Dean , I have read some of Cater's articles and greatly respect his knowledge of the subject . However , unfortunately , this is just not the type of theoretical language which the science establishment accepts . Like they say "when the game is chess , you can't win by playing like Chinese Chekkers"
The fact is , Cater's writings have been out there for quite some time now but have been completely ignored by the mainstream . Some have even (unfairly) categorised him as just a philosopher or a writer of esoteric texts . Cater is a bit like the brilliant Immanuel Velikovsky who too got similar (mis)treatment by the establishment...
What the science establishment will find convincing is mathematical equations and formulation of theories , the way they do it . Which is why, the chances of success will be a lot greater if we can build an alliance of conventional scientists from different fields whose theories complement the Hollow Earth concept .
Regards
--------------------------
Reply from Dean:
Yes, Cater's science compltely pulls the rug out from under newtonian physics, period. Were it to become widely understood, not only would it provide an understanding of anti gravitics, but it would provide an understanding of what is a proton exposion, and this would become deadly is deployed, similar to a nuclear device. Thus, any two-bit dictator could become a major player in the world of weapons of mass destruction.
There are efforts, starting at the university level, to keep an intellectual straightjacket on people from espousing the electromagnetic idea of gravity, and I can't condem anyone for that.
On the other hand, the hollow earth theory doesn't stand in the context of orthodox physics. The crust would collapse inwards due to the superior weight.
So I just shy away from the scientific presentation, it leads me to a deadlock. I usually present other aspects.
Thanks for contributing.
Dean