NEVER TRUST "PEER REVIEWED" "SCIENCE JOURNALS": How Elsevier scientific publisher manipulates peer-reviewed science to match the narrative…

Interesting News & Stuff
#1

Many of us are familiar with and work with Elsevier provided content routinely in our scientific work and research. For anyone not familiar, just a quick synopsis from (yes, yuck) wikipedia:

Elsevier is a Netherlands-based publishing company specializing in scientific, technical, and medical content. It is a part of the RELX Group, known until 2015 as Reed Elsevier. Its products include journals such as The Lancet and Cell, the ScienceDirect collection of electronic journals, the Trends and Current Opinion series of journals, the online citation database Scopus, the SciVal tool for measuring research performance, the ClinicalKey search engine for clinicians, and the ClinicalPath evidence-based cancer care service. Elsevier's products and services also include digital tools for data management, instruction, research analytics and assessment. Elsevier publishes more than 500,000 articles annually in 2,500 journals. Its archives contain over 17 million documents and 40,000 e-books. Total yearly downloads amount to more than 1 billion

While the following is regarding medical information, there is no doubt that they do the same for ALL of their massive set of "scientific" peer-reviewed content:

Reminds me of the importance of observations such as Robert Distinti's
YouTube: 4ROA34 The Journal Fallacy

And other videos you might peruse that have the keyword "peer" in them:

2 Likes
#2

@Soretna , you're spot on . This overwhelming requirement of "CONSENSUS" (is it an election ??!!) has destroyed the real spirit of scientific enquiry . The peer review "process" is a thinly disguised method to methodically "WEED OUT" and stifle any alternative ideas and ensures any such attempt is nipped in the bud .

Any researcher who has "FAILED" to clear the all important peer review by the "high priests" of science gets branded as a "fringe theorist/maverick" and is then systematically denied funds/scholarship/mentors for pursuing that particular line of research .

**The real charm of AUTHENTIC scientific research lies in the fact that this is a field where one single researcher could be right and thousands of "learned scholars" could be proven wrong , it is a field where the majority does NOT always win (thank God for that !) :)) It is a field where past reputation and legacy have ZILCH value , only the TRUTH is important . Finally , it is a field where existing paradigms & biases can be demolished in an instant , if conclusively proven wrong .

Regards

2 Likes
#3

The concept of consensus follows very well with the Luciferian concept of "democracy" and is a very interesting pattern that is insidious and easy to be ensnared by. This is why the insightful founders of the USA Constitution settled upon and pushed for a Democratic Republic in hopes to give the people the ability to govern themselves, but to have checks in place to reduce rapidity of corruption. Unfortunately science has gone and yet still goes unchecked in its power and it is grabbing power hand over fist in corrupted societies...

All of this is being used as a tool to bludgeon society into submission in a way that is not detectable by the masses at large.

Sadly, while things can be proven wrong - it doesn't always mean that they win. For example, there are very nearly 4,000 (at least) serious studies that have disproven Einstein's "great work" since 1908 that have been documented in this book alone: https://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/buch.pdf

#4

So true , @Soretna . Very well spoken ! Einstein's framework must be ripped out from the core of mainstream science for there to be any further breakthrough.

It is dismaying to see mainstream media shamelessly reporting every other week how YET another Black Hole has been found (BILLIONS of light years away from Earth of course - as usual) :)) This is a classic case of circular logic where gravity itself is used to prove the existence of gravity !! The Plasma Universe Theory has such a convincing explanation for this phenomena in the form of Z-pinch structures at the heart of Galaxies , but that concept has been brushed under the carpet !

Regards