Tibetan Sound Levitation Of
Large Stones Witnessed By Scientist
http://rense.com/general8/stones.htm
I'll pass on Mr. Cater's explanation of this exact phenomena tomorrow.
Dharma/Dean
Jeff,
I'll definitely look into your comments tomorrow, I'm on the run.
It would be interesting to get to the bottom of the Diverging Shadows photo.
I invite you all to look and make a comment:
http://skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index3.html
Again, it is the last photo down and the title reads " Diverging Shadows."
List Members-
None of us is an absolute expert. If anyone knows about photography and
light, please let loose with a comment. Nobody gets shot down on this list,
everyone so far has always been polite to other members, so speak up!
Dharma/Dean
The best guy I have seen re photo analysis is Erol Erkmen. His tutorial on
tuvpo.com is excellent. He also says NASA is staging shots. Rene in his book
"NASA Mooned America" also did a credible job. http://www.waynegreen.com has
Rene's book. Green was the guy that started Byte Magazine way back when. He
no longer owns it. I think he has divested all his publications except 73
magazine and Cold Fusion.
Kirk
···
-----Original Message-----
From: Dean [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 3:34 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Diverging shadows, yes or no?
Jeff,
I'll definitely look into your comments tomorrow, I'm on the run.
It would be interesting to get to the bottom of the Diverging Shadows photo.
I invite you all to look and make a comment:
http://skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index3.html
Again, it is the last photo down and the title reads " Diverging Shadows."
List Members-
None of us is an absolute expert. If anyone knows about photography and
light, please let loose with a comment. Nobody gets shot down on this list,
everyone so far has always been polite to other members, so speak up!
Dharma/Dean
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.230 / Virus Database: 111 - Release Date: 1/25/2001
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.230 / Virus Database: 111 - Release Date: 1/25/2001
The best guy I have seen re photo analysis is Erol Erkmen. His tutorial on
tuvpo.com is excellent. He also says NASA is staging shots. Rene in his
book
"NASA Mooned America" also did a credible job. http://www.waynegreen.com
has
Rene's book. Green was the guy that started Byte Magazine way back when.
He
no longer owns it. I think he has divested all his publications except 73
magazine and Cold Fusion.
Kirk
Kirk,
The diverging shadow image might be from this guy Erol Erkman. I've had it
for a year.
Dean
Jeff,
I just don't feel comfortable with your interpretation below. On a hill or
not on one, the shadows should fall to the same side.
Dharma/Dean
Tibetan Sound Levitation Of
Large Stones Witnessed By ScientistTibetan Sound Levitation Of Large Stones Witnessed By Scientist
List Members,
I have attached Mr. Cater's explanation on the Tibetan sound levitation of
large stones.
Mr. Cater defines that gravity effects are caused by electromagnetic
radiation generated from within the Earth's shell. This radiation is
negatively charged.
Mr. Cater explains that the overall positive charge of the stone was
diminished and that the negative charge became prominent. This means that
the levitation came about as a result of repulsion, i.e., antigravity.
This concept is revolutionary in various ways. In relation to the hollow
Earth theory, this concept provides a strong defense and justification. One
big complaint about the HET comes from the Newtonian concept of gravity
related to the density of mass. If the Newtonian concept of gravity were
true, then the shell of a hollow planet would tend to collapse in upon the
cavity, unless the shell were extremely thick. Such a shell wouldn't leave
much space in the hollow portion, though, such that no type of inner sun
would be able to exist without scorching the inner surface.
Huge caverns, the size of regions and even continents, as well as oceans,
are said to exist within the shell of the Earth. Given gravity related to
the density of matter, the superior crusts would come crashing down upon
such caverns, caving them in, so to speak. If we conceive of gravity as a
electromagnetic radiation, however, the force of gravity would diminish the
more one penetrated because the radiation would meet other forces which
oppse its progress, basically. This would relieve the pressure of gravity
from above.
And remember- Clouds Don't Fall!
http://skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index8.html
Dharma/Dean
Members,
Here is a little snippet from Rod M. Cluff's book Our Hollow Earth:
www.ourhollowearth.com
Concerning this warm wind, explorer Peary writes on pages 214 and 215 of his
work: " I expected to hear later of our February foehn in other parts of
Greenland, and I was not disappointed. Lieutenant Ryder was living for nine
months at Scoresby Sound, on the coast of East Greenland, while we were at
McCormick Bay. He was about four hundred and fifty geographical miles south
of us. The maximum temperatures he recorded occurred in February and May. He
says (Petermanns Mittheilungen, XI, 1892, p. 256) that these high
temperatures were due to severe foehn storms, one of which, in February
suddenly, raised the thermometer to 50 F, 8 degrees higher than my
instruments had recorded." Foehn storms are warm winded storms which come
out of the north (Arctic) in winter. "
Admiral Peary, the Arctic explorer, related temperatures of 50* F and 42* F
in Greenland in the middle of the winter, and not in Southern Greenland.
Warm temperatures in the Arctic are not uncommon, Nansen experienced such
warm temperatures near the Pole that he woke up one morning at 2:00 AM due
to the heat. Warm temperatures have been typically reported by explorers in
the Arctic. This phenomenon really smacks of an opening to the hollow
portion of the Earth.
Later,
Dharma/Dean
Hi Dean,
Dean wrote:
Jeff,
I just don't feel comfortable with your interpretation below. On a hill or
not on one, the shadows should fall to the same side.
You can reproduce a change of shadow angle (from a third party perspective)
using a piece of paper, a light source, a pencil and a stack of books
as I mentioned earlier. For example
pencil--> |
> () <-- light source
>
____________ <-- paper
/
/ ==========
/ ==========
···
==========
^Stack of books
Now, flex the piece of paper (on the left end) up and down.
From the perspective shown , view the shadow effects on
the paper from the pencil. The shadow will appear to rise
as the paper rises. (i.e. a changing shadow angle but only
from the perspective of a third party.) Hopefully, that
makes sense.
Jeff
Jeff,
I now follow your logic, but I am going to try the shadow experiment at
home.
Those astronauts were close together, though, don't you think? That is quite
an apparent divergence for two people so close together.
I hope you don't lose your patience. Nobody really needs that particular pic
to disprove Apollo, there are plenty of Apollo pics around which don't jive.
But I am curious because, if it is an airtight case, that pic becomes
dramatic, obvious evidence.
I'll probably harp on it again later on.
# : ^ )