Attached an infra-red picture of cenral sun's rays escaping through polar
openings.
Hazel,
My system wouldn't open it. Where did you get it? I'll go there myself and
find it.
DD
Related thread: Pyramids — the pyramid conversation continues here
Dean, It wasn't that spectacular, but I got it from a web-site, of a guy who
devotes his life to photographing the aurora and corona, from every angle,
at every time of the year, from every location it is visible. His hundreds
of photos are awesome. I'll try and find the link. Hazel.
DD,
What did you think of the NY Post article? This has been in the news lately
up here. I am just wondering who, what, where, when and how this "civilian
company, Raytheon," came about, more than anything. I wonder if they have a
website.
MM
Raytheon got their start making magnetrons for radar. Probably 50 years ago.
mm48ny wrote:
DD,
What did you think of the NY Post article? This has been in the news lately
up here. I am just wondering who, what, where, when and how this "civilian
company, Raytheon," came about, more than anything. I wonder if they have a
website.
MM
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.247 / Virus Database: 120 - Release Date: 4/6/2001
Mike Maloney,
Yes, I was aware of the rescue mission, I had heard something about it. But
what can you say? It could be a normal event; it is hard to read into it
without some additional info.
Raytheon is a defense contractor. They are in bed with all the military
secrets and such.
Dharma/Dean
Dean, This isn't the web-page with satellite images of aurora borealis, but
to any aurora fanciers out there, here are great pictures. In layman's
terms, I would say this is the cenral sun being charged with 'orgone'
(ether) by the outer sun! Hazel.
Kirk,
I wonder what sort of vested interest Raytheon has in the Antarctic,
especially since they got their start in the field of radar technology?
MM
hazel,
please consider the possibility that the inner sun becomes charged through
the passage of transformed particles through the SHELL of the Earth, and
that what you see in the auroral display is a discharge through the opening.
# ; ^ )
DD
Dean, I've grasped the soft particles through the crust bit and a disharge
from the polar cavity producing the auroral bands of colour is probably
correct. But the corona appears at midnight, in a circular halo, surely
THAT'S the central sun's rays. Dr. Reich said he first produced a 'negative
orgone' which formed a dark cloud above his lab and all plants and insects
within it's field sickened and died. He created a 'positive orgone' which
dispersed it. Just thought I'd mention it. Hazel.
Ralph,
Nice info about the pyramids. They had those new chambers excavated for a
long time, a few years, before they went public with what was inside. The
whole process is so sanitized- why? Maybe we would learn something about
civilization's roots which would rock the boat, or maybe we would learn
about what's way underneath the pyramids. I suspect that there is a whole
cavern world down there- not a cavern, a cavern WORLD.
I mention some of the finding underneath in my pyramids article.
http://www.skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index3.html
DD
Yes, of course! In that first post you made it sound as if the inner sun
were sucking in, charging itself, through the polar openings during the
aurora. Discharging the the holes is the opposite.
Of course, you are allowed to feel however you want- I don't want to be a
dictator, not much of one anyway!
But I think that we are on the same page now.
Later,
DD
Dr. Reich said he first produced a 'negative
Scott wrote:
I will point out one more
thing you recently stated about the Sun. You stated that the
Newtonian laws of a falling body don't apply to the coronal gas
or plasma emissions on the sun. Does a lit match on the Earth
adhere to the laws Newton set forth for falling bodies? Of course
not! The sun is the same way. This isn't just room temperature
gases but highly heated flames and fires. A flame doesn't obey
the rules applied to falling bodies on the Earth. It is supplied
with an energy release that for the weight of the excited atoms
in the gases that make up the flame overcomes the laws of gravity.
Does not the chemical reaction from a rocket or jet defy the gravity
of the earth. Please examine and enhance your statements on this
topic because your argument doesn't hold water in my opinion.
Dean:
Scott,
If I am not mistaken, he took that part out from his new edition. I'll
double check, the book is not here.
But I've had other people call me on that one. There could be
electromagnetic forces at play, right? So I'll go along with you on this
one.
DD
Scott questioned-
" My problem with Cater, though not having read his book, is
that he apparently feels justified in negating the gravitational force
of each atom within the Earth. Why does 50 miles mark the
ending point of gravitational radiation? Has all the mass below this
point become inert gravitationally? I would think not."
Dean wrote:
Scott,
Remember that Cater attributes the gravity effect to an electromagnetic
radiation with a certain frequency. According to his redistribution of
frequency law, the frequency becomes lower and lower the further it
penetrates. The radiation continues, but at a lower frequency, further down.
Once the radiation leaves that frequency, the gravity effects diminish and
gradually end.
The mass at no point becomes inert, and the gravitational force of the atoms
doesn't get negated, because the gravity effect is due to the charge on the
particles, in the ultimate issue. Keep track of the charge, not of the mass.
What you just said above was very Newtonian.
DD