Group,
Stuart Swerdlow says that we did go to the Moon,
but because they did see beings, structures, etc.,
they did the filming of the landing elsewhere, and
that is why the film/pictures can debunk the actual
landing on the Moon.
Mike, NYC
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I have to concur, since I inadvertently became part of an experiment on the missing 'a.'
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2011 5:11 PM
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Re: The Apollo Hoax
Group,
Stuart Swerdlow says that we did go to the Moon,
but because they did see beings, structures, etc.,
they did the filming of the landing elsewhere, and
that is why the film/pictures can debunk the actual
landing on the Moon.
Mike, NYC
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Mike and All
What they did, IMHO, was go to the Moon in some other vehicle, such as a back-engineered saucer, or a recovered one, and they filmed the whole hoax ahead of time. They went, but certainly not in that Apollo. (You couldn't get to Hoboken in that thing.)
I am not the originator of this theory.
Dean
--- In [email protected], C Greenwood <protectingconnie@...> wrote:
I have to concur, since I inadvertently became part of an experiment on the missing 'a.'
From: "mm48ny@..." <mm48ny@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2011 5:11 PM
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Re: The Apollo HoaxGroup,
Stuart Swerdlow says that we did go to the Moon,
but because they did see beings, structures, etc.,
they did the filming of the landing elsewhere, and
that is why the film/pictures can debunk the actual
landing on the Moon.Mike, NYC
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
What's the missing 'a'? Please excuse my ignorance, can you tell us more??
--- On Mon, 24/10/11, C Greenwood <[email protected]> wrote:
From: C Greenwood <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [allplanets-hollow] Re: The Apollo Hoax
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Received: Monday, 24 October, 2011, 1:09 AM
I have to concur, since I inadvertently became part of an experiment on the missing 'a.'
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2011 5:11 PM
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Re: The Apollo Hoax
Group,
Stuart Swerdlow says that we did go to the Moon,
but because they did see beings, structures, etc.,
they did the filming of the landing elsewhere, and
that is why the film/pictures can debunk the actual
landing on the Moon.
Mike, NYC
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Of course not, but why not?
I'm about personal EXPERIENCE,
but you want second hand (?)
Anyway, that was von Braun's job.
Although he worked on the saucers, too, he really was a (smart) rocket scientist.
You have no idea how much resources they go through for nothing:
it was THEY [NASA] putting up this hoax to get you to believe a [conspiracy]
not even true to make all the others look foolish for the fence-sitters.
Get it? No?
BTW
Armstrong NEVER said the 'a' and over the course of 25 years
they wanted to know who knew that;
an ESP experiment.
[Evidently there was two of us that knew that]
No, as usual they did not come out with the truth but
called it the missing 'a' like it got lost in transmission [BUNK---HE NEVER SAID IT]
Also why it was put aside for years, to keep you believing the lie.
AND
how hard is it to INSERT an 'a' when they did put it out there
before the 25 years?
Hey "Dean"
Do you also go by "Deon?"
From: maracsl <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 10:38 AM
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Re: The Apollo Hoax
Mike and All
What they did, IMHO, was go to the Moon in some other vehicle, such as a back-engineered saucer, or a recovered one, and they filmed the whole hoax ahead of time. They went, but certainly not in that Apollo. (You couldn't get to Hoboken in that thing.)
I am not the originator of this theory.
Dean
--- In [email protected], C Greenwood <protectingconnie@...> wrote:
I have to concur, since I inadvertently became part of an experiment on the missing 'a.'
From: "mm48ny@..." <mm48ny@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2011 5:11 PM
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Re: The Apollo HoaxGroup,
Stuart Swerdlow says that we did go to the Moon,
but because they did see beings, structures, etc.,
they did the filming of the landing elsewhere, and
that is why the film/pictures can debunk the actual
landing on the Moon.Mike, NYC
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
http://www.holloworbs.com/Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I wondered about that too. There is a good explanation here, though not sure what it has to do with the earlier thread. Did Neil Armstrong Flub His First Words on the Moon? | Snopes.com
/Bob
--- In [email protected], Christine Heffernan <chris_heffernan7@...> wrote:
What's the missing 'a'? Please excuse my ignorance, can you tell us more??
Â--- On Mon, 24/10/11, C Greenwood <protectingconnie@...> wrote:
From: C Greenwood <protectingconnie@...>
Subject: Re: [allplanets-hollow] Re: The Apollo Hoax
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Received: Monday, 24 October, 2011, 1:09 AMÂ
I have to concur, since I inadvertently became part of an experiment on the missing 'a.'
From: "mm48ny@..." <mm48ny@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2011 5:11 PM
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Re: The Apollo HoaxGroup,
Stuart Swerdlow says that we did go to the Moon,
but because they did see beings, structures, etc.,
they did the filming of the landing elsewhere, and
that is why the film/pictures can debunk the actual
landing on the Moon.Mike, NYC
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]