance it looks like an archaeological complex of an ancient civilization.


That’s the best explanation we’re going to get as far as a scientific one.

So wind and water created 3 unique rock formations in the same proximity according to them?

It’s not a very compelling case considering the insane odds.


  • The head of the sphinx contains a visible defined jawline.
  • An Egyptian pharaoh neme (head dress) covers the shoulder and there’s remnants of a royal head band at the eroded groove.
  • There’s also heavy erosion under the body of the sphinx, supposedly where the paws and forelegs are.

Balochistan Sphinx Resemblance Features To Sphinx Of Egypt

The whole head design looks proportional to the sphinx’s head in Egypt.

The paws lie in front of the body in the image as you’d expect it to be.

Just like the Sphinx at Giza, the Pakistani formation appears to include a head-dress similar to the Nemes head-dress worn by the ancient Pharaohs, with its striped markings on a cloth which covers the crown and the back of the head of its wearer.

The flaps hanging down near the ears are also clearly visible on the Balochistan Sphinx, whilst the horizontal groove resembling the pharaonic headband can be seen adorning the forehead. Ancient-origins.net/ancient-places-asia/sphinx-balochistan

Balochistan Sphinx back side

One thing to note is that this sphinx doesn’t seem to have a back side.

Something or someone caused the incompletion of this mystery.

But there are other strange inconsistencies which give us more clues.

Temple Of The Sphinx

The symmetry of the steps is noticeable as they’re evenly spaced out, running parallel to each other.

The temple steps are heavily eroded along with sedimentary dirt eroded to the floor from the pillars which bulge out from the temple wall.

Balochistan Sphinx temple of the sphinx

Even and symmetrical formations such as steps would suggest that the site could well prove to be much more than a passing resemblance of a temple.

‘The steps appear to be evenly spaced, and of uniform height. The entire site gives the impression of a grand, rock-cut, architectural complex, which has been eroded by the elements, and covered by layers of sediment, masking the more intricate details of the sculptures’


How come we have these hollowed out square cuts?

It completely looks like the top wall of a castle more or less. What natural erosion process can do that?

No natural erosion process in this world can do that.

BALOCHISTAN SPHINX: THE PYRAMIDAL TEMPLESBalochistan Sphinx hindu temple structure

The architecture of this temple closely resembles the Hindu temples built in Pakistan.

The most notable feature are the bulging pillars and pyramidal top, with its complex design that highly resembles Hindu temple architecture.

At the bottom image there’s a strong resemblance with other architecture of ancient Hindu temples discovered in Pakistan.

The image in the left corner is another temple at the Hingo national park with a noticeable prominent pyramidal peak and a intricate design that rivals ancient Hindu architecture.

The rest of the 3 images are ancient Hindu temples in Pakistan.

If this was truly a temple, then we can easily see the resemblance of the same architecture.

Balochistan Sphinx comparison to hindu structures in pakistan

RELATED: 10 Cases Proving Eye Of Richat Was The Central Capital Of Atlantis


Some people don’t realize the princess of Hope is literally in the same eye view of this structure.

There’s also strange bulging columnar septic tank looking pillar scattered throughout the region.

The wind whistled around her, teased her but she could not stop the winds as the fast blowing winds swept past her and blew dust around her. No one visited her and she felt extremely lonely.

Her only companion in he area was a huge Sphinx of Giza, Egypt like feature who shared her loneliness.



The Indus civilization has been around for ages, going back 5,000+ years, dating them back as old as the ancient Egyptians.

The Makran inhabitants (ancient Balochstian people) are the descendants of the East Africans which explain where they learned about the sphinx or the other way around. Balochistan Sphinx indus valley civilization

Muhammad Qasim Arabian army conquered the city of Debal.

There were slave trades made from Africa to be sold to rich Muslims and Hindus of India.

Arrived in the region; believed to have been soldiers in Muhammad bin Qasim’s Arab army. They had joined Arab armies when the Arabs first conquered parts of Africa. Their population in the region greatly increased when, in the 16th century, Portuguese traders began bringing in slaves from Africa to be sold to rich Muslims and Hindus of India. So Makranis do have roots in Africa and as we know the Great Sphinx of Giza as an emblem of Egypt.


