Frode,
Back to that ever-present topic for Hollow Earthers- gravity.
Clouds are composed ofmicroscopic water particles and are much heavier than
the surrouning atmosphere. It is a mystery that they don't fall. Orthodox
science attributes the flotation of clouds to the idea that the microscopic
water particles of which they are composed are always fluxing between a
gaseous and watery state.
Mr. Cater has a very different explanation for the flotation of clouds based
on his presentation of gravity as an electromagnetic radiation. The
microscopic water droplets in clouds actually carry a negative charge which
brings about repulsion in relationto the Earth's electromagnetic,
gravity-inducing radiation. ( They float )
" Now back to the example of clouds to study exactly how they are imbued
with negative charges- Remember that Mr. Cater presents the idea of a
gravitational field being characterized by a negative charge. " A paradox
seems to exist with regards to clouds. They consist of small water droplets
that do not fall. From the standpoint of the properties of water just
presented, they should fall. Every water droplet is attached to a dust
particle. This dust particle absorbs a high concentration of negative
charges from the water. The particle would levitate upward, were it were not
for the water droplet holding it down. [ The droplet now bereft of its
negative charge, and simply exhibiting the natural, positive charge of
matter ] If the amount of water around this dust particle exceeds the
critical amount, the droplet will fall as rain. Outer space is permeated
with fine dust that continually replaces the dust taken out of the
atmosphere by precipitation. Ths dust is vital to sustaining life on a
planet. Without it, there would be little or no precipitation.
Under certain conditions, water can lose weight and even levitate.
Experiments have shown that water, when ejected in the form of fine jets,
will start to levitate after falling a certain distance. Also, the fine
spray resulting from waterfalls often has a tendency to levitate upwards.
This phenomenon has puzzled many observers. By now, the reason is obvious.
[ for the reader of his book ] Such conditions cause the water droplets to
be impregnated with an inordinate concentration of soft electrons " [ of a
negative charge ]. ( Page 171 of The Awesome Life Force ) "
What I would like to know is this- Does the orthodox explanation account for
the phenomenon, or is it simply a non-sequitur? What drives the flux? What
is the source of heat? Why don't clouds freeze in freezing temperatures?
Does Mr. Cater's explanation fit in with the orthodox explanation, reinforce
it, exist as a remote cause, orare they simply mutually exclusive?
In spite of a lack of electricity for my computer ( Brazil! ), I would like
to get to the bottom of this mystery.
Dharma/Dean