"All the subterranean caverns of America are inhabited by
an ancient people who disappeared from the world. These people and the
subterranean regions where they dwell are under the supreme authority of the
King of the World. Both the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans were once the home of
vast continents which later became submerged; and their inhabitants found
refuge in the Subterranean World. The profounder caverns are illuminated by
a resplendent light which permits the growing of cereals and other vegetables,
and gives the inhabitants a long life-span free from disease. In this world there
exists a large population and many tribes."
If we were to assume that the particles from the Sun that penetrate the Earth's surface are made up of photons, i.e., photon aggragates, then it would also be natural to asume that photon aggragates would break up as they pass through the crust, due to friction with other layers of particles.
As they break up, individual photons would be loosened, thus forming an omnipresent glow.
It is not orthodox particle physics, that's for sure.
But how else would you explain the omnipresent light in the depths below that has been reported?
We know so little about particle behavior.
And here is another one: not only does Cater theorizes that electrons are composed of smaller particles that are composed of smaller particles, that are composed of smaller particles, et cetera, but he stipulates that when particles of a certain frequency pass through a medium, that their frequency is reduced. As an example he offers that, as The Sun sets and its particles pass thorugh the atmosphere sidelong, the frequency becomes reduced to orange and red. I have noted that towards the end of the afternoon I can often perceive a very subtle tint of green and yellow.
Notice that we've gone to the Moon, we have satellites and telecommunications, but nobody have proved that the red rays of the sidelong Sun are caused by scatter. This supposed phenomenon has never been observed. Where do they scatter to? What modulates the scatter such that it always produces the same azure blue tint?
Orthodox physics, in more ways than these, does not lend itself to explaining a hollow world nor deep subterranean caverns of such size as have been reported.
Newtonian physics is a nasty obstacle, for example.
Dean , the best way to test this out could be in the deepest mine shafts or of the world , such as in South Africa , or the deepest underground cavern systems...though I suspect this particular phenomena happens in the caverns , at much deeper layers of the Earth's crust , than man has yet been able to explore .
Books such as Etidorpha claim that all the photons of light falling on the Earth's surface are absorbed in some way by the Earth's upper crust and then re-emitted at great depths to provide the strange illumination
My take on this is that since there is proven electrical activity in our crust in the form of Massive Telluric currents , at a certain depth in the crust this electrical current might be generating some sort of luminescence...even the bio luminescence of deep sea creatures is caused by electrical currents that their own bodies can generate .
Mainstream science does acknowledge for sure , that Neutrinos are able to pass through miles of rock and have been detected even in the deepest of mine shafts . Whether even photons can pass through is a big question mark , but illumination at those depths maybe getting caused by some other underground phenomena that are electrical or electromagnetic in nature .
Regards
silopanna wrote:
Todd,
It is not orthodox particle physics, that's for sure.
But how else would you explain the omnipresent light in the depths below that has been reported?
We know so little about particle behavior.
And here is another one: not only does Cater theorizes that electrons are composed of smaller particles that are composed of smaller particles, that are composed of smaller particles, et cetera, but he stipulates that when particles of a certain frequency pass through a medium, that their frequency is reduced. As an example he offers that, as The Sun sets and its particles pass thorugh the atmosphere sidelong, the frequency becomes reduced to orange and red. I have noted that towards the end of the afternoon I can often perceive a very subtle tint of green and yellow.
Notice that we've gone to the Moon, we have satellites and telecommunications, but nobody have proved that the red rays of the sidelong Sun are caused by scatter. This supposed phenomenon has never been observed. Where do they scatter to? What modulates the scatter such that it always produces the same azure blue tint?
Orthodox physics, in more ways than these, does not lend itself to explaining a hollow world nor deep subterranean caverns of such size as have been reported.
Newtonian physics is a nasty obstacle, for example.
Have a good one.
