http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELu9ARLo0jc&feature=colike
Cheers!
Holly
Very nice find
···
--- On Wed, 11/28/12, Seerius <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Seerius <[email protected]>
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Slightly off topic, but fascinating!!
To: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, November 28, 2012, 9:16 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELu9ARLo0jc&feature=colike
Cheers!
Holly
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Holly,
I wouldn't say it's off topic.
It is fantastic, what great evidence. Did thee giants come up from below? How else did they get to be giants? The only other places they have giants are in NY and San Francisco. (I left my heart in San Francisco ...)
Dean
···
--- In [email protected], "Seerius" <seeriuscat@...> wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELu9ARLo0jc&feature=colike
Cheers!
Holly
Interesting. I came across the same post from a fb group I am on. Were is another one by the same guy, a little longer cause not in the TED format: http://youtu.be/5eNjm4_moFE
/Bob
···
--- In [email protected], "Dean D" <silopanna@...> wrote:
Holly,
I wouldn't say it's off topic.
It is fantastic, what great evidence. Did thee giants come up from below? How else did they get to be giants? The only other places they have giants are in NY and San Francisco. (I left my heart in San Francisco ...)
Dean
--- In [email protected], "Seerius" <seeriuscat@> wrote:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELu9ARLo0jc&feature=colike
>
> Cheers!
> Holly
>
You could have said
How else did we get our size?
I dont understand your last sentence
Joe
···
--- On Sat, 12/1/12, Dean D <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Dean D <[email protected]>
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Re: Slightly off topic, but fascinating!!
To: [email protected]
Date: Saturday, December 1, 2012, 3:22 AM
Holly,
I wouldn't say it's off topic.
It is fantastic, what great evidence. Did thee giants come up from below? How else did they get to be giants? The only other places they have giants are in NY and San Francisco. (I left my heart in San Francisco ...)
Dean
--- In [email protected], "Seerius" <seeriuscat@...> wrote:
Cheers!
Holly
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Joe,
The last sentence was a pun. The NY Giants are a football team, and the San Francisco Giants just won the world series again.
Dean
···
--- In [email protected], Joe Fit <sishmoke@...> wrote:
You could have said
How else did we get our size?
I dont understand your last sentence
Joe--- On Sat, 12/1/12, Dean D <silopanna@...> wrote:
From: Dean D <silopanna@...>
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Re: Slightly off topic, but fascinating!!
To: [email protected]
Date: Saturday, December 1, 2012, 3:22 AMÂ
Holly,
I wouldn't say it's off topic.
It is fantastic, what great evidence. Did thee giants come up from below? How else did they get to be giants? The only other places they have giants are in NY and San Francisco. (I left my heart in San Francisco ...)
Dean
--- In [email protected], "Seerius" <seeriuscat@> wrote:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELu9ARLo0jc&feature=colike
>
> Cheers!
> Holly
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Those are the only giants we have. The others are from below deck.
Dean
···
--- In [email protected], "Dean D" <silopanna@...> wrote:
Joe,
The last sentence was a pun. The NY Giants are a football team, and the San Francisco Giants just won the world series again.
Dean
--- In [email protected], Joe Fit <sishmoke@> wrote:
>
> You could have said
> How else did we get our size?
> I dont understand your last sentence
> Joe
>
> --- On Sat, 12/1/12, Dean D <silopanna@> wrote:
>
> From: Dean D <silopanna@>
> Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Re: Slightly off topic, but fascinating!!
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Saturday, December 1, 2012, 3:22 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Â
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Holly,
>
>
>
> I wouldn't say it's off topic.
>
>
>
> It is fantastic, what great evidence. Did thee giants come up from below? How else did they get to be giants? The only other places they have giants are in NY and San Francisco. (I left my heart in San Francisco ...)
>
>
>
> Dean
>
>
>
> --- In [email protected], "Seerius" <seeriuscat@> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELu9ARLo0jc&feature=colike
>
> >
>
> > Cheers!
