The Moon Matrix
http://hollowplanet.blogspot.com/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Speaking of which, I blundered into this video about the Moon yesterday,
and it has some interesting NASA photos that have been ahem, adjusted
for proper exposure......
Lonni
···
On 7/7/2012 1:16 PM, Gary Fleck wrote:
The Moon Matrix
http://hollowplanet.blogspot.com/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Teach InfoWest Spam Trap if this mail is spam:
Spam
<Vote - CanIt-PRO;
Not spam
<Vote - CanIt-PRO;
Forget previous vote
<Vote - CanIt-PRO;*REMEMBER:* Never give out your account information, password, or
other personal information over e-mail.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Great find Lonni. Gary
···
--- In [email protected], Lonni Clarke <lonniclarke@...> wrote:
Speaking of which, I blundered into this video about the Moon yesterday,
and it has some interesting NASA photos that have been ahem, adjusted
for proper exposure......
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyYto9H85Gw&feature=player_embedded
LonniOn 7/7/2012 1:16 PM, Gary Fleck wrote:
>
>
>
> The Moon Matrix
>
> http://hollowplanet.blogspot.com/
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Teach InfoWest Spam Trap if this mail is spam:
> Spam
> <Vote - CanIt-PRO;
> Not spam
> <Vote - CanIt-PRO;
> Forget previous vote
> <Vote - CanIt-PRO;
>
> *REMEMBER:* Never give out your account information, password, or
> other personal information over e-mail.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
On this blogspot, there is a reference to a Ciel et Espace
<http://www.cieletespacephotos.fr/main.php/v/Terre/VuesGlob/700-09010-11high.jpg.html>
website of 3D topographic images. I sometimes like to examine new
pictures, using Photoshop to seek evidence the eye can not find.
Unfortunately, the images as Ciel et Espace were all 72dpi. That low
resolution does no good if one studies down to the pixel level.
However, I just spent several hours looking at other north pole images I
could find, and ran across the MODIS website (NASA),
MODIS Web, and found one photo there
that was high resolution, 12MB, titled "Sunny Skies over Artic Sea Ice".
I found something interesting with this one photo. NASA does say that
it is a mosaic, but to the eyes of most viewers, they see lots of white
and won't have a clue of the composite layers used to construct the
photo. So what I did, using Photoshop, is changed the contrast to
bring out slight color differences, then I zoomed in and cropped the
area above Greenland so that I could study the North Pole area.
Anyone with Photoshop could do the same thing I've done to examine this
photo.
I'm attaching my cropped photo, I hope it will come through the forum.
I've added some red lines near the areas where the composite layers
exist. They don't all run in the same direction, so I conclude a NASA
employee used several layers to build this photo. There is no way to
know just how much of this photo has been "pasted" together.
It is difficult to find "real" photos of either pole, and when you do
find one that is worthy of examination, finding this sort of evidence
leads one to assume they're not about to give us true untouched
photography of the poles.
Which is why I keep saying, "there is a huge cover-up going on
pertaining to the poles".
Kathy
···
On 7/7/2012 12:16 PM, Gary Fleck wrote:
The Moon Matrix
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I'm sorry... I watched this youtube and watched the image changes
carefully. I don't see anything that I feel is credible. Sorry.
Some of the audio recordings were interesting though.
Kathy
···
On 7/7/2012 4:08 PM, Gary wrote:
Great find Lonni. Gary
--- In [email protected]
<mailto:allplanets-hollow%40yahoogroups.com>, Lonni Clarke
<lonniclarke@...> wrote:
>
> Speaking of which, I blundered into this video about the Moon
yesterday,
> and it has some interesting NASA photos that have been ahem, adjusted
> for proper exposure......
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyYto9H85Gw&feature=player_embedded
> Lonni
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Gary,
Wow! This is a real nice one.
Dean
···
From: Gary Fleck
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2012 4:16 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] The Moon Matrix
The Moon Matrix
http://hollowplanet.blogspot.com/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Lonni,
You know, mainstream institutions, such as the Association of Lunar and Planetary Observers, ALPO (The dog food people?), just sompletely ignore this whole genre of evidence, so do our universities and public schools. (The collusion runs deep)
I can imagine a major war coming up such that communication and freedom of speech gets censured and even stopped. Then that which will remain will just be the sterile corporate version, period.
Too little, too late. Too much football, too much Rolling Stones and Mc Cartney.
Dean
···
From: Lonni Clarke
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2012 6:28 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [allplanets-hollow] The Moon Matrix
Speaking of which, I blundered into this video about the Moon yesterday,
and it has some interesting NASA photos that have been ahem, adjusted
for proper exposure......