Dean #yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755 -- #yiv6793934755ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755ygrp-mkp#yiv6793934755hd {color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755ygrp-mkp#yiv6793934755ads {margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755ygrp-mkp .yiv6793934755ad {padding:0 0;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755ygrp-mkp .yiv6793934755ad p {margin:0;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755ygrp-mkp .yiv6793934755ad a {color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755ygrp-sponsor#yiv6793934755ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755ygrp-sponsor#yiv6793934755ygrp-lc#yiv6793934755hd {margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755ygrp-sponsor#yiv6793934755ygrp-lc .yiv6793934755ad {margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755actions {font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755activity {background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755activity span:first-child {text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755activity span a {color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755activity span span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755activity span .yiv6793934755underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv6793934755 .yiv6793934755attach {clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;}#yiv6793934755 .yiv6793934755attach div a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv6793934755 .yiv6793934755attach img {border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv6793934755 .yiv6793934755attach label {display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv6793934755 .yiv6793934755attach label a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv6793934755 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 4px;}#yiv6793934755 .yiv6793934755bold {font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv6793934755 .yiv6793934755bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv6793934755 dd.yiv6793934755last p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv6793934755 dd.yiv6793934755last p span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv6793934755 dd.yiv6793934755last p span.yiv6793934755yshortcuts {margin-right:0;}#yiv6793934755 div.yiv6793934755attach-table div div a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv6793934755 div.yiv6793934755attach-table {width:400px;}#yiv6793934755 div.yiv6793934755file-title a, #yiv6793934755 div.yiv6793934755file-title a:active, #yiv6793934755 div.yiv6793934755file-title a:hover, #yiv6793934755 div.yiv6793934755file-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv6793934755 div.yiv6793934755photo-title a, #yiv6793934755 div.yiv6793934755photo-title a:active, #yiv6793934755 div.yiv6793934755photo-title a:hover, #yiv6793934755 div.yiv6793934755photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv6793934755 div#yiv6793934755ygrp-mlmsg #yiv6793934755ygrp-msg p a span.yiv6793934755yshortcuts {font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv6793934755 .yiv6793934755green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv6793934755 .yiv6793934755MsoNormal {margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv6793934755 o {font-size:0;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755photos div div {border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755photos div label {color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755reco-desc {font-size:77%;}#yiv6793934755 .yiv6793934755replbq {margin:4px;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755ygrp-actbar div a:first-child {margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755ygrp-mlmsg {font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755ygrp-mlmsg select, #yiv6793934755 input, #yiv6793934755 textarea {font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755ygrp-mlmsg pre, #yiv6793934755 code {font:115% monospace;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755ygrp-mlmsg#yiv6793934755logo {padding-bottom:10px;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755ygrp-msg p a {font-family:Verdana;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755ygrp-msg p#yiv6793934755attach-count span {color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755ygrp-reco#yiv6793934755reco-head {color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755ygrp-reco {margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755ygrp-sponsor#yiv6793934755ov li a {font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755ygrp-sponsor#yiv6793934755ov li {font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755ygrp-sponsor#yiv6793934755ov ul {margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755ygrp-text {font-family:Georgia;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755ygrp-text p {margin:0 0 1em 0;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755ygrp-text tt {font-size:120%;}#yiv6793934755#yiv6793934755ygrp-vital ul li:last-child {border-right:none !important;}#yiv6793934755
Further to my earlier note , here is an article that explains interactions between neutrino/photon/electron . Now mainstream science already acknowledges that
Neutrinos can pass through miles of solid rock unhindered .
We also know about the Telluric (electric) currents in the Earth's crust - so electron flow is also present .
The only thing we do not know is how photons can penetrate miles deep into the Earth's crust to provide illumination in the cavern worlds below .
Could it be possible that some kind of interaction between electrons and Neutrinos is giving rise to photons (light) at great depths in those underground caverns below ? If someone in this group understans quantum physics in more detail , could you comment on this aspect ?
Wave interference photon/neutrino: the electron?
Apart from the wave interference among equals photons or neutrinos, there is also the possibility that there is wave interference between a photon and a neutrino.In a still simple illustration: Both entities that formed the photon as well as the neutrino had the same ejection speed at the moment of restart of the magnetic compensation (3rd period), being the speed of light. The electric phenomenon of both systems did have absolute exactly the same frequency starting conditions, in the order of magnitude of 10²³ Hz.At the restart of the magnetic system, there was a permanent backlash of this compensation for electric manifestation of the photon and the neutrino. As from the 3rd period, the photon is compensated by a symmetric magnetic compensation and apparently this is similar to the potential causality before the start of the universe. The photon does not show inertia and continues propagation at the speed of light, V1The neutrino though, has due to the backlash only left handed chirality and also a monopole for the magnetic compensation. In particular the continuation of left-handed chirality requires a magnetic compensation out of line with the original magnetic compensation, which is assumed to have been symmetrical, with no preference for left or right-handed chirality. This asymmetrical spin behavior will trigger a more complex magnetic compensation and the now formed neutrino will show inertia and as a consequence a slightly reduced speed and thus