The Hollow Earth

ALLPLANETS-HOLLOW Yahoo Group (Old Posts)
1

Dear Dean

       You probably already know, but just in the case you don't, Jan
Lamprecht will be talking to Ian Punnett on the Art Bell coast to
coast AM program tonight, 2/1/01, about the hollow Earth. The format
of the program is pretty bad right now with all the commercials, and
Ian is a serious drag to have to listen to, but hey, the topic of
discussion is the hollow earth. Also Dean Why do we never have people
like yourself and Sadaputa talking to Art and people like him explain-
ing Krsna consciousness and all the wonderful things that you guys
know? I'm sick of listening to all these mundane "scientists" along
with all manner of bonehead mistaking the subtle body for the soul.

  We appreciate you Dean

  Kevin

···

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

2

Members,

The inner sun and the outer, simultaneously, and at the same time, too.

# ; ^ )

Olaf Jansen wandered, with his father on their family fishing boat, into the
polar opening to the hollow portion of the Earth. At a point very far along,
they first noticed the inner sun. I think that it is interesting that Olaf
mentioned the the regular sun was " high in the heavens," and that at "
about that time " they sighted what became the inner sun low on the horizon.
Having both of them visible during the same time period kind of rules out
the possibility of an over-the-horizon mirage of the real sun. That is the
complaint against what Nansen saw. Since Nansen's crew saw their mirage
during the Arctic night and since Nansen didn't say in which direction it
came from, we can't be absolutely sure that it 'wasn't a mirage, i.e.,
over-the-horizon reflection of the regular sun. But Olaf's comments are
different. Here they are:

" I found myself wanting to sleep much of the time; whehter it was the
effect of the exciting experience of sailing in unknown waters, or the
relaxation from the awful excitement incident to our adventure in a storm at
sea, or due to want of food, I could not say. I frequently lay down on the
bunker of our little sloop, and looked far up into blue dome of the sky;
and, notwithstanding the sun was shining far away in the east, I always saw
a single star overhead. For several days, when I looked for this star, it
was always there directly above us. It was now, according to our reckoning,
aboout the first of August. The sun was high in the heavens, and was so
bright that I could no longer see the one lone star that attracted my
attention a few days earlier. One day about this time, my father startled me
by calling my attention to a novel sight far in front of us, almost at the
horison. "It is a mock sun," exclaimed my father. "I have read of them; it
is called a reflection or mirage. It will soon pass away." But this
dull-red, false sun, as we supposed it to be, did not pass away for several
hours; and while we were unconscious of its emitting any rays of light,
still there was no time thereafter when we could not sweet the horizon and
locate the illumination of the so-called false sun, during a period of at
least twelve hours out of every twenty-four. Clouds and mists would at times
almost, but never entirely, hide its location. Gradually it seemed to climb
higher in the horizon of the uncertain purply sky as we advanced. It could
hardly be said to resemble the sun, except in its circular shape, and when
not obscured by clouds or the ocean mists, it had a hazy-red, bronzed
appearance, which would change to a white like a luminous cloud, as if
reflecting some greater light beyond. We finally agreed in our discussion of
this smoky furnace-colored sun, that, whatever the cause of the phenomenon,
it was not a reflection of our sun, but a planet of some sort - a reality."
http://skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index2.html

Here are some of Nansen's comments as quoted in my article Seven Days North
of Tibet:

" Friday, February 16th. Hurrah! A meridian observation today shows 80* 01'
North latitude ... " Today another noteworthy thing happened, which was that
about midday we saw the sun, or to be more correct, an image of the sun, for
it was only a mirage. A peculiar impression was produced by the sight of
that glowing fire lit just above the outermost edge of the ice. According to
the enthusiastic descriptions given by many Arctic travelers of the first
appearance of this god of life after the long winter night, the impression
ought to be one of jubilant excitement; but it was not so in my case. We had
not expected to see it for some days yet, so that my feeling was rather one
of pain, of disappointment, that we must have drifted farther south than we
thought. So it was with pleasure I soon discovered that it could not be the
sun itself. The mirage was at first a flattened-out, glowing red streak of
fire on the horizon; later there were two streaks, the one above the other,
with a dark space between; and from the maintop I could see four, or even
five, such horizontal lines directly over one another, all of equal length,
as if one could only imagine a square, dull-red sun, with horizontal dark
streaks across it." Today another noteworthy thing happened, which was that
about midday, we saw the Sun, or, to be more correct, an image of the Sun,
for it was only a mirage."

Page 162: " Monday, February 19th. ... Both today and yesterday we have seen
the mirage of the Sun again; today it was high above the horizon, and almost
seemed to assume a round, disk-like form.

Initially, Dr. Nansen became rather depressed when the sun appeared low on
the horizon, as that would be an indication of yet another supposed error in
navigation and place them quite to the South. But this sun appeared " high
on the horizion ", although they were still experiencing the Arctic night.
It would still be a week before the tip top of the Sun would make an
appearance, so any Sun appearing already so " high " above the horizon would
naturally be considered a mirage by them."

