"Split the wood, lift the stone and I am there."
Food for thought. Some interesting points.
Leslee
Light Ring Theory: Part 1
Almost every science oriented person has his own "theory of everything." So here is mine. It has little mathematical development behind it, and I cite very few sources as far as scientific research papers are concerned, so by the standards of the "establishment," this article is laughable.
However, if you follow along, you will note the elegance of this theory and its ability to visually explain many physical characteristics and events such as inertia, gravity, and relativistic effects, in addition to covering observations recorded in fringe science such as antigravity and scalar waves.
Furthermore, the entire theory is based on the traditional esoteric concept that matter is made of light. In its entirety, it is easy to understand, visualize, and were the reader up for the task, it would be fertile territory for mathematical exploration.
The informality of this article here is a product of its aim toward a lay audience.
Introduction
The LRT is based on two fundamental concepts:
-
Matter arises from light, the speed of light being the only true velocity
-
Infinitely harmonic dimensions exist
Matter Arises from Light
A photon is a two dimensional, right-angled vector construct with electricity and magnetism comprising these vectors. Each vector oscillates from positive to negative at a frequency commonly called electromagnetic (EM) frequency.
The only difference between electric and magnetic fields is their orientation in our three-dimensional space.
In addition, to the E and B(magnetic) vectors, there is also a third vector called a poynting vector, which is represents the power per unit area a beam of light carries and the direction which it travels. This poynting vector also happens to be a disguised gravity vector, in that E X B = u*S, where u is a constant yet to be found, and S is the poynting vector, shows the relationship between electricity, magnetism, and gravity. They are all at right angles. This basic idea has been promoted by many fringe science writers, and I do not claim authorship of the idea.
Note that the G-vector indicates its synonymity with the velocity of light vector; both point in the same direction. Bruce Cathie's work into harmonics and dimensionless numbers reveals there to be an inverse harmonic relationship between gravity and speed of light, meaning they are flip sides of the same coin, just as the LRT suggests.
The relation between matter and light is logically derived as follows: if both are two forms of the same entity then the change from one to the other involves no annihilation of substance, only form.
An object such as a photon always travels at a constant speed, like the ball in a game of Pong. To simultaneously keep the ball still but allow it to maintain its speed, the ball can be made to follow a tight circular track. The track as a whole remains still while the ball continues to whiz around at its original speed.
A photon follows the same motion when it transforms into matter. The electric vector radiates in line with the radius vector, the B-vector points as the axis-vector does, and the G-vector aims tangentially.
Since the tangential velocity is constant, the rotational frequency of this "Light Ring" (LR) changes only with the circumference, area, or radius. The properties of LR's will be discussed later.
Infinitely Harmonic Dimensions
When a solid shape casts its shadow upon a wall, its shadow is the object reduced by one dimension...from 3D to 2D. Furthermore, the shadow can be projected onto a line, and the line into a point. It follows that the original 3D object might have been a shadow of a 4D form, and 4D of a five-dimensional shape, ad infinitum.
The idea of multiple dimensions is conceived and supported by the special theory of relativity, especially the Lorentz transformations.
Lorentz Transformation
The basis of relativity, the Lorentz transformation, describes how phenomena appears to behave to stationary observers as systems in which they occur travel at velocities near that of light. For example, objects appear "squished," they age slower, and are said to become increasingly massive with increasing velocity. The reason for this is attributed to a physical rotation of the system through spacetime, our perceptions of the system being distorted by the misalignment, and is attributed mathematically as such:
As an object increases in velocity (v), but with the speed of light (c) remaining constant, the length(l) of the object must decrease. In actuality, the "squished" image of the object is our perception of its shadow as it rotates out of our dimension. The property and severity of the length contraction is calculated through the Pythagorean theorem.
This last equation is a factor that can be multiplied by an object's original length to calculate its apparent length as it travels by at some velocity.
It can be seen that relativity is indeed a geometrically engendered effect, and thanks to this fact, the ideas of relativity can be taken beyond what mainstream scientists have conceived thus far.
For example, if a certain velocity represents a certain angle into the 4th spatial dimension (In the LRT, time is a dimension that is not included for practical purposes, thus 4D means one spatial dimension above ours), then a changing angle would mean both a rotation into 4D and a changing velocity vector. Interestingly, a changing velocity vector is known as acceleration, which helps explain the property of inertia.
Spatial Framework
The coordinate system and framework we will operate in for now is Cartesian in shape, and has an LR situated as such:
This diagram has our 3rd dimension represented by the x-axis. Ninety degrees from it are the fourth and fifth dimensions.
An LR is really 4-D and greater in shape. As its linear velocity increases, it rotates off the xy plane and into the xyz space (which represents a 5-D space). This rotation is identical to the one described by the Lorentz transformation.
Now, the diagram is not simply an imaginary construct, but a representation of the true physical space in which the LR's exist.
Ether
When looking at the diagram, it can be seen that the space metered by the axis is 5-dimensional, while the xy plane is 4-D, and the x-axis represents our 3rd dimension.
This space, however, is not empty. It is permeated by a proto-field known as the ether, originally a popular concept until the Michelson-Morley experiment "proved it wrong." This experiment, as will later be shown, never disproved the ether concept I propose.
This concept is centered about a multidimensional ether, the portion of which exists in our space being only a thin slice. In the diagram, the xyz space represents this hyper-ether (called simply ether from now on), and the plane symbolizes our space.
When an object moves through our space, it moves about in the diagram on the xy plane or x-axis, depending on the level of interpretation.
When an object accelerates, however, it actually rotates through the ether in the diagram.
Inertia
Think of the diagram's ether replaced by water, and the xy plane as a table submerged far beneath the surface. The LR is a large metal dinner tray, flat all around, on the table's top.
Now, an object in uniform linear motion (ULM, meaning constant speed, constant direction) is analogous to the tray moving about, skimming the surface of the table. Because it slices through the water, it experiences, for analogy's sake, no resistance, like a knife through lard.
But when an object accelerates (changes velocity), it rotates into hyperspace. The dinner tray is picked up vertically through the water, but like a parachute, it experiences much resistance to this motion.
Thus, any object accelerated undergoes a resistance in its acceleration because the ether is in the way of the object's rotation into hyperspace.
An object in ULM, however, is slicing sideways through the ether, and therefore experiences free motion through the ether and is not hindered in our space.
Michelson-Morley
The MM experiment was conducted to detect earth's passage through a stationary ether, the flow of which was to alter the path of a beam of light.
The results were that no such drift was detected, and they concluded unfortunately that no ether existed.
This conclusion is incorrect. The experiment tested for an ether that would resist ULM in our space. The beams of light and machinery were kept relatively still, and thus in my diagram, the beams "sliced" through the ether, but did not travel perpendicularly to it, so there was no resistance encountered. Michelson and Morley were in essence searching for water by sliding the dinner tray sideways.
But, were the experimental apparatus suddenly accelerated, there would indeed be a detected alteration in the path of the beam of light.
In fact, light rays bend in gravitational fields and in accelerating frames of reference, as Einstein predicted and later had confirmed during an eclipse where stars near our sun looked "warped" from their normal positions in the sky, their light having been bent in a new direction as the photons passed near the sun's intense gravitational field. Also, he proved mathematically that light does not escape black holes because it bends back into itself.
Furthermore, a thought experiment of Einstein's involved accelerating an elevator in outer space, that an observer in the elevator would be pressed to the floor and not be able to distinguish between an accelerating elevator and one standing still in a gravitational field. In both cases, objects fall to the floor, and in both cases, light bends downward.
In the diagram, the accelerating elevator is rotating into the ether, and objects within it undergo inertial effects.
Gravity
The big question at the turn of the century was: what is gravity? In fact, this is still an important, heavily researched question. The thinkers knew then it was similar to acceleration, but why do acceleration and gravity both exhibit the same effects in different circumstances? Some went as far as to theorize that we actually live on the inside of earth, and its rotation causes us to be pressed to the ground just as we are slung to the side door of a car when rounding a corner. They had the general idea, that a force was pressing us to the ground...
So what is the connection? The connection is as follows:
In the diagram, an acceleration is the rotation of an object composed of LR's perpendicularly into the stationary ether, like a parachute drawn through they air.
Gravity, however, is when a stationary object is in the way of a rotating ether field, like a stead man standing waist high in a rushing river. Were he to lose his footing, he would be swept away at the linear velocity of the river; were an object to loose the ground beneath it, it would rotate along with the natural rotation speed of the ether field surrounding the planet, or in our space, falling downward at a constant rate of acceleration.
To recap: acceleration is motion against a stationary ether, and gravity is the ether's motion against a stationary object.
The rotating ether is described as a "curl" in the hyper-dimensional ether, and as a "sink" in our 3rd dimension. Curl is a measure of vorticity (swirly-ness), and sink a measure of suction at a point. The first is exemplified by a whirlpool, and the second as a vacuum cleaner nozzle sucking in air. Both are the same phenomena, except the latter is a lower dimensional slice of the first. A whirlpool is seen as a sucking point by a flatlander. The purpose of the foregoing paragraph is to hint at a mathematical quantization of the seemingly qualitative properties described here.
My theory supports the idea of gravity being mostly a "push" from above, and is in agreement with another theory stating that masses shield other masses from this etheric rays such that two bodies are pushed together since each is in the other's shadow. Thus, masses are gravity sinks.
Energy
As far as the multidimensional arrangement of reality is concerned, at velocity v = 0, the LR is at angle 0. When an LR accelerates, it rotates continuously away from the x axis or xy plane, and when it stops accelerating to travel forth at a constant velocity, it stays at the angle at which it quit accelerating. So different angles represent different velocities; the higher the angle, the higher the velocity (at non-relativistic speeds). Since energy of an object is 1/2 mass * velocity^squared, higher angles also denote higher energies.
In fact, it is a principle of the LR that one unit of angle is proportional to the square root of one unit of energy per unit mass. But since mass here is the same for all LR's in this analogy, we can say that one unit of angle is relatively proportional to one unit of energy only. Since at v = 0, Angle A = 0, and at v = c, A = 1, we can say the following:
Therefore, with every input of energy for the LR, it will rotates some angle "A" into hyperspace. For objects of varying mass, the rotation differs as A = energy / mass. So a 2 kg rock given 2 joules of energy will be approximately twice the angle of a 4 kg rock given the same energy to set it into motion.
One might wonder what would happen if the energy increases such that the angle reaches 1...would the object then be travelling at the speed of light?
Dimensional Ascension
This brings us to another feature of the theory. An object does not rotate simply from our dimension directly into the next. While it is in 4-D, it is partly in 5-D also, and 6-D to a lesser degree, and 7-D to an even lesser one.
The object we see speeding by us is spread across many dimensions, but the majority of this distribution resides in certain dimensions, which ones depending on velocity.
For example, an object at rest almost entirely occupies our three dimensions and is only 4th and 5th dimensional enough not to disappear entirely. This is because if we shave a shape down to a thin plane, and continue shaving away, if it's thickness is 0, it no longer exists, so it must have some infinitesimal thickness. But as the object speeds up toward higher velocities, all we begin to see is the shadow it leaves behind, its image projected from the higher dimension which is yet another image of a still higher dimension...each projection is a little more contracted than the one closer to the original.
In this illustration, a is shorter than b which is shorter than c because c is at a higher dimension than b, which is higher in dimension than a.
But a unit of angle is still a unit of angle. One can turn ten degrees to the left, right, up or down, back and forth, and there is nothing significant about the direction. Likewise, one can turn ana or kata (the equivalent of up or down into hyperspace) by the same ten degrees and not undergo anything unique.
The same is true for energy, since energy is proportional to angle. What we see of an LR at a certain angle, velocity, or energy is but a projection, and as an object nears the speed of light, its collections of dimensions (in our case, the object would consist of three dimensions) are found at such high dimensions that all we see in our sets of dimensions is a thin sliver of the original.
So as a spaceship, for example, adds more fuel to its thrusters, while alreadygoing near the speed of light, it actually does increase in velocity by the same amount as when it left the runway, contrary to the Theory of Relativity. This increase in velocity, however, is primarily in the n-th dimension and space, and the part we see in our dimension is only a tiny fraction of it. We see only a small part of its total acceleration.
Thus, we never actually observe objects reach the speed of light, since they must be at an infinite dimension to result in an angle of v/c = 1.
An LR does not rotate simply from the x axis to the vertical z axis and can be claimed to have easily reached the speed of light. It instead spirals upward, then anaward, then hyperanaward, etc... and all that happens in the original diagram is that it appears to rotate more slowly the closer it gets to the z axis since most of the energy put into making the LR go faster makes it go faster in a distant higher dimension, not the dimensions in the diagram.
Mass Increase
But since orthodox scientists do not know about dimensional ascension, how can they account for objects requiring more energy to increase their velocities by the same increment as when they began accelerating from standstill? How do they explain that a rocket ship throws fuel into its boosters but appears to accelerate less at relativistic speeds? Well, they know that E = 1/2 m*v^2, and momentum p = mv, and that energy must be conserved, so they believe what their incomplete equations tell them to believe, that mass increases with increasing velocity. In other words, at high velocities, because the object is heavier, more energy is needed to make it go faster. Or so it seems.
Were dimensional ascension adopted, there would be no need for the concept of "relativistic mass increase." In fact, when an object is said to gain mass, it is also said to not exhibit any greater gravitational effects. Now, we all know that things weigh more on Jupiter than they do on Mars, because Jupiter is more massive for its size than Mars. So what makes reality weird enough to circumvent this law of gravitation and allow relativistic masses to increase but not have greater gravitational fields?
Nothing. Reality is not weird; it is simple, elegant, precise, and beautiful. It is more logical, and less complicated to assume that masses ascend dimensionally than to say they stay within our dimension but magically increase in mass because the math appears to state so. Ockham's razor applies here, which says that the simple explanation is more likely to be correct [which does not apply to conspiracy theories since the conspirators use Ockham's Razor to mask their actions with simple explanations, known as plausible deniability].