Lonni
On 7/7/2012 1:16 PM, Gary Fleck wrote:
The Moon Matrix
http://hollowplanet.blogspot.com/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
----------------------------------------------------------
Teach InfoWest Spam Trap if this mail is spam:
Spam
<Vote - CanIt-PRO;
Not spam
<Vote - CanIt-PRO;
Forget previous vote
<Vote - CanIt-PRO;*REMEMBER:* Never give out your account information, password, or
other personal information over e-mail.
----------------------------------------------------------
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I see that images don't come through or aren't allowed.
So here's a link to where I've posted my cropped photo and a link to the
original NASA photo.
http://home.comcast.net/~readingnews/artic.html
Kathy
···
On 7/7/2012 7:02 PM, Kathy wrote:
However, I just spent several hours looking at other north pole images I
could find, and ran across the MODIS website (NASA),
MODIS Web, and found one photo there
that was high resolution, 12MB, titled "Sunny Skies over Artic Sea Ice".I found something interesting with this one photo. NASA does say that
it is a mosaic, but to the eyes of most viewers, they see lots of white
and won't have a clue of the composite layers used to construct the
photo. So what I did, using Photoshop, is changed the contrast to
bring out slight color differences, then I zoomed in and cropped the
area above Greenland so that I could study the North Pole area.I'm attaching my cropped photo, I hope it will come through the forum.
I've added some red lines near the areas where the composite layers
exist. They don't all run in the same direction, so I conclude a NASA
employee used several layers to build this photo. There is no way to
know just how much of this photo has been "pasted" together.Kathy
_,_._,___
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Hi Kathy,
Unless the person receiving the image, get's It personally, iow, not thru the internet, then every single
image released by NASA has been doctored before anyone from the public, including the public scientists,
sees It.
This has been known for over ten years, now.
Kind Regards,
Bre.
···
----- Original Message -----
From: Kathy
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2012 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: [allplanets-hollow] NASA Artic photo "Sunny Skies over Artic Sea Ice"
I see that images don't come through or aren't allowed.
So here's a link to where I've posted my cropped photo and a link to the
original NASA photo.
http://home.comcast.net/~readingnews/artic.html
Kathy
On 7/7/2012 7:02 PM, Kathy wrote:
>
>
> However, I just spent several hours looking at other north pole images I
> could find, and ran across the MODIS website (NASA),
> http://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/gallery/index.php#, and found one photo there
> that was high resolution, 12MB, titled "Sunny Skies over Artic Sea Ice".
>
> I found something interesting with this one photo. NASA does say that
> it is a mosaic, but to the eyes of most viewers, they see lots of white
> and won't have a clue of the composite layers used to construct the
> photo. So what I did, using Photoshop, is changed the contrast to
> bring out slight color differences, then I zoomed in and cropped the
> area above Greenland so that I could study the North Pole area.
>
>
> I'm attaching my cropped photo, I hope it will come through the forum.
> I've added some red lines near the areas where the composite layers
> exist. They don't all run in the same direction, so I conclude a NASA
> employee used several layers to build this photo. There is no way to
> know just how much of this photo has been "pasted" together.
>
>
> Kathy
> _,_._,___
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Thanks for the input Kathy, unfortunately attachments are removed by Yahoo, you can post pictures to the photo section of the group though. Gary
···
--- In [email protected], Kathy <getnews1@...> wrote:
On this blogspot, there is a reference to a Ciel et Espace
<http://www.cieletespacephotos.fr/main.php/v/Terre/VuesGlob/700-09010-11high.jpg.html>
website of 3D topographic images. I sometimes like to examine new
pictures, using Photoshop to seek evidence the eye can not find.
Unfortunately, the images as Ciel et Espace were all 72dpi. That low
resolution does no good if one studies down to the pixel level.However, I just spent several hours looking at other north pole images I
could find, and ran across the MODIS website (NASA),
MODIS Web, and found one photo there
that was high resolution, 12MB, titled "Sunny Skies over Artic Sea Ice".I found something interesting with this one photo. NASA does say that
it is a mosaic, but to the eyes of most viewers, they see lots of white
and won't have a clue of the composite layers used to construct the
photo. So what I did, using Photoshop, is changed the contrast to
bring out slight color differences, then I zoomed in and cropped the
area above Greenland so that I could study the North Pole area.Anyone with Photoshop could do the same thing I've done to examine this
photo.I'm attaching my cropped photo, I hope it will come through the forum.
I've added some red lines near the areas where the composite layers
exist. They don't all run in the same direction, so I conclude a NASA
employee used several layers to build this photo. There is no way to
know just how much of this photo has been "pasted" together.It is difficult to find "real" photos of either pole, and when you do
find one that is worthy of examination, finding this sort of evidence
leads one to assume they're not about to give us true untouched
photography of the poles.Which is why I keep saying, "there is a huge cover-up going on
pertaining to the poles".