>
> > Holly
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
So your heart belonged to the NY Giants..?
Joe
···
--- On Sun, 12/2/12, Dean D <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Dean D <[email protected]>
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Re: Slightly off topic, but fascinating!!
To: [email protected]
Date: Sunday, December 2, 2012, 12:32 PM
Those are the only giants we have. The others are from below deck.
Dean
--- In [email protected], "Dean D" <silopanna@...> wrote:
Joe,
The last sentence was a pun. The NY Giants are a football team, and the San Francisco Giants just won the world series again.
Dean
--- In [email protected], Joe Fit <sishmoke@> wrote:
>
> You could have said
> How else did we get our size?
> I dont understand your last sentence
> Joe
>
> --- On Sat, 12/1/12, Dean D <silopanna@> wrote:
>
> From: Dean D <silopanna@>
> Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Re: Slightly off topic, but fascinating!!
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Saturday, December 1, 2012, 3:22 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Â
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Holly,
>
>
>
> I wouldn't say it's off topic.
>
>
>
> It is fantastic, what great evidence. Did thee giants come up from below? How else did they get to be giants? The only other places they have giants are in NY and San Francisco. (I left my heart in San Francisco ...)
>
>
>
> Dean
>
>
>
> --- In [email protected], "Seerius" <seeriuscat@> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELu9ARLo0jc&feature=colike
>
> >
>
> > Cheers!
>
> > Holly
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
At one time in history it was thought that the Earth was the center of the universe, but science eventually figured out Earth traveled around the Sun, and science eventually found more planets.
Now, with science and mathematics, we now know we don't exactly circle or travel around the Sun.
Here is one good video which shows how the Earth's "orbit" changes, it's called orbit orbit eccentricity, which they think is caused by the gravitational pull of other planets.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82p-DYgGFjI
However, it's this following video I really wanted to share, it has really good graphics in it, look particularly and the representation starting at 3:58, of how we spiral through space.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6jBK1ZV-qs
You can easily Google to find other videos showing this same spiral.
I wasn't taught this way back in my early schooling, I was taught we "circled" around the sun. That isn't true. We travel through space in a spiral, never returning to the point of origination in 365 days.
Science is in it's infancy in defining "space", and also "gravity". It's really hard for me with my pee brain to comprehend the gravity of this galaxy and how our Solar System is moving around it, yet, it's there. When you look at how our planets, each with it's own orbital plane covering thousands of years, I do wonder as to what "force" is moving our planets, with the Sun, through space. If you look at the Spiral pattern, and consider how distance some of the large planets including Jupiter and Saturn are from the Sun, you might think the Sun should be "pulling" our planets behind it, rather in the elliptical orbits perpendicular to the Sun.
Just all very interesting, and in these mysteries, is the aspect of how our planets were formed and became hollow.
Kathy
Here is something very unusual. Has anyone heard about this phenomenon?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NR7NIwY5y1A
Is this a dark mass near the sun, or a natural phenomenon as described by NASA?
Heart no, mouth yes.
Dean
···
--- In [email protected], Joe Fit <sishmoke@...> wrote:
So your heart belonged to the NY Giants..?
Joe--- On Sun, 12/2/12, Dean D <silopanna@...> wrote:
From: Dean D <silopanna@...>
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Re: Slightly off topic, but fascinating!!
To: [email protected]
Date: Sunday, December 2, 2012, 12:32 PMÂ
Those are the only giants we have. The others are from below deck.
Dean
--- In [email protected], "Dean D" <silopanna@> wrote:
>
> Joe,
>
> The last sentence was a pun. The NY Giants are a football team, and the San Francisco Giants just won the world series again.
>
> Dean
>
> --- In [email protected], Joe Fit <sishmoke@> wrote:
> >
> > You could have said
> > How else did we get our size?
