Nansen, Kane and the Ice

People,

Here is something from some writing/doodling that I am doing. The small map,
attached, shows his actual path. Print it out and trace it, looking at an
atlas. Use a magnifying glass if necessary-

When Dr. Fridtjof Nansen expored the area shown above, in 1895, he and the
crew of the ship Fram also found it free of ice and navegable. They left the
New Siberian Islands, headed Northwards across open sea and lodged the ship
Fram into the ice at about 79* North, 138* East latitude. His expedition was
exemplary in terms of polar anomalies experienced by explorers. Dr. Nansen
and the crew encountered much warmer weather than expected from the North,
warmer waters the farther Northwards they went, anomalous open seas, clouds
of volcanic ash which covered the ice and snow from horizon to horizon,
warm-blooded mammals such as- land birds, foxes, and bears- and even a
mirage of the inner sun!

Dr. Kane, an Arctic explorer of the 1850s, wrote: "An open sea near the
Pole, or even an open polar Basin has been a topic of theory for a long
time, and has been shadowed forth to some extent by actual or supposed
discoveries. As far back as the days of Barentz, in 1596, without referring
to the earlier and more uncertain chronicles, water was seen to the eastward
of the northernmost cape of Novaia Zemlia; and, until its limited extent was
defined by direct observation, it was assumed to be the sea itself. The
Dutch fishermen above and around Spitzbergen pushed their adventurous
cruises through the ice into open spaces varying in size and form with the
season and the winds; and Dr Scoresby, a venerated authority, alluded to
such vacancies in the floe as pointing in argument to a freedom of movement
from the north, inducing open water in the neighborhood of the Pole. Baron
Wrangell, when forty miles from the coast of Arctic Asia, saw, as he
thought, a ´vast, illimitable ocean,' forgetting for the moment how narrow
are the limits of human vision on a sphere."

This is the same area of the Arctic Ocean, Northeast of Nova Zemlya, to
which we are referring. It is the very area where Nansen shot upwards
towards the Pole. He and his crew were surprised at the open water. It was
open when Nansen went there is 1895, when Barentz went there in 1596, and it
is still open as evidenced by the Earthview photos above.

This area of open Polar sea, which seems to be a permanent feature, is
another piece of deductive evidence which points to an opening to a warmer,
hollow Earth.

Again, a natural explanation would be that some current from within the
hollow portion passes through that area and warms the sea.

Yahoo Groups removed 1 attachment from this message: nansenfinal3.jpg (image/jpeg)

From Marshall Gardner´s book, on Kane:

Kane's views were further strengthened by the experiences of
Commander Inglefield of the Royal Navy. In Sir Edward Inglefield's
book: A Summer Search for Sir John Franklin; with a Peep into the
Polar Basin he wrote of how he sailed up to 78° 35' North with his
steamer "Isabel." On pages 66 67 he tells of rounding Cape
Alexander and "the full glory of being actually in the Polar Sea
burst upon my thoughts, for then I beheld the open sea stretching
through seven points of the compass, and apparently unencumbered with
ice" (emphasis added).' Kane had every intention of following
Inglefield's route into this Open Polar sea.
Kane enjoyed a position of trust with the Smithsonian Institute and
even with the Secretary of the Navy, the Hon. J. P. Kennedy. But this
was not enough for him to obtain financing from the US Congress. The
Congress, so it seems, did not care too much about the lost English
and so Kane's humanitarian appeals fell on deaf ears. Whether Kane
really intended finding Franklin is itself open to question. Perhaps
it was just an excuse to try to get Government funding? Kane's ideas
of where Franklin had gone were wrong anyway. Franklin had never
ventured in search of the Open Polar sea. Even so, Kane managed to
get the expedition off the ground with private funding, and he set
off on a journey which has become one of the minor classics of Arctic
exploration.
He did however receive specific instructions from the Navy
Department. In a letter to him dated 9th February 1853, J. P.
Kennedy, the Secretary to the Navy had written in part:
"In connection with the special duty assigned to you by the order of
this Department bearing date November 27, 1852, your attention is
invited to objects of scientific enquiry; particularly to such as
relate to the existence of an Open polar sea, terrestrial magnetism,
general meteorology, and subjects of importance in connection with
natural history" (emphasis added)."
As Kane's expedition was sailing northwards in August 1853, winter
began setting in. Kane's subordinate officers suggested that he turn
back south so they could spend the winter in a warmer clime where
their ship would not be frozen in. Kane did the exact opposite. He
continued sailing as far north as he could, dodging enormous icebergs
until his ship was frozen in. His ship's advance was finally stopped
near Van Rensselaer harbour at a latitude of 78° 45' by masses of
polar ice 60 feet high. They nearly perished from this decision.
Kane's bold strategy paid off and his exploration northward was to
remain unmatched for decades.
Here, in Dr Kane's words, is what he found: "An open sea near the
Pole, or even an open polar Basin has been a topic of theory for a
long time, and has been shadowed forth to some extent by actual or
supposed discoveries. As far back as the days of Barentz, in 1596,
without referring to the earlier and more uncertain chronicles, water
was seen to the eastward of the northernmost cape of Novaia Zemlia;
and, until its limited extent was defined by direct observation, it
was assumed to be the sea itself. The Dutch fishermen above and
around Spitzbergen pushed their adventurous cruises through the ice
into open spaces varying in size and form with the season and the
winds; and Dr Scoresby, a venerated authority, alluded to such
vacancies in the floe as pointing in argument to a freedom of
movement from the north, inducing open water in the neighborhood of
the Pole. Baron Wrangell, when forty miles from the coast of Arctic
Asia, saw, as he thought, a `vast, illimitable ocean,' forgetting for
the moment how narrow are the limits of human vision on a sphere