But, to follow the law of conservation of energy, we must somehow still be able to see evidence of the energy put into an LR in our dimension even while it is at a far higher one. Indeed, the energy shows up as an increase in the amplitude of the photons comprising the LR.
Multidimensionality of the Photon
In the Light Ring Theory, a property of a photon includes it travelling at a constant velocity when free, and when bound as part of an LR, it has certain amplitudes dependent upon the linear velocity of the LR. Therefore, since free photons in vacuum travel at constant velocities, they have constant amplitudes no matter their frequencies, which any physics book will tell you.
Since energy increase is proportional to dimensional angle increase, a high energy photon is at a higher angle than a low energy photon. The energy of a photon is E = h*f, where h is Planck's constant, and f is frequency. As one can see, the energy of a photon is entirely dependent upon its frequency. This is in agreement with the LRT. When a photon, illustrated below, is at a greater angle, its projection onto our space (represented by the x-axis) appears more "scrunched" than the photon at a lower angle. The closer the peaks and troughs are to one another, the higher the frequency. So, the greater the angle, the greater the energy, and the greater the frequency, just as the equation above points out.
What we see of a photon is what is left after a nearly infinite dimensioned "superphoton" has cast its shadow downward from dimension to dimension until it is visible in ours. In other words, all photons are the same in their true forms, and since everything is made of LR's, and LR's are constructs of photons, everything is essentially the same thing...all is one.
When an LR gains high velocity, the whole entity has rotated into a higher dimension, the photons trapped within the LR, also. As it rotates, we see a change in the superphotons' properties such that when projected into our 3-D space, we simply see a ring of photons with greater amplitude than when each photon traveled at c (equivalent to the photons being free in vacuum, or bound in an LR at standstill). This is all rather esoteric, but sticking to what we can see of the superphoton is more practical than studying light rays based on their divine source.
Energy and Fields
Electric, gravitational, and magnetic fields are all different geometric motions, directions, and distortions within the (hyper) ether. As said earlier, electric and magnetic fields differ only in the direction which their distortions point, with gravity as a curl in the hyperether and a sink in the ordinary ether.
As far as the visible projection of an LR is concerned, the extra amplitude of an LR's photons can be "unloaded" into this ether to create new swirls and LR's within it...more will be discussed on this shortly.
All energy can be quantized as angle, and when two particles are at different potentials within a field (be it two masses at different heights or separated by some distance, or a negative electron and positive proton, or two magnets close but not touching) they are separated by an angle proportional to their potential energies. Earlier, angle referred strictly to kinetic energy, but potential energy also contributes to angle.
In a gravitational field, a potential difference is exemplified by a mass being some height above the earth. The potential energy in this case is massgravitational accelerationheight. The angle would be where G is the universal gravitational constant, M is mass of the planet, h is height of the object above the surface of the planet, r is the planet's radius, and c is the speed of light.
In view of the LRT, an object at some height above us is rotationally and dimensionally separated from us.
The same is true of particles in electric and magnetic fields. In general, two objects are at different dimensions when there is some potential energy between them.
Time Dilation due to Uniform Linear Motion
Length contraction and mass increase have already been discussed.
As for time dilation, the explanation lies in the area (or volume since the LR is really not a ring, but a hypersphere) of an LR always remaining constant no matter how it is viewed or from what dimension. So if an LR is at a high velocity, and all we see is its squished appearance, but the area stays constant, then the circumference must increase. This sounds a lot like orthodox scientists pointing to energy equations and claiming mass being the only property that can and does change...which means the LRT might be incomplete when explaining time dilation...
Since a photon can travel at c, and since circumference becomes greater, then the overall cyclical frequency of the LR decreases. In other words, it takes a photon more time to go around the perimeter of an LR because the perimeter has gotten longer from our perception, but in proper reality, the photon still travels at the same speed as before. Thus, a clock flying past us would appear to be moving slower, and those traveling with the clock would observe our clocks on the ground doing likewise.
It is another feature of the LRT that time is measured by the frequency of an LR, and that slowing the cyclical frequency of an LR slows its apparent time. Outside of an LR, there is only hyperether and photons, both of which are timeless; hyperether because no observation tool is composed of unperturbed hyperether, and photons because they have no cyclical frequency and since they travel at c, have infinite time dilation. Thus, the only entities capable of defining time as we know it are LR's. Measuring time by the speed of light is misleading; our time and the time measured by the speed of light do not correspond due to relativistic effects since light and matter are of opposite form. By clocking time by the cyclical frequency of matter, we gain a better understanding as to what happens when matter ascends dimensionally.
Time Dilation during Acceleration
During ULM, objects appear to one another as aging more slowly, which leads to the twin paradox. If twin B leaves twin A near light speeds, and returns, he is younger than twin A, since twin A saw B move away and come back, and saw his clock tick slower. But, twin B saw A leave him and return as the earth fell away beneath his spacecraft, meaning A would be younger. So who is younger?
Well, the key to solving this paradox is that only twin B was accelerating. You see, uniform linear motion causes one to perceive the other's time as dilated, but it is acceleration which actually makes one younger than the other. So, whichever twin has to fire his thrusters is the one who will be younger when they meet again.
The LRT explains this beautifully, much like ordinary relativity explains time dilation during uniform linear motion.
A stationary light ring, or one moving at a constant velocity through space, has a certain cyclical frequency which determines how quickly it ages. If this frequency is altered within the LR itself, it will likewise change the rate of aging. During acceleration, an LR moves at a constant angular rotation (not to be confused with cyclical frequency) through the hyperether until the acceleration stops.
Now, visualize one photon moving in a circle and note how long it takes to make one cycle. When we apply acceleration, this photon moves upward and traces out a helical path, all the while maintaining its velocity of c. But before it comes back around 360 degrees, it has traced a longer path in the helix than when it was stationary and merely moving in a circle. A longer path length and constant velocity results in a longer time to complete one cycle compared to stationary LR's.
Thus, the LR within twin B traced a helix as he was accelerating into outerspace, when he turned around, and when he slowed before landing. His LR's traced out longer path lengths than twin A, and thus did not complete as many revolutions, resulting in his younger appearance.
As a side note, perhaps it would be possible to accelerate one electron with respect to another, such that when they meet their difference in time dilation would result in a 180 degree phase shift among their LR's, causing them to annihilate.
Multidimensionality of Reality
To explain the next section, we must first analyze how reality is constructed. The diagram we have been using to illustrate how LR's rotate are applicable only to our reality. In order of archetypical-ness, there are multiple timelines, realities, universes and spaces. Equivalently, there are more spaces (dimensions) than universes, more universes than realities, and more realities than timelines. Our diagram can only show some of the spaces, and awkwardly illustrate a few of the other universes, such as the antimatter universe and negative matter universe. Because reality is so holographic, hierarchical, and web-like, there is no perfect analogy or diagram to illustrate all of it.
Full Structure of the Light Ring
In addition to a circular (hyperspherical) arrangement of photons, there are several more properties to be mentioned about an LR.
First, no light ring is created or exists alone. It always has a counterpart, and is one pole of a double-LR structure. The entire light ring structure (LRS) looks like an hourglass, or like two cones joined at the base, or two vortices linked by their tails that spin in opposite directions across the symmetry line.
The diagram shows two LRS's and four poles all together, each having its own unique spin and flow directions. The significance of these orientations will become evident as follows.
Electric Monopoles and Magnetic Dipoles
No magnetic monopoles have yet been observed, meaning that all things magnetic have both a north and a south pole, but never one alone. Electric charges, however, are often found by themselves as in an electron with a solitary negative charge. Why is this?
It is known that electrons in motion produce magnetic fields, and that at the speed of light, these electrons would become pure magnetic dipoles giving off no electric field, only magnetic. The reverse is also true. As mentioned earlier, the difference between E and B is an angle of 90 circular degrees or 1 in our convention. Also, velocities result in angular separations, so it follows that electrons rotate 90 degrees to appear as magnetic dipoles. Additionally, the LR-structure explains why only magnetic dipoles are found. What we observe of an LR depends on its "slice" we observe, so in this diagram, all we observe is a ball with radiating electric field lines.
Since only one pole of the LRS in this case is in our universe, we observe a monopole. The other pole is in the negative universe. But when the LR-structure undergoes a 90 degree rotation, we observe flux entering one side and exiting the other, the arrangement being a dipole.
As the angle ranges between 0 and 90 degrees, different proportions of E to B (E = B*c) are observed as the LR/electron is moving at various velocities.
Attracting Electric Particles
With two particles comes diagrams of two LR-structures. When these particles are separated by a distance and are of opposite polarity of charge, they attract, and thus have a potential difference between them. They have the potential to move toward one another if the restraining force keeping them apart is released. For example's sake, they are arranged as such:
As can be seen, the ether distortions follow a complementary path, i.e., the emanation of one LRS's pole is the influx of the other LRS, and they therefore attract.
Attracting Magnetic Particles
The situation is similar, except the flow of flux from one structure must equal the direction of flow toward another structure. In other words, one LRS must jet out flux while the other LRS takes it in. If both blow or suck (yeah, haha), then they repel.
Obviously, what all of this refers to is the north and south poles of a magnet. Opposite poles attract, and similar ones repel; no big surprise there, except orthodox science calls it "action at a distance" and resorts to complex quantum mechanics to explain how two magnets repel without contacting one another. The LRT simply uses the concept of ether flux to explain this.
One might ask why the flux from a magnet does not influence all masses, since gravity was said earlier to be a flux. This is because the direction of flux of a magnet is within our dimension, not perpendicular to it. Gravity is a stream of water pushing down on the dinner tray, while the flux from a magnet is merely skimming along the top of the tray, leaving the tray unmoved. Also, due to the parallel flux, a magnetic field does not perform work, since work is the expenditure of energy and no energy is expended when LR's are not forced to rotate. Any physics book will state that magnetic fields do no work, unlike electric fields, which once again is in agreement with the LRT.
Since energy is proportional to angle, if there is an angular separation, there is a magnetic potential difference. Since the two LRS's attract in such a way that the angle between them is forcibly reduced, the real-world equivalent would be two magnets attempting to reduce the potential energy between them, which can only be accomplished if the distance between them is reduced. Therefore, magnets of opposite polarity attract.
Gravitational Attraction
Two facing poles spin, most often in the same direction:
The ether between and surrounding the poles also spin, in a vorticial manner, at the frequency of the LR's cyclical rotation.
Dissonance between the frequencies of the poles is disfavored by nature, and the poles seek attraction by virtue of their sympathetic oscillations, by their equalities in frequencies when their separation angles are small.
For example, a particle far above a planet is at a greater angle from the planet than one on the ground. Because of this angle, time differs for the higher object relative to both the ground object and the planet itself. And since LR's seek equality of frequency with other LR's, the object is attracted toward the planet's center of gravity such that the angle reduces and hence the frequencies become more equal due to the reduction in relativistic time dilations. This form of gravity, then, is a direct response to time dilation. Special relativity explains general relativity.
This is the second component to gravity, the first being the curl/sink phenomena whereby objects are pushed toward earth by ether flow.
In summary, gravity is caused both by sympathetic attraction of vertical rotation of two LR's, and the curl of such a system which manifests itself as a sink whereby ether flows from outer space (actually from hyperspace) toward the center of the earth (actually center of each LR) which in turn presses all masses toward the earth and slightly toward one another. So gravity is both a push and a pull.
Antigravity
There are at least two methods to achieving antigravity effects: emulation and worming.
Emulation is when a disk is spun horizontally, and the arrangement produces an ether flux just as an LR-structures does. An example of this is the rotating superconducting disk antigravity effect first noticed in Finland a few years ago, or the gyroscopes experimented with in Japan that lost or gained weight depending on direction of rotation, or John Searl's disks.
Second, we have worming. As shall be described in the Coanda article (check this site to see if it is yet written), smoke rings roll their way through the air, but LRS pairs can roll their way through the hyperether given the correct geometric arrangement. One of such devices is the biefeld-brown gravitator.
Biefeld-Brown
The biefeld-brown effect is evident in high voltage, parallel plate capacitors usually charged to >100kV DC. This "gravitator" will usually accelerate toward the positive plate.
The simplest gravitator is an electric dipole: (small diagram of dipole) separated physically by vacuum or dielectric. Because there is potential energy between the dipoles, they are angularly separated, and it is this separation which explains why the gravitator moves.
Other theories exist seeking to explain the biefeld-brown effect, one of which proposes the electron orbits within the dielectric between the electrodes distorting and biasing into an eccentric elliptical shape whereby the inequality of motion of the electron acts as a centrifugal rectifier propelling the entire device forward. This theory fails in that the biefeld-brown effect still occurs when vacuum is the dielectric, and there are obviously no electrons in vacuum, and thus no distorted orbits to propel gravitators forward.
The LRT diagram of an electric dipole separated by an angle looks as such:
A separation allows flux leakage which is more localized to the reality plane than a closed system where the flux has to span much farther and is evident on the far poles of the LR-structure. As will be mentioned next, the far poles of an LR structure are not in our universe, but represent poles existing in our anti-universes and negative universes.
So, looking at the diagram above, the system's geometry allows flux outside the LRS to flow in the same direction. This flux is a hyperether flux, and the entire system treads or "worms" its way through the hyperether as a smoke ring through air, or if it is stationary in our space, it channels hyperether around itself as normal masses do and generates gravity. If the plates are not charged with high voltage, then the two poles are virtually atop one another, allowing no flux leakage outside the circumference of the LR's and thus no reactive force against the hyperether.
In other words, this arrangement either accelerates toward the positive pole or emits gravitational fields if stationary. The behavior of its worming upward or downward in angle means that in our space, it is constantly gaining energy, accelerating. This particular example demonstrates the possibility of free energy when devices tap into the ever-present flux ether, the trick being in engineering devices to channel the perpendicular flux into our dimensions.
