List Members,
George Adamski gave a complete explanation for the habitability on the more
distant planets, and the following is taken from his book, Flying Saucers
Farewell.
"One of the most frequent problems encountered when giving a lecture on
space is the insistence of scientists that the outer planets are devoid of
light and heat. Their objection is that radiation from the sun is so weak at
these vast distances that Pluto, for instance, would be at absolute zero or
close to it, with a frozen atmosphere, and totally incapable of supporting
life-forms of any type.
This is the main argument brought against me when doubt is expressed about
my meeting human beings from some of these other planets.
The first thing to realize is that the sun does not emit light and heat in
the form we observe here on Earth. Radiation from the sun does not manifest
itself as light and heat until it penetrates the atmospheres of the planets
themselves. Outer space is devoid of light as we know it. The light in outer
space is a cold light caused by the phosphorescence of vast clouds of
particles and gases responding to the radiation given off by the sun. To a
human observer, outer space looks like a dark, vast void, filled with
billions upon billions of tiny specks of multicolored light. All of these
tiny lights are in a state of continuous motion and activity.
Radiation from the sun is composed of ultra-violet light, hard and soft
X-rays, cosmic and gamma rays. The greater portion of these destructive rays
are filtered out by a planet's ionosphere and upper atmosphere."
End of Adamski .................................
David LaPoint's Primer Fields presentation explains very well how planet's generate heat and light right where they are. Of course, part of the process involves absorbing particles passing through outer space and from The Sun.
But Adamski's comments are refreshing.
Dean