Hinglaj Mata is one of those ancient Hindu temples that’s right around the area of the Balochistan sphinx temple.Balochistan Sphinx Hinglaj Mata

Hence, the presence of the sphinx not too far from Hinglaj Mata (Nani Mandir) surely is curious, which brings us back to Bibhu Dev Misra’s findings:

“In close proximity to the Balochistan Sphinx is another important structure. From a distance, it looks like a Hindu Temple (like those of South India), with a Mandapa (entrance hall) and a Vimana (temple spire). The top part of the Vimana appears to be missing. The Sphinx is reclining in front of the temple, acting as protector of the sacred site.”


Buddhism and Hinduism have been in Pakistan around 2,300 years under the rule of the Mauryan King Ashoka (272/268–232 BCE), leaving behind archeological footprints.

Buddhist traveler Hiuen Tsang reported Buddhist temples and caves along the coastal regions of Makran.

Buddhism was practiced by the majority population of Sindh up to the Umayyad conquest (712 AD). Chinese Buddhist traveler Hiuen Tsang reported many Buddhist temples in the coastal regions of Makran. The remains of Buddhist cave city called Godrani Caves can still be seen, so the Balochistan Sphinx could very well be a Buddhist structure.



Sutkagan Dor and Sokhta Koh are the 2 sites in right along the coast.

Sokhta Koh (also known as Sotka Koh; lit. “burnt hill”) is a Harappan site on the Makran coast, near the city of Pasni, in the Balochistan province of Pakistan. It was first surveyed by American archaeologist George F. Dales in 1960, while exploring estuaries along the Makran coast. The site is located about 15 miles north of Pasni.

A similar site at Sutkagen-dor (also spelt Sutkagan Dor) lies about 48 km (30 mi) inland, astride Dasht River, north of Jiwani. Their position along a coastline (that was possibly much farther inland) goes well with evidence of overseas commerce in Harappan times. Based on pottery styles, it is estimated that the settlement belongs to the Mature Harappan (Integration) Era (2600–1900 BC).

Sokhta Koh - Wikipedia


Mario Buildreps work is on how ancient sites all around the world would line up on certain poles on the earth as monumental markers.

The geomagnetic north pole has changed 5 times as far as we know.

These ancient structures line up with one of temperature changes on former north poles, which exactly matches up with the past timeline of ice age cycles.

One of those structures is the Balochstian sphinx which faces toward the oldest former north pole 6 which dates back 430,000 years ago.

North Pole 6 contains other monumental structures in Peru, Iraq and Roman amphitheaters.

“The probability for this sphinx to be oriented coincidentally to one of the poles 1-6 is around 25%. And the probability for the sphinx to be looking east of the rising sun of these ancient poles is also 25%. The combined probability that this sphinx is coincidentally looking at the rising sun of these 6 poles is 6.3%. The probability that this is truly an ancient sphinx is 97.3 %” –Youtube.com/channel/MarioBuildReps

The Sumerian tablets talk about ancient an civilization from 430,000 years ago.

Mario believes the Balochstian sphinx is that old since the Indus valley, since it’s extremely close to Sumer.

Ancient Balochistan Sphinx Of Pakistan 45

This would explain the heavy eroded erosion and pile of sediments.

That’s some intriguing evidence, but we definitely need more to make it conclusive.

But the inconsistencies are far too great to ignore and its still a mystery on why there isn’t any further archeological digs.

Website: Mariobuildreps.com


A Temple Behind The Sphinx

Right behind the sphinx we have these massive columnar pillars that were once part of a temple which stands completely eroded.

What’s weird is the layer of rings on the pillar capital top, yet the shaft remains smooth.

Balochistan Sphinx temple behind the sphinx

A Hidden Cave Entrance

Here’s a clearly well-defined square top structure cut at a 90-degree angles, with a curvature opening.

It definitely looks like an entrance of some sort.