Another Arctic tidbit from Kane:

THE HOLLOW EARTH
WHAT PRODUCES COLORED SNOW IN THE ARCTIC?

Why is the snow colored in the Arctic regions? The snow has been
analyzed and the red, green and yellow have been found to contain
vegetable matter, presumably a flower, or the pollen of a plant. From
where did it come? A flower that produced pollen sufficient to
permeate the air with such density that it colored the snow, which
require a vast territory-millions of acres-to grow it. Where is that
to be found? It must be near the North Pole, for, if it grew
elsewhere, colored snow would be found at other locations, and not be
confined to the Arctic regions. As no such flowering plant is known
on the earth's surface, we must look elsewhere.

"The interior of the earth is the only spot that will furnish us with
an answer to the question. As the colors fall at different seasons,
we may presume that the flowers mature at these seasons. It is also
easy to find out where the black snow, frequently mentioned by the
explorers, comes from. It comes out of an exploding volcano-of the
kind that covered Nansen's ship with dust. All un-explained questions
could be easily answered if one would believe that the earth is
hollow. It is impossible to answer them under any other theory.

"Kane, in his first volume, page 44, says: `We passed the Crimson
Cliffs at Sir John Ross in the forenoon of August 5th. The patches of
red snow from which they derive their name could be seen clearly at
the distance of ten miles from the coast. It had a fine deep rose
hue.'

"Kane speaks of the red snow as if it had a regular season in which
to appear-as he says, `if the snowy surface were more diffused, as it
is no doubt earlier in the season.' In another place he speaks of the
red snow being two weeks later than usual. Now taking the fact into
account that the material that colors the snow is a vegetable matter,
supposed to be the blossom or pollen of a plant, and that no such
plant grows on earth, where does it come from? It must grow in the
interior of the earth."

From The Hollow Earth, pages 110 – 111

WHERE AND HOW ARE ICEBERGS FORMED?

Since icebergs are formed from fresh water, not salty ocean water,
they could not be formed from the Arctic Ocean, but by some fresh
body of water. However there is no fresh body of water in the polar
region. Reed's theory is that icebergs are formed from rivers coming
from the interior of the earth and flowing toward the surface through
the polar opening. When they reach the cold exterior they freeze,
while more water passes over the frozen part and freezes too, forming
mountains of ice. With the coining of summer, these big masses of ice
are thawed loose and break off, falling into the sea and producing
the mysteri-ous tidal waves observed in the far north. Reed says:

"It is simply out of the question for an iceberg to form in any
location yet discovered. On the other hand, the interior of the earth-
back from the mouth of rivers or canyons-being warmer, is just suited
for the forma-tion of icebergs. The mouth freezes first, and the
river, continuing to flow to the ocean, overflows the mouth, and
freezes for months, until spring. As the warm weather of summer
advances, and, owing to the warmth of the earth, the bergs are thawed
loose, and water from the rains in the interior rushes up, and they
are shoved into the ocean, and tidal waves started.

"Note the difference. On the outside of the earth, the whole length
of a stream is frozen, and the farther inland the harder the
freezing, while in the interior of the earth (at the polar opening)
only the mouth is frozen. In the interior of the earth, there is not
only plenty of water to produce icebergs, but plenty to shove them
into the ocean.

"For the last three hundred years a fairly steady stream of explorers
have been trying to reach the Pole-Arctic and Antarctic-and no one
has ever seen an iceberg leaving its original location and plunging
into the ocean. Isn't it strange that no one thought of asking about
their place of origin?"

In support of the theory that icebergs, made from fresh water, cannot
be formed on the outside of the earth and must come from fresh water
rivers in its interior, Reed quotes Bernacchi who, writing on his
observations in the Antarctic, says: "There was less than two inches
of rainfall in eleven and one-half months, and while it snowed quite
frequently, it never fell to any great depth. Under such conditions,
where would mate-rials be found to produce an iceberg? Yet the
greatest one on earth is there-one so large that it is called the
Great Ice Barrier, rather than an iceberg-being over four hundred
miles long and fifty miles wide. It is grounded in two thousand one
hundred feet of water, and extends from eighty to two hundred feet
above water." Reed comments: "Now it would be impossible for this
iceberg to form in a country having practically no rain or snow. As
icebergs are made from frozen water, and there is no water to freeze,
it evidently was formed at some place other than where it now is. The
iceberg itself, being of fresh water, lies in an ocean of salt water.