> > I dont understand your last sentence
> > Joe
> >
> > --- On Sat, 12/1/12, Dean D <silopanna@> wrote:
> >
> > From: Dean D <silopanna@>
> > Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Re: Slightly off topic, but fascinating!!
> > To: [email protected]
> > Date: Saturday, December 1, 2012, 3:22 AM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ÃÂ
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Holly,
> >
> >
> >
> > I wouldn't say it's off topic.
> >
> >
> >
> > It is fantastic, what great evidence. Did thee giants come up from below? How else did they get to be giants? The only other places they have giants are in NY and San Francisco. (I left my heart in San Francisco ...)
> >
> >
> >
> > Dean
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "Seerius" <seeriuscat@> wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELu9ARLo0jc&feature=colike
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Cheers!
> >
> > > Holly
> >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Stillness does not exist in outer space. Planets are a representation of space motion, or more precisely what is called their central sun. The cause of the creation of the Central Sun is due to space eternal motion .Thats how Light that is Life is created.So the force is the motion.Why it is like that?We dont know and its the real God.A good way to understand gravity and orbits is Cater's explanation on how and why an electromagnetic field is created.So it is the disruption of cosmic matter which creates all visible and invisible matter.Thinking of planets revolving around the sun is the equivalent of thinking the earth is the center of the universe.Its a built in motion of cosmic matter in which planets ,suns,galaxies included,are the visible parts.The sun isnt pulling anything,it is pulled the same way planets are.Joe
···
--- On Sun, 12/2/12, Kathy <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Kathy <[email protected]>
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] More about planets, orbit eccentricity, traveling in a spiral
To: [email protected]
Date: Sunday, December 2, 2012, 3:14 PM
At one time in history it was thought that the Earth was the center of
the universe, but science eventually figured out Earth traveled around
the Sun, and science eventually found more planets.
Now, with science and mathematics, we now know we don't exactly circle
or travel around the Sun.
Here is one good video which shows how the Earth's "orbit" changes, it's
called orbit orbit eccentricity, which they think is caused by the
gravitational pull of other planets.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82p-DYgGFjI
However, it's this following video I really wanted to share, it has
really good graphics in it, look particularly and the representation
starting at 3:58, of how we spiral through space.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6jBK1ZV-qs
You can easily Google to find other videos showing this same spiral.
I wasn't taught this way back in my early schooling, I was taught we
"circled" around the sun. That isn't true. We travel through space
in a spiral, never returning to the point of origination in 365 days.
Science is in it's infancy in defining "space", and also "gravity".
It's really hard for me with my pee brain to comprehend the gravity of
this galaxy and how our Solar System is moving around it, yet, it's
there. When you look at how our planets, each with it's own orbital
plane covering thousands of years, I do wonder as to what "force" is
moving our planets, with the Sun, through space. If you look at the
Spiral pattern, and consider how distance some of the large planets
including Jupiter and Saturn are from the Sun, you might think the Sun
should be "pulling" our planets behind it, rather in the elliptical
orbits perpendicular to the Sun.
Just all very interesting, and in these mysteries, is the aspect of how
our planets were formed and became hollow.
Kathy
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Kathy,
Joseph H. Cater contends that the Sun does not hold the planets within its gravitational pull, not to any great extent, in spite of its mass. This is one implication of the concept of gravity as an effect of electromagnetic forces. In this case, it would not be the mere mass that causes gravitational effects, but the frequency of radiation emitted by a given mass, such as the surface strata of a planet. Cater tells that the frequency that induces gravity effects is not so characteristic of the radiations that the Sun emits, i.e., that the Sun doesn't emit much radiation in the gravity-inducing range.
I would dare to say that the fact that the solar system is not heliocentric is incompatible with Newtonian gravity, i.e., gravity related to the density of mass.
Dean
···
From: Kathy
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2012 1:14 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] More about planets, orbit eccentricity, traveling in a spiral
At one time in history it was thought that the Earth was the center of
the universe, but science eventually figured out Earth traveled around
the Sun, and science eventually found more planets.