Friday, February 16th. Hurrah! A meridian observation today shows 80* 01'
North latitude ... " Today another noteworthy thing happened, which was that
about midday we saw the sun, or to be more correct, an image of the sun, for
it was only a mirage. A peculiar impression was produced by the sight of
that glowing fire lit just above the outermost edge of the ice. According to
the enthusiastic descriptions given by many Arctic travelers of the first
appearance of this god of life after the long winter night, the impression
ought to be one of jubilant excitement; but it was not so in my case. We had
not expected to see it for some days yet, so that my feeling was rather one
of pain, of disappointment, that we must have drifted farther south than we
thought. So it was with pleasure I soon discovered that it could not be the
sun itself. The mirage was at first a flattened-out, glowing red streak of
fire on the horizon; later there were two streaks, the one above the other,
with a dark space between; and from the maintop I could see four, or even
five, such horizontal lines directly over one another, all of equal length,
as if one could only imagine a square, dull-red sun, with horizontal dark
streaks across it." Today another noteworthy thing happened, which was that
about midday, we saw the Sun, or, to be more correct, an image of the Sun,
for it was only a mirage."

Page 162: " Monday, February 19th. ... Both today and yesterday we have seen
the mirage of the Sun again; today it was high above the horizon, and almost
seemed to assume a round, disk-like form.

Initially, Dr. Nansen became rather depressed when the sun appeared low on
the horizon, as that would be an indication of yet another supposed error in
navigation and place them quite to the South. But this sun appeared " high
on the horizion ", although they were still experiencing the Arctic night.
It would still be a week before the tip top of the Sun would make an
appearance, so any Sun appearing already so " high " above the horizon would
naturally be considered a mirage by them.

http://skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index5.html

Dharma/Dean

3

Members,

The American Lunar Society is a very good Lunar site. It has lots of photos:

http://otterdad.dynip.com/als/

And do they ever have links!

I have attached an image of the crater Alphonsus, imaged by a guy named E.
Douglas, which is on the above site. I think that it is a good example of
the point or points which Mr. Cater tries to make in chapter 15 of his book
The Ultimate Reality.
http://www.healthresearchbooks.com/Authors/joseph_cater.htm

Mr. Cater points out that the mainstream theories of crater formation are
not tenable. Look at the picture of Alphonsus. A knob of a mountain ( a huge
knob ) in the middle, a flat floor all around, a fairly uniform radius; it
wan't formed by an impact crater, nor was it filled in by lava.

An impact Crater wouldn't leave a hill in the middle, and an impact by a
meteor would have a depth conmeasurate with its width. An impact crater
which created some of those craters would have rent in two the Moon. Nor
could lava have flowed in evenly and have covered scores of miles so evenly-
lava flows create mountains, such as Hawaii.

Mr. Cater will explain below how a particle beam would leave a signature
hill specifically in the middle of a Crater, and why the craters have such a
lateral extension.

I am glad that we have soft particle physics to call on. With one short post
anbd a paragraph by Mr. Cater, we can arrive at conclusions which even
altenative astronomy sites, which are dedicated to this kind of stuff, don't
even touch, and for us it is just something extra that we do in stride.

" THE ORIGIN OF MOON CRATERS

The concensus seems to be that moon craters are caused by the impact
of meteors. This is consistent with the quality of logic displayed in other
areas of orthodox cosmology. The diameter of most of these craters is
disproportionally great compared to their depth. A true impact crater
has a depth commensurate with its diameter. An impact great enough to
produce a crater with a diameter of some size on the moon would shatter the
entire moon, since it is hollow with a relatively thin shell. To wit:
some craters have a mountain in the center. It is significant that, in all
cases in which the crater has a mountain, the mountain is always in the
center. How did it ever escape destruction?

The only logical answer is that the craters were produced by particlebeam
weapons during the great interplanetary war. This, no doubt, was the one
mentioned earlier, when the planet Maldek was destroyed. Other planetary
bodies show similar craters, for instance, Mercury, Mars and the moons of
Jupiter.

A concentrated beam of high speed positive charges, preferably protons, can
have devastating effects, if directed against a specific target. The beam by
itself does relatively little damage. It is the after effects that are
destructive. While in motion, the positive charge effects of the particles
comprising the beam are minimal. After they strike the target, they lose
their velocity and a tremendous positive charge is concentrated at the point
of impact. This charge is maintained by incoming particles. A high
concentration of soft and hard electrons converges on the area from all
directions, creating a void in the regions originally occupied by these
particles. Others rush in to fill the void and a chain reaction, or domino
effect, is produced which affects the regions of space at ever increasing
distances around the target area. The number of electrons that converge on
the area is far out of proportion to the number of protons concentrated in
the area.