V2<V1. The energy for this more complex magnetic compensation is derived from the frequency energy of the electrical manifestation. This difference is the equivalent to the Compton translation of the “invariant mass” component of the neutrino. Therefore, it can be questioned what the required conditions are for a potential interference of the two different forms of light or EM radiation. Such a study is not yet done and at present I assume that these conditions for wave interference could be met in the early period of the universe.What will happen when a photon and a neutrino interfere?This can be discussed with this illustration: Note: an animation of the spinor functionality is available in the chapter on a second form of light. Independent of the sense of direction of the chirality, we have in the neutrino a monopole magnetic compensation system. When the two electric manifestations come into interaction distance, than this will impact both magnetic systems. The photon is EM active at the higher frequency and bipolar and therefore will be able to bridge the backlash of the magnetic system of the neutrino in interference conditions and can potentially induce a flip of the spinor to right-handed chirality. The backlash of the neutrino would change into an advanced phase shift in the direction of the movement, which would be a peculiar phenomenon due to the restart conditions. Therefore it is my opinion that this situation could potentially be unstable.Stability can be preserved or restored in different ways:1. A potential rotation in the direction of movement by 180° and restoring left-handed chirality.2. Reversing the direction of movement3. While doing one or the other, the magnetic manifestation of the photon restores the left-handed chirality when the appropriate phase shift of this magnetic compensation is available again In my opinion, the first option is most likely. It is in line with the oscillating behaviour of a neutrino when interfering with external magnetic manifestations, while showing left-handed chirality restored when naked again. We then have to take into account, that whenever the magnetic compensation of the photon induces another rotational movement, it will immediately influence the position of the photon as well. The neutrino has inertia and the photon does not have this form of mass manifestation. A small momentum induced by the neutrino will have no inertial resistance from the photon. This momentum is induced as soon as an asymmetry will show in the electric manifestation of the photon and this will indeed happen. Such an asymmetry will initiate the phenomenon of what we call the electric charge. This electric charge will trigger a force that is known as the Lorentz force and this will exercise its existence within the construct of the photon and neutrino. Therefore, it is my opinion that prior to the full impact of flipping chirality to right-handed by interfering with the magnetic manifestation of the photon, such a potential momentum is inducing a turn of 90° of the photon and locks it into that position relative to the neutron. This can be illustrated as follows: This is a quite interesting situation, because this is another form of wave interference, with the magnetic compensations only. The photon/photon interference was on both EM manifestations, the neutrino/neutrino on none, while the photon/neutrino is on magnetic manifestations only. A somewhat primitive graphic can represent such a potential construct: A more realistic animation is available on teh website of The Dutch Paradigm electron. Whenever the two magnetic manifestations amalgamate under specific, but unknown “environmental” conditions, they will also – either randomly or intentionally – merge into a combined magnetic compensation. In practical terms, this would mean that the entity related to the photon goes into a circular motion around the center in which the entity is situated which is linked to where the second form of light – the spiralling electric component, the neutrino – is manifest. The entities themselves cannot fully merge up to the center.Such an arrangement lends itself for mathematical formulation, but I have not yet made an attempt to do so. It is obvious though, that the circular behaviour of the photon around the center is possible, even at extremely high speed, because the photon has in its electric manifestation no mass related inertia aspects. The photon will establish itself in a stable circular motion as a result of the amalgamation of the magnetic compensations, while restricted to a reduction of its electric energy to the quant at that frequency. This standing wave of electric energy alternates perpendicular to the magnetic manifestation, while the related entity continues moving at the speed of light around the center. The magnetic compensation available to the electric manifestation of the photon constituent has become asymmetrical. Therefore the electric standing wave in this circulation will no longer be symmetrical as well. It will show a characteristic as indicated in the simple graph.In other terms, it is as if the electric behaviour shows a permanent anisotropic electric charge to the outside world due to its asymmetry. This has no effect within the construct itself.The amalgamated magnetic compensation also has some peculiarities. The plane within the circular motion of the photon will be saturated for these conditions, while there is still an asymmetrical portion relative to the circle surface that shows its existence. It could well be seen as a counter effect in magnetics that is relative to the occurrence of the electric charge. This residual magnetic manifestation could be the source of gravitational behaviour of this combination of one photon and one neutrino.Though I indicate the linear light as a photon, it is acting on gamma frequency and is most likely what is normally indicated as a gluon.All in all, this combination of a gluon and a neutrino behaves like an electron.The neutrino behaviour will also adopt itself to the new situation, but I do not expect a similar fundamental impact on its properties to the world as with the gluon that went from linear into a circular motion. The gluon in circular motion will react towards an addition to the magnetic momentum.It is reasonable to assume that the energy that is required to build up and sustain the more complex, magnetic causal compensation, is derived from both constituents and as long as there is no argument against it, I assume that this is done in proportional equal portions. This means that there is a continuous difference between the acting frequencies of the neutrino relative to the gluon constituents.The graphical representation would look like: The electric charge is indicated negative as per convention.Assuming that this is indeed a fair representation of an electron, this would indicate that we may expect some peculiar manifestations. It is likely that the neutrino and gluon frequencies are not completely harmonized. The neutrino has a small mass manifestation as per the more complex magenetic compenstaion. This has transferred electric energy to the magentic compenstaion and therefore reduced the frequency of the two manifestations. We may expect natural oscillations of the naked electron. Another phenomenon is that relative to the spin condition the vector that represents the electric