Now, with science and mathematics, we now know we don't exactly circle
or travel around the Sun.
Here is one good video which shows how the Earth's "orbit" changes, it's
called orbit orbit eccentricity, which they think is caused by the
gravitational pull of other planets.
However, it's this following video I really wanted to share, it has
really good graphics in it, look particularly and the representation
starting at 3:58, of how we spiral through space.
You can easily Google to find other videos showing this same spiral.
I wasn't taught this way back in my early schooling, I was taught we
"circled" around the sun. That isn't true. We travel through space
in a spiral, never returning to the point of origination in 365 days.
Science is in it's infancy in defining "space", and also "gravity".
It's really hard for me with my pee brain to comprehend the gravity of
this galaxy and how our Solar System is moving around it, yet, it's
there. When you look at how our planets, each with it's own orbital
plane covering thousands of years, I do wonder as to what "force" is
moving our planets, with the Sun, through space. If you look at the
Spiral pattern, and consider how distance some of the large planets
including Jupiter and Saturn are from the Sun, you might think the Sun
should be "pulling" our planets behind it, rather in the elliptical
orbits perpendicular to the Sun.
Just all very interesting, and in these mysteries, is the aspect of how
our planets were formed and became hollow.
Kathy
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I've been called a loon because some of the stuff I've posted.
But if what I've read from my sources is correct, these giant planet like objects are galactic federation ships used to stabilize the sun.
Nibiru is real and the reason why the poles are shifting is because each planet is like a giant magnet, and when you introduce another large planet object (nibiru), then it affects the other planets as well.
Nibiri is of course being hidden or cloaked, so it is rarely seen or photograph (but there are pictures of it near the location of the sun posted by Donny Gilson and others).
The federation is planning to route Nibiru out of the way of causing the most destruction by using some sort of tunnel (I don't know anything about the technology they are using).. but its affect will still be felt by earth. They can mitigate the damage, but they cannot stop it totally.
The pyramids that have been activated and seen pushing out light out of the top of them are generating a force field around earth to help protect against the effects of Nibiru.
There is more I could say about this, of course, but it would start getting off topic. And I'm probably skimming on the topic as it is.
···
--- In [email protected], Kathy <getnews1@...> wrote:
Here is something very unusual. Has anyone heard about this phenomenon?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NR7NIwY5y1A
Is this a dark mass near the sun, or a natural phenomenon as described
by NASA?
Zenalpha,
It is not a matter of being a loon, it's just that extraordinay claims require extraordinary evidence.
Dean
···
From: zenalpha
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 11:53 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Re: Slightly off topic, but fascinating! What is this near the Sun?
I've been called a loon because some of the stuff I've posted.
But if what I've read from my sources is correct, these giant planet like objects are galactic federation ships used to stabilize the sun.
Nibiru is real and the reason why the poles are shifting is because each planet is like a giant magnet, and when you introduce another large planet object (nibiru), then it affects the other planets as well.
Nibiri is of course being hidden or cloaked, so it is rarely seen or photograph (but there are pictures of it near the location of the sun posted by Donny Gilson and others).
The federation is planning to route Nibiru out of the way of causing the most destruction by using some sort of tunnel (I don't know anything about the technology they are using).. but its affect will still be felt by earth. They can mitigate the damage, but they cannot stop it totally.
The pyramids that have been activated and seen pushing out light out of the top of them are generating a force field around earth to help protect against the effects of Nibiru.
There is more I could say about this, of course, but it would start getting off topic. And I'm probably skimming on the topic as it is.
--- In [email protected], Kathy <getnews1@...> wrote:
Here is something very unusual. Has anyone heard about this phenomenon?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NR7NIwY5y1A
Is this a dark mass near the sun, or a natural phenomenon as described
by NASA?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Have to poke my nose in here - because that phrase has irritated me for some time (believe it was used by Sagan when he was entering his bitter / cynical phase: maybe around the time of `Demon-haunted World' when Sagan became a skepti-bunker).