The ramifications are not difficult to imagine. The soft electrons
congregating there disintegrate and release the hard electrons they contain.
An inordinate concentration of hard electrons is the result, and is far more
than can be absorbed by the protons. First, an implosion and then
an explosion of electrons of colossal proportions are created. Most of the
energy of the explosion is directed outward, since it follows the lines of
least resistance. The number of particles involved and the amount of energy
released can far exceed that of any nuclear device. Since the energy is
directed outward, extremely wide but relatively shallow craters in a
planet's surface result. The principles involved in such destructive forces
are similar to those employed by Wilhelm Reich's cloudbuster, which will be
discussed later. The center of the craters produced would experience a
relatively small disturbance and, consequently, any mountain in the path of
the proton beam would be left standing."

4

Also Dean Why do we never have people

like yourself and Sadaputa talking to Art and people like him explain-
ing Krsna consciousness and all the wonderful things that you guys
know? I'm sick of listening to all these mundane "scientists" along
with all manner of bonehead mistaking the subtle body for the soul.

Kevin,

Another thing about media exposure, I get articles in VNN now and then. I
just had one up for about two weeks, on the nature of time and astrology,
and it helps because VNN gets a lot of hits, maybe a million per month. I
like exposure in magazines and journals because your idea, in written form,
just sits there for a while and people have the chance of studying it
without interference from callers and such. If any of you have any ideas
about on-line journals, or even paper journals where I can send some
articles, then I am all ears.

Why don't a few of you try your hand?

Dharma/Dean

5

Members,

I have a question about space walks, especially way back in the Gemini era.
Those space suits used zippers, at least this is what I have heard. How can
zippers conserve all that pressure in the vacuum of space? Try getting into
one of those pressurized diving suits with the hose connected to the helmet,
have one made up with a zipper on it and see how long you breathe.

Also, think about this- The Moon has a daytime temperature, supposedly, of
250*F. How did they air condition those suits for an hour and forty-five
minutes? What air conditioner, so small, could do that, especially back
then? The real question is, what mobile power source could do that?

So many of our concepts about the configuration of planets comes from the
space programs, but I don't think that you can trust Never A Straight Answer
( NASA ) as far as you can throw a cinder block. So why shouldn't I be open
to the hollow planets theory? If a lie is too bold, nobody will suspect it.

And the university science programs, all across the world, all filled up
with and run by people who swear by the validity of NASA's presentations,
and the presentations of the Russian space programs.

I KNOW that there is an economic conspiracy, fostered by the banking elite
and the petroleum industry, which has infiltrated and even subjugated
governments of the world. But could it be more extensive than we think? I
mean, the average guy doesn't have the time nor the means to scrutinize
Apollo scam properly, but what about the university people?

Something is rotten in Denmark, very rotten.

Dharma/Dean

6

From Seven Days North of Tibet:

Although Nansen did not realize it, the anomalies that he was experiencing
and would continue to experience, as well as the anomalies experienced by
other Artic explorers, would inspire further hollow Earth reseach and,
indeed, become part and parcel of hollow Earth lore. This is only natural,
because one has to search for an explanation for such strange experiences,
i.g., for the fact that they didn't find ice until 79*, even though ice was
to be found at much lower latitudes all around the polar circle. For
example, until they came over as far East as the New Siberian Islands, they
had to closely hug the coast of Russia in order to aviod the ice which
impinged itself upon them. So how could it be that they encountered open,
rolling seas as they shot northwards towards the Pole?

Those familiar with the Hollow Earth Theory would explain that the polar
opening, which they have always had reason to believe is located near the
area where the Fram was navigating, serves as a conduit for warmer air which
can have a dramatic impact within certain Artic areas. And as for the
observations of bird life coming from the North? Did the flight of these
birds originate from the other side of the pole, from deep within the Artic
wastelands of North America? Probably not; but the close proximity of a
polar opening, leading to closer lands, would certainly provide the platform
needed to explain the direction and origin of the bird's flight. In fact,
according to recent radar mapping which indicated low and weak echo
responses in the area, the polar opening could be centered at 141* East
longitude and 84.4* North latitude ( info provided by Rod M. Cluff,
www.ourhollowearth.com ).

Seven Days North of Tibet: http://skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index5.html

7

http://skyboom.com/hollowearthhttp://skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index5.h
tmlpuranas/index8.html

" However, a tenable hollow-Earth, geological model has been presented by
Joseph H. Cater, in his book The Awesome Life Force ( copyrighted in 1982 ).
Throughout the book, the type of alternative physics necessary to support
his hollow-planet model has been unfolded as well.

