Dean,
Regarding the photos by Thomas Tifton that you posted in October, 2006:
What spectrum was used to penetrate the ice pack?
Please post a photo showing a magnification of the dark area to
the right of the three (New Siberian?) islands in photos #1 and #2, at
the end of a long fissure.
I visited the Nicholas Roerich museum on 107th St again yesterday. He
published a book called "Shambhala." There is a chapter in there about
"Subterranean," regions. The cost was $18.00, and I didn't feel like buying it. I breezed
thru that chapter though. He talks about legends that exist in various cultures
that all seem to consist of similar tales; giant people appearing that help
the people, etc. Interesting enough is some of his art that was exhibited shows
"Temples" that are underground and appear to look like the inside of a geode
and numerous caves, etc., that he mentions are "sacred."
Mike
Roger,
Unfortunately, I don't know to tell you.
In general, I'll say that it is harder to study the Northern opening
in this sense, in the sense of telltale images and pictures. In this
case, it ecomes easier to study the Antarctic opening.
The Radarsat image, for example, ws done in the Radar band (I'm
smarter than the average bear!), and you can find information about
it, specifications, online. Here is the Hollow Orbs Radarsat page:
http://www.holloworbs.com/Radarsat.htm
If you look at the "Files" section of the allplanets-hollow site, the
one that controls this list, you will find a file at the top
called "Antarctica Pix", and it has a whole complement of Radarsat
images with circles and comments at some point by Rod, perhaps at the
bottom (inside that file). These images have a higher pixel count
than the one on the Radarsat page.
If you want to just see the Antarctic hole, with the aurora flowing
out, then click on this page, then on the first, underlined,
clickable link:
http://www.holloworbs.com/Antarctic%20aurora.htm
Dean