Inner Earth Openings Revealed
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xyl2wx_inner-earth-openings-revealed_news#.UWVZmkor7PM
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I have to say, this video was just awful!
Stephen Sindoni starts it and ends it with photos that have been
debunked a long time ago. There is absolutely no credibility in this
film, and it's a shame that people try to pretend they know something
when they don't.
The beginning and ending photos are a type of a storm/center off the
coast of Alaska, not even near the north pole. It's in the wrong
place. Jan Lampretch debunked it, I posted a comparison of the angles
of where that storm is a couple of years ago that debunks it... it is
NOT the pole opening whatsoever!
We need to all be very careful in our research. A lot of bad
information out there is why many people in the public laugh at the idea
of hollow earth.
Kathy
Inner Earth Openings Revealed
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xyl2wx_inner-earth-openings-revealed_news#.UWVZmkor7PM
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I was going to mention about the first and last photos, (almost did in fact) but, I didn't. Thanks for pointing that out. But, I disagree with your analysis of the other pics, I figure folks should have the right to decide for themselves, but, thanks for your opinion. Gary
···
--- In [email protected], Kathy <getnews1@...> wrote:
I have to say, this video was just awful!
Stephen Sindoni starts it and ends it with photos that have been
debunked a long time ago. There is absolutely no credibility in this
film, and it's a shame that people try to pretend they know something
when they don't.The beginning and ending photos are a type of a storm/center off the
coast of Alaska, not even near the north pole. It's in the wrong
place. Jan Lampretch debunked it, I posted a comparison of the angles
of where that storm is a couple of years ago that debunks it... it is
NOT the pole opening whatsoever!We need to all be very careful in our research. A lot of bad
information out there is why many people in the public laugh at the idea
of hollow earth.
Kathy> Inner Earth Openings Revealed
>
> http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xyl2wx_inner-earth-openings-revealed_news#.UWVZmkor7PM
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Kathy,
I admit that those opening photos are neither here nor there, they just don't establish much.
However, certainly from minute and second 1:36 onwards, he nailed it. The video that we have seen before marked Japanese Weather Satellite shows the opening to be between Baffin Bay between Canada and Greenland, and somewhere around Severnaya Zemlya and the New Siberian Islands. Due to the camera angle, it is hard to tell.
This video presented by Sindoni shows what seems to be a black hole right along the same trajectory, but it sits closer to Canada than I had been thinking; maybe right above the part where Ellesmere and the New Siberian Islands touch. Again, the angles do play some tricks, but this one is from right above.
Lamprecht used to talk of the opening being offset from the Pole, the opening doesn't have to correspond to what we call the geographical North Pole.
And remember that the basin of the Arctic Ocean in the Greenland half has an inward slope, and this makes it difficult to speak in terms of relative distances between the Pole and the opening.
What we call the geographical North Pole, by definition, will not be synonomous with the opening. First there will be a point along the slope that seemingly sits below the Pole Star, but it is not the geographical North Pole nor any Pole. The neck of the opening will sit at some other point, and the distance bettween the two with depend on whether or not the slope is steep or gradual from the suppoed pole point to the actual opening.
The same thing would have to occur on the Canadian side of the opening, but I'll mention two things that would make this situation hard to identify:
Number one, the angle on the Canadian side could be steeper and the neck of the opening could be reached more quickly.
And number two, there is a big-time NATO exclusion zone above northern Canada. Nobody, but nobody goes up there to wander around and stick their noses into things.
And the South Polar opening in the Sindoni video is right where it should be.
People, be aware of the polar body of evidence regarding the hollow earth. Learn the arguments yourselves so that you can better analyze. Get the Marshall Gardner book from Health Research books; click on the "authors" list and order it. We need many balls of light!
Dean
···
From: Kathy
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 11:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [allplanets-hollow] Inner Earth Openings Revealed
I have to say, this video was just awful!