KathyOn 7/7/2012 12:16 PM, Gary Fleck wrote:
>
> The Moon Matrix
>
> http://hollowplanet.blogspot.com/
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Yeah, I thought so too. Gary
···
--- In [email protected], "silopanna" <silopanna@...> wrote:
Gary,
Wow! This is a real nice one.
Dean
From: Gary Fleck
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2012 4:16 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] The Moon MatrixThe Moon Matrix
http://hollowplanet.blogspot.com/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Kathy,
When Damir's images made the rounds, I put them together with the Radarsat image on my Radarsat page, and when the Ciel et Espace image was passed around, I put it in, too. They are all mutually supportive.
http://www.holloworbs.com/Radarsat.htm
We have the evidence, we would know where to go if we could. And now what?
Dean
···
--- In [email protected], Kathy <getnews1@...> wrote:
On this blogspot, there is a reference to a Ciel et Espace
<http://www.cieletespacephotos.fr/main.php/v/Terre/VuesGlob/700-09010-11high.jpg.html>
website of 3D topographic images. I sometimes like to examine new
pictures, using Photoshop to seek evidence the eye can not find.
Unfortunately, the images as Ciel et Espace were all 72dpi. That low
resolution does no good if one studies down to the pixel level.However, I just spent several hours looking at other north pole images I
could find, and ran across the MODIS website (NASA),
MODIS Web, and found one photo there
that was high resolution, 12MB, titled "Sunny Skies over Artic Sea Ice".I found something interesting with this one photo. NASA does say that
it is a mosaic, but to the eyes of most viewers, they see lots of white
and won't have a clue of the composite layers used to construct the
photo. So what I did, using Photoshop, is changed the contrast to
bring out slight color differences, then I zoomed in and cropped the
area above Greenland so that I could study the North Pole area.Anyone with Photoshop could do the same thing I've done to examine this
photo.I'm attaching my cropped photo, I hope it will come through the forum.
I've added some red lines near the areas where the composite layers
exist. They don't all run in the same direction, so I conclude a NASA
employee used several layers to build this photo. There is no way to
know just how much of this photo has been "pasted" together.It is difficult to find "real" photos of either pole, and when you do
find one that is worthy of examination, finding this sort of evidence
leads one to assume they're not about to give us true untouched
photography of the poles.Which is why I keep saying, "there is a huge cover-up going on
pertaining to the poles".
KathyOn 7/7/2012 12:16 PM, Gary Fleck wrote:
>
> The Moon Matrix
>
> http://hollowplanet.blogspot.com/
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Every single image?
Doctored?
Do you have evidence of this, or is this just your belief?
And what do you define as 'doctored'?
···
On 7/7/2012 11:45 PM, Brel wrote:
Hi Kathy,
Unless the person receiving the image, get's It personally, iow, not
thru the internet, then every single
image released by NASA has been doctored before anyone from the
public, including the public scientists,
sees It.
This has been known for over ten years, now.
Kind Regards,
Bre.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
For the back story on how the Apollo photos were faked (not why but how) have a look at this: http://vimeo.com/30261162
/Bob
···
--- In [email protected], Lonni Clarke <lonniclarke@...> wrote:
Speaking of which, I blundered into this video about the Moon yesterday,
and it has some interesting NASA photos that have been ahem, adjusted
for proper exposure......
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyYto9H85Gw&feature=player_embedded
LonniOn 7/7/2012 1:16 PM, Gary Fleck wrote:
>
>
>
> The Moon Matrix
>
> http://hollowplanet.blogspot.com/
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Teach InfoWest Spam Trap if this mail is spam:
> Spam
> <Vote - CanIt-PRO;
> Not spam
> <Vote - CanIt-PRO;
> Forget previous vote
> <Vote - CanIt-PRO;
>
> *REMEMBER:* Never give out your account information, password, or
> other personal information over e-mail.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
People,
I imagine that most-all of the Mars and Moon images that we get are doctored. But there are all kinds of images that have been released which probably haven't been doctored, such as deep space images. There has to be a reason to doctor an image.
Dean
···
--- In [email protected], Kathy <getnews1@...> wrote:
Every single image?
Doctored?
Do you have evidence of this, or is this just your belief?
And what do you define as 'doctored'?On 7/7/2012 11:45 PM, Brel wrote:
>
> Hi Kathy,
> Unless the person receiving the image, get's It personally, iow, not
> thru the internet, then every single
> image released by NASA has been doctored before anyone from the
> public, including the public scientists,
> sees It.
> This has been known for over ten years, now.
> Kind Regards,
> Bre.
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]