For a start it's hypocritical to demand a different standard of evidence just because you're afraid of the implications; and secondly that demand is open-ended, as the denier can and will claim that _any_ evidence isn't extra-ordinary enough.
To set it in a courtroom - the first axiom of justice is "Let justice be done - though the heavens might fall (as a result)".
I.e. you shouldn't allow possible consequences to affect your reasoning.
Ray
silopanna wrote:
···
Zenalpha,
It is not a matter of being a loon, it's just that extraordinay claims require extraordinary evidence.
Dean
Ray,
By the same token, if one just goes around making off the wall statements, then one can't expect to much acceptance. But one can make them.
Dean
···
--- In [email protected], "Ray D" <ray.dickenson@...> wrote:
Have to poke my nose in here - because that phrase has irritated
me for some time (believe it was used by Sagan when he was
entering his bitter / cynical phase: maybe around the time of
`Demon-haunted World' when Sagan became a skepti-bunker).For a start it's hypocritical to demand a different standard of
evidence just because you're afraid of the implications; and
secondly that demand is open-ended, as the denier can and will
claim that _any_ evidence isn't extra-ordinary enough.To set it in a courtroom - the first axiom of justice is "Let
justice be done - though the heavens might fall (as a result)".I.e. you shouldn't allow possible consequences to affect your
reasoning.
Raysilopanna wrote:
> Zenalpha,
> It is not a matter of being a loon, it's just that extraordinay
> claims require extraordinary evidence.
> Dean
Yup - You're quite right.
On the same subject - some time ago a guy raised the fact that in the area of `anomalies' in science (i.e. UFO stuff and maybe poltergeists etc), multi-witness evidence is routinely ignored and/or passed over by `scientists'.
Whereas, in the courtroom, testimony from two or more observers is accepted as `proof'. (Provided they're not known ciminals - or politicians maybe).
Ray
Dean D wrote:
···
Ray,
By the same token, if one just goes around making off the wall statements, then one can't expect to much acceptance. But one can make them.
Dean--- In [email protected], "Ray D" <ray.dickenson@...>
wrote:Have to poke my nose in here - because that phrase has irritated me for some time (believe it was used by Sagan when he was entering his bitter / cynical phase: maybe around the time of `Demon-haunted World' when Sagan became a skepti-bunker).
For a start it's hypocritical to demand a different standard of evidence just because you're afraid of the implications; and secondly that demand is open-ended, as the denier can and will claim that _any_ evidence isn't extra-ordinary enough.
To set it in a courtroom - the first axiom of justice is "Let justice be done - though the heavens might fall (as a result)".
I.e. you shouldn't allow possible consequences to affect your reasoning.
Raysilopanna wrote:
Zenalpha,
It is not a matter of being a loon, it's just that extraordinay
claims require extraordinary evidence.
Dean------------------------------------
http://www.holloworbs.com/Yahoo! Groups Links
I am with Ray on this one and felt pretty much the same when I read the "extraordinary evidence" phrase. Nothing personal against you, Dean. That phrase is used all the time by so-called skeptics to stifle debate and dismiss anomalous, repeatable scientific evidence that does not fit with the dominant paradigm.
To flip this around, just have a look at the big bang theory which is widely believed. It claims that the entire Universe came into existence due to an exploding black hole in the distant past, but has nothing to say about how this hypothetical black hole was formed or what triggered it to explode. When you dig into it, this is an enormously extraordinary claim, yet it is accepted with no hesitation by almost everyone in the mainstream.
So, yes, there is a big double standard at work here. IMO.
/Bob
···
--- In [email protected], "Dean D" <silopanna@...> wrote:
Ray,
By the same token, if one just goes around making off the wall statements, then one can't expect to much acceptance. But one can make them.