By alternative physics is meant the physics of saft particles. Mr. Cater
outlines how radiation from the Sun interacts with the fundamental particles
of matter within the Earth's shell and experience a redistribution of
frequency ( lower ). This concept is important because it is from within the
Earth that the bulk of these electromagnetic forces are generated- forces
which produce the gravitational field of the Earth, and account for
geological processes such as earthquakes, volcanoes, and continental drift.
Mr. Cater describes how these soft particles actually penetrate through the
shell of the Earth, only to be repelled by the gravitational field of the
inner surface towards the center of the hollow cavity, thus forming the
inner sun. The soft particles are invisible as they stream out through the
polar openings until they begin to disintegrate, at which time they release
the harder particles camouflaged within."

···

From: A Hollow Earth, Geological Model, third article down:

8

Members,

The following piece is from the article You could Learn a Lot from a Daitya:
http://skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index13.html

Let's say that the article is my take on the book Etidorhpa, a book which is
a hollow earth classic. Below the article is the ENTIRE book Etidorhpa,
complete with drawings. Do investigate. Here is the piece from the article:

The book Etidorhpa described this amazing trip through the caverns of the
inner earth in detail. It also presented some of the philosophy and
sci-entific truths the guide imparted to this man.

The author [ Joseph H. Cater narrating ] was astounded when he read the
book, since it confirmed many of the new ideas he had already formulated. In
fact, some of the factual material presented in the book enabled him to
extend the new concepts to a more comprehensive view of the universe. It was
then pos-sible to explain many things not properly resolved in the book.
According to Etidorhpa, the shell of the hollow earth is 800 miles thick,
which an analysis of the satellite pictures confirms. Gravity at the 25-mile
depth was one-third normal earth gravity. From that level, gravi-ty
decreased gradually until it disappeared at the 700-mile depth. At that
point, the narrative ended. The reasons for these conditions were not
giv-en, but they are to be expected from the principles already outlined. "

Mr. Cater feels that, if ever there were a book written as fiction in order
to present a great truth, then Etidorhpa was such a book.

One of the two main protagonists of the book was The-Man-That-Did-It. This
person is referred to as the " stranger " by Mr. Cater above. He seemed to
play a passive role in the book as he was led by The Guide through the shell
of the Earth on a subterrainian tour, though he turned out to be a very
brave and wise man as he obviously comprehended and passed his tests, for
which reason he was referred to in the book as The-Man-Who-Did-It (
Henceforth, we shall simply refer to him as The Man. ) . Rod M. Cluff, a
hollow Earth researcher, had the following to say about The Man: " A fellow
hollow Earth researcher, Bruce Walton, came to the conclusion that the
nameless person was actually William Morgan. I have a copy of the book
Morgan wrote on Free Masonry. It makes perfect sense that he was taken by
the Free Masons who faked his death and sent him on a life-long journey to
inner earth through a cavern in Kentucky. No mention is made of polar
openings in this book."

The way in which The Man was abducted by a network of people allied with
underground beings strongly suggests that, especially by now, some 150 years
later, institutions of the surface world could be quite infiltrated.

Of as much interest to us as the man was the Guide, referred to as the cave
dweller by Mr. Cater. He was described in the book as a man with " ... a
forehead which extended from crown to cheekbone in an unbroken plane (
eyeless ) ... [ with ] a body color of light blue putty [ which ] glistened
in the sunlight like the slimy hide of a water dog, [ with ] a chubby tip of
an abortive nose without nostrils ... cold, clammy hands ... sappy skin from
which moisture seemed to ooze, as from the hide of a water lizard." The
description of The Guide reminds us of descriptions of UFO occupants, with
their small noses and grey complexions. The way his skin is described with
the words " sappy " and " moisture " smacks of the slimy surface of a
mushroom; indeed, this denizen of the underworld was not a sun-based
biological entity. It occurs to us that he was a Daitya, a follower of
Shukra Acharya, the Daitya Guru, the preceptor of a race of beings who take
an opposite stance to the demigod followers of Vishnu. The role of Shukra in
Puranic lore corresponds to Venus in the West. Why do we suspect that The
Guide was a Daitya-follower of Shukra Acharya in particular? As the book
unfolds, and particularly, when the book ends, the Guide is revealed as a
highly placed, confidential functionary of Aphrodite- Etidorhpa is Aphrodite
spelled backwards- who according to Vedic lore is but the daughter of Venus,
not actually the predominating deity of the planet itself.

Careful consideration of the phenomena experienced in Etidorhpa will allow
the reader to decide for him or herself if the book actually describes
knowledge, scientific truths, and the mysteries of the inner shell and
hollow Earth, as well as whether or not an understanding of Mr. Cater's soft
particle physics is able to bring rational justification to the book. Our
consideration can begin on page 193.

While conversing about the configuration of continents, The Guide
illuminated his charge by saying: " You argue from an erroneous hypothesis.
The Earth is neither rigid nor solid."
" True," I answered. " If it were solid I could not be a hundred miles
beneath its surface in conversation with another being; but there cannot be
many such cavities as that which we are now traversing, and they cannot
surely extend entirely through its mass; the great weight of the
superincumbent material would crush together the strongest materials, if a
globe as large as our earth were extensively honeycombed in this manner."

