People,
I think I have mentioned that I have been reading the Mahabharat, about the great war that took place just before the Kaliyuga began. I am currently reading about the 17th and 18th days of the war and about the rascal Shakuni, who fought to kill Arjuna and his brothers, and who died in the attempt.
Anyway, just in the last 100 pages more or less, three times a statement has poppooed up about meteors that originate from The Sun. On Page 396 of the seventh volume of the Debroy translation, Sanjaya, an eye witness to the battle, commented the following to King Dhritarashtra (He won't be the King for long!) This was during his description of the battlefield that day: "From the solar disc, meteors deescended down in every direction."
I've just done some reading on the origin of meteorites and they seem like unproven, incongruent speculations, as usual. Orthodox science lies about everything else, so why not the origin of meteors?
Five will get you ten that Sanjaya's comment is the real deal comment!
Cheers!
2 Likes
That's fascinating! I was wondering the other day if the sun ever spews out solid objects.
I think we should listen to ancient records and ancient stories instead of relegating them to myth and fantasy. They might just be telling the truth, and the ancients may have known a heck of a lot more than our present-day archeologists and scientists would ever believe.
1 Like
SilverMoon,
You are right on the money. There are glyphs in Mexico depicting Giants interacting with the common crowd, and glyphs in Egypt showing helicopters and astronauts and jets and such.
The Vedic literature leaves much history behind, written in a sophisticated language. And the archeologists dig for shards sothat they may piece things together and arrive at conclusions.
Just read the books and you'll know.
Cheers
1 Like
I do have the Bhagavad Gita, and have read it at least once, maybe twice. It's what convinced me that Krishna and Christ (Jesus) are the same person.
SilverMoon,
The same author who wrote The Hollow Earth, Dr. Raymond Bernard, wrote "From Christ to Crishna". He draws the same conclusion. Remember that we have the Holy Bible which was handed down to us by the Emperor Constantine, who was a big rascal. We have to take the Bible that we currently use with a lot of salt.
I once read one of the lost books of The Bible, the one about the birth of Christ that wasn't included in the BIble. It had some things that the one in use didn't. But I easily realized that when you put them both together, you get an account which closely corresponds to the birth of Krishna as told in the Puranas of India.
I read a story about Hercules and a fight that he had with a willd horse when he was little. It was the same story of the fight that little Krishna had with the demon in the form of a mule named Dhenukasura. Same story.
Bala was Krishna's brother, and he led an army against the female Amazons in northern Africa. I have an account of this in a booklet in Greek and Castillian/Spanish. The bookllet is a bit broader than just Bala's incursion, it doesn't write a whole lot about it. One chapter is entitled: The Atlantean Wars Against the Atlanteans And the Gorgons.
Cristo is Latin for Christ. The "s" in Latin was pronounced as an "sh", and only "ss" got the "s" pronunciation. Krishna is often pronounced as Krishno in certain regions of India, such as Berngal. Pronunciations do get corrupted over time.
So know that the "s" in Cristo is the same as the "sh" in Krishno, and then Christ becomes Krishno except for the consonant "t" in Christ. Change it to an "n", and you have the name Krishno. All you have to do is understand how Cristo was pronounced in Latin, and then change one consonant for another.
I wonder if, when the robots are in charge, they will allow us to have talks like this.
I want a pretty robot!
Cheers!