One might ask why two attracting magnets at a fixed distance allowed to movefreely do not worm their way through our space. It is because magnetic dipoles are LR's lying sideways, their full lengths intersecting our reality plane, whose flux leakage is parallel to this plane and not perpendicular as in the diagram above. Thus, two magnets cannot worm their way into the hyperether or
gain angular separation and accelerate as a gravitator because their direction
of flux is not in the direction of angular movement.
Einstein-Rosen Bridge within LRS
Potential characteristics of an Einstein-Rosen bridge include rotation, vorticity, and connectivity between locations separated by space, even if those locations are in alternate universes. It is hereby hypothesized that the double inverted vortex connecting the two poles of an LRS is in fact this Einstein-Rosen bridge. One pole exists in this space, and the other in our negative universe (as opposed to anti-universe, where only the charges are opposite).
As is known, the Casimir effect consists of particles and antiparticles emerging from vacuum and immediately annihilating. In other words, out of zero potential come forth a particle and antiparticle, demonstrating the principle of symmetry. However, the particles and antiparticle both exist in this space, neglecting the question of how symmetry applies to the concept of a negative universe. Symmetry, it so happens, includes not only particle and antiparticle duality, but particle and negative-particle duality.
In the diagram showing the two LRS types, please notice features relating antimatter to matter to negative matter. The spin direction and electric field directions differ between matter and antimatter, but the handed-ness of the fields distinguish matter from negative matter. In other words, one uses the right-hand rule in the positive universe and left-hand rule in the negative. Within each of these universes, positive or negative, the spin and field directions differ.
Also, note that in either of the two LRS types, one pole is right handed while the other is left handed. One pole is in a positive universe, and the other in a negative universe -- thus, the vortex structure between them is a bridge between those universes, an Einstein-Rosen bridge.
Scalar Fields and Waves
The following information is partially paraphrased from an article by Rick Anderson, published in Leading Edge International Research Journal, Issue 127.
Electromagnetic waves propagate through space at the speed of light, the amplitude of the wave depending upon which point of the wave is measured at what particular time. If one isolated the space component, or made the time part zero, one would have a "frozen" wave, looking like a stationary sine wave. Between two close points on the wave, a potential difference, or gradient, exists since the amplitudes are different. The electric field at point A could be 100 Volts/meter while that at point B could be 20 Volts/meter. And no matter how long one waited with the voltmeter probes at points A and B, the wave would not be moving and thus the readings would not change from one minute to the next since the spatial component is isolated and time is irrelevant.
Now, an ordinary travelling wave has neither component isolated, and thus the wave varies with both. However, going to the other extreme, one can isolate the time component and make space irrelevant.
Such a wave is characterized by no potential gradient existing between any two points, only by time. One can place the probes anywhere and get a potential difference of zero, or if a probe is grounded, one would measure a voltage X at all points on this wave, which looks like a flat line. However, a moment of time later, the voltage would increase or decrease to Y, with all points on the wave having that amplitude. More simply, the wave looks like a flat line bobbing up and down as time passes. Such a wave is a scalar wave.
The significance of a scalar waves are many. For one, all points on the wave drop or rise simultaneously, regardless the distance between two points used for potential difference measurements. Therefore, a scalar wave has infinite propagation speed. If the speed were not infinite, then the potential at a far distance would be different from that at the wave disturbance's excitor since the disturbance has not yet reached that point. Scalar waves, then, allow superluminal communication.
Production of scalar waves has been a process causing many bloodied foreheads in the layman alternative science communities, and Tom Bearden has failed to disclose necessary secrets required to fully utilize the potential scalar fields have to offer. This is beside the point however, since a simple method indeed produces scalar waves, though not at the efficiency that could be reached were we to know what Bearden knows.
The simple method, devised by Bearden, is to glue two button magnets together, north to north, then wrapping the sandwich in magnet wire and sending a pulsed current through the coil. Also, the caduceus coil, which is nothing more than the equivalence of two oppositely wound coils on one ferrite core, produces the same effect, as well as a bifilar wound coil. Simply put, two opposing magnetic fields are used as a static magnetic field, and the third coil provides modulation of that field at a direction perpendicular to both.
Visualize two jets of water colliding head on. The resulting splash is in a plane perpendicular to the two streams, and so it is with magnetic fields. The original, 3-D orthogonal magnetic fields "collide" and produce a 4-D magnetic field (or electric, if it is an EM wave), which will be shown in the next paragraph to be a scalar wave.
As you will note in the diagram above, an EM scalar wave is travelling perpendicularly to our reality plane -- it intersects our 3-D reality axis. Since magnetic and electric fields are at right angles, only the electric field, in this case, is apparent in our space. The magnetic field is at right angles and extends into the y-axis direction, the fourth dimension, which is why we do not perceive it, and why scalar waves are said to be a single component of a full electromagnetic wave. As the wave propagates, the
amplitude on the reality axis varies, even though the location of intersection does not. This is the very definition of a scalar wave. Thus, magnetic fields
collide (or cross mathematically by means of a cross product) to produce and orthogonal EM wave whose direction so happens to characterize it as a scalar
wave.
In the article featured on this site, the Philadelphia Experiment, the author proposed the concept of enveloping an object within a magnetic hyperbubble. The concept used in Project Rainbow directly relates to scalar waves, as the preceding discussion evidences. The delta-T antenna utilizes a similar process, that of orthogonal waves interacting to produce a hyperdimensional field.
Just as 3-D waves cross to produce 4-D (actually 5-D in the diagram) waves, so can 5-D waves cross again to convert back to 3-D or 4-D. The application of weaponry employing scalar technology is truly devastating. By directing where two scalar waves intersect and thus cross, a remote source of EM energy can be created. A scalar rifle could create an explosive ball of EM behind any barrier, since the scalar waves themselves are not in this dimension and consequently bypass the barrier as one would hop over a fallen tree branch. Once the scalar waves "go over" the barrier, they recombine into ordinary EM waves, frying whatever lies beyond.
Black Holes
Scientists' calculations show black holes (often) to be singularities of 0-D which have infinite mass density, and allow no matter or light to escape them beyond a certain radius known as the schwarzschild-radius due to their intense gravitational fields which closes off space around the black hole in such a way that light cannot escape this boundary.
Because of these qualities, we can say that black holes are almost rotated 90 egrees from all dimensions, and that such a black hole almost occupies dimension infinity. Because a black hole still has measurable mass and a definite schwarzschild radius, and because it fails to destroy information, it is not actually rotated a full 90 degrees, nor is it a singularity as scientists with their incomplete equations claim.
So what is a black hole? It is the merger of many LR's into one macroscopic light ring. As more light rings are swallowed by the black hole, it ascends dimensionally, approaching the limit of 90 degrees where the protogenic superphoton state lies. Recall the superphoton; it is the single photon at 90 degrees whose projection into lower dimension produces our ordinary photons and all of physical reality as we know it.
We are now entering the realm of metaphysics.
An LR's counterpart exists in the negative universe, the two LR's being joined by an Einstein-Rosen bridge. In the case of a black hole, the same hourglass geometry applies, except this macroscopic Einstein-Rosen bridge is physically accessible to us, whereas in the previous case of LR/quantum scales, the bridge was smaller than the diameter of an LR and therefore non-influential toward ordinary matter.
Where does this negative universe lie?
Nature of the Negative Universe
It is said here that antimatter and matter can exist simultaneously in the same universe, the only difference being charge and spin direction of their LR's. Energy can translate into two LR's, one normal and the other antimatter, within the same interval of time but in different locations, meaning there is spatial symmetry.
However, there are also normal and negative-matter LR's formed, but these are in the same location but in different times. Whereas matter and antimatter form at the same time but separate locations, matter and negative matter form in the same universe (space) except one is created now and the other later, demonstrating temporal symmetry.
From the preceding discussion, it would seem that the "negative" and "positive" universes are somehow separated by space, that this "negative" universe is far away and only accessible through black holes or that it lies in another dimension -- which is a misperception.
The negative universe is not elsewhere in space, but elsewhere in time. You see, this positive universe we exist within is only temporary...it will eventually undergo a Big Crunch where all matter is swallowed up into a single black hole. Scientists say there is inadequate mass in this universe to cause it to contract under its own gravitational pull, but what they fail to realize is that beyond a certain boundary the universe repeats and all matter entering it emerge from the other side of the universe. It is this boundary which is shrinking, not the distance between galaxies, and therefore a Big Crunch will indeed occur -- either by galaxies pulling themselves together or by hurtling toward the boundary and approaching one another from the other side. Regardless of this little tangent, there is one last important point to be made which will explain where in time our negative universe exists.
Time will one day reverse. The positive and negative universe are like two halves of the same sine wave; first, the universe runs on positive time, then everything reverses and it goes the other way. But will people one day walk backwards and regress in reverse toward the womb? No, just as drivers on the other side of the street are not driving backwards. In fact, in the negative universe which will emerge into existence several billion (or even trillion) years from now, everything will seem as normal as our world seems normal to us. The only major difference is that physics will follow the left-hand rule instead of the right-hand, but it certainly will not amount to objects falling up or eggs unscrambling. Like the drivers on the opposite lane, they are only backward from our point of view -- and they think the same of us -- but within each lane, the views are the same. Special relativity seems to explain more than Einstein ever imagined.
If, say, we were privy to a peek into the negative universe, we would see objects falling up and eggs unscrambling, but this would not violate their laws of physics since those events occurred in their universe, and since their perception of time is also opposite ours, they would perceive these events in the correct direction.
Now, matter and negative matter are separated by time, but united in space (not in the actual x,y,z coordinate, but within the same timeline), so when a positive particle is created, its negative particle is created sometime in the future when the universe is in its negative stretch.
Since black holes are macroscopic light rings connected to an Einstein-Rosen bridge leading to their future negative counterpart and because black holes are such intense dimensional "stairways" or gates to the single superphotonic state, it serves as an intersection between universes and dimensions. Normally, we as inhabitants of a positive universe are never exposed to the negative universe, and thus our laws of physics and the negative laws of physics are separated by time and objects within each have no chance to interact with the other. Within the schwarzschild radius, however, the universes intersect and the negative laws of physics may interact with positive matter or vice versa, causing positive matter to repel under antigravity instead of the usual gravity until their subatomic structure is realigned in accordance with the universe once they escape the schwarschild radius into the negative universe.
White Holes and Worm Holes
As matter falls into a black hole, we see it slowing in time the closer it gets to the center, until eventually it is frozen in time. Because this time dilation is a relativistic effect, and since relativistic mass increase is illusionary, when matter falls into a black hole the total mass and energy of the black hole increases only by how much fell into it, and the gravity field increases by the same proportion. So a black hole is a conglomerate of matter "frozen in time," each frozen piece of which still allows its mass to contribute to the overall gravitational field of the entire black hole.
This matter will remain frozen "forever" by our standards, but actually only remains so until time reverses and our universe turns negative. At that point, the black hole will reverse and spew all matter back out because each piece of matter within the black hole was and is temporarily positive matter under the influence of physical laws of a negative universe, an interaction only possible within the schwarzschild-radius.
In effect, the negative universe's astronomers observe cosmic bodies ejecting matter, which soon aggregate and behave like any other ordinary matter in that universe. What they are observing is positive matter having been swallowed into a black hole within the previous (positive) phase of the universe interacting violently with the new negative physical laws and exploding under antigravitic pressure beyond the schwarzschild-radius, immediately becoming negative matter past that radius and further ejecting into space, now as negative matter which obeys those negative laws as positive matter obeys positive physical laws.
What the astronomers are viewing is indeed a white hole.
Black holes have critical mass before they explode, that mass being equivalent to all the mass/energy in this universe. Such a state is only possible at the moment of Big Crunch. Time reverses then, laws reverse, and the black hole explodes in a Big Bang.
The black holes we see today are miniature versions of the Big Crunch black hole, except these do not explode. They are quasi-static macroscopic light rings which suck up matter and channel them into their future selves, white holes or light rings with similar spin but opposite handedness. Black holes and white holes, then, are smaller parts of a greater process of creation cycle that ends and begins in a Big Crunch and Big Bang.
Thus, those who argue over Big Bang vs. "constant creation of matter via white holes" is moot since both sides are correct, as are the issues of an expanding or contracting universe mentioned above.
Wormholes are Einstein-Rosen bridges through space, linking or acting as a short cut through two locations in this positive universe. Black/white holes are Einstein-Rosen bridges through time, linking the present positive universe to the future negative universe.
Black Holes as Time Machines
It would be inappropriate to say that the Einstein-Rosen bridge linking a black to white hole is actually a tunnel into the future. It acts more like a cryogenic chamber which keeps one in suspended animation until some future time is reached and the cryogenic process is undone.
Matter that has fallen into a black hole is kept in suspended animation (from our perspective) since its time slows down to a virtual stop. This matter continues to fall into the black hole while the universe outside the black hole progresses onward through time at an increasingly faster pace relative to that falling matter. Eventually, the universe has contracted into the Big Crunch and explodes into the negative universe. The matter then repels as explained previously and continues on its normal rate of time since it is external to the black (actually, white) hole and free to form galaxies, planets, and stars.
LRT Metaphysics
Make no mistake about it -- flying into a black hole with a spaceship will guarantee your brains ripping into its constituent particles due to intense gravitational gradients. Your soul, however, will not perish, but instead meet the same fate it shall upon death: return to the Creator state
You might have noticed something. "Creator state" is equivalent to "superphoton state," suggesting that the superphoton is actually God itself, which introduces the subject of consciousness to this discussion.
So far, this article detailed the rules or physical reality, which is a tidy collection of principles in a neat little box. Outside of the box these rules break down, as quantum physicists are discovering. Quantum physics is a method of quantifying the unquantifyable, where the only predictable order amid the subatomic sea of chaos is found in statistically analyzing a system's possible states of existence.
LRT metaphysics is entirely compatible with LRT physics, the first being closer to mysticism and the latter to orthodox science, though both are perfectly compatible with one another and non-dualistic. The transition between one and the other is smooth, elegant, and non-contradictory. The first explores "why?" and the latter answers "how?"
