Gravity, Orbits and Hollow Planets

ALLPLANETS-HOLLOW
#1

People,

It is hard to justify the hollow nature of planets as long as we hold on to Newtonian gravity, that gravity is caused by the mere density of mass. If this were so, the crust of a hollow planet would collapse inwards upon the hollow portion.

But gravity effects taper off because they are induced by electromagnetic radiations which don't pass all the way through the hollow crust, at least not at the frequency that induces gravity effects. Thus, deep within a planet, there is to be found structure and mass, but without weight. Thus, there is no inward collapse.

Planets don’t have enough mass to justify that the Sun’s gravity keeps them in their orbits, so science invents that the planets have dense cores of iron, zinc, nickel, lead – whatever fits into the equations (Kepler’s). Spolter counters this with a nice comment in her book, The Gravitational Force of The Sun: “This currently accepted Earth Model [dense core – Dean] is inconsistent with the law of sedimentation in a centrifuge." And so it is that the gravity effects that keep planets within The Sun’s orbit are caused by electromagnetic attraction and repulsion, and are not dependant of mass.

And, if the Earth was formed by a centrifugal process, the denser part would have been thrown to the OUTSIDE, not that it gets denser the further inside that you go.

Dean

1 Like
#2

People,

Pari Spolter wrote a book called The Dance of The Moon, which mostly consisted of tables that document the erratic movements of The Moon along its orbital path. Well, that The Moon's movements have some erratic nature to them is not something new, Newtonian gravity - based on the density of mass - cannot explain it, though.

This is because mass is constant, and in the Newtonian scheme, mass causes gravity effects. So how could Newtonian gravity account for inconstant movements?

But if we consider that gravity effects are caused by electromagnetic attractions and repulsions, then there is scope for erratic orbits because electromagnetic radiations are flows; and all flows can accelerate, meet forces opposed and slow down, be deflected in path, et cetera.

If this argument confirms that electromagnetic force causes gravity effects, then this is good for us because , as I mentioned at the beginning of the prior post: "It is hard to justify the hollow nature of planets as long as we hold on to Newtonian gravity, that gravity is caused by the mere density of mass. If this were so, the crust of a hollow planet would collapse inwards upon the hollow portion".

If Newtonian gravity were true, then we could just pack it up and go home.

Dean

1 Like
#3

People,

Just to give a couple of practical examples, I'll quote from Page 30 of The Awesome Life Force by Joseph H. Cater. These two paragraphs are short, easy reading and impactful.

"Many incredible blunders of astronomers are documented by Fort, as well as misleading claims that will not stand up under close scrutiny. For example, everyone has been led to believe that the planet Neptune was discovered as a result of brilliant, mathematical deduction and application of celestial mechanics, based on Newtonian concepts, that its exact position was determined by this method and that all the astronomers had to do was to point their telescopes in that direction. Careful research shows this was not the case. When Neptune was finally discovered, it was not in a position anywhere close to the calculated one. Fort noted that, when pointing in a given direction, an astronomer, instead of using one finger, must use all his fingers in a widely separated position."

"Fort also uncovered a strange coincidence where astronomers were concerned. It was found that the uncanny precision and accuracy of astronomical determinations always ocurr in areas that cannot be checked on by the public or even amateur astronomers. As an example; the accuracy of the calculated time and position of eclipses of The Sun is always far greater in the remote and unpopulated regions of the Earth. When they ocurr in civilized and heavily populated areas such as New York City, the errors do not conform with the accuracy generally attributed to modern astronomy."

People,

If orthodox science doesn't know what causes gravity effects, then how can science calculate the movements of the planets and various moons in the solar system with accuracy?

The Newtonian concept that stipulates that the mere density of mass can reach across a distance and exert gravitational pull is fallacious, and cannot be even imposed upon the planetary motions of the solar system. More importantly, the "missing mass", so to speak, from the planets cannot be explained by oversimplistic fabrrications such as lead or iron cores. For example, for Newtonian gravity to explain the behavior of the tides on this planet, the gravity effects of The Moon would have to penetrate not only thrugh the crust and mantle of the Earth, but through a molten, metalic core - then all the way to the oposite crustal surface - and still have enough strength to bend it inwards. The Moon's gravity already suffers atenuation between the ocean layer and the crustal surface below the ocean, even though the ocean can be no more than five miles deep, and even though the ocean and the planet itself receive the same acceleration from The Moon. The Moon's gravitational pull wouldn't get anywhere near a metal core without being completely attenuated and nullified, what to speak of extending through it.

If you want to give life to the Hollow Earth Theory, then kill the concept of Newtonian gravity; but don't just kill it, murder it, murder in the first degree!

Dean

1 Like
#4

Yes, you're 100% right @deandddd. This must be killed and we've gotta move forward as a society, but getting past over 100 years of mis/disinformation is a big hurdle that seems to be a huge task at present. You can just see some chatter from more open minded folks here and feel the palpable discouragement that comes through strange closed mindedness even amongst those that should not be as you step through the thread replies: http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/2020-May/000822.html

#5

Soretna,

There are those among us, especially in academic circles, whose job it is to keep the blinders on us.

Even so, I reserve judgement on their character until I hear the other side. They'd have to make it good, though!

Dean

#6

Soretna,

I don't want to get political on this list, but it is the yoke that subjugates us.

We cut the petroleum off from Japan before WII, and they attacked us. No petroleum: then no industry, no heat, no transportattion.

Hitler had a petroleum problem, too.

And The USA wants to threaten China with a petro problem to China, too, by controlling Iran and Saudi Arabia. But Russia is doing a pipeline, I think. Actually, it's a gas pipeline. But they send it by tanker ship and, in case of war, by train and Mack trucks. I don't think we would be able to cut them off. (I am not saying we should or shouldn't)

Dean