Stephen Sindoni starts it and ends it with photos that have been
debunked a long time ago. There is absolutely no credibility in this
film, and it's a shame that people try to pretend they know something
when they don't.
The beginning and ending photos are a type of a storm/center off the
coast of Alaska, not even near the north pole. It's in the wrong
place. Jan Lampretch debunked it, I posted a comparison of the angles
of where that storm is a couple of years ago that debunks it... it is
NOT the pole opening whatsoever!
We need to all be very careful in our research. A lot of bad
information out there is why many people in the public laugh at the idea
of hollow earth.
Kathy
Inner Earth Openings Revealed
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xyl2wx_inner-earth-openings-revealed_news#.UWVZmkor7PM
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
The only evidence that we have of the opening from the Canadian side is the mirage of an inner earth mountain range, as seen by Lt. Greely and company. And it is good quality evidence.
However, there is a reason why we don't have evidence of the opening from the Canadian side; no explorers ever set out upon the ice, during the Arctic night, towards the opening. If any ever had, as they would have approached the opening, they would have seen the mock sun, a mirage of the inner sun being refracted along the atmosphere. Ultimately, they would have seen a glow.
Dean
···
--- In [email protected], "silopanna" <silopanna@...> wrote:
Kathy,
I admit that those opening photos are neither here nor there, they just don't establish much.
However, certainly from minute and second 1:36 onwards, he nailed it. The video that we have seen before marked Japanese Weather Satellite shows the opening to be between Baffin Bay between Canada and Greenland, and somewhere around Severnaya Zemlya and the New Siberian Islands. Due to the camera angle, it is hard to tell.
This video presented by Sindoni shows what seems to be a black hole right along the same trajectory, but it sits closer to Canada than I had been thinking; maybe right above the part where Ellesmere and the New Siberian Islands touch. Again, the angles do play some tricks, but this one is from right above.
Lamprecht used to talk of the opening being offset from the Pole, the opening doesn't have to correspond to what we call the geographical North Pole.
And remember that the basin of the Arctic Ocean in the Greenland half has an inward slope, and this makes it difficult to speak in terms of relative distances between the Pole and the opening.
What we call the geographical North Pole, by definition, will not be synonomous with the opening. First there will be a point along the slope that seemingly sits below the Pole Star, but it is not the geographical North Pole nor any Pole. The neck of the opening will sit at some other point, and the distance bettween the two with depend on whether or not the slope is steep or gradual from the suppoed pole point to the actual opening.
The same thing would have to occur on the Canadian side of the opening, but I'll mention two things that would make this situation hard to identify:
Number one, the angle on the Canadian side could be steeper and the neck of the opening could be reached more quickly.
And number two, there is a big-time NATO exclusion zone above northern Canada. Nobody, but nobody goes up there to wander around and stick their noses into things.
And the South Polar opening in the Sindoni video is right where it should be.
People, be aware of the polar body of evidence regarding the hollow earth. Learn the arguments yourselves so that you can better analyze. Get the Marshall Gardner book from Health Research books; click on the "authors" list and order it. We need many balls of light!
Dean
From: Kathy
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 11:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [allplanets-hollow] Inner Earth Openings RevealedI have to say, this video was just awful!
Stephen Sindoni starts it and ends it with photos that have been
debunked a long time ago. There is absolutely no credibility in this
film, and it's a shame that people try to pretend they know something
when they don't.The beginning and ending photos are a type of a storm/center off the
coast of Alaska, not even near the north pole. It's in the wrong
place. Jan Lampretch debunked it, I posted a comparison of the angles
of where that storm is a couple of years ago that debunks it... it is
NOT the pole opening whatsoever!We need to all be very careful in our research. A lot of bad
information out there is why many people in the public laugh at the idea
of hollow earth.
Kathy> Inner Earth Openings Revealed
>
> http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xyl2wx_inner-earth-openings-revealed_news#.UWVZmkor7PM
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]