Dean,
Do you think that the different colors of the the Aurora is due to the pollen?
MM
Related thread: hyperborea article — Answers Dean's 'Migration North and back' post of 4 Apr 2001
Gardner believed that the interior was lit and warmed
by an inner or Central Sun (or Star)possibly 600 miles
in diameter, left over from the spinning nebula from
which the Earth was formed. Mars had been formed in a
similar fashion, he wrote and its interior sun could
sometimes be seen glinting through its polar openings.
Reflected light from the Earth's interior sun,
according to Gardner, creates the startling brilliance
of the aurora Borealis at the North Pole (in the
Arctic) and the aurora Australis at the South Pole (in
Antarctica).
On this subject, Gardner parted company with Reed,
who maintained that the inner world got its light from
the outer sun shinning in at the Poles. As for the
aurora, Reed had an ingenious explanation. The
northern lights, he said, are the reflected images of
interior prairie fires and volcanoes. They obviously
are not caused by electricity, as modern orthodox
scientist had proposed. This theory Reed disposed of
with a scornful rhetorical question: "Does electricity
ever move through the heavens as if driven slowly
along by some unseen agency?!"
To explain why the aurora is most brilliant during
the winter, Reed pointed out that the sun shines
directly into the south polar opening at that time of
year. The ice and snow reflect at the rim and
intensify the light that emerges from the North Pole
to create the aurora. Presumably, the situation is
reversed in summer.
I strongly belive that the strange phenomenon of the
northern light which in the light of Symmes' theory
may easily be explained as rays of light from the
central sun of the Inner World, breaking occasionally
through the fog and cloud banks above the polar
opening as well as ice reflected images of interior
fires and volcanic eruptions that must be constant in
the inner world.
Russ
Mike Maloney,
No, the aurora is way too high. Light breaking up into its constituent
particles is a viable explanation.
DD
Russ,
I am with you 100% on the idea of the inner sun being the origin of the
aurora. The NASA model is just imagination and can't be adapted to a HE
understanding. The NASA model has the charged particles being stored in the
" magnetic bottles " similar to the Van Allen Belt. But these types of
belts only extend up to about 62* of latitude, so how do the particles make
the jump? How can we say that these belts are magnetic anyway? They are
thick around the equator and taper off by 62* latitude on each side like a
crescent moon. And if the solar winds trigger the displays by swelling the
magnetic bottles with charged particles, then why is the triggering not
synchronous with the displays,? The delay can take days. Not! And the amount
of charged particles in the magnetic bottles can't be measured. They measure
the display and assume that the magnetic bottles were holding the amount of
charged particles necessary to form the display. The whole thing is a myth,
a VERY unproven theory.
We make a mistake if we stay within the parameters of conventional science
and try to explain geological phenomena, especailly HE Geo phenomena.
It shouldn't be too hard to accept that particles passing through the
Earth's shell can congregate at the center of the cavity and form the inner
sun. The Earth's shell is not an impregnable barrier. Even conventional
science admits that some cosmic rays and nutrinos can pass through. Of
course, science doesn't understand how the sun's rays generate soft
particles which seep on through, but it's not necessary. They already have
the idea that particles can pass through the Earth. One doesn't have to
stretch things too far in a hollow Earth context to figure out what the
source of the inner sun can be.
And why the delay between the arrival of the solar winds and the aurora? The
charged particles have been building up within the cavity. It is that
accumulated quantity, not only the quantity which arrives, which causes the
display, although the newly arriving charged particles " nudge " the whole
process. It takes the newly arriving particles a bit of time to pass through
the Earth's shell, and then for a sufficient quantity to build up in the
cavity maybe a bit more of time has to pass. That is why the synchronicity
is not exact. And if solar winds arrive but there still hasn't been enough
of an accumulaion in the cavity, then a display won't come about.
So I agree that Garnder was right that the aurora is caused by the sun
within. But he didn't understand the details. Still, he was basically right.