Definition of God
God, consciousness, oversoul, superphoton, Creator, Alpha Node, etc... are all synonymous terms. So what is this God?
First, God is pure potentiality, this concept originating elsewhere but whose veracity necessitates its unoriginal use in this article. It is a superphoton with potential to be anything at anytime, to experience anything within physical limitations. The key to this concept is that God is not everything already, but is in the process of becoming one with everything. A seed is potentially a tree, but it is not a tree until it has time to grow. Likewise, God is potentially everything, but cannot be so unless it has time to infuse itself within all matter and energy. This also why "time" even exists.
Second, God is eternal order and transitory chaos. When flipping a coin or watching an animal do what it does, it is impossible to always predict exactly what will happen next. It is chaotic, but only transitorily so, for collecting data over long periods of time will allow one to gather an idea a certain behavior's probability. If the system's behavior is studied for an infinite period of time, its probability is perfectly comprehended, and is no longer chaotic when viewed in light of such an extended period. True chaos is God in action and creation. If all behavior were mechanical and perfectly predictable, with no evidence of chaos, then there is no originality, creativity, or creation resulting from that behavior. God's motive is to explore its own potential and gain all information, knowledge, wisdom, and experience there is to be gained, thus chaos is the only path to reach such a goal.
Third, God is negentropic synergy. Negentropy is characteristic of a process organizing random, uniform, stagnant systems into organized, interesting, lively ones. Synergy describes getting more out than in. Together, negentropic synergy means that the influence of God causes matter and energy to organize into complex systems, allowing more varied forms of expression with greater complexity of those systems. For example, one of these systems is the human brain, and another is humanity. Both are complex and non-uniform in function, as well as chaotic and dynamic.
Were there no God, all rock would eventually turn to dust and matter would decay into energy. Rather, rock is quarried by humans and made into works of art or buildings to house the functions of society. In particle accelerators, energy is converted to matter, etc... The probability of each of these things happening in such ways without conscious intent (the influence of God) is virtually zero.
In thermodynamic systems, entropy (random energy distributed among the molecules in the form of heat which is unusable for further work) can only be decreased if energy is added to the system, as in electricity running an air-conditioner which forces the house to cool while expelling hot air (entropy would be evident when your house warms to the same temperature as the air outdoors). In social systems, God's influence is equivalent to this electricity, but informational, rather than electrical in nature. Thus, God is counter-decay and anti-entropy.
Holographic Nature of God
The concept of a holographic universe is not novel, but once again, it is truth and therefore included here.
All LRS's are composed of photons, each being a projection of the superphoton, God. As mentioned earlier, the superphoton is at a near infinite dimension, casting its image downward to the next lower dimension, which in turn casts its image downward, etc... until it reaches this space and we see it as the usual ExB photon illustrated in physics books. God's dilemma since the dawn of time was how to compact its virtual infinite self into a finite form.
God cannot perceive itself -- its focus is always forward, never back, because it is pure potentiality and like a tree never regresses back into a seed. In fact, God is like the photon it projects, which always travels forward at a constant speed and never slows or stops. But the conversion of a photon to a particle of matter is equivalent to God converting itself to a point of self-aware consciousness.
A photon becomes a "stationary" particle by circling in a ring like a dog chasing its tail. Likewise, God with its focus narrow as a laser beam becomes self-aware by circling or spiraling inward about itself. A photon is not bound by inertia like matter, and God is not bound by self-awareness like a solitary mind. The ultimate goal of God is to unite itself with all matter, such that it can become self-conscious of its true form. Presently, individual minds are only self aware of their minor selves, which are poor holograms of God -- this idea is explained as follows.
First exists a physical object. Using two lasers, and interference pattern is created on photographic film which is an image of the object. This film can be cut into smaller pieces, each of which contain the full picture of the original object, only at a lower resolution. Upon further reducing the size of the pieces, the image becomes so incoherent that only the most general features of the original object are discernable.
Likewise, there first exists the superphoton, which projects its image downward into the lower dimensions. Finally the image cast reaches our dimension and organizes into an LR, which is a self-encircling hologram of the superphoton, but so limited by incomplexity and its dimensional distance from the superphoton that only the most general features of the superphoton/God are noticeable in the LR or in the individual mind.
Individual minds are indeed holograms of God. This is one meaning behind the Biblical reference to we humans having been made in the image of our Creator. However, unlike the orthodox concept of a holographic universe, the entire universe is not contained within each of its particles, and neither is all of existence contained within an individual mind. We are only projections of God, and God is only a sum of the information gained since time began. God has not reached its goal, and is therefore incomplete. Because it is incomplete, we are projections of its incompleteness and consequently cannot immediately comprehend all there is to know. There is a purpose to life because we have not yet reached completion.
God's Interface with the Universe
The physical universe is a subset of true reality. Our universe is composed of ether, which is a slice of 5-D hyperether, which is a slice of 6-D hyperether, and so on. True reality is made of infinite-D hyperether, which is the field created by its proximity to the superphoton/potential in this infinitely dimensioned space.
By analogy, a seed (pure potential) can be said to emanate a morphic field of its latter self, the tree, which is a template or auric scaffold for the future cells arising from the seed to follow in growth. God (pure potential) emanates the infinite-D hyperetheral field, which is a blank, protogenic, multi-dimensional template from which electricity, gravity, and magnetism arise to give substance to matter and provide a physical carrier for the self-encircling and self-aware individual mind. This infinite-D hyperether may be termed the matrix.
In short, the potential creates a field, within which projections of that potential convert into fulfillment.
This foregoing mechanism is how the superphoton expresses itself in this timeline.
There are in fact multiple timelines, which allow further expression of the superphoton since the larger the template, the greater the number of experiences and thus the quicker the rate of information gathering and the closer the goal of full self-awareness.
The actual interface between God and physical reality occurs at the quantum level, in the freewill of the individual mind to choose its future. To understand this, we must first comprehend the nature of time.
Nature of Time
Time is the sequential arrangement of eternal states of being. Eternity is the nonexistence of time, which occurs at the speed of light, or at the infinite dimension, or in the mind of God; potential is in actuality a frozen eternity, because for potential to manifest itself, time is required, and for it to remain pure potential, time must be nonexistent. God's potential field, much like the morphic field of a seed, consists of a near infinite number of frozen possible eternities, like a collection of still movie frames.
Free Will's Influence Upon Reality
These frames are animated according to the laws of physics -- a situation in which a ball is lower in the second frame than the first occurs when gravity is pulling upon the falling ball. After every frame, a great number of possibilities exist for which frame comes next, but without conscious influence, the most basic of scientific laws naturally determine which frame does indeed follow: the one with the highest probability.
In other words, there might be a million possible frames where the ball is lower in the second frame, and maybe two or three where it is not. Those two or three are so unlikely from happening, however, that they rarely follow the first frame. That is, unless a self-aware conscious mind chooses to make one of those two or three frames happen, in which case the ball stops falling.
The laws of nature, then, are obstacles for an individual mind to overcome. By overcoming these obstacles, the mind gains information, experience, and wisdom in accord with the purpose of life.
Animals are slave to nature, for their evolution happens on a physical level and comes about only by surviving the trials nature has to offer them. Because they are unaware of their own freewill, animals normally experience frames of reality dictated by the laws of nature. At a certain point in evolution, however, animals become sentient, self-conscious, and aware of their own freewill just like we humans. At this point and to a greater degree, we choose future frames which have lower probability than what the laws of physics predict. Science calls these choices "chaotic" since the events no longer follow the old-fashioned mechanistic principles. This is why the origin of consciousness still remains a mystery to orthodox scientists.
The interface between God and reality occurs precisely when individual minds (no matter how minute in girth) choose whether a microscopic event happens one way or another. Like the superphoton, these individual minds project a probability field, the field imparting a preference such that one frame, or possibility, is chosen over another to actualize in this universe. The greatest example of this is the firing or nonfiring of a neuron, which is chosen by the mind inhabiting the body and brain to which the neuron belongs. In occult circles, this probability field is known as the astral body, and as mentioned above, is commonly called the morphic field. DNA molecules are microscopic/atomic/quantum receivers which are sensitive enough to allow easy influence from the probability field or astral body.
[Because this probability field manifests itself as one transcending time (in order to have influence upon the frames of eternity which comprise time), the field itself must be electromagnetic in nature but also non-parallel to this space, meaning it is perpendicular to this reality plane. Recall the section dealing with scalar waves, and how scalar waves are 90 degrees from this reality plane, meaning that the probability field is really a scalar field, though much more subtle and complex than a scalar field produced from a caduceus coil. The significance of this aside is in the influence of foreign scalar fields over the biological development of the human body. Many devices inadvertently create scalar fields, such as television monitors, high voltage power lines, and other electrical things, which have the potential for overpowering the subtle astral body/scalar field of the mind and causing DNA to execute faulty maneuvers due to its receivers no longer receiving the appropriate field. This is why high voltage power lines cause leukemia, and why scalar fields are said to impact the biological/neurological component of living systems]
It is evident from the characteristics of the individual mind that God and the individual mind have much in common, though at different scales, which is entirely due to the holographic nature of the relationship.
Cosmology of God
In summary, God differentiates itself into individual minds, whose probability fields allow them to take control over (or infuse with) physical matter and gain the experience that comes with overcoming physical limitations.
Hence, black holes are physical manifestations of the concept of "unity," which is one purpose of life as explained in the Alpha Node article. Note that at the center of every galaxy lies a black hole. Matter infused with consciousness returns to total unity upon entering a black hole.
In its entirety, white holes spew matter into the universe as a process of "differentiation," and black holes suck matter into themselves as a process of "unification." After matter is ejected into the universe, it is slowly infused with consciousness as it becomes part of more complex and chaotic systems, the process also known as "spirit descending into flesh," and sooner or later the matter, with its intrinsic memory of all it underwent, departs from its final soul and collects in one of the numerous number of black holes. The many souls which at one time or another inhabited that particular piece of matter have long since returned to the superphotonic state or become born again in a new body. Eventually, all matter unites as part of the Big Crunch, and life starts anew in a negative universe with unique events imparting more information to God.
Photon Structure (6/5/00):
The following is a subsection of the Light Ring Theory which deserves a whole separate chapter due to its concise, elegant, and self-contained nature. Discussion will involve the quadstructure of the photon, the amplitude and phase characteristics of each component, their implosion into corresponding particles, life cycle of the universe, and ultimately, the source of consciousness in a physical context.
Quadstructure of the Photon
Our perception of a photon is in only one-fourth of a multidimensional entity -- the other three-fourths lie in other spaces and times. There are four components to every photon. Generally speaking, these four components are:
- realphoton (P): the real component, that which we observe and measure in the laboratory.
- antiphoton (P~): identical to the real component, except 180 degrees out of phase.
- takyon(T): imaginary component 90 degrees out of phase with realphoton.
- antitakyon (T~): identical to takyon, but 180 degrees relatively out of phase with it.
Each component has two subcomponents: electric(E) and magnetic(B). The E and B terms are characteristic of the classical model of the (real)photon. The purpose of this particular quaternary structure is to preserve charge and amplitude symmetry. Charge symmetry is preserved because the total charge of the photon is zero due to each component having its anti- counterpart which is opposite in charge. Amplitude symmetry answers how a photon can have zero fields at the nodes and still transmit energy from peak to peak with node in between.
For example, graphing the kinetic energy over time of a simple pendulum will yield a sine function which peaks when the pendulum has reached the bottom of its swing and goes at maximum speed. One can wonder where the energy of the pendulum goes at the nodes (points of zero) on the graph. Physically, the nodes correspond to the moment when the pendulum has reached the top of its swing and stops shortly before descending again. The answer then, is obvious, namely that the energy is stored in the gravitational field as potential energy at the nodes.
Likewise, the peak of the E and B components of a photon correspond directly to observable energy expressed as a high distortion in the ether matrix of our local proximity while the nodes signify total nonexpression of the energy of such a photon, at least locally. But just as there was a destination for the energy of a pendulum at its moment of zero kinetic energy, so must there be a destination for the photon's energy at zero field amplitude. But where is it?
The equation for a pendulum's energy is similar to: E = A sin(x) + i Bcos(x) where A and B are arbitrary constants. What this equation means is that the total energy is divided up between two components, real and an imaginary. Both components are separated by 90 degree phase, by virtue of one being a sine and the other a cosine. The nature of sines and cosines is that while one is 1, the other is 0. While kinetic energy is 100%, potential energy is 0% and vice versa.The i is the square root of -1, and serves as a mathematical tool to label the second term B cos(x) as existing on a number line perpendicular to the first term, A sin(x), such that both components remain separated in the equation. We know that gravity is a fourth dimensional distortion in the ether, and hence we can say that the square root of negative one signifies that component being rotated spatially by 90 degrees (not to be confused with phase shifted by 90 degrees, which concerns linear alignment and not rotation) from all the other components.
The same equation applies to the photon. At the nodes, the energy in a photon is imaginary, meaning it is rotated by 90 degrees, in addition to the 90 degree phase shift. Both realphoton and antiphoton have their imaginary counterparts, the takyon and antitakyon. Takyon, in conventional terms of physics, includes all particles which travel faster than light. In this theory, we are restricting the term to mean only the imaginary component of a photon. The superluminal particles will henceforth be called negative matter. When the antiphoton implodes (bends and travels in a 'circular' or more appropriately, hyperspherical path), it becomes antimatter. A realphoton becomes matter, and an antitakyon transmutes into negative antimatter ( or antinegamatter). As you can see, the energy at the nodes is completely stored in the amplitude of the takyon.