manifestation can point in two perpendicular directions. It could well be that is quite important in further developments with regard to a better understanding of what is called the antiparticle of an electron, the positron. Due to the fact that the neutrino electric manifestation has a lower frequency than the one of the photon, spin oscillations of the electron are indeed to be expected and are known as spin resonance. The neutrino constituent will periodically flip from left to right-handed chirality.A second peculiarity could be that there is no preference for a harmonisation in sense of direction of the photon relative to the neutrino and both options can occur at the occasion of the merger.The electron will show a reduced speed relative to its constituents to approximately 2/3 of the speed of light.The electric charge phenomenon is anisotropic. Its vector is speeding linked to the entity over the circle perimeter of the new formed electron. This vector is pointing perpendicular to the plane in which the electric manifestation of the neutrino and the combined magnetic manifestation is active. There is no Coulomb type of repelling force (reference Poincaré stress) within the electron.On the website of The Dutch Paradigm you will find an elaborated animation to show the principles of the interference of the photon and the neutrino to form the electron Detailed calculations are required for this rather complex construct for further description of dimensions and EM activity. The postulate that an electron is a construct of a photon and a neutrino in combination with the difference in wave frequency of the constituents, will induce a regular flip of the spin behaviour of the electron from left handed chirality to right handed and reverse. This effect will show a new insight for the EINSTEIN-PODOLSKY-ROSEN paradox. There is based on these assumptions a firm and strict link between the spin behaviour of two electrons in the first shell of an atom. They have opposite spin and are entangled in flip behaviour: they will flip at exactly the same moment. There is no reason to assume that each electron is in superposition of both states. When such a couple of electrons would be released in empty space, they still would have a real and measurable direction in spin and be entangled with each other. They run at the same frequency pattern and even on distance, they will flip at exactly the same moment. There is entanglement of the two electrons, due to the release conditions and not by something like a collapse out of superposition through observation. This behaviour is in accordance with Bell's theorem as well. It is obvious that this conclusion has potentially a big impact on our assumptions regarding uncertainties as suggested by quantum physics. This will be discussed in more detail in a separate chapter on EPR.
Books such as Etidorpha claim that all the photons of light falling on the Earth's surface are absorbed in some way by the Earth's upper crust and then re-emitted at great depths to provide the strange illumination
My take on this is that since there is proven electrical activity in our crust in the form of Massive Telluric currents , at a certain depth in the crust this electrical current might be generating some sort of luminescence...even the bio luminescence of deep sea creatures is caused by electrical currents that their own bodies can generate .
Mainstream science does acknowledge for sure , that Neutrinos are able to pass through miles of rock and have been detected even in the deepest of mine shafts . Whether even photons can pass through is a big question mark , but illumination at those depths maybe getting caused by some other underground phenomena that are electrical or electromagnetic in nature .
Regards
silopanna wrote:
Todd,
It is not orthodox particle physics, that's for sure.
But how else would you explain the omnipresent light in the depths below that has been reported?
We know so little about particle behavior.
And here is another one: not only does Cater theorizes that electrons are composed of smaller particles that are composed of smaller particles, that are composed of smaller particles, et cetera, but he stipulates that when particles of a certain frequency pass through a medium, that their frequency is reduced. As an example he offers that, as The Sun sets and its particles pass thorugh the atmosphere sidelong, the frequency becomes reduced to orange and red. I have noted that towards the end of the afternoon I can often perceive a very subtle tint of green and yellow.
Notice that we've gone to the Moon, we have satellites and telecommunications, but nobody have proved that the red rays of the sidelong Sun are caused by scatter. This supposed phenomenon has never been observed. Where do they scatter to? What modulates the scatter such that it always produces the same azure blue tint?
Orthodox physics, in more ways than these, does not lend itself to explaining a hollow world nor deep subterranean caverns of such size as have been reported.
Newtonian physics is a nasty obstacle, for example.
Have a good one.
Dean #yiv1370922219 -- #yiv1370922219ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219ygrp-mkp#yiv1370922219hd {color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219ygrp-mkp#yiv1370922219ads {margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219ygrp-mkp .yiv1370922219ad {padding:0 0;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219ygrp-mkp .yiv1370922219ad p {margin:0;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219ygrp-mkp .yiv1370922219ad a {color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219ygrp-sponsor#yiv1370922219ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219ygrp-sponsor#yiv1370922219ygrp-lc#yiv1370922219hd {margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219ygrp-sponsor#yiv1370922219ygrp-lc .yiv1370922219ad {margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219actions {font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219activity {background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219activity span:first-child {text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219activity span a {color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219activity span span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219activity span .yiv1370922219underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1370922219 .yiv1370922219attach {clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;}#yiv1370922219 .yiv1370922219attach div a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv1370922219 .yiv1370922219attach img {border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv1370922219 .yiv1370922219attach label {display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv1370922219 .yiv1370922219attach label a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv1370922219 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 4px;}#yiv1370922219 .yiv1370922219bold {font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv1370922219 .yiv1370922219bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv1370922219 dd.yiv1370922219last p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv1370922219 dd.yiv1370922219last p span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv1370922219 dd.yiv1370922219last p span.yiv1370922219yshortcuts {margin-right:0;}#yiv1370922219 div.yiv1370922219attach-table div div a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv1370922219 div.yiv1370922219attach-table {width:400px;}#yiv1370922219 div.yiv1370922219file-title a, #yiv1370922219 div.yiv1370922219file-title a:active, #yiv1370922219 div.yiv1370922219file-title a:hover, #yiv1370922219 div.yiv1370922219file-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv1370922219 div.yiv1370922219photo-title a, #yiv1370922219 div.yiv1370922219photo-title a:active, #yiv1370922219 div.yiv1370922219photo-title a:hover, #yiv1370922219 div.yiv1370922219photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv1370922219 div#yiv1370922219ygrp-mlmsg #yiv1370922219ygrp-msg p a span.yiv1370922219yshortcuts {font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv1370922219 .yiv1370922219green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv1370922219 .yiv1370922219MsoNormal {margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv1370922219 o {font-size:0;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219photos div div {border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219photos div label {color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219reco-desc {font-size:77%;}#yiv1370922219 .yiv1370922219replbq {margin:4px;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219ygrp-actbar div a:first-child {margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219ygrp-mlmsg {font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219ygrp-mlmsg select, #yiv1370922219 input, #yiv1370922219 textarea {font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219ygrp-mlmsg pre, #yiv1370922219 code {font:115% monospace;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219ygrp-mlmsg#yiv1370922219logo {padding-bottom:10px;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219ygrp-msg p a {font-family:Verdana;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219ygrp-msg p#yiv1370922219attach-count span {color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219ygrp-reco#yiv1370922219reco-head {color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219ygrp-reco {margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219ygrp-sponsor#yiv1370922219ov li a {font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219ygrp-sponsor#yiv1370922219ov li {font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219ygrp-sponsor#yiv1370922219ov ul {margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219ygrp-text {font-family:Georgia;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219ygrp-text p {margin:0 0 1em 0;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219ygrp-text tt {font-size:120%;}#yiv1370922219#yiv1370922219ygrp-vital ul li:last-child {border-right:none !important;}#yiv1370922219
Joseph H. Cater does not claim, nor interpret the book Etidorhpa, such that photons are absorbed into the Earth. He acccepts that Phtons bunce off the Earth's crust.
He interprets Etidorhpa and theorizes that larger particles pass through the Earth's crust but, as they pass through the Earth's crust they break up due to friction with other electrons (telluric flows, ok) and then fragment into their constituent photon particles. In other words, the larger electron particles are made up of photons in the first place.
Dean , Todd , I did some further research on what all phenomena in nature can cause Luminescence i.e. emission of photons or visible light and it turns out , there are quite a few .
It seems there are quite a few scenarios in nature that can create light , some of them , even without application of heat .
I read that collision of an electron with a positron can also generate 2 photons (light) . The most common everyday experience is of electroluminescence wherein electrons flowing (electric current) through a gas can generate light - example : all the neon signs , glowsigns we see that is cold plasma (ionised gas) .
So , the question about light in the cavern worlds below boils down to - which of the scenarios described below is most applicable !
What other types of luminescence are there?
Shine light on a luminous watch and it shines straight back at you. That'san example of what we call photoluminescence: luminescence made bylight. But you can make things give off light by exciting their atomswith many other kinds of energy. You give the atoms one kindof energy (light, heat, sound, or whatever) and they give the same energy backto you as light. Scientists almost have an entire A-Z(well a B-T anyway!) of words to describe the different kinds ofluminescence:
Bioluminescence: made by living creatures such asfireflies, glow-worms, and many marine creatures.
Chemoluminescence: made by a chemical reaction. Glowsticks work this way.
Electroluminescence: made by passing electricitythrough something like a gas.
Photoluminescence: made by shining light at"luminous" (phosphorescent) paints.
Röntgenoluminescence: made by shining X-rays atthings. (The curious name comes from Wilhelm Röntgen (1845–1923), the discoverer ofX-rays.)
Sonoluminescence: made by passing energetic sound wavesthrough liquids.
Thermoluminescence: made when photons are emitted fromhot materials.
Triboluminescence: made by rubbing, scratching, orphysically deforming crystals.
What's the difference between luminescence, fluorescence, and phosphorescence?
When we talk about "luminous" watches and paint,what we really mean is phosphorescence, which isvery similar to fluorescence: the process by which energy-saving lamps make light.Photo: An energy-saving compact fluorescent lamp (CFL). The fluorescent chemical is a kind of chalky white coating on the inside of the thin glass tubes. You might have noticed that lamps like this continue glowing a little bit even after you switch them off? Like luminous watches, the phosphor chemicals are still excited enough to give off light for some time after they've been stimulated.Fluorescent materials produce light instantly, when the atomsinside them absorb energy and become "excited." When the atoms returnto normal, in as little as a hundred thousandth of a second, theygive out the energy that excited them as tiny particles of lightcalled photons. Shine ultraviolet (UV) light light on a stolenTV or camera and you might find someone's address shining back at you, written in invisible ink. The ink is made offluorescent chemicals that absorb energy from the UV light, becomeexcited, and then give out the energy as photons of visible light.Switch off the UV light and the ink disappears again. You can readmore about how atoms make light in the feature box in our article onlight.Phosphorescent materials work in much the same way as fluorescentones, except that there's a delay between them absorbing energy andgiving out light. Sometimes phosphorescence lasts for a few secondsafter the stimulating energy has been removed; sometimes—as inluminous watches—it lasts for hours. You've probably noticed that ittakes a bit of time to "charge up" a luminous watch with energybefore it will glow in the dark. You might have also noticed that a luminous watchshines most in the early part of the night. By the time dawn breaks,it's typically run out of energy and stopped glowing.That should come as no real surprise. A watch can't makelight out of nothing at all without violating one ofthe most basic laws of physics—theconservation of energy.