Adopting NASA's model of charged particles accumulating in magnetic bottles
and then passing into the Polar openings is a big deviation, though. It
ignores the ability of certain particles to pass through the shell of the
Earth to the cavity, and only admits that a sparse number of particles can
do so, whatever conventional science says. We don't have to stay within the
bounds of canventional geology and astronomy to present our HE models.
And by the way, Cater is the one who presents this basic model. He first
presented it in a book copyrighted in 1982, but it was ahead of the
comprehension of most hollow Earthers and, consequently, was never really
incorporated in the mainstream HE theories.
I've been trying my best to bring the guy's model to the attention of the HE
community; maybe now someone will try to understand the guy, in spite of my
imperfect presentations.
Dharma/Dean
--- Dean De Lucia, [email protected]
I wish to offer the belief that:"the trees will still
be here after man has gone the way of all the
countless forms of life that preceded him." To me it
is a "tremendous" thought which suggest the greatness
of nature and the insignificance of man. After all the
Saber-toothed-tiger (Smilodon)who stalked his prey in
the Eocene-era times was gone, although he very much
took better care of himself than we do.
Obviously man will not persist through eternity, but
the trees will.
Note:"I can contemplate with equanimity the thought
of a manless world; but a treeless world-never!"
Russ
http://www.bibliofind.com/cgi-bin/texis.exe/s/search/search.html?dealerid=&q
author=pari+spolter&qtitle=&qcomments=&minp=&maxp=&daysback=at+any+date&x=0&
y=0
Pari Spolter's book Gravitational Force of the Sun
Pari Spolter's book Review paper says "This book is a serious challenge to
Newton's law of universal gravitation as it is present formulated....The
need to accept Albert Einstein's general the ory of relativity has been
obviated." presents new equations for this fundamental force in nature.
Extensively referenced; charts, equations, tables etc. supporting her
point., Science, Philosophy & Religion PHYSTICS EINSTEIN KEPLER S THIRD
NEWTON S LAW THEORY OF RELATIVITY GRAVAITY SCIENCE PHILOSOPHY & RELIGION
Review paper says " This book is a serious challenge to Newton's law of
universal gravitation as it is present formulated....The need to accept
Albert Einstein's general the ory of relativity has been obviated." presents
new equations for this fundamental force in nature. Extensively referenced;
charts, equations, tables etc. supporting her point., Science, Philosophy &
Religion PHYSTICS EINSTEIN KEPLER S THIRD NEWTON S LAW THEORY OF RELATIVITY
GRAVAITY SCIENCE PHILOSOPHY & RELIGION
The above is from the bibliofind page
Dean
Dean,
Also I forgot to mention; You once said in a previous
e-mail that you believed the Triassic Period was
cyclic and that one day (in the Far remote future)that
creatures from the inner world would return to the
surface.
And you might be 100% correct! The history of
evolution has taught us that life cannot be contained
nor can it be controlled.These creatures may very well
return to the surface one day. Obviously these
animals;the dinosaurs and prehistoric mammals of the
Mesozoic and Cenozoic eras had faced extinction on the
outer crust and were forced to migrate into the Inner
World through the Polar Openings.
Good Points you made. After all Chaos Theory yields
that the future is unpredictable.
Perhaps in nature's laboratory each type that had at
some era dominated all others represented an
experiment in the eternal search for perfection. The
invertebrate had given away to fishes, the fishes to
the amphibians to the reptiles, the reptiles to the
dinosaurs, birds and mammals, and these in turn, ha
been forced to bow to the greater intelligence of man.
What would be next? I am sure there would be
something after man, who is unquestionably the
Creator's greatest blunder, combining as he does all
the vices of preceding types from invertebrates to
mammals, while possessing few of their virtues.
Russ
Do you know when the prehistoric cave species of lion was supposed to
disappear
from earth according to the modern science? I've found one interesting hint
in the Mahabharata (Adi Parva) that they were still around in Vedic times
(5000 years +).
Jan