This chart shows the photon components, velocities, corresponding particles and their velocities:
name symbol velocity particle velocity
realphoton P c matter < c
antiphoton P~ c antimatter < c
takyon T c negative matter c
antitakyon T~ c negative antimatter c
To aid in visualizing photon structure, consider the following illustration:
Each bent arrow signifies a constant unit of energy devoted to either the electric or magnetic field. As the photon oscillates through the ether (or hyperether), the arrow tips move toward and away the central axis (the velocity vector c). For example, first the electric subcomponent of the realphoton Ep increases in length while the electric subcomponent of the takyon decreases, then once the length of Et is zero, the process reverses. Other arrows do the same. If one were to look at Ep and Bp (the magnetic subcomponent of the realphoton), Et and Bt, Ep~ and Bp~, and Bt~ with Et~, one would see how all the components relate. The preceding illustration serves only to allow a better understanding of the dynamic photon structure.
Energy to Mass
A typical example of energy to mass conversion via E = m c^2 involves a high energy photon flying past a nucleus (to utilize as an absorber of momentum in order to conserve momentum) and transmuting into two particles, an electron and an antielectron (usually called positron). According to the LRT, here is what theoretically happens:
The photon, with its four components, splits up into four light rings (LR's). The LR's themselves are grouped into two light ring structures (LRS) , one being a particle and the other an antiparticle. Each LRS is composed of a light ring and a negative lightring. Between the two are two conical vortices representing the imploded movement of the photon.[in the middle is the black hole, the one that the Big Crunch at the end of the universe will evolve into. It is irrelevant that the universe has been "found" to be relatively flat, or that not enough dark matter exists to collapse the universe...the Big Crunch will be a result of conscious intent, and it is obvious that consciousness is antithetical to the default laws of physics as a ball placed on an incline will according to the laws of physics roll down -- but you, being conscious, could upset a physicist's calculations by reaching over to scoot it toward the top]
Nature of Negative Matter
There are two interesting properties of negative matter: 1) it is antigravitic, meaning it repels ordinary matter, and 2) it travels backward in time from our perspective. There is a direct relation between gravity and time, since both arise from the circulating property of the light ring...even John Keely said that gravity is time.
These two properties follow from several observations. First, a negative light ring rotates in an opposite direction from ordinary light rings. Because gravity is partly a function of sympathetic resonance and attraction between two light rings which rotate in the same direction, a negative light ring with its opposite rotational direction will be repellent and hence antigravitic.
Since time is measured not only by the rate of cyclical rotation of the light ring, but also its direction of rotation, it is logical that something which rotates opposite from normal matter will travel backward in time.
Furthermore, by analyzing the relativistic formula relating measured mass to velocity, we see that any particle which travels back in time will:
- have an imaginary mass
- go faster than light
Does negative matter, as defined in this article, not qualify? And are the
takyons from which negative mass arises not imaginary entities?
Life Cycle of a Photon
Here we enter a somewhat more theoretical, abstract, and complicated aspect of this theory.
Do not be intimidated by the diagram. The explanation will be pleasant, it is assured. We begin with a single photon and its four components, but for now we shall concern ourselves only with the P and P~. The photon decays into two particles, an electron (1) and positron (2). Afterward, each particle can choose one of two paths in this example. Path (a) will lead to eventual recombination into a photon (3), and path (b) will allow each particle to stay as particles for a long period of time.
One day, the photon of the particles will enter the Big Crunch black hole (4) [called BCBH for short]. It is when all matter and space has been absorbed into the BCBH that a universe reaches the "temporal symmetry axis", meaning the "ball has hit the wall and must now bounce back(ward in time)." [There is yet no inductive logic to back up the "temporal symmetry axis" idea, only that it explains much and is not yet contradicted, which according to the author is the very definition of a good theory]. After the axis has been reached, P and P~ become T and T~ as the rotation of the light rings reverse, black hole (4) becomes a white hole (5), and negative matter travels back in time, tracing the same steps these particles took prior to absorption into the BCBH. [We as humans undergo this same process on a similar but smaller scale when we die and undergo our life review, sending our consciousness within our imaginations and memories back in time...but unlike humans' subjective views of its recently completed life, the universe's imaginations and memories are what constitute objective reality]
For path (a), a photon composed of T and ~T emerge from the white hole, and travel back in time to split into negative particle (8b) and negative antiparticle (7b) in this example and eventually combine into the original negative half of the photon.
So you see, the negative components of a photon do not come into existence until the positive components enter the BCBH, emerge from the white hole, travel back in time, and intersect the position of the original photon, completing the four-component structure. It is only because they intersect on the timeline that a photon can be said to have four components, since the negative half occupies the same spatial and temporal region as the normal half, and hence for all practical purposes has always been a part of the photon throughout its history.
Analysis
From the preceding discussion, some surprising conclusions may be reached.
First, our future is negative matter's past, and vice versa. Our future is bifurcated, meaning it branches out into many different possible futures, the number growing with temporal distance into the future. This means that negative matter's past is also bifurcated. Correspondingly, our past is as bifurcated negative matter's future, as illustrated here:
Second, when photon components T and T~ (6) split into (8b) and (7b), a form of memory intrinsic to the photon must have been present. This must be so because if the photon were thought to be homogeneous, then any information (matter) entering it must also become homogenous and hence unintelligible and undecipherable for future reference. The very act of a photon splitting into particle and antiparticle as it did in the same manner once before shows that the photon held information within it, triggering it to do so at that moment in time to coincide with the original decay of the P P~ photon. One shouldn't accuse the author of anthropomorphizing the photon, because it is claimed (and supported in the LRT) that the photon is inherently conscious, and hence privy to information and memory. Finally, the last conclusion is of utmost importance. It is known that takyons, or at least electromagnetic information originating from the future, have psychoactive properties, meaning they hold the capability of influencing one's consciousness. Therefore, there is a distinct link between consciousness and the future (or the past of takyons / negative matter). The link is metaphysically esoteric, though comprehensible. Recall that black holes are 7th density entities, and that the BCBH amounts to a singularity with no external reference, one of complete unification between matter, energy, and consciousness, where the Alpha Node has realized itself and has manifested infinite potential into astronomically finite accomplishment. Thus, the BCBH is the rightmost side of a cycle beginning with the Big Bang on the left, in which time progresses from left to right.
Whereas the Big Bangresulted immediately in the total separation of consciousness from matter and energy which was left to coalesce into particles and essentially polarized the universe into one half of simply the naked Alpha Node singularity and one half of matter and energy, the Big Crunch dissolves the polarity by being a reunification of all consciousness with all matter.
It is reasonable to note that the Alpha Node after the Big Bang was very primitive and powerless, since it was as a seed unmanifested in potential. The Alpha Node near and during the Big Crunch, however, is omniscient and all pervasive, and self-knowing. It is consequently both timeless in its own perspective, and eternal to ours; it transcends time, forward or back.
Hence, takyons owe their origin to the future Alpha Node, and ordinary photons to the past unmanifested Alpha Node. It is for this reason that realphotons and antiphotons are merely wavelets of light with no personality or conscious signature. However, takyons, the very components said to be psychoactive, originate from the future superconscious Alpha Node and therefore act as sentient sentinels, easily dancing with our consciousness and playing with our thoughts since thoughts and takyons are next of kin. [recall the movie "Event Horizon" in which a lifeless mechanical craft returns from a black hole fully conscious].
Taken to its logical conclusion, the preceding paragraph would indicate that while matter and energy are merely crystallized, or locallized, imploded, and self-circular forms of photons originating from the Big Bang Alpha Node, consciousness comes from the future.
Does this mean that our future is fixed, since it has already happened from the viewpoint of our source of consciousness? No, because the past is as bifurcated as the future. You see, the whole cycle from Big Bang to Big Crunch and back is but one reality in a collection of countless number of realities. To the 7th or 8th density black holes and Alpha Node, the cycle from beginning to end happens in the blink of a cosmic eye. This is precisely what a photon, which travels at the speed of light and thus experiences infinite time dilation or no time transition experiences, which is not surprising considering photons are nothing but the end projection of a series of shadow
projections cascaded downward from the Alpha Node at the highest of finite dimensions to this one. In essence, photons experience the universe instantly just as 7th and 8th density entities do because photons are facets of these entities.
The Meaning of it All
So, the big clincher to this article involves freewill and the interface between matter and consciousness. As stated in many of the metaphysical articles on this site, a system of particles sensitive to chaotic fluctuations can be infused with consciousness when the Alpha Node, or at least a holographic fragment thereof, chooses which one of many equally feasible outcomes the system actually manifests. How does this tie into the preceding paragraph? A system of particles is under conscious direction when among the countless number of realities (each in which the system progresses to a unique outcome and reaches the BCBH in that unique state) that reach the singular BCBH, the superconscious Alpha Node, knowing the outcome of every reality, travels back in time with full sentience to the point before the system changed state and chooses then to experience under its own freewill only one of the realities to follow. This is how consciousness originates from the future.
The greater the complexity of a system, the greater the number of possible outcomes and hence realities it generates...and the more realities there are, the more instances the system is eventually absorbed into the BCBH, and the more it is exposed to the superconscious Alpha Node which knows that any system which offers a greater range of choices for it will better be able to accommodate its freewill and evolution through experience. Thus, complex systems are more easily and likely to be infused by consciousness.
In other words, the Alpha Node already knows the details of every reality ever generated due to it originating from a bifurcated future (each bifurcation which like one amongst a million tributaries, empties into a single ocean, the Big Crunch black hole or superconscious Alpha Node), but uses its freewill to experience only one of those.
This is why we experience only one timeline, unless we time travel, in which case we end up choosing another timeline. It is why it would be incorrect to say that every choice leads to an alternate reality, because even though those alternate realities formed once, they were erased when the Alpha Node (you) went back in time before those realities were ever spawned and consciously chose only one of them to manifest.
Let's Hit QM while We're at It
In fact, the collection of outcomes a particle can experience is the definition of that particles wave function, according to quantum mechanics. States of a system are bifurcated only when consciousness has not made its impact upon the system, which means the state of such as system either lies in the future, or will only be known in the future. Collapsing the wave function means taking into account all those probable outcomes or "present" states of existence and allowing only one to exist or manifest. Thus, when the Alpha Node, or consciousness, travels back in time to prevent all outcomes from happening other than the single desired one, it is effectively collapsing the wave function of that particle.
Quantum mechanics writes the equations describing all possible states of a particle or system, because that particle or system is composed of crystallized light originating from the primitive Big Bang Alpha Node, which is totally non-chaotic and entirely predictable according to the laws of quantum mechanics. What quantum mechanics can not do is calculate what state the wave function will collapse into, because this is decided not by the primitive Big Bang Alpha Node which operates under cut and dried mathematical rules, but from the very conscious BCBH Alpha Node which is beyond mathematical description. It is beyond scientific mathematical description because its origin is not physical matter upon which all of physics is based (see my proof of God article for further discussion of equations vs. consciousness).
Equations are simply linear combinations of a physical set which can only describe through further linear combination other systems in that set, but the BCBH Alpha Node (consciousness) in general originates from an altogether different, hyperdimensional set. Such equations can never fully describe the BCBH Alpha Node and thus cannot predict what state a wave collapses into because that is a function of the BCBH Alpha Node, not of the physical set from which these physics equations originated.
Conclusion
There are several logical inconsistencies in this theory, but the majority of it makes sense, explains orthodox and alternative scientific phenomena, and predicts testable characteristics of nature -- all properties of a good theory. More shall be added as the author acquires further knowledge and as the logical wrinkles are ironed out.
___________________________________
Light Ring Theory (part 2)
This article is a graphical summary of my theory on how metaphysics and physics are part of the same unified reality. There are many theories on the net seeking to do the same thing, but what separates this one is the sheer breadth of phenomena it explains, and the complexity and elegance of its features. Plus it has plenty of entertaining diagrams to allow you to easily understand the points being made.
Although this is part 2, you really don't need to read part 1 to understand this article since I'm recapping the essential ideas.
What separates part 2 from 1 is that it includes the idea of multiple types of time, and further defines the functions of the 4th and 5th dimension. Ultimately, this theory seeks to reconcile the ideas of mind and spirt with matter and energy.
MATTER AND ENERGY
We know this physical universe is made of matter and energy. Einstein proved through E=mc^2 that matter and energy are flip sides of the same coin. So how exactly does energy turn into matter and vice versa? If we consider energy in its form when not tied to matter, we think of electromagnetic radiation, the propagation of energy directly through space. Such radiation consists of photons, little wave-packets of energy in the form of coupled (linked) pairs of electric and magnetic fields.
This photon flutters through vacuum at close to 300 million meters per second. A stream of photons constitutes a beam of electromagnetic radiation, and depending on the frequency of the photons, this beam could be described either as light, radio wave, microwave, x-ray, or gamma ray.
If the universe is indeed made of matter and energy, these differing merely in form, the question arises as to how a ray of electromagnetic (EM) radiation which rushes through vacuum at tremendous speeds can be turned into something that stands virtually still and is bounded by a definite spatial area.
The only way of turning infinity, such as an infinite ray, into something finite is by turning the ray into a circle. This way, energy can maintain its velocity, though the velocity is circular like cars racing around a track. The track itself stays put, despite the cars being in motion as though they were on a straight stretch of highway.
Since stand-alone energy is in the form of photons, the way photons turn into matter is through this self-circulation.
A stream of photons is knocked into a circular path, whereby the end of the stream chases the beginning like a dog chasing its tail. Each photon races around this tiny circular path at the speed of light. Since each photon carries a pair of magnetic and electric fields, such a circular arrangement of photons, called a Light Ring (LR), emits its own magnetic and electric fields. This LR is the simplest of elementary particles of matter.
THE 5D DIAGRAM
In this case, the LR represents an electron. But what do we know of electrons? We know that they carry negative charge, meaning they radiate a negative electric field in all directions symmetrically. The electron is a point particle, and its electric field is "spherically symmetric," meaning the field lines are evenly spread outward from the center.
As you can see from the diagram (the point particle has been exaggerated into a sphere to show spherical symmetry), the field lines are truly spherically symmetric.