" Quite the contrary," he replied; " and here let me, for the first time,
enlighten you as to the interior structure of the terrestrial globe. The
earth-forming principle consists of an invisible sphere of energy that,
spinning through space, supports the space dust which collects on it, as
dust on a bubble. By gradual accumulation of substance on that sphere a
hollow ball has resulted, on the outer surface of which you have hitherto
dwelt. The crust of the earth is comparatively thin, not more than eight
hundred miles in average, thickness, and is held in position by the central
sphere of energy that now exists at a distance about seven hundred miles
beneath the ocean level. The force inherent to this sphere manifests itself
upon the matter which it supports on both sides, rendering matter the
lighter the nearer it lies to the center sphere. In other words, let me say
to you: `The crust, or shell, which I have just described as being but about
eight hundred miles in thickness is firm and solid on both its convex and
concave surface, but gradually loses in weight, whether we penetrate from
the outer surface toward the center, or from any point of the inner surface
towards the outside, until at the central sphere matter has no weight at
all.' Do you conceive my meaning?"

" Yes," I replied; "I understand you."

Here the guide is explaining that huge caverns and cavities deep within the
Earth's inner shell do not typically collapse due to the weight of the Earth
above them because the effects of gravity diminish the deeper one
penetrates.

On page 201 we can see that, the deeper the pair penetrated the Earth's
shell, the less exhaustive was simple movement thanks to a diminuition of
gravity:
" ... we had been rapidly walking, or I should better say advancing, for we
no longer walked as men do, but skipped down into the Earth, down, ever
downward. ... I was sensible of a marked decrease of muscular energy
required to carry us onward, and I realized that my body was quite exempt
from weariness. Motion became restful instead of exhausting, and it seemed
to me that the ratio of the loss of weight, as shown by our free movements,
in proportion to the distance we traversed, was greater than formerly. The
slightest exhibition of propelling force cast us rapidly forward. Instead of
the laborious, short step of upper earth, a single leap would carry us many
yards. A slight spring, and with our bodies in space, we would skip several
rods, alighting gently, to move again as easily. I marveled, for, although I
had been led to anticipate something unusual, the practical evidence was
wonderfully impressive, and I again questioned my guide.

We are now nearing what physicists would call the center of gravity," he
replied, arid our weight is rapidly diminishing. This is in exact accordance
with the laws that govern the force called gravitation, which, at the
earth's surface, is apparently uniform, though no instrument known to man
can demonstrate its exact variation ... as we descend into the Earth."

9

From Venus, Venera Nine and the Puranas:
http://skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index4.html

This picture of Venus, taken by the Venera 13 space probe, corresponds to
astronomer's typical descriptions of the planet- that it is a lifeless
desert. Does such a description invalidate the Puranic descriptions of life
on other planets, including the ones along " Bhu Mandala," the plane of the
planetary orbits, our solar system?

Maybe the question really is, can we trust this picture? The Venera 9
lander, for example, passed through an upper atmosphere in which clouds
swirl around at 360 kilometers per hour, and reported a surface temperature
of 900* F. We are assured that the lander carried an ample cooling system
for its mission, but we all may want to ask what material the parachute was
made of! It opened up at 60 kilometers above the surface of the planet. Even
assuming that the craft was able to parachute through the 360 kilometer per
hour winds, the question remains: What could that parachute have been made
of that it did not melt nor burn during a 60 kilometer descent at 900*F?
NASA ( Never A Straight Answer ) seems to have met its match in the Russian
space agency.

10

According the the hollow Earth model, however, the inner sun is the direct
source of the charged particles which form the auroral display. Joseph H.
Cater, in his book The Ultimate Reality, presents an inner sun model whereby
the rays of the inner sun consist of soft particles.

http://skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index7.html

According the the hollow Earth model of Joseph H. Cater, however, the inner
sun is the direct source of the charged particles which form the auroral
display. In his book The Ultimate Reality, presents an inner sun model
whereby the rays of the inner sun consist of soft particles.

Astronomers do not have a complete picture insofar as the actual origin of
the particles which bring about the auroral display, as the soft particles
emanating from the Earth's interior sun have been outside of the purview of
NASA's instrumentation. Mr. Joseph H. Cater elaborates on this point on page
92 of The Ultimate Reality:

" From an orthodox standpoint there is no way this ring effect can logically
be explained and all attempts have been devoid of sound thinking. From what
has just been presented ( in Mr. Cater's book ) , the explanation is
obvious. The central sun would naturally radiate high concentrations of soft
electrons in all directions. Those whose paths take them close to the edge
of the opening will encounter much of the Earth's atmosphere. Many of these
will tend to disintegrate as they pass through the atmosphere. Most of these
disintegrations will occur some distance above the Earth's surface as they
leave the opening. Those whose paths are further from the edge, including
the center, will encounter little or no atmosphere, and thus travel to outer
space without disintegrating. A ring effect is the result. Although this
ring is close to the North Pole, it could not be centered there, but must be
offset a few hundred miles, since previous satellite pictures show this
opening to be in the vicinity of the magnetic pole in northern Canada.