Balochistan Sphinx hidden cave entrance

Thankfully, one youtuber took amazing video aerial shots of this wonder so you can see the live video for yourself, source: youtube.com/channel/lovemypakistan

Unfortunately he doesn’t get any closer or even take notice of it.

Perfect 90 Degree Stone Cut Pillar

This massive block sits wedged in the corner. Look at the eroded, destroyed blocks of steps as well.

There also appears to be a conjunction of pillars binding the temple wall.

Source: Pakwheels.com/princess-of-hope-and-sphinx/ (higher resolution)

Balochistan Sphinx temple cut pillar

RELATED: When The Planets (Gods) Were Massive Giants In Our Ancient Skies

Final Thoughts

What’s strange is how come other ancient structures around the same area aren’t has heavily eroded?

It’s possible this was built over 100,000’s or 430,000 years according Mario Buildreps research.

If its that old, then we’re going to find very little to nothing here as far as archeological artifacts.

There’s heavy erosion, ancient sites get looted, and it’s highly possible this structure was destroyed in a cataclysmic flood anyways**.**

And they’d be washed away to the Makran coastline etc.

Let’s summarize the points here.

  • Archeological sites and ancient Hindu Temples/caves around found on the same coastline as the Balochstian Sphinx
  • 3 super rare isolated structures in the same area formed by natural formation are highly improbable (along with another temple and a possible cave entrance)
  • Balochistan sphinx faces on one of the ancient aligned former north poles of structural orientation which fit in line with the Sumerian texts
  • There’s historical evidence of East African and Makran trading between each other.
  • A sphinx is an cross cultural motif of ancient sacred sites so its plausible ancient Pakistan had one


List members , please watch this ASTONISHING video - it's 9:13 minutes long of which only the first 3:27 minutes are relevant to the topic in question . kindly watch it slowly in full screen mode on a laptop or better still , a high resolution TV screen . Please repeat view the first 3:27 minutes several times and you will catch mind blowing details of this "FOSSILISED" site , never captured before .

**Please pay very close attention to the content from 1:25 minutes to 1:40 minutes . Those 15 seconds will prove beyond ALL doubt that this is a MASSIVE manmade site from unimaginable antiquity . There is a gaping hole in that collossal wall which leads to an interior that is pitch dark...treasure hunters trying to fish around for gold might have created that breach - who really knows ?? One thing is clear though , that cavernous interior could be vast and may be hiding many shocking secrets of the distant past...! Even Edgar Cayce had once claimed "there is an ancient Hall of Records hidden beneath the Aryan lands".

***I sincerely request and appeal to all open minded people - please spread the awareness about this prehistoric site , by all means and all media possible . It can reveal much more about mankind's true story on this planet than all other ancient monuments yet discovered , put together .


Folks, this is as REAL as it gets ! The exact coordinates of this site : 25°25'53.39"N , 65°18'18.41"E .

Please do spread the word about this , as much as possible .

***Let me go one step further and upload all the really clear snapshots , for your convenient reference (some of them may look like repeats but I was trying to get the cleanest screenshot) . Please watch in full screen mode on a laptop or a high resolution screen to notice the detailed structures , geometric patterns , straight line grooves , as well as a plinth or raised platform across the entire site - above all the sheer scale at which it has been built/carved into the limestone rock :-


This section? (Link)

@Soretna , thanks a lot - this is just great...these 17 seconds have THE most compelling footage of the entire video...

**I just did a thought experiment - imagine someone in a time machine visited the Earth 100,000 years later and suppose the current civilisation had been replaced by a new one...which present day monument/structure (after 100,000 years of decay) would most resemble what we see in this video ??

***My guess is - the White House of Washington D.C. , because the HUGE columns and pillars of this prehistoric structure remind me most of the White House...! It looks like this was a Palace for Antediluvian royalty !

