Recent Earth Change Follow Ups

ALLPLANETS-HOLLOW Yahoo Group (Old Posts)
, , ,
1

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ADVERTISING ABOVE IS NOT CONNECTED TO THE EARTH CHANGES BULLETIN

PHOENIX FIVE EARTH CHANGE BULLETINS
June 25, 2001 by MW Mandeville

ITEM(S): Recent Earth Changes Follow Ups

  1. Mayon erupting again
  2. Peru still shaking
  3. PNW shakes in rare places
  4. Even rarer in the Netherlands

but Hell has not broken loose, unless you happened to have been in Northern
Ireland over the weekend

El Popo remains steady

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
More eruptions expected;
32,000 forced to flee homes
Posted:11:39 PM (Manila Time) | June 25, 2001
By Floreno G. Solmirano and Rey Nasol
Inquirer News Service

LEGAZPI CITY--Expect more explosive eruptions after Mayon Volcano blew its
top on Sunday.

"A possibility of another explosion is present," Raymundo Punongbayan,
Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology director, yesterday saidhere.

The eruptions forced 32,000 people to leave their homes and to move into 16evacuation centers in the province, prompting the provincial government
yesterday to declare a state of calamity in Albay.

The main eruption cloud discharged from the crater two days ago rose to about10kilometers high.

Southeast monsoon winds dispersed ash mainly to the northeast in the vicinityy of Malilipot.

Because of the eruptions, Philippine Airlines suspended its flights between Manila and Legazpi City from June 26 to July 1.

Phivolcs said Mayon's latest eruption could last from one to two weeks.

"Mayon has no history of erupting only for a day. The probability is high
that there will be more eruptions," resident volcanologist Ed Laguerta said.

"There are factors . . . that could lead to even stronger explosions," he said. "It's not yet time to go back. The danger is not over."

  1. Peru rocks and rolls

The coast of Peru in the same area as the 8.1 continues to shake with at least a 5.0 plus quake about twice a day. Bet your bippies this is big time action. This area of Peru is almost due west of the Lake Titicaca area. If you remember your Graham Hancock, this famous Lake area includes the ancient seaport which is now about 8,000 feet in elevation. That is apparantly how much the land can uplift during a pole shift.

  1. Eastern Washington??? Nahhh, you gotta be kidding

Palthecat wrote:

Mild quakes rattle Spokane
June 25, 2001
 SPOKANE WA A rare series of earthquakes jolted this Eastern Washington city early Monday, breaking some dishes but causing no serious damage or injuries. "It felt like I was flying in the air," Patten said. "It was not a very good thing to wake up to." That quake had a magnitude of 3.4 and was centered about 2 miles southwest of Spokane, said Waverly Person with the National Earthquake Information Center in Golden, Colo. A second quake with a magnitude of 2.8 was reported about 6 miles northwest of the city at about 8:01 a.m. A third smaller quake with a magnitude of about 2.0 was felt about 10 minutes later, Person said. A series of aftershocks continued to shake the ground throughout the day. Damage was limited to broken windows and dishes, some toppled brick chimneys and cracks in plaster walls.

The Pacific Northwest Seismographic Network at the University of Washington reported the initial quake occurred about 3.1 miles below the surface. The second was about 7.3 miles deep. There were no reports of major damage. Some area residents heard a boom and felt several sharp jolts, and workers in some high-rise office buildings were temporarily evacuated as a precaution.

Earthquakes are rare in Eastern Washington, which lies above thick sheets of volcanic basalt. As a result, there are relatively few seismic measuring devices in the region, said Ruth Ludwin, a UW research scientist and seismologist.

The UW initially reported the first quake's magnitude at 3.9, then revised that to 3.7. John Minsch, a USGS geophysicist at the national earthquake center at Golden, Colo., said it is not unusual for different observers to come up with different figures because of differences in formulas used for computing magnitudes. Lani LaRock of Spokane, a recent Gonzaga University graduate from Butte, Mont., said the quake "felt like it lifted the whole building and set it down."

"It felt like a 3.9 earthquake," said Henjum, who lives in Alaska and says she can "feel the tiniest ones."

  1. The Netherlands

Saturday 23 june, little eartquakes (3) in the South_ Netherlands, force 3,9 Richter. Little, but very unusual for our land. Expectation is more to be followed.