Regards
Neutrinos can pass through miles of solid rock unhindered .
We also know about the Telluric (electric) currents in the Earth's crust - so electron flow is also present .
The only thing we do not know is how photons can penetrate miles deep into the Earth's crust to provide illumination in the cavern worlds below .
Could it be possible that some kind of interaction between electrons and Neutrinos is giving rise to photons (light) at great depths in those underground caverns below ? If someone in this group understans quantum physics in more detail , could you comment on this aspect ?
Wave interference photon/neutrino: the electron?
Apart from the wave interference among equals photons or neutrinos, there is also the possibility that there is wave interference between a photon and a neutrino.In a still simple illustration: Both entities that formed the photon as well as the neutrino had the same ejection speed at the moment of restart of the magnetic compensation (3rd period), being the speed of light. The electric phenomenon of both systems did have absolute exactly the same frequency starting conditions, in the order of magnitude of 10²³ Hz.At the restart of the magnetic system, there was a permanent backlash of this compensation for electric manifestation of the photon and the neutrino. As from the 3rd period, the photon is compensated by a symmetric magnetic compensation and apparently this is similar to the potential causality before the start of the universe. The photon does not show inertia and continues propagation at the speed of light, V1The neutrino though, has due to the backlash only left handed chirality and also a monopole for the magnetic compensation. In particular the continuation of left-handed chirality requires a magnetic compensation out of line with the original magnetic compensation, which is assumed to have been symmetrical, with no preference for left or right-handed chirality. This asymmetrical spin behavior will trigger a more complex magnetic compensation and the now formed neutrino will show inertia and as a consequence a slightly reduced speed and thus V2<V1. The energy for this more complex magnetic compensation is derived from the frequency energy of the electrical manifestation. This difference is the equivalent to the Compton translation of the “invariant mass” component of the neutrino. Therefore, it can be questioned what the required conditions are for a potential interference of the two different forms of light or EM radiation. Such a study is not yet done and at present I assume that these conditions for wave interference could be met in the early period of the universe.What will happen when a photon and a neutrino interfere?This can be discussed with this illustration: Note: an animation of the spinor functionality is available in the chapter on a second form of light. Independent of the sense of direction of the chirality, we have in the neutrino a monopole magnetic compensation system. When the two electric manifestations come into interaction distance, than this will impact both magnetic systems. The photon is EM active at the higher frequency and bipolar and therefore will be able to bridge the backlash of the magnetic system of the neutrino in interference conditions and can potentially induce a flip of the spinor to right-handed chirality. The backlash of the neutrino would change into an advanced phase shift in the direction of the movement, which would be a peculiar phenomenon due to the restart conditions. Therefore it is my opinion that this situation could potentially be unstable.Stability can be preserved or restored in different ways:1. A potential rotation in the direction of movement by 180° and restoring left-handed chirality.2. Reversing the direction of movement3. While doing one or the other, the magnetic manifestation of the photon restores the left-handed chirality when the appropriate phase shift of this magnetic compensation is available again In my opinion, the first option is most likely. It is in line with the oscillating behaviour of a neutrino when interfering with external magnetic manifestations, while showing left-handed chirality restored when naked again. We then have to take into account, that whenever the magnetic compensation of the photon induces another rotational movement, it will immediately influence the position of the photon as well. The neutrino has inertia and the photon does not have this form of mass manifestation. A small momentum induced by the neutrino will have no inertial resistance from the photon. This momentum is induced as soon as an asymmetry will show in the electric manifestation of the photon and this will indeed happen. Such an asymmetry will initiate the phenomenon of what we call the electric charge. This electric charge will trigger a force that is known as the Lorentz force and this will exercise its existence within the construct of the photon and neutrino. Therefore, it is my opinion that prior to the full impact of flipping chirality to right-handed by interfering with the magnetic manifestation of the photon, such a potential momentum is inducing a turn of 90° of the photon and locks it into that position relative to the neutron. This can be illustrated as follows: This is a quite interesting situation, because this is another form of wave interference, with the magnetic compensations only. The photon/photon interference was on both EM manifestations, the neutrino/neutrino on none, while the photon/neutrino is on magnetic manifestations only. A somewhat primitive graphic can represent such a potential construct: A more realistic animation is available on teh website of The Dutch Paradigm electron. Whenever the two magnetic manifestations amalgamate under specific, but unknown “environmental” conditions, they will also – either randomly or intentionally – merge into a combined magnetic compensation. In practical terms, this would mean that the entity related to the photon goes into a circular motion around the center in which the entity is situated which is linked to where the second form of light – the spiralling electric component, the neutrino – is manifest. The entities themselves cannot fully merge up to the center.Such an arrangement lends itself for mathematical formulation, but I have not yet made an attempt to do so. It is obvious though, that the circular behaviour of the photon around the center is possible, even at extremely high