Dean
--- In [email protected], "Ray D" <ray.dickenson@> wrote:
>
> Have to poke my nose in here - because that phrase has irritated
> me for some time (believe it was used by Sagan when he was
> entering his bitter / cynical phase: maybe around the time of
> `Demon-haunted World' when Sagan became a skepti-bunker).
>
> For a start it's hypocritical to demand a different standard of
> evidence just because you're afraid of the implications; and
> secondly that demand is open-ended, as the denier can and will
> claim that _any_ evidence isn't extra-ordinary enough.
>
> To set it in a courtroom - the first axiom of justice is "Let
> justice be done - though the heavens might fall (as a result)".
>
> I.e. you shouldn't allow possible consequences to affect your
> reasoning.
> Ray
>
> silopanna wrote:
> > Zenalpha,
> > It is not a matter of being a loon, it's just that extraordinay
> > claims require extraordinary evidence.
> > Dean
>
DeanCould we deduce then these gravity inducing radiations may reflect the disturbance of the cosmic matter surrounding the crust formation of any planet?These radiations may have some caracteristics special to the generated matter .And may I dare to say they are generated anywhere in the vicinity of each planets but °out° of the space matter and not from the planet itself.Being used properly these radiations could lead to a state of no gravity at all but different from the one astronauts are experimenting.I didnt read Cater on this subject and would be curious to know what he said exactly.Joe
···
--- On Mon, 12/3/12, silopanna <[email protected]> wrote:
From: silopanna <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [allplanets-hollow] More about planets, orbit eccentricity, traveling in a spiral
To: [email protected]
Date: Monday, December 3, 2012, 12:03 AM
Kathy,
Joseph H. Cater contends that the Sun does not hold the planets within its gravitational pull, not to any great extent, in spite of its mass. This is one implication of the concept of gravity as an effect of electromagnetic forces. In this case, it would not be the mere mass that causes gravitational effects, but the frequency of radiation emitted by a given mass, such as the surface strata of a planet. Cater tells that the frequency that induces gravity effects is not so characteristic of the radiations that the Sun emits, i.e., that the Sun doesn't emit much radiation in the gravity-inducing range.
I would dare to say that the fact that the solar system is not heliocentric is incompatible with Newtonian gravity, i.e., gravity related to the density of mass.
Dean
From: Kathy
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2012 1:14 PM
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] More about planets, orbit eccentricity, traveling in a spiral
At one time in history it was thought that the Earth was the center of
the universe, but science eventually figured out Earth traveled around
the Sun, and science eventually found more planets.
Now, with science and mathematics, we now know we don't exactly circle
or travel around the Sun.
Here is one good video which shows how the Earth's "orbit" changes, it's
called orbit orbit eccentricity, which they think is caused by the
gravitational pull of other planets.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82p-DYgGFjI
However, it's this following video I really wanted to share, it has
really good graphics in it, look particularly and the representation
starting at 3:58, of how we spiral through space.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6jBK1ZV-qs
You can easily Google to find other videos showing this same spiral.
I wasn't taught this way back in my early schooling, I was taught we
"circled" around the sun. That isn't true. We travel through space
in a spiral, never returning to the point of origination in 365 days.
Science is in it's infancy in defining "space", and also "gravity".
It's really hard for me with my pee brain to comprehend the gravity of
this galaxy and how our Solar System is moving around it, yet, it's
there. When you look at how our planets, each with it's own orbital
plane covering thousands of years, I do wonder as to what "force" is
moving our planets, with the Sun, through space. If you look at the
Spiral pattern, and consider how distance some of the large planets
including Jupiter and Saturn are from the Sun, you might think the Sun
should be "pulling" our planets behind it, rather in the elliptical
orbits perpendicular to the Sun.
Just all very interesting, and in these mysteries, is the aspect of how
our planets were formed and became hollow.
Kathy
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]