But the LR is not. It's disk-shaped, with photons racing around the rim. So obviously, a true LR cannot be shaped like this, because the electric fields are only circularly symmetric, but the north and south poles of that disk don't have the same emission of electric field lines.
What if the ring is not really a 2D ring, but really a 3D sphere? If so, then the LR is only a 2D ring in 4D space. What do I mean by this? Well, if you draw a diagram to represent 4D space, then a cube would be drawn as a square. The most familiar example of this process is the Einstein analogy of curvature of space, with space being a 2D rubber sheet; any mass placed upon it will sink into the sheet and cause a depression. In this case, the 2D sheet represents our 3D space...and the curvature on that sheet represents 4D distortion, something we couldn't visualize unless we reduced the whole thing by one dimension to make things clear.
So take a look at this diagram. The first frame shows a 2D ring in 3D space, which obviously can't be the case for an electron because we know an electron is at least spherical, but in this diagram it looks like a flat disk to a 3D person. The next frame shows a ring in 4D space, meaning the ring actually represents a sphere to a 3D person, pretty close to what we would expect of anelectron. However, the third frame shows a ring drawn in 5D space, which also looks like a sphere to us, though it is in fact a hypersphere, a 4 dimensional sphere. So which case is it...4D or 5D, since both make the ring appear to a 3D observer as a sphere?
To answer this, we must first understand what the 4th and 5th dimension represent. Objects can rotate into the 4th or 5th dimension. This simply means that just as flat piece of paper can be stood up vertically into the 3rd dimension, so can 3D objects be rotated into higher dimensions. All I'll tell you right now is that the LR is a ring in 5D. Why? You'll soon see why, not in the reasoning I used to arrive at this conjecture, but the sheer elegant applicability of assuming it is so. The 4th and 5th dimensions have definite purposes and properties which will be described below. So for now, keep in mind that the electron, being matter composed of self-circulating photons, appears in its proper diagram as follows:
Don't be deceived by the "ring" shape. This electron is actually a 4 dimensional hypersphere. The photons are actually rotating around a 2 dimensional axis, a membrane. It's impossible to visualize in its true form, so keep the diagram above in mind and remember that the axes are the 5th, 4th, and 3rd dimensions. The 2nd and 1st dimension are curled up in the 3D axis to make things comprehensible. If you were to calculate the size of this ring, assuming it is merely a 2D ring, you would find that the radius is quite large on an atomic scale, far larger than anything scientists have been able to detect in the lab. But since the ring is not really a ring, but a hypersphere,
the energy and momentum of the photons need not be distributed strictly through the 1st and 2nd dimension, but the 3rd and 4th as well. This allows the entire hypersphere to have a much smaller radius for the same amount of photon energy than if the photons were limited to a 2D ring. The size of such
a hypersphere, or at least the 3D slice (sphere) we could see of it would most likely be so small that it appears as a point particle, the size of an electron.
The last diagram shows an object existing in 5-dimensional space. This 5D diagram is the one we'll be working with in this article. To illustrate properties of this 5D space, I'll walk you through a simple explanation of Special and General Relativity, Einstein's theory on the nature of space and time.
RELATIVITY
First, Special Relativity deals with velocities. Velocity is simply a measure of how fast something is going, and which direction it's going. If you only care about how fast you're going, then that measure is called speed. Velocity itself is represented in the 5D diagram like this:
The circular shapes are LR's, and what you're seeing is a rotation into the 5th dimension when an LR, or any object composed of LR's, gains any velocity. When velocity = 0 from our point of view, it is not rotated away from us into the 5th dimension. When the object travels past us at half the speed of light, it's rotated 45 degrees (or halfway to vertical) into the 5th dimension. When it reaches 90 degrees, it's traveling at the speed of light. Of course, relativity says that an object cannot ever reach that speed because certain things happen to it which makes it impossible to push such an object any faster. Once again, I'm not telling you exactly why this rotation is into the 5th dimension, but as you'll see from the applications of this idea, the idea itself not only makes sense, but makes sense beautifully.
So why can't an object ever reach 90 degrees, or the speed of light? According to relativity, it experiences something called "mass increase" whereby the faster an object goes, the heavier it appears to us. As you know, a heavier object is harder to accelerate or push than a light object. So if this object becomes more massive the faster it goes, it becomes harder to push it any faster. In fact, when it nears the speed of light, the object becomes so massive that we'll never be able to make it reach the speed of light. This has been confirmed in experiments, such as in supercolliders which speed up protons and electrons to relativistic speeds, enough to indicate that they are indeed harder to push when they're going that fast. But, all these experiments really show is that given an amount of energy put toward the object's acceleration, it accelerates less the faster it's already going. Is there another explanation for this?
DIMENSIONAL ASCENSION
Yes, according to the Light Ring Theory, what's really happening when objects reach higher speeds is a phenomenon called "dimensional ascension." When an object begins rotating into hyperspace, it departs our 3rd dimensional space and enters the 5th dimension. But, the higher it goes, into higher in dimensions it rotates. What we are seeing from our point of view is merely the shadow of an object long gone into higher dimensional space. This accelerating object spirals into higher dimensions as illustrated in this diagram:
Understand, however, that the object doesn't totally leave one dimension and enter another. It spreads itself out among many dimensions, with only the bulk of that spread dominating one dimension at a time. So when the object is motionless, the bulk of its spread lies in the 3rd and 4th dimension. As it starts accelerating, the bulk shifts into the 5th, then the 6th, 7th, 8th, etc...
But even while the bulk resides in the 11th or 12th, for example, there is still a residue or a piece of it visible and present in our 3rd dimension. This piece of it is called a "projection," similar to a flat shadow cast on a wall by a 3 dimensional object in front of a flashlight.
This diagram shows an 8D object, a line in the diagram, casting its projection downward into the 7th dimension, which casts its own projection into the 6th, which does the same into the 5th and so on down to our dimension. The 7th dimensional projection is shorter than the 8th, and 6th is shorter than the 7th by sheer geometry and the pythagorean theorem which says that the hypotenuse (sloping edge) of a right triangle (triange with one square corner) is longer than either of the two other sides. In the 5D diagram we're working with the LR, which is now merely a 5D projection of the true LR, inches closer and closer to 90 degrees, but the higher in dimension the object primarily resides, the less further rotation of that object results in visible 5D rotation toward the 90 degree mark. Therefore, an object never quite reaches the speed of light.
So when the bulk of such an object is located in a very high dimension, in our 3D space we see only a tiny component of that object, a projection that is a fraction of its true self. In fact, whatever energy we put into accelerating that object will only accelerate it mostly in that higher dimension. We would see only a tiny fraction of that acceleration in our 3rd dimension. Therefore, objects at high velocities, and therefore high dimensions, appear to accelerate more slowly to us for any given amount of energy.
MASS INCREASE
Every unit of energy will accelerate any given mass, changing its velocity by a definite amount. However, at high velocities, that acceleration is directed into a higher dimension, and all we see is the miniscule acceleration of its projection into 3D space. But scientists don't accept, or don't know about, the idea of "dimensional ascension" -- they think that objects just rotate into the 4th dimension during acceleration, and that's all. Therefore, when it appears to them that objects become harder to accelerate, they can only conclude that such objects must be gettting heavier. But as the idea of "dimensional ascension" indicates, this does not have to be the case.
And here's the proof that dimensional ascension is a more accurate view that "mass increase" : we know that mass generates a gravity field. The more massive an object is, the higher its gravity. That's why astronauts on the moon could bounce with ease, due to the moon having less mass than earth and therefore less gravity. Now, if an object truly gained mass at high speeds, wouldn't you expect it to also give off a stronger gravitational field? Of course you would, but according to theory, experiment, and observations in physics, it does not. So on one hand modern physics tells us that mass has gravity, and on the other hand it tells us that it doesn't. This is contradictory and doesn't make much sense. Not unless you consider the idea that an object really doesn't gain mass relativistically, but only appears sodue to the"dimensional ascension" effect on acceleration. Experimental observation supports "dimensional ascension" over mass increase, and nothing mathematical in relativity disproves dimensional ascension. To the contrary, it supports it. This suggests that not only is relativistic rotation actually into the 5th dimension and not 4th as mainstream scientists believe, but there are an infinite number of dimensions that an object can rotate into.
LENGTH CONTRACTION
Special Relativity predicts a the phenomenon of length contraction, whereby objects at relativistic speeds appear shrunken in the direction of travel. If you examine an LR at a relativistic velocity, it becomes quite clear why length contraction happens.
The rotated LR projected onto 3D space will automatically appear contracted due to the pythagorean theorem. There is actually a derivation of the Lorentz Transformations (equations in Relativity which in one case show how much an object actually appears to shrink in length for a given velocity) that relies upon the pythagorean theorem a^2 +b^2 = c^2. This idea of length contraction is nothing new. Any physics textbook on relativity will explain that acceleration is rotation into hyperspace, and that rotation causes length to appear to shrink. The difference with those textbooks and the Light Ring Theory is that here it's shown that this rotation is into the 5th dimension, and the 5D diagram explains a lot more things a lot more simply than mainstream physics' 4D spacetime.
TIME DILATION
The next phenomenon Relativity predicts is time dilation. This means that fast moving objects appear to slow in time. There is a fact that many textbooks touch upon but fail to make clear, and I'll make it clear for you right now: there are two types of time dilations, relative time dilation and true time dilation. Relative time dilation is when an object merely appears to be moving more slowly in time. In this case, that object also sees us moving more slowly in time. How can it be that each sees the other as moving slower in time? It can be because this time dilation is mere illusion, it's relative. On the other hand, there is true time dilation, resulting in objects that speed off and then return to be younger than their twin counterparts that stayed behind and didn't move at all. In other words, if you left your twin here on earth and left the planet in a spaceship at relativistic speeds for a couple months, when you return to earth, you would actually have aged less than your twin, and there's nothing relative about it.
So what's the difference between relative time dilation and true time dilation? Relative time dilation is due mainly to a difference in velocities, and true time dilation is due to the process of acceleration.
Relative time dilation is explained simply in special relativity. The most common example used is the idea of two opposing mirrors with a photon bouncing back and forth between them. This comprises a photon clock, since the speed of light is constant and the photon just bounces back and forth with rapid clicks, like the ticks of a clock. Let's call the downward path "a" an the upward path "b."
If the photon clock is mounted vertically on a cart, when the cart isn't moving, the photon keeps a certain rate of time. However, when the cart moves toward the right and stops, the downward path a' is longer than the downward path a. This is because the photon didn't only have to move downward, but also sideways a bit.
The path a' is longer than a, but since the speed of light is constant (at any given time) no matter what, it takes the photon longer to complete path a' than a. Therefore, a moving clock ticks more slowly than one standing on a motionless cart.
What's funny about this example is that physics uses it to illustrate why time dilation happens as predicted by relativity, an example that relies upon a photon as the critical component in the clock. And it must be a photon since only light doesn't change its speed under various motional perspectives. Doesn't this imply that if time dilation is true for ordinary matter, then matter itself must be made of photons? It sure suggests this, but science ignores the very implication of an example it boasts. How hypocritical, though not surprising.
Relative time dilation means that if in addition to the photon clock on the cart, there were another one stationed on the ground, an observer on the moving cart would see the clock on the ground also running slower. So both observers on the cart and on the ground see each others clocks as running slower. This seems paradoxical, but realize that such relative time dilations is only that -- relative.
True time dilation, however, is what results in one observer ending up younger than the other. And which one it is depends on who's accelerating. In order to go from any velocity to any other velocity, you have to accelerate. When you go from 25 mph to 55 mph in ten seconds, you can feel yourself being pushed back into the driver's seat. That's a consequence of acceleration and your body's resistance to acceleration, called inertia. He who accelerates is the one who ends up younger than his friend who stays at home. Acceleration is not relative, since it can be detected and measured without refference to any other object. To judge velocity, you need to compare the moving object with another one. Acceleration, however, stands alone. The true time dilation initiated by acceleration results in non-relative difference in the ages of relativistic and non-relativistic moving objects.
So how do you explain the fact that acceleration results in true time dilation? General relativity, which deals with accelerated refference frames (non-inertial frames) is obscure in explaining why. Its explanation of gravity and acceleration is myred in complex mathematics such as analytic geometry only because it sees such effects happening due to curvatures in space-time. While the math correctly predicts the outcome, the conceptual foundation might be faulty.
Recall the 5D diagram showing the LR a various velocities:
A change in velocities, defined under physics as acceleration, equates to a moving rotation toward the 5D axis. In other words, the LR is essentially moving vertically in the diagram.
This diagram plots the path (greatly exaggerated for the sake of illustration) of a photon as the LR is accelerated from rest to a relativistic speed. As you can see, the photon, which rotates around the rim of the LR, traces out a helix. This helix is analagous to path a' in the photon clock example, in that a helical path is longer than a simple path around the rim of an LR. Because the path is longer, the photon takes longer to make a complete 360 degree cycle.
The significance of this fact is that time as we know it is determined in part by the cyclical rotation of an LRs' photon. So for an object whose photons must trace out a longer helical path during acceleration, by the time acceleration is complete, the photons will have completed less cycles than an otherwise stationary object. Therefore, the accelerated object has aged more slowly and is now younger than its stationary counterpart. This explanation makes more sense and is visually more obvious than standard physics' explanation of true time dilation.
GRAVITY AND ACCELERATION
To explain gravity, a new aspect of the LRT theory must be presented here. This isn't a new feature of the theory, just one that hasn't been mentioned here yet. The 5D diagram through which an LR is shown to rotate during acceleration, is filled with an ether. This ether is at least 5 dimensional in nature. What do I mean by this? A film of oil atop water is 2 dimensional since it's flat and spread out. The water itself is 3 dimensional since it occupies volume. The ether through which the LR rotates is 5 dimensional.
Notice that when an object is at constant velocity, in the 5D diagram it's stuck at a particular angle into hyperspace. It's not moving through any ether at all in the diagram since it's at a fixed velocity. Only during acceleration does the LR move through the ether. Is it suprising that a mass being accelerated resists acceleration, but a mass traveling at constant velocity doesn't resist at all? Of course not...resistance is only encountered during acceleration when the 5D ether blocks the LR from moving easily through it.