speed, because the photon has in its electric manifestation no mass related inertia aspects. The photon will establish itself in a stable circular motion as a result of the amalgamation of the magnetic compensations, while restricted to a reduction of its electric energy to the quant at that frequency. This standing wave of electric energy alternates perpendicular to the magnetic manifestation, while the related entity continues moving at the speed of light around the center. The magnetic compensation available to the electric manifestation of the photon constituent has become asymmetrical. Therefore the electric standing wave in this circulation will no longer be symmetrical as well. It will show a characteristic as indicated in the simple graph.In other terms, it is as if the electric behaviour shows a permanent anisotropic electric charge to the outside world due to its asymmetry. This has no effect within the construct itself.The amalgamated magnetic compensation also has some peculiarities. The plane within the circular motion of the photon will be saturated for these conditions, while there is still an asymmetrical portion relative to the circle surface that shows its existence. It could well be seen as a counter effect in magnetics that is relative to the occurrence of the electric charge. This residual magnetic manifestation could be the source of gravitational behaviour of this combination of one photon and one neutrino.Though I indicate the linear light as a photon, it is acting on gamma frequency and is most likely what is normally indicated as a gluon.All in all, this combination of a gluon and a neutrino behaves like an electron.The neutrino behaviour will also adopt itself to the new situation, but I do not expect a similar fundamental impact on its properties to the world as with the gluon that went from linear into a circular motion. The gluon in circular motion will react towards an addition to the magnetic momentum.It is reasonable to assume that the energy that is required to build up and sustain the more complex, magnetic causal compensation, is derived from both constituents and as long as there is no argument against it, I assume that this is done in proportional equal portions. This means that there is a continuous difference between the acting frequencies of the neutrino relative to the gluon constituents.The graphical representation would look like: The electric charge is indicated negative as per convention.Assuming that this is indeed a fair representation of an electron, this would indicate that we may expect some peculiar manifestations. It is likely that the neutrino and gluon frequencies are not completely harmonized. The neutrino has a small mass manifestation as per the more complex magenetic compenstaion. This has transferred electric energy to the magentic compenstaion and therefore reduced the frequency of the two manifestations. We may expect natural oscillations of the naked electron. Another phenomenon is that relative to the spin condition the vector that represents the electric manifestation can point in two perpendicular directions. It could well be that is quite important in further developments with regard to a better understanding of what is called the antiparticle of an electron, the positron. Due to the fact that the neutrino electric manifestation has a lower frequency than the one of the photon, spin oscillations of the electron are indeed to be expected and are known as spin resonance. The neutrino constituent will periodically flip from left to right-handed chirality.A second peculiarity could be that there is no preference for a harmonisation in sense of direction of the photon relative to the neutrino and both options can occur at the occasion of the merger.The electron will show a reduced speed relative to its constituents to approximately 2/3 of the speed of light.The electric charge phenomenon is anisotropic. Its vector is speeding linked to the entity over the circle perimeter of the new formed electron. This vector is pointing perpendicular to the plane in which the electric manifestation of the neutrino and the combined magnetic manifestation is active. There is no Coulomb type of repelling force (reference Poincaré stress) within the electron.On the website of The Dutch Paradigm you will find an elaborated animation to show the principles of the interference of the photon and the neutrino to form the electron Detailed calculations are required for this rather complex construct for further description of dimensions and EM activity. The postulate that an electron is a construct of a photon and a neutrino in combination with the difference in wave frequency of the constituents, will induce a regular flip of the spin behaviour of the electron from left handed chirality to right handed and reverse. This effect will show a new insight for the EINSTEIN-PODOLSKY-ROSEN paradox. There is based on these assumptions a firm and strict link between the spin behaviour of two electrons in the first shell of an atom. They have opposite spin and are entangled in flip behaviour: they will flip at exactly the same moment. There is no reason to assume that each electron is in superposition of both states. When such a couple of electrons would be released in empty space, they still would have a real and measurable direction in spin and be entangled with each other. They run at the same frequency pattern and even on distance, they will flip at exactly the same moment. There is entanglement of the two electrons, due to the release conditions and not by something like a collapse out of superposition through observation. This behaviour is in accordance with Bell's theorem as well. It is obvious that this conclusion has potentially a big impact on our assumptions regarding uncertainties as suggested by quantum physics. This will be discussed in more detail in a separate chapter on EPR.
Books such as Etidorpha claim that all the photons of light falling on the Earth's surface are absorbed in some way by the Earth's upper crust and then re-emitted at great depths to provide the strange illumination
My take on this is that since there is proven electrical activity in our crust in the form of Massive Telluric currents , at a certain depth in the crust this electrical current might be generating some sort of luminescence...even the bio luminescence of deep sea creatures is caused by electrical currents that their own bodies can generate .