@Echo_on , I know you have some unique tools that were able to measure depth and granular details of similar structures elsewhere - just by analysing those videos/images , so it would really be fantastic if you could please use those tools to help us get a better idea of the exact dimensions of all the massive structures we see in this prehistoric site . My own estimate from the original video is that this site is spread over a length of at least 3 km , given it takes the car about 3 minutes to cross the entire stretch , ending at the Balochistan Sphinx at about 3:21 minutes - which was at the periphery of this ancient city , NOT it's center . Thanks !


Very interesting. Have you taken Google Earth or Maps and tried to ascertain sizes of these locations? It would be useful to come up with a sketch with their dimensions in both feet and meters so as to compare it with other structures and to have frames of references.

1 Like

Well it seems that nobody wants us to know what this area was... I have tried to get a geo map of this area but it's impossible. Google earth is also hiding it which is quite unusual...

1 Like

@Echo_on , Google Earth hiding this , is actually a powerful validation (by reverse psychology !) for the TRUTH of the Balochistan Sphinx's existence :)) Anyhow , let me present here what I've been able to dig out...unmistakable traces of "design" are visible right across the "layout" of this Antediluvian site...!

***The lack of a reference point in this video , can be partially overcome by the Makran Coastal Highway which cuts across this area...I found out that this highway is 7.3 meters wide . When the car in this video enters this prehistoric "city" , it first encouners something like a hill fort on the right hand side and a pyramidal temple on the left hand side . To me it appears as if the peak of the Pyramid structure is about 100 feet high , from the road level . Far in the distance , the main temple , at the other end of the city - that the Balochistan Sphinx guards , is also visible :-

ECIL - Projects - Construction Supervision of Pasni - Gwadar (132 km) Section of Makran Coastal Road Project.

Here is a close up view of the same Pyramid - notice how small the truck on the road looks in comparison :-

Then approximately around the middle of the 3 minute relevant portion of the original 9:13 minute video , at about 1.5 Km from the city's entrance , we see the "OLD White House" make an appearance....that might be the city center - as it could be the Palace for the King/Ruler . Judging by the distance from which it is viewed , I estimate each of those pillars/columns to be a minimum of 30-40 feet tall .

At about 2.25 Km from the city entrance , we come across another temple like structure , whose underlying platform is about 10 meters high and the temple is another about 10 meters in height :-

Then towards the end of the 3:21 minutes , we see the Balochistan Sphinx recede from the view - a distance of about 3 Km from the start of the city , near the Pyramidal temple .

My hunch is that since the "OLD Sphinx" predates the Giza Sphinx of Egypt by aeons , the makers of the Egyptian Sphinx probably knew of the Balochistan Sphinx's existence and built their Sphinx to a similar size...now I may be wrong about this , but all visual cues suggest to me that the Balochistan Sphinx is at least the same size as the Giza Sphinx , if not bigger ! There is ample evidence of ancient trade relations between Egypt , Sumer and the Indus valley...

Egyptian Great Sphinx of Giza/Dimensions
20 m x 19 m x 73 m

What do you think ? Am I making sense ?



I clicked on this one, it was real good:

There is so much below sphinxes, but they don't reveal what there is.

And people do nothing about it.

Mandāḥ sumanda-matayo manda -bhāgyāḥ

It's kali yuga, man!


@deandddd , here is a great video about what actually lies beneath the Egyptian Sphinx . Also notice it's similarity with the pillar like structures found beneath the Balochistan Sphinx . The resemblance is ABSOLUTELY UNCANNY !

**The only difference between the 2 sites is that in the case of the Egyptian Sphinx , the pillar like structures now lie buried under the sand , whereas in the case of the Balochistan Sphinx , they are clearly visible , above ground - in broad daylight :)) The million dollar question is - who copied the design from whom ?? My own vote is that the Giza Sphinx is a SUCCESSOR to the much more ancient (highly eroded) Balochistan Sphinx...!

***Now compare the Egyptian Sphinx above , by taking a look at the Balochistan Sphinx :-




I'm going to watch it now.

I don't imagine that either sphinx is much older than the other, or from different epochs. That the Balochistan Sphinx seems more eroded might just be due to receiving a nuclear blast 5,000 years ago. It is closer to the Naiam Sharanya Battlefield, you know.