···

From: A New Dawn for Hollow Earthers:

11

Members,

Here is a little piece from the Book of Marshall B. Gardner, a hollow
Earther from yesteryear, and a man who did a lot to give the hollow Earth
theory its modern start, and a man who gave very good justification to the
theory. He basically organized and interpreted the results of all the Arctic
exploration up to that time and interpreted it very well according to the
hollow Earth ( HE ) perspective.

Gardner relates how it was the Lord Barrington was one of the first to
assert that the Pole was attainable, or nearly so, by sea, and there was, at
least at times, open polar seas in the vicinity. This brought on the later
exploration to the area, which exposed the world to the Arctic anomalies,
such as Arctic warming, which are so suggestive of the HE.

Here is Gardner:

" At that time, too, it was the generally perceived notion that there was a
perpetual barrier of ice whose boundries corresponded more or less to a
latitude of 80 � degrees and that any discovery of the regions north of that
would have to be made by a sort of wind-propelled sled, a mechanism actually
used for traveling over the ice by the Dutch.

HIS REPORT TO THE ROYAL SOCIETY
This idea Barrington combatted. He recalled to the Royal Society that as
early as 1663 its secretary at that time had examined a traveler lately
returned from Greenland, and that this traveler had told of a Hollander
captain who claimed that he had come within half a degree of the pole, and
corroborated it by showing his journal, the entries entries being attested
by his mate. Now, in view of later explorations it does not matter just how
accurate that sailor was-the point is simply that even in those early days
it was possible to get much nearer the pole than was supposed at the time,
and simply for the reason that the water was open as one went north.

But Barrington has instance after instance of the same kind. He mentions in
particualr two Hollander whalers who- in the seventeenth century- sailed to
89 degrees and found no ice but " a free and open sea." ( the pole is at
90* )."

Here is another piece from his book about open polar seas:

OPEN WATER AND WARMER

Now here is testimony of the most unimpeachable character and it is as plain
as it is unimpeachable. There is no misunderstanding it. We find Greely ten
degrees farther north than Lieutenant Ray, finding not merelv that the winds
and waters were warmer than further south but that this warmth was so
constant that the ground thawed to a depth of thirty feet. We find that
whenever water flowed from the north pole it was warmer than when it flowed
from the south. We find that there is no sea of " ancient ice " as Nares and
explorers before him thought but that there is an open polar basin with
strong currents. Now if that open water that stopped Greely were only a
small sea that did not extend very far, there would be no such currents in
it as are described above. Those currents testify to the fact that here is a
sea which does extend to the northern regions. Of course Greely could not
imagine how those warm currents could come from the north and he could not
account for the strong currents in the sea. But our reader, who remembers
the conformation of the polar regions, can easily see how these things would
be. The water insid the polar orifices, warmed by the inner sun, would
naturally form a very strong current as it met the cooler waters of the
outside polar regions. Quite as naturally that water would keep clear from
ice the great polar sea. Ice from the south could only come up to a certain
point, the point where Greely and other discoverers found " open water ",
and after that the sea would get warmer and warmer. It is interesting to
note that one of the people interviewed in regard to the Greely discoveries
at the same time as the other speeches and interviews were made, which we
have quoted, said that further Arctic exploration had better be postponed
until air ships could be built with which to undertake it. Well, at the time
that may not have sounded like a practical suggestion, but it is now a thing
of the very near future. And we shall see then just what one would expect
from the observations made by Greely. For there is only one possible
explanation for them and that is the explanation given in this book."

I know that some of the members have already been exposed to some of this,
but it doesn't hurt to hear it again, the logic of the arguments only
becomes reinforced. Some of the new people, and there are a lot of them,
need to get some orientation.

Gardner's book, which I highly recommend, is called A JOURNEY TO THE
EARTH'S INTERIOR. It is available from Health Research, who are the largest
distributor of hollow Earth books in the world:
http://www.healthresearchbooks.com/categories/hollowearth.htm

Dharma/Dean

12

Members,

Some really great NOAA Arctic maps. Their bathymetry map is nice, I am going
to post it on my site.