To understand the 5D ether, all you have to do is take any physical motion such as velocity or acceleration, and time-differentiate it. In other words, motion in the 5D diagram is the time derivative of 3D motion. This is an important fact to keep in mind when you read other fringe science literature. What is time differentiation or a "time derivative"? It's simply a term from calculus whereby a derivative is the formula that tells you how fast a function is changing with respect to any given variable, such as time in this case. If you don't know calculus, don't worry. To show you all that you need to know in this regard, just know that the derivative of velocity is a stationary position, and that the derivative of acceleration is a fixed velocity. This means that 3D velocity = fixed angle into 5D hyperspace, and 3D acceleration = fixed velocity in 5D hyperspace. Velocity just means movement, and moving through hyperspace means encountering resistance from the ether. So only during 3D acceleration or 5D velocity/rotation does an object experience resistance, or inertia.
Acceleration and gravity are also flip sides of the same coin. Einstein showed a simple example involving a man in an elevator box. If the box is standing still on earth, he feels a downward tug of gravity. If the box is in outer space, however, and accelerated, the man feels an identical tug due to his mass resisting being accelerated. Therefore, acceleration and gravity are impossible to tell apart, from the man's perspective. General relativity is all about explaining how this is so. But let's see how the LRT explains this...
If inertia (resistance to acceleration) happens when an LR moves through a stationary 5D ether, then gravity is simply 5D ether moving through a stationary LR. Let's put it another way...a fisherman standing in waist-high water. Acceleration would be equivalent to him wading through still waters, encountering resistance from the water. Gravity is analagous to the man standing still in a river, feeling the onrush of water trying to sweep him away. If he loses his footing, he's swept away, just as a rock climber falls due to gravity when he loses his footing. From our 3D perspective, then, gravity is more a push than a pull, since it involves accelerated motion resulting from 5D ether movement.
When an object is in freefall in a gravity field, it no longer feels any acceleration at all. This is why your stomach feels funny during a downward stretch of a roller coaster...you're accelerating downward along with gravity, and therefore no longer feel its pull or push.
In the first frame, we have an LR in outer space...the ether is stationary and so's the LR, meaning no force upon the LR. The second frame shows a stationary LR in the onrush of 5D ether, when it's on the surface of earth for example. The third frame shows the LR in freefall, following the current of the moving ether. To the LR in freefall, the ether is motionless as well. The fisherman, when swept away, begins to move with the speed of the waters, and the water itself looks stationary to him now that he's moving along with it.
ENERGY, TIME, AND GRAVITY
Now it's time to introduce yet another detail concerning the 5D diagram. As mentioned, higher angles or distances into 5D equates to higher velocities here in 3D. But velocity also comes with kinetic energy, energy put into the motion of an object. Therefore, higher 5D distances mean higher energies.
In the second frame of the previous diagram, the ether 5 dimensionally above the LR implies higher energy than the ether below it. On earth, this equates to higher potential energy for objects that are high up than those low to the ground. In fact, the equation for gravitational potential energy near earth is E = massgravitational accelerationheight. The higher up it is, the more potential energy it has. This just means that if the object were to fall, by the time it reached the ground, a object falling off a skyscraper would have greater velocity upon impact than one that fell from a table edge.
Another thing General Relativity says is that objects in a strong gravitational field age more slowly than those in weak or nonexistent gravity fields. From the LRT perspective, this is due to the helix-effect, whereby an onrush of ether means more ether for a photon in an LRT to travel through, making it complete less cycles around the rim of an LR than one without that extra ether motion. This means that time is different for different areas of space that have certain speeds of 5D ether motion.
In our 3D space, on earth, the situation is summarized as follows:
Near earth there is one rate of time, and far away from earth is another rate of time, with various rates in between. This constitutes a "time gradient." A gradient simply implies the distribution of something changing over space. In this case, it's the rate of time changing over space. It is possible to say, then, that gravity is actually a consequence of a time gradient. Time and gravity are intricately linked. Even in outer space, an object still experiences time because it generates its own gravitational field.
The generation of a gravity field is due to an LR's rotation.
A rotating LR, as shown in this diagram, sucks in or expels ether depending on whether it is matter or imaginary matter. Imaginary matter will be explained later, so ignore that for now. The point here is that a rotating LR either generates or is created around an etheric vortex, whose center is a singularity much like a black hole. [Although you may not understand it now, the vortex is a bridge through time...linking the present with that fateful moment in this universe's future where all matter has coagulated into a single black hole, the Big Crunch Black Hole. That BCBH is the singularity around which all LRs' vortices are centered.]
Two LRs interact in the 5D diagram like this:
Each one sucks in 5D ether, and so they attract. If one object is considerably larger than the other, such as the earth compared to a man standing upon it, then the divergence (spread) of the earth's ether is so small from the man's perspective, and the LRs of the man absorb such little of the incoming ether, that it appears the man is being pushed by a vertical etheric force.
This diagram shows what's going on. The earth is laid flat on the 3D-2D plane, and 5D ether is sucked into it. The mass is so small in the grand flow of ether, that it's essentially being pushed toward earth. So while it is true that matter LRs can only suck ether, and two small LRs in proximity of each other suck the same region of ether and hence attract, when one mass is much larger than the other, the smaller object is caught in the bigger one's grand incomming ether flow and seems pushed. This is why gravity can be thought of both as a push and a pull. One experiment indicating it's more a push involves shielding a mass from above with another mass. The results of such an experiment have indicated that the mass beings shielded reduces in weight...which can only be explained if ether is coming from above and moves to push objects downward. In this case, the shield absorbed some of that ether and hence the mass below wasn't pushed as hard, hence losing weight.
TYPES OF TIME
As mentioned, matter generates gravity fields because of the LR rotation. But what about a photon, you might ask...it is massless and so generates no gravity, but does it not experience time as well? The truth is that no, light does not experience time in the traditional sense. Sure, it takes time for it to go from one place to another, but the photon itself experiences no time -- at least not in the sense that matter experiences time. This brings us to a new and major aspect of the LRT: the existence of multiple types orcharacteristics of time.
T1 is time as we normally define it, the type of time used in physics equations. This type of time is universal and a constant stream exists for it even in the absence of matter. It is the "stuff" that makes time what it is.
T0 is time as defined by the cyclical motion of photons around the rim of an LR.
T2 is not really a new type of "time," but is associated with the temporal distance between two parallel timelines. Yes, I said timelines...multiple realities, alternate realities, etc... This is not science fiction, it's fact. Just because mainstream physics doesn't accept the idea of alternate realities, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Quantum mechanics supports this idea, and as you will see shortly, the quantum world constitutes the interface between physical and metaphysical worlds.
To make the idea of multiple types of time clearer, take a look at this analogy:
What's shown are two streams of water, representing two streams of time. On the first stream there are two small bay areas with water circulating. On one of these bay areas, there is a counter keeping track of how many times the little boat has gone around the isle of the bay. The stream of water represents T1, the flow of time. The circular bays represent the LR, with the counter recording T0, or the cyclical rate of self-circulating photons. And the distance between the two streams of time represent T2. This analogy, ridiculous as it may be, accurately relates T0, T1, and T2. So why even bother with distingushing these additional types of time? Because these additional features allow an explanation of not only physics, but multi-dimensional reality and metaphysics.
Before getting into further details of how T0 and T1 relate, we must discuss the full nature of the photon and the concept of "imaginary" things.
FULL NATURE OF THE PHOTON
A photon isn't just a simple coupling of electric and magnetic fields as I told you earlier. What I showed you was only 1/4th of a full photon. The full photon is composed of four components...two that are opposite in field direction, and two that are opposite in time.
P is the "real photon," that which constitutes the light emitted from any lightbulb.
-P is the "anti-photon," same as the real photon but opposite in sign, or 180 degrees out of phase.
iP is the "imaginary photon" which essentially travels back in T1 time, but can also appear to travel forward in T1 time in which case it must also appear 90 degrees out of phase from the "real photon." It is resides in a higher dimension.
-iP is the same as iP, but opposite in sign.
Each type of photon, when it is made to travel self-circularly, results in a particular type of matter.
The real photon, as indicated already, results in matter that travels forward in T1 time, and spins in such way to create forward T0 time.
The imaginary photon, on the other hand, creates imaginary matter that spins in the opposite direction.
The anti-photon results in antimatter, which spins the same direction as matter but exists in an opposite stream of time. Reversal of T1 inverts the sign of a particle's charge. So while an electron is negative, the positron which travels back in T1 time is charged positively. In fact, if you reverse the time of a positron, it behaves exactly like an electron, and this is experimental fact. The LRT just explains it as a difference of direction in T1 time.
RELATION BETWEEN T1 AND TO
The mathematics of how T1 and T0 relate, I haven't entirely figured out yet, but thus far it appears to be like this:
T1 is just the stream of time as we know it in physics, and the opposite of this stream of time is indicated by a negative sign. That's why the opposite of T1 is just -T1.
T0 also has its opposite as being -T0. However, -T0 equates to iT1 where "i" is the square root of negative one. I am certain that the equation -T0 = iT1 is valid, because it links such diverse topics as consciousness, spirit, antimatter, and scalar physics.
Philosophically, the square root of -1 is something that isn't ordinarily logically reconcilable. The square root of a number asks "what two identical numbers can I multiply to make this number?" So ask yourself "What two identical numbers can I multiply to make -1?"
Well, certainly you can't multiply any identical pairs of real numbers to create -1. So we make up a number "i" which just so happens to create -1 when you multiply it by itself, or square it. In other word, i*i = -1
The "i" just blows the mind of anything rational. It is beyond rationality, beyond that which we identify as logical and real. That is why it's called "imaginary." The "i" is a signature of consciousness. Consciousness is truly beyond the material...it is metaphysical. In many cases, the inclusion of "i" in an equation is a sign that metaphysics is involved. And if not metaphysics, then something beyond 3D physical reality. The imaginary variable also signifies a 90 degree rotation into a higher dimension, away from this reality.
So knowing this, you have a fresh interpretation upon imaginary photons and imaginary matter. If you haven't figured it out yet, imaginary matter and imaginary photons are the substance of metaphysical realms, spirit, and consciousness. So as you can see, -T0 = iT1 reconciles physics with metaphysics as far as time is concerned. More on this later.
" i " AND THE CONSERVATION OF VOID
Positive, negative, real, and imaginary are four components of reality that when summed together, equal zero. This physical universe, including space and time, matter and energy, were created from nothing. From the void this world burst forth into space and time. The only way to turn nothing into something is by creating pairs of opposites: opposite space and opposite time. Positive and negative space and time, when summed, collapse back into nothing. The only thing keeping nothingness separated into the four opposite components is consciousness' pure will to exist. But this is getting ahead of the story. For now, let's focus on the physics and leave metaphysics for later.
For a photon, the four components sum to zero. The same should be true for matter. If matter and antimatter annihilate into energy, then imaginary matter and imaginary antimatter should annihilate into negative energy.
What is negative energy? It is energy that goes back in T1 time. Recall that T1 is associated with space itself, and doesn't depend on the cyclical rotation of an LR which constitutes the definition of T0. Therefore, photons and energy still possess T1 despite having no T0 value. This is why energy and imaginary photons can travel backward in T1 time.
Here's Einstein's mass-energy equation with added explanation point out that T1 is the time used in physics equations,:
The c^2 in the equation has units of (mass/time)^2, and time in this sense means T1. Now keep in mind the equation -T0 = iT1 or equivalently T1 = iT0
When turning matter into imaginary matter, the "second" in speed of light's "meters per second" is turned into "imaginary seconds." When the speed of light is squared in the equation, you end up with negative energy, or energy that goes back in time. And negative plus positive energy results in zero. This is a mathematical way of explaining what I showed above with the various real and imaginary matter/antimatter pairs collapsing into zero.
5D DIAGRAM AND THREE TYPES OF TIME
So far we've discussed plenty about the 5th dimension. What about the 4th? Well, the fourth dimension encompassed the true size of an LR. In a 4D diagram, the LR appears as a sphere. There needs to be reconciliation between the three 'types' of time and the 5 dimensions we're working with. So here is the diagram explaining how they relate:
From the diagram, T1 is aimed vertically downward through the 5th dimension. T1 is the direction of superconscious awareness, like a spotlight shining down onto reality. This spotlight is the Creator, beaming its rays of awareness outward into all dimensions and timelines. Each timeline has its own ray of T1, so to speak. T2, the distance separating timelines, is associated with 4D, and T0 is related to the rotation of LRs. So to summarize:
5D == T1
4D == T2
LR == T0
REALITY CREATION
This diagram shows how the Creator creates reality. We start at the top left of the diagram, with the Creator being situated at an infinite number of dimensions away from us. It radiates energy on all frequencies and all dimensions into all directions. Part of this spectrum is intercepted by the "grand matrix" which filters out all other dimensions except for one. The grand matrix comprising our perceptual reality is a three dimensional filter, allowing only three dimensional objects and entities to directly manifest in our reality. Of course, the grand matrix is only like a stage curtain, and plenty of things go on back stage which have influence in the show. This back stage is our 4th and 5th dimension.
So after the grand matrix leaves only electromagnetic energy of a limited dimensional size, you're left with a single universe filled with EM radiation of all frequencies, from zero to infinity. This is called "white noise." The energy emitted by this source goes both forward and backward in time which cancel to nothing. That's why empty space is pretty much empty due to the infinite number of waves cancelling out.
The Big Bang was an event in which empty space was separated by the will of the Creator into positive and negative time/energy, or real and imaginary universes. Everything remains conserved, since positive and negative are just opposite pairs which can be created from nothing. The process of separating zero into positive and negative space/time is called "time differentiation."