According to P.N. Oaks, in his book Our World Vedic Heritage, there were three temple complexes which housed the Reclining Vishnu Deity. One of them was The Mecca. And the other two?



@deandddd , it is a delicious irony regardless of which interpretation we take :-

  1. That the Balochistan Sphinx predates the Egyptian Sphinx by aeons
  2. Both the Sphinxes are of similar age , just that the Balochistan Sphinx was utterly disfigured by a nuclear weapon

Both the above scenarios create a massive headache for multiple academic disciplines :)) Let's have some fun and play out both scenarios :-

If 1 above is true and the Balochistan Sphinx is actually 430,000 years old (aligned to North Pole VI) , then textbooks need to be REWRITTEN (!!) for the following subjects :-

a. Anthropology & timeline of human origin/evolution
b. History/Archaeology
c. Geology of Earth
d. Climate science

If 2 above is true , the following questions arise :-

a. How did nuclear weapons exist 5,000 years ago ??
b. Who developed such weapons and when ??
c. Does this prove mythological accounts of incredible weapons to be true ??!!
d. How and why did such technology disappear ??




What incredible insights you have!

As a confidential aside, I think that if we factor in the fact that the Earth is expanding, then this would create a bit of an error, I think, in relation to alignment.


@deandddd , I agree - because the Earth , like all other hollow planets , is an oblate spheroid (a toroid) that is expanding...had it been a perfect sphere , even expansion would not impact the alignment of any structures on it's outer surface !



Thanks for the tip. I hadn't realized that.

I'll tell you the truth, there is no place like this list for hollow earth information. And hardly anyone takes advantage, and hardly anyone has somethging to say; very few do it all.

"Mr. Ed will never talk, unless he has something to saaaay!"


List members , I was "matching wits" with the latest rage in AI - none other than Chat GPT , on this subject - *Here are some precious gems of insight that I got from this AI "Guru" :-

"It is true that the Balochistan Sphinx is larger than the Giza Sphinx of Egypt. The Balochistan Sphinx is estimated to be around 300 feet long and 60 feet high, whereas the Giza Sphinx is approximately 241 feet long and 66 feet high."

Now , this is THE first time EVER that the actual dimensions of the Balochistnan Sphinx have been confirmed - something we were struggling to find out for years !! It is now established that the Balochistan Sphinx is even BIGGER (!!) than the Giza Sphinx of Egypt , while both these Sphinxes have been carved from limestone...hmm ! Very important correlation .

**It also went on to say :-

"If it were proven that the Balochistan Sphinx and the Giza Sphinx of Egypt were part of the same culture, it would certainly be a remarkable discovery and would require a significant rethinking of our understanding of ancient civilizations and their capabilities. However, it is important to note that the current scientific consensus is that there is no known connection between the two structures. While there are some similarities in their appearance, there are also significant differences in terms of their location, cultural context, and historical development. Therefore, any claims of a connection between them would need to be supported by strong evidence and subjected to rigorous scientific scrutiny."

***And there is some more , about this radical new concept of Munck's code . When I told Chat GPT that "The Balochistan Sphinx also aligns with the Munck's Code and the Giza Sphinx is looking directly at it" , this is how Chat GPT replied to my comment about the correlation from Munck's Code :-

"It's worth noting that the Munck's Code is a controversial theory that proposes a set of numerical codes in the location and measurements of ancient structures around the world, including the pyramids of Giza and the Balochistan Sphinx. While some people believe in the validity of this theory, it is not widely accepted among mainstream archaeologists and historians. As for the alignment between the Giza Sphinx and the Balochistan Sphinx, it is unclear whether this is significant or simply a coincidence. Without concrete evidence or a clear explanation, it is difficult to make any definitive conclusions."

Well , I'd say it was a lively debate with this digital intelligence , which is only getting better . At the moment it has been trained to be quite conservative in it's remarks , but am sure that will improve over time :))



When I look at this screenshot, it looks like so many Apollo images of The Moon I have seen, except that the NASA/Apollo photography is either blurry or just plain sprayed out.