Dharma/Dean

http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/maps.html

13

Members,

Who can help me interpret the Arctic Oscillations in the Zonal Wind? Can we
say that the wind is emanating from the 84.4 * North area, 141* East, and
then spreading out? This would be suggestive of an Arctic Polar opening.

http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/maps.html

Dharma/Dean

14

NOAA aurora map.

http://sec.noaa.gov/pmap/index.html

Dharma/Dean

15

List Members,

I have attached an image of Jupiter's aurora. On the fifth title down, I
have posted a larger image, along with this explanation, on my site:
http://skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index7.html

" All the outer planets were found by Voyager to have auroral lights. This
was a surprise to space scientists, because they have assumed that auroras
on Earth are caused by the impact of the solar wind on the atmosphere above
the Poles. However, with Voyager's discoveries of auroras on the outer
planets which are located so far from the sun that any solar wind reaching
them is far too weak to cause their auroras, scientists have begun looking
for another power source that could cause the auroras." From: Uranus is
Hollow by Rod M. Cluff: www.ourhollowearth.com

An inner sun which radiates soft particle light fits the bill very well.
Such light particles camouflage the more conventional harder particles,
break up into their constituent, visible light upon experiencing friction-
this happens while passing through the atmospheres of the outer planets- and
in this way form the auroral display.

Dharma/Dean

16

On the same page as the Jupiter aurora there is an image of an aurora, and
the title reads " Aurora in the Absense of Solar Winds."

That actually happened at one point- supposedly the soalr winds cause the
aurora, but this time there was no solar wind, yet an auroral display
ocurred. The NASA spokesperson chalked it up to an electron beam which must
have originated from the Sun, but hey, that doesn't cut the mustard.

According to Mr. Cater's hollow Earth model involving soft particles, the
aurorae are caused by soft particles which emanate from the inner sun after
building up within the inner cavity. This accounts for the lack of absolute
synchronicity between sunspot activity and auroral displays.

The soft particle light isn't visible on its way out of the polar openings-
once it experiences friction with the Earth's atmosphere, then it breaks up
into its visible, constituent light.

http://skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index7.html

I'll get an explanation up beneath that picture before the end of the week,
but at least you all know what the idea is. Take a look at these images,
they are very interesting.

Dharma/Dean

17

I already got up the explanation for that " In the Absense of Solar Winds "
image of an aurora. It is better than before, and reproduced below. But do
go look at the pic.

http://skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index7.html

It is well-known that charged particles have a causitive role in the auroral
displays. Astronomers tell that these electrons and protons arrive in the
solar winds and cause the auroras to light up when they hit atmospheric
atoms such as Oxygen and Nitrogen, which then give off light as the aurora.

But there is a lack of synchronicity between the solar winds and the auroral
display. This lack of synchronicity was summed up very nicely by Jan
Lamprecht in Hollow Planets: " Firstly, the cause and effect between the
Sun's output of charged particles, and subsequent aurora, is extremely
loose. Over a long period of time, there is without question a statistical
link between the two. However, on a short-term basis this is not so. For
example, the light emitted by the Sun takes 8 minutes to reach the Earth
though the charged particles from the Sun move at anything from 15 million
to 52 million miles per day, there is no fixed link between solar flares and
auroras. One expect each solar outpouring to be accompanied by an aurora
within 2 days or a week of that event. However this is not always the case.
Sometimes, solar flares can occur for days or even weeks on end and there
will be no resultant aurora." Insofar as this statement is concerned, we
whole-heartedly agree with Jan.

The lack of synchronicity is explained by the existence of so-called "
magnetic bottles " around the Earth which store up the charged particles,
which later on undergo acceleration and a triggering to actually cause the
aurora. But the mechanism which causes the acceleration is not known, and
none of this can really be tracked nor measured. This is a theory, no more,
it has not been absolutely proven.

On May 11, 1999, an event occured which threw a monkey wrench into the
works, so to speak. NASA emitted the following explanation for an " unusual
" auroral display in the absense of solar winds which carry charged parged
particles. The NASA statement is as follows:

Unusual Aurora During Solar Wind Dropout
Credit: PIXIE, POLAR, NASA

Explanation: On May 10, for some unknown reason, the Solar Wind virtually
stopped. Normally our Sun emits a wind of between five and ten energetic
particles per cubic centimeter moving outward at about 500 kilometers per
second. Late on May 10, however, this gale was reduced to a mere breeze of
one particle per every five cubic centimeters. The Sun's Corona was suddenly
able to flow out into the Solar System relatively unimpeded, creating beams
of energetic electrons. One such beam apparently reached Earth's North
Magnetic Pole, and was seen as the unusual X-ray aurora digitally
reconstructed in the above false-color image. Our atmosphere absorbed the
electrons. This display gave direct evidence, however, that Earth's North
Magnetic Pole was connected to the Sun, while the Earth's South Magnetic
Pole connected to the distant Solar System. The Solar Wind returned to
normal on May 12.

A display in the absence of solar wind is unlikely given the current model,
to say the least, because the very cause of the display are the charged
particles which arrive from the sun in the solar winds. The NASA explanation
attributes the phenomena to: " beams of energetic electrons. One such beam
apparently reached Earth's North Magnetic Pole, and was seen as the unusual
X-ray aurora."