To check the latest status of the Change In The Earth and the location of
Earth's Axis, go to:
http://www.michaelmandeville.com/earthmonitor/

To connect to the Phoenix Five Psychic Monitor, go to:
http://www.michaelmandeville.com/polarmotion/psyche/phoenix5_psychic_monitor.html

To connect with the on-going Phoenix Quest, go to:
http://www.michaelmandeville.com/quest/questhomepage.htm

To connect with the data about Vortex Tectonics, go to:
http://www.michaelmandeville.com/vortectonics/vortextectonics.htm

Best Wishes,
Michael Wells Mandeville, The Hills of Arizona USA at [email protected]

2

Nathan, or Dick wrote:

I once used the analogy that it exists/doesn't exist. That isn't quite right, but "FREQUENCY" refers to how many pulsations each particle has. In each pulsation, the particle is detectable, and then "de-materialized." A very bad explanation, I know, but maybe it will give you an idea of what he's talking about.

Chapter 13 of The Ultimate Reality:

CHAPTER 13

A CLOSER LOOK AT THE PROPERTIES OF LIGHT

The fundamentals of physics have now been fairly well outlined; however, this presentation is still far from complete. There are still many details which need to be filled in. This is especially true concerning the properties of light, despite the fact that the real rneanin of Planck’s constant has already been presented and its relationship to light has become apparent. How does the law of redistribution of energy work? What are the real principles behind color perception? Why is the velocity of light independent of its frequency? Why is this velocity equal to the ratio between an electromagnetic and electrostatic unit of charge? The answers to these questions have never been given before. Great fluctuations occur in the velocity of electrons in their orbits when materials are subjected to high temperatures. This, in turn, creates interactions and interference effects between electrons moving in opposite directions inside atoms and between electrons in adjacent atoms. These interactions generate changes in the electrostatic field effects of the electrons, which will cause regular and distinct changes in their orbits. This is because the charge on the electron varies with its velocity. Abrupt changes in a particle disrupts the ethers which, in turn, results in the formation of photons. In one respect, the theorists did make a lucky assumption, but the “ quantum jumps “ of the electrons were the effects, along with the light produced, and not the cause of the spectral lines.

3

Dean and all...

A non-list friend alerted me to the following website with
list member GERRY FORSTER'S online "book"
"IS OUR EARTH REALLY HOLLOW?"
http://onelight.com/forster/earthforster1.htm

If you haven't read it. Do. It's pretty good! Comparable to anything I've yet read on the subject. A lot of text to read. Lots of history. Will take you some time. But he writes well and will keep you interested.

Just after his "book" he included the same long email he sent the list a little earlier in which he personally endorses the "Expanding Earth" theory of others.

About that "Expnading Earth" theory, I can't agree. I read the theory earlier on an Australian website illustrated a gradually increasing earth, only one/third present size during the Jurassic period, depicting all the continents pushed together. That attempts to explain the "continental drift" idea (which Expanding Earth theorists also appear to support.) showing the continents drifting to their present positions.

BUT if you follow the "balls" back further... the earth continues to reduce smaller and smaller! This is where the theory seems a bit bizarre. Somehow a fully developed, but squished together, really tiny little Earth, over billions of years, became SWOLLEN in size (like an inflating balloon) to the size of present earth. No RATIONAL explanation is presented to indicate where all the ADDITIONAL MATTER came from to add to the INSIDE of the "expanding" outer crust or additional ocean waters. At least not rational to me!

But read Gerry's letter (sent to a friend), supporting the theory (same email he sent the list), and judge for yourselves

  • Dick
4

Re: [allplanets-hollow] Quantum JumpsDick,

I am definitely going to read Jerry's material, it's just that I'm a bit slower to react nowadays, things have piled up.

The " pushing together " of the continents could also be explained by vertical plate movement. In other words, they seem to have interlocked at some point but rather, the interlocking plate in between them goes up and down. And so do they! This would explain marinefossels high up in the mountains. A solid planet doesn't allow for much vertical plate movement. But if continental plates are supported over cavern worlds by electrostatic charge- for example, by electrostatic repulsion- then we have an mechanism.

By the way, a LOT of Pratt's geology is Lamprecht, more than what he directly quotes.I am not criticising at all.

DD

Just after his "book" he included the same long email he sent the list a little earlier in which he personally endorses the "Expanding Earth" theory of others.

About that "Expnading Earth" theory, I can't agree. I read the theory earlier on an Australian website illustrated a gradually increasing earth, only one/third present size during the Jurassic period, depicting all the continents pushed together. That attempts to explain the "continental drift" idea (which Expanding Earth theorists also appear to support.) showing the continents drifting to their present positions.

BUT if you follow the "balls" back further... the earth continues to reduce smaller and smaller! This is where the theory seems a bit bizarre. Somehow a fully developed, but squished together, really tiny little Earth, over billions of years, became SWOLLEN in size (like an inflating balloon) to the size of present earth. No RATIONAL explanation is presented to indicate where all the ADDITIONAL MATTER came from to add to the INSIDE of the "expanding" outer crust or additional ocean waters. At least not rational to me!

But read Gerry's letter (sent to a friend), supporting the theory (same email he sent the list), and judge for yourselves