When the real and imaginary universes arise from empty space, photons (multiple holographic copies of the matrix-filtered Creator) comprise the substance of each universe. In other words, when empty space is time differentiated into real and imaginary universes, the energy created from this process takes the form of photons. Most of these photons (composed in the real universe of real photons and anti photons) begin to self-circulate to form matter and antimatter.
In the real universe, containing matter and antimatter, all photons are holographic projections of the single filtered image of the Creator. In the imaginary universe there also exist small holographic copies of the Creator, and these travel self-circularly and comprise individual consciousness. A real LR is matter, and an imaginary LR is spirit, to put it simply. To matter, spirit or consciousness appears to move backward in time, as described in the simple equation -T0 = iT1 or T0^2 = -T1^2
Furthermore, even a real LR is conscious to a degree, since its time component T0 is associated with individual consciousness while T1 is associated with the Creator's consciousness streaming downward through the fifth dimension. It is the Creator's moving awareness through the 5D ether that constitutes the flow of T1 time. If each moment of T1 time were a frame of a movie, then the Creator is analagous to the projector. So creator consciousness, T1 time, energy, and gravity are all associated with the 5D direction and therefore each other:
Ponder on its significance, because a variety of sources including Tom Bearden, John Keely, and the Cassiopaeans have commented on a link between these things.
COUPLING MATTER TO CONSCIOUSNESS
Matter coupled to spirit involves both consciousness (T0) and matter (T1) being "phase locked." Our physical bodies and brains act to house our consciousness and make us experience positive linear time, which would otherwise be nonexistent to our perceptions. You may wonder how it's possible for matter and imaginary matter to phase lock when they're both supposedly spinning in opposite directions with one having positive T0 and the other negative T0. However, due to the TO^2 = -T1^2 property which holds true only for matter (the squaring comes from E = mc^2), despite imaginary matter or consciousness being negative T0 (normally spinning opposite from matter), the reversal of sign in T1 means it reverses the opposite spin and makes it appear to matter to be spinning the same direction, hence allowing phase lock. This is subtle and potentially confusing, so just study the diagram above til you get it, or else move on for a while.
But how exactly does matter and imaginary matter phase lock? What physical process occurs which allows the imaginary realm to bleed through and influence the material realm?
COLLAPSING THE WAVE FUNCTION
To understand the process, you must know something about what quantum mechanics calls "collapsing the wave function." The wave function is an equation that completely describes a subatomic particle as it exists in all its possibilities and future states. Collapsing the wave function means narrowing down that equation until only one possibility and future state exists. For example, Schroedinger's cat is both dead and alive when it's an uncollapsed wave function, but when I open the lid to look at which it really is, I collapse the wave function and it becomes one or the other. With an electron, its wave function encompasses a number of things, and depending on
which aspect I want to look at, I can calculate the probability that it'll be one or the other when I collapse the wave function through observation. Of course, quantum mechanics cannot predict which state it falls into, because that's where freewill and consciousness enter the equation. Since consciousness is beyond the perfect predictability of mathematics which only describe material things, no physics equation can accurately predict the outcome of a quantum system.
When both the lense of individual cosciousness (associated with T0) and the Creator consciousness (associated with T1) focus upon a particular reality of a wave function, that becomes the solid, objective, physical present moment in time. The future doesn't entirely exist yet...it only exists so much as a nebulous wave function encompassing what could possibly happen next. For example, the moment a cast die leaves my hand, the wave function involves a nebulous entity composed of six possibilities, each of equal probability and involving only one number turning up. Not until the present reaches the moment where the die comes to rest does that wave function collapse into an objective reality. Of course, this example isn't accurate since it relies upon a physical not quantum object (consciousness can enter this physical reality only through quantum systems). The future, as it exists now, is embryonic -- existing like machine code that won't be assembled into dashing graphics until the stream of time/consciousness "compiles" this embryonic state into full-detailed reality. What's interesting is that by changing this embryonic state with one's mind and emotions, one can change the future to a degree.
MATTER / CONSCIOUSNESS INTERFACE
But this still doesn't answer the question of what physical thing acts like a transceiver between the imaginary and real realms. Whatever it is, it must rely upon quantum mechanics as a primary description of its behavior, and it must be something that all living things possess. The one object that fits this requirement is a crystal.
A crystal is an ordered arrangement of atoms into a three-dimensional lattice structure. Put simply, it's a highly regular and geometric arrangement of atoms. What's the big deal, you may ask. The big deal is that ordered structures like these have unique quantum properties. An electron running loose in a crystal has its wave function spread throughout the crystal. Quantum mechanics is often adamant that energies of subatomic particles must be discrete...they must come in chunks or quanta. In a crystal, however, the energies of electrons fall not into thin lined categories, but smeared levels called "energy bands."
The formerly discrete nature of allowed energies for an electron is turned into thick energy bands, within which electrons can occupy any energy they desire (well, almost). The important thing here is that due to the crystal lattice, an electron wave function become severely smeared and spread out.
But the smearing is not only through space. It's also through the 4th and 5th dimension. In other words, an electron wave function in a crystal treads upon the imaginary as well as future and past domains, linking and coupling all these regions with one another. Information can pass from one of these domains into the other.
So it would be okay to say that an electron in a crystal exists in multiple areas...what is right now, what could be right now, and what could be in the future.
Multiple futures can send information back into the present, and the phase-locked consciousness of the present can then get a good idea of which among these future realities to choose as its next collapsed wave function. The only thing limiting what state can be occupied next are the laws of quantum mechanics, which forbid certain things. Out of all possible futures that are actually allowed, some states are less probable than others. But given conscious will and intent, even states with small probability can be manifested during the next moment in time given enough intent and will. This is how teleportation and telekinesis, allowed but highly improbable under quantum mechanics, can be made to exist given enough willpower and psychic skills of a person.
Some examples of crystals are DNA and water, two things contained within all living things. Also, the brain is said to contain liquid crystals, which are probably the critical mechanism in allowing a dynamic response of a complex organic brain to the commands from consciousness residing in the metaphysical realm of imaginary reality. Real crystals such as quartz are more rigid ways of interfacing matter with consciousness. Information stored in such a crystal is stored not in the arrangement of atoms (since such atoms are fixed), but in the quality of the smeared electron wave function. Conscious information and emotional energy can be stored in crystals, and this includes water. Unlike large quartz crystals, the crystals of a physical being are small and dynamic, and can also store memory not only through the electron wave function, but also by arranging themselves physically into a coded pattern.
INVISIBILITY AND THE 4TH DIMENSION
Getting back to the more physics oriented aspects of this theory, let's talk about the 4th dimension, which has been kept from in-depth discussion thus far. The 4th dimension is what spans the true size of a physical particle. A 2D ring in 5D space appears as a 3D sphere in 4D space. In other words, most subatomic particles, and hence physical objects, are 4 dimensional in size. To illustrate the properties of the 4th dimension, we shall consider what happens when an object is rotated into the 4th dimension.
At 0 degrees, both object 1 and object 2 are located in the 3rd dimension. One can shine a photon onto the other and have it bounce back. In other words, both objects can see each other with ordinary 3 or 2 dimensional light.
At 45 degrees, however, object 2 is lifted off the 3D plane. The photon shined by object 1 now passes under object 2, seeming to go right through where object 1 was before. Because the emitted photon did not face interference, object 1 cannot see object 2 any longer. Object 2 has now become invisible. But both objects can still bump into each other due to the 4th dimensional size of the objects. In fact, object 2 can also shine a light onto object 1, but this emitted light is also rotated into the 4th dimension and reflects off the component of object 1 that sticks out into the 4th dimension. This is how an invisible person can still walk over solid ground and see where he's going, though he's observing everything in their higher 4th dimensional parts.
At 90 degrees, not only is object 2 above the path of object 1's emitted photon, but it's also entirely above interaction with object 1. The objects now neither see nor interact with each other.
In fact, by the time object 2 rotates so far away from our timeline, it has actually shifted into another timeline, separated by T2 or a 4th dimensional distance. It can now see an entirely new reality. What this reality is like, I'm not certain, but the possibilities are endless.
During astral projection, one actually separates his own imaginary self from the physical body and rotates into the 4th dimension consciously. The beginning of the projection is characterized by minimal rotation, allowing one to see the 4th dimensional component of the world, appearing to an astral projectionist as glowing in an eery light. If projection continues, the person can rotate into a number of alternate timelines and higher realities. He can even transfer himself to the imaginary realms and experience the various gradations of "imaginary" to the point of pure imaginary or pure consciousness, equating to the mental plane.
By this point, you might have wondered why a 4th dimensional rotation results in an object entirely leaving this reality, while a 5 dimensional rotation merely results in its apparent length contraction. The reason is that projection occurs only through the 5th dimension directly down into 3D, due to T1 and the Creator consciousness streaming downward like light from a spotlight casting shadows on the floor.
This is why objects that are at different velocities still bump into each other despite being at different angles into 5D; their projections interact at all levels.
Secondly, you may have noticed that during dimensional ascension, the spiral through which an object ascends dimensionally must obviously cross over into 4D at some point and intrude upon a parallel timeline. Well, this is not so because T2 separation occurs all along the spiral:
As you can see, even with the helix, the timelines remain separated.
TOROID MODEL OF REALITY, CYCLICAL TIME
It has been suggested by some that time is cyclical, that it loops endlessly. But an endless loop is only endless so long as you remain within it. A merry-go-round can turn forever, but it's merely a matter of hopping on and off that turns eternity into a finite ride. Likewise, this physical universe with its T1 may be a mere merry-go-round of time. We phase lock ourselves into it for the ride and hopefully remember to hop off when we've had enough. A cyclical model of T1 looks as follows:
T1 goes around the toroid in repeating cycles, while the edge of the toroid delineates T2 distance between timelines. Putting the previous invisibility example into this context gives a cross section of the "doughnut" whose angles relate to 4th dimensional rotation away from this reality:
The doughnut diagram is a mere geometrical device used for illustration, and has no real physical counterpart. Nonetheless, its importance lies in that it agrees with what Al Bielek has said of how time and timelines relate, and reasonably explains the existence of electronic devices that can rotate one out of this reality to achieve invisibility, or rotate further and make one be able to walk (or necessarily hover) through walls.
SCALAR PHYSICS
The last aspect of the LRT to be discussed in this article is how the idea of imaginary reality and consciousness ties into wave mechanics and scalar physics.
A wave can be broken down into spatial and temporal components. This can be excellently illustrated in these diagrams:
This diagram shows a wave that is part spatial, part temporal. It is drawn on a plane spanned by the space and time axes. This wave is oriented in such a way that its projection onto the time axes and space axes results in both having a sinusoidal (wave-like) shape. All this diagram shows is that such a wave drawn situated at an angle halfway between space and time results in a wave that half space and half time. From our point of view in actual reality, this wave looks like a wave upon the ocean that has definite peaks and troughs which change over time.
What's shown here is a wave that's oriented such that when it is projected or moves in the direction of the arrow, only the space axis indicates a wave, while there is a flat line on the time axis. In other words, this wave is shaped like a wave, but doesn't move at all. It is analagous to a stationary electromagnetic field, something quite common in the real world, such as the field of a bar magnet or an electrically charged object.
Last we have a wave that is situated such that the projections upon the sinusoid is only apparent on the time axis. On the space axis there is only a flat line which bounces up and down. This means that in space, the wave is the same everywhere but only changes over time. Such a wave is called a "scalar wave." Scalar just means "one number" and since this wave is the same everywhere in space, only one number is needed to describe its amplitude at any moment in time.
What I will do now is show how a scalar wave, one whose oscillation lies only in the time domain, is related to the imaginary reality and can be psychoactive, or capable of influencing consciousness.
First, I'll restate a commonly accepted mathematical fact that a wave can be broken down into real and imaginary components.
Many engineering and physics calculations involve waves that have both real and imaginary parts. Such an equation of the wave is worked upon, and to get the final answer that has any relation to physical reality, the imaginary component is erased and only the real component of the wave is considered. Of course, the imaginary component exists just as much as the real component, just in a different dimension or universe.
In these preceding steps, I've transformed the accepted equation of a wave with real and imaginary parts into an equation for the same wave in terms of spatial and temporal components. The letters with the little inverted v above them are just another name for a particular axis. So the T0 with the inverted v means the things attached to it point along the T0 axis. The very last part shows that what is normally considered the imaginary component of a wave is equal to the part of the wave that lies in the domain of T0, that associated with individual consciousness.
Furthermore, it has been suggested by Tom Bearden at one time that phase conjugating a wave, or adding a wave to its opposite, will result in a scalar wave. It's not quite that simple according to Bearden's latest research, but mathematically it adds up as follows:
Both waves have forward time components, but opposite spatial components. This is physically accomplished through a bifilar or caduceus coil, though thecaduceous coil leaves some of the field in phase and some of it out of phase. Anyway, when these waves are added together, only the temporal component remains. None of it is physical, and all the energy is stored in the time domain. Any information propagated through these waves will be propagated through time and in the domain of consciousness.
CONCLUSION
That concludes this article, the second part to the Light Ring Theory. More will be refined, overhauled, and added over time, but for now this article is the simplest and clearest explanation of the LRT I've been able to produce. It is not the most comprehensive, for it leaves out many phenomena and details covered in Part 1 which you might want to read some time if you haven't already. Part 2 and Part 1 differ in some details, so consider the details in Part 2 to be more accurate if you find a contradiction between them. As you have seen, there is some mathematics in Part 2, but it is still primarily a geometry-based theory.
According to mainstream physicists, a theory is crap if it isn't filled withpages of plagiarized and trite equations, and is called crazy if it contains more creativity than academic parroting. But I'm not catering to these priests of scientism. Rather, I've written this article for you to ponder upon. Keep what makes sense and throw out what you know to be wrong. If you know of a fault in my theory, e-mail me, for it will be greatly appreciated. Thanks for being patient with this article.
http://www.montalk.net/photondoc/photondoc.html
=====
HE-Space-Ancients-Astrology-Musings-More
http://seekers.100megs6.com/index.htm