"How do I know that the great ice barrier came from the interior of
the earth? Or from the kind of river described? First, it could not
come from the exterior of the earth, since icebergs are not formed
there. That river must have been 2,500 feet deep, fifty miles across
and from four to five hundred miles long, for these are the present
dimensions of the iceberg. The river had to be straight or the
iceberg could not pass out without breaking. It passed through a
comparatively level country because the surface is still flat.
Another proof that the interior of the earth is level near the
Antarctic entrance is that many of the icebergs found in the
Antarctic are long and slim. They are called `ice tongues,' which
indicates that they came out of rivers running nearly on a level. The
icebergs found in the Arctic, on the other hand, are more chunky,
indicating that they come from a more mountainous country, where the
fall of streams is more abrupt, causing the icebergs to be shorter
and thicker.

"When Bernacchi was voyaging in the Antarctic, he wrote: `During the
next two days we passed some thousands of icebergs, as many as ninety
being counted from the bridge at one time. There was very little
variety of form among them, all being very large and bounded by
perpendicular cliffs. There was a large quantity of fresh water at
the surface, derived from the number of icebergs.'

"How does this account accord with your notions of how icebergs are
formed in a country where Bernacchi reports less than two inches of
rainfall in the whole year, and but small quantities of snow? Where
is the water to come from that will produce such great quanti-ties of
icebergs averaging a thousand feet in thickness, and many of them
several miles long? Those icebergs were on their way north-never to
return-yet the ocean will always be filled with them, as others will
come from the place where they came. Where is that place? There is no
rain or melted snow to furnish the water to freeze into an iceberg.
Icebergs can come from only one place- the INTERIOR Of the earth.

TIDAL WAVES. Reed here repeats the description of Arctic tidal waves
by various explorers. They lift the ice of the great ice fields to
great heights and can be heard for miles in the distance before they
reach the ship and for miles after they pass beyond the ship. Arctic
ex-plorers describe these tidal waves as follows: "Giant blocks
pitched and rolled as though controlled by in-visible hands, and the
vast compressing bodies shrieked a shrill and horrible sound that
curdled the blood. On came the frozen waves. Seams ran and rattled
across them with a thundering boom, while we watched their terrible
progress." Reed says: "These tidal waves are caused by some
tremendous agency and I can think of nothing more powerful than the
plunging of an iceberg into the ocean. The great frequency of these
powerful tidal waves seems to exclude the possibility of their being
caused by underwater volcanic eruptions."

THE HOLLOW EARTH VIEW OF THE WATER-SKY

The skies in the Arctic and Antarctic circles reflect the surface of
the earth, water and ice, accurately. No great enterprise is
undertaken without first consulting the water-sky.

Original subject: bears and foxes sighted

From pages 138 - 140 of Nansen's book Farthest North: [ At 79 degrees
North,
bears and foxes sighted. ]

" Friday, December 22d. A bear was shot last night. Jacobsen saw it
first,
during his watch. He shot at it. It made off, and he then went down
and told
about it in the cabin. Mogstad and Peter came on deck; Sverdrup was
called,
too, and came up a little later. They saw the bear on his way towards
the
ship again; but he suddenly caught sight of the gallows with the trap
on the
ice to the west, and went off there. He looked well at the apparatus,
then
raised himself cautiously on his hind-legs, and laid his right paw on
the
cross-beam just beside the trap, stared for a little, hesitating, at
the
delicious morsel, but did not at all like the ugly jaws round it.
Sverdrup
was by this time out at the deckhouse, watching in the sparkling
moonshine.
His heart was jumpinghe expected every moment to hear the snap of his
trap.
But the bear shook his head suspiciously, lowered himself cautiously
on to
allfours again, and sniffed carefully at the wire that the trap was
fastened
by, following it along to where it was made fast to a great block of
ice. He
went round this, and saw how cleverly it was all arranged, then slowly
followed the wire back, raised himself up as before, with his paw on
the
beam of the gallows, had a long look at the trap, and shook his head
again,
probably saying to himself, `These wily fellows have planned this very
cleverly for me.' Now he resumed his march to the ship. When he was
60 paces
of the bow Peter fired. The bear fell, but jumped up and again made
off.
Jacobson, Sverdrup and Mogstad all fired now, and he fell among some
hummocks."

What were warm-booded mamals doing hundred of miles from land? The
nearest land was the New Siberian Islands, which aren't exactly
teeming with bears anyway- they are desolate and windswept from what
I understand.
Where did these bears come from? At 79* North, Nansen was at the
threshold
of the opening, so take a guess.

It was a typical experience of the Arctic explorers that they ran
across mammal life heading North for the winter across the ice,
decade after decade, from various points of the Arctic basin. Where
would they find food? Unless, of course,they were heading from the
opening, maybe following the magnetic lines of force with their
instincts.

People,

Far from land on the outer surface, but from the hollow portion?

DD