Let us examine this NASA statement. Usually, when a spokesperson offers a
rational for an event, it is the rationale which justifies the event. Here,
the opposite is true. The NASA spokesperson does not offer any empiric
evidence for the cause of the aurora. Rather, he starts at the end result
and works his way back to a justification. He explains that, because there
was an aurora in the absence of solar winds, that there must have been a
beam reaching from the corona of the Sun to the North Pole. The spokesman
uses the word " apparently." In other words, an assumption is being made.
This explanation gives new meaning to NASA's nick name " Never A Straight
Answer."

The solid planet model offers little alternative. For this reason the NASA
spokesperson had to suggest that the charged electrons just arrived somehow,
maybe in a " beam. "

According Mr. Cater's hollow Earth model, however, the inner sun is the
direct source of the charged particles of the auroral display. Joseph H.
Cater, in his book The Ultimate reality, presents an inner sun model whereby
the rays of the inner sun consist of invisible particles of light in the
lower frequency ranges, called soft particles by Mr. Cater.

It seems apparent that the irradiation of soft particles from the Earth's
inner sun has escaped NASA's attention.

Dharma/Dean

18

Members, I ran this image by the list about six months ago, but now I have
decided to put it up on the site. Again, NASA credulity is not so high with
me. The image is attached

" This is a NASA image which I snatched off of some site.

Again, given a single light source on the Moon, there shouldn't be any
difference in the angle of the shadow. The angles are rather far apart, and
not easily explainable otherwise, if at all."

http://skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index3.html

Dharma/Dean

19

Dean wrote:

Again, given a single light source on the Moon, there shouldn't be any
difference in the angle of the shadow. The angles are rather far apart, and
not easily explainable otherwise, if at all."

http://skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index3.html

I think I can reproduce this bottom photo with a piece of paper,
a pencil, a few books, and a light source.

My experiment shows that if the photo hasn't been modified
then the guy on the right is probably going down a hill. The
guy on the left is at the bottom of a hill to the left of him.

If you assume that the surface they are walking on is flat
then it would be easy to get confused or for it to appear
abnormal.

That's one interpretation anyway,

Jeff

20

Membvers,

Below I have copied an exchange between The Guide and The Man That Did It,
from the book Etidorhpa. Etidorhpa is a hollow Earth classic, it describes a
journey through the shell of the Earth. Although it may be couched in
fiction, Joseph H. Cater feels that the phenomena described corresponds
closely to the inner-shell environment which soft particle ( orgone )
physics dictates.

Etidorhpa:

" Lost in contemplation, I unconsciously asked the mental question:
' Where are the shadows?'

My guide replied:
' You have been accustomed to lakes on the surface of the earth; water that
is illuminated from above; now you see by a light that is developed from
within and below, as well as from above. There is no outside point of
illumination, for the light of this cavern, as you know, is neither
transmitted through an overlying atmosphere nor radiated from a luminous
center. It is an inherent quality, and as objects above us and within the
lake are illuminated alike from all sides, there can be no shadows.'''

The idea is that light composed of soft particles penetrate the Earth's
shell. This is especially true of low frequency, soft particle light. When
particles vary in frequency, they don't interfere with each other and tend
to pass through each other. Soft particles are generated within the Earth's
crust and shell; initially, by an interaction between sunlight, the
fundamental particles of the Earth's matter and ether. Ether is such a
subtle particle that it flows eveywhere in the cosmos. Photon particles are
formed when ether compacts and adheres, and photon particles group together
to form the fundamental particles such as electrons. Mr. Cater gives a
justification for this process and explains it very well in his book The
Ultimate Reality. He explains it in various chapters, from a simple level to
one more complex.

In order to understand the significance of the above passage, think of it
this way- you already have some idea of how soft particles, also different
in frequency, pass through the Earth's shell. Now keep this in mind- they
camouflage hard particles of light and amend their properties, such as
visibility itself! I won't go into how at the moment, either, because it is
too technical; best to get Cater's book.
http://www.healthresearchbooks.com/Authors/joseph_cater.htm
But the idea is that when soft particles experience friction with each other
on their way through, the less stable of them tend to break apart and
release visible light. In this way light begins to manifest within the
Earth's crust as an omnipresent luminosity, therefore, no shadows. This is
because there is not exactly a pinpoint source of light, it is a matter of
light particles just " popping " out at this depth or at that. At first
only a little, further down much more strongly. This breakup only begins
after about 15 miles below the surface. All of this is described in
Etidorhpa.

This is the kind of presentation which makes this list special. There are
other lists which talk about the Hollow Earth, and lists which talk about
orgone energy/soft particles. But this is the only list which brings up the
role of soft particles in geological processes, and Mr. Cater's soft
particle, hollow planet geological model is the only cohesive geological
model in the world, bar none! Conventional science can field a solid planet
model, but I wouldn't exactly call it cohesive.

It is only by incorporating soft particles into the geological model that
the book Etidorhpa can be understood, Etidorhpa comes to life through Mr.
Cater's soft particles explanations.

I have Etidorhpa posted on my site:
http://skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index13.html
It begins at the second template down

Dharma/Dean