Mainstream science does acknowledge for sure , that Neutrinos are able to pass through miles of rock and have been detected even in the deepest of mine shafts . Whether even photons can pass through is a big question mark , but illumination at those depths maybe getting caused by some other underground phenomena that are electrical or electromagnetic in nature .
You mentioned: "I read that collision of an electron with a positron can also generate 2 photons (light) ." Why do they say "generate"? Why not "release" If electrons are composed of photons, then some jarring event would break up the electrons and release the constituent photons.
I don't see much difference between this description and Mr. Cater's theory.
The point is that omnipresent light could be generated in the cavern worlds below where there must already be water.
Dean , electrons are actually composed of Neutrino + photon , so when an electron decays , it breaks up into's constituent photon and neutrino - this is however , an extremely rare event in nature because electron is one of the most stable particles in nature (from a radioactive decay/half life perspective) .
There are numerous radioactive substances in the Earth's crust though , which have a half-life for radioactive decay eg. Uranium , Thorium etc. These substances too could emit photons (light) in their process of decay , with heat as another by-product .
Regards
silopanna wrote:
Sidharta,
You mentioned: "I read that collision of an electron with a positron can also generate 2 photons (light) ." Why do they say "generate"? Why not "release" If electrons are composed of photons, then some jarring event would break up the electrons and release the constituent photons.
I don't see much difference between this description and Mr. Cater's theory.
The point is that omnipresent light could be generated in the cavern worlds below where there must already be water.
Dean #yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823 -- #yiv4025411823ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823ygrp-mkp#yiv4025411823hd {color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823ygrp-mkp#yiv4025411823ads {margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823ygrp-mkp .yiv4025411823ad {padding:0 0;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823ygrp-mkp .yiv4025411823ad p {margin:0;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823ygrp-mkp .yiv4025411823ad a {color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823ygrp-sponsor#yiv4025411823ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823ygrp-sponsor#yiv4025411823ygrp-lc#yiv4025411823hd {margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823ygrp-sponsor#yiv4025411823ygrp-lc .yiv4025411823ad {margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823actions {font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823activity {background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823activity span:first-child {text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823activity span a {color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823activity span span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823activity span .yiv4025411823underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4025411823 .yiv4025411823attach {clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;}#yiv4025411823 .yiv4025411823attach div a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4025411823 .yiv4025411823attach img {border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv4025411823 .yiv4025411823attach label {display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv4025411823 .yiv4025411823attach label a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4025411823 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 4px;}#yiv4025411823 .yiv4025411823bold {font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv4025411823 .yiv4025411823bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4025411823 dd.yiv4025411823last p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv4025411823 dd.yiv4025411823last p span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv4025411823 dd.yiv4025411823last p span.yiv4025411823yshortcuts {margin-right:0;}#yiv4025411823 div.yiv4025411823attach-table div div a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4025411823 div.yiv4025411823attach-table {width:400px;}#yiv4025411823 div.yiv4025411823file-title a, #yiv4025411823 div.yiv4025411823file-title a:active, #yiv4025411823 div.yiv4025411823file-title a:hover, #yiv4025411823 div.yiv4025411823file-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4025411823 div.yiv4025411823photo-title a, #yiv4025411823 div.yiv4025411823photo-title a:active, #yiv4025411823 div.yiv4025411823photo-title a:hover, #yiv4025411823 div.yiv4025411823photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4025411823 div#yiv4025411823ygrp-mlmsg #yiv4025411823ygrp-msg p a span.yiv4025411823yshortcuts {font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv4025411823 .yiv4025411823green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv4025411823 .yiv4025411823MsoNormal {margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv4025411823 o {font-size:0;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823photos div div {border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823photos div label {color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823reco-desc {font-size:77%;}#yiv4025411823 .yiv4025411823replbq {margin:4px;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823ygrp-actbar div a:first-child {margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823ygrp-mlmsg {font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823ygrp-mlmsg select, #yiv4025411823 input, #yiv4025411823 textarea {font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823ygrp-mlmsg pre, #yiv4025411823 code {font:115% monospace;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823ygrp-mlmsg#yiv4025411823logo {padding-bottom:10px;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823ygrp-msg p a {font-family:Verdana;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823ygrp-msg p#yiv4025411823attach-count span {color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823ygrp-reco#yiv4025411823reco-head {color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823ygrp-reco {margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823ygrp-sponsor#yiv4025411823ov li a {font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823ygrp-sponsor#yiv4025411823ov li {font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823ygrp-sponsor#yiv4025411823ov ul {margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823ygrp-text {font-family:Georgia;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823ygrp-text p {margin:0 0 1em 0;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823ygrp-text tt {font-size:120%;}#yiv4025411823#yiv4025411823ygrp-vital ul li:last-child {border-right:none !important;}#yiv4025411823