Dear list members, I've had some close friends shift over to the concept of
the flat earth model over the past year or so and I have spent some time
researching this myself. I have had many discussions about the topic and I
have come to some conclusions. A very recent additional email has prompted
me to write this longer note with some thoughts.
First, I want to thank Dean very much for his continual urgings to read the
works of Joseph H. Cater. Joseph Cater's works have been on my reading
list for quite a while now, but I could not find the time to make them a
priority. I continued to push through other works on advanced physics and
advanced mathematics, but I kept pushing Mr. Cater back each time I perused
my library. I now deeply regret having taken so long to partake of his
insight and revelatory effort.
I'm amazed at how well Jan Lamprecht's work dovetails with Mr. Cater. It
feels as though they are of one mind at times. I wish that Mr. Lamprecht
did not feel so juxtaposed with non-Newtonian options as I feel that it
would open up the way for his much desired follow up book.
Next, I want to forcefully say and very briefly elaborate as to why: The
flat earth theory is a DISTRACTION (or misdirection). I want to applaud all
of us for wanting to know the truth for I believe that we all sincerely
seek the truth here on this list, but the flat earth model is not the
truth.
Any list member who believes or is starting to believe in the flat earth
model should immediately pick up "The Awesome Life Force" by Joseph H.
Cater. Please read this as soon as possible for a very eye opening
experience. Mr. Cater sometimes comes off the wrong way and may feel like
"heavy" reading, but I can promise you that if you can push through it your
rewards will be multiplicative in nature and likely your own understanding
will raise by orders of magnitude.
On the outset, the flat earth model was used previously as a distraction by
many societies for many centuries and up until relatively recent times in
some cultures. Anciently it was used to control migration and discovery;
societal flow. It was also used to control research efforts and directions
of society for a variety of reasons.
Some of these reasons were cautionary and understandable given the risks of
delving into the depths of the planet (we can see evidence of this from so
very many ancient tales and myths that we regard as baseless today with
various creatures and beings such as the Naga, etc.). Other reasons were
due to the desire to control and disallow migratory excursions into these
zones.
I postulate that there have always been liaisons and relationships with
leadership of the inner societies with the outer societies and they have
always been far superior to us technologically. One evidence of this may
be the "sea people" who Egypt held back by the skin of their teeth. There
are also too many other evidences to consider in this presently, but the
logic follows quite well. Also one might consider how inner societies who
are well established might feel about a deluge of outer world humans
rushing in attempts to claim land tarnish their high accomplishments.
There are many logical progressions one can consider here.
History is replete with stories of proponents of a non-flat earth who were
punished severely. Even those who proposed hollow planet models were
narrowly looked up and their writings and works are relatively scant. It
seems impossible to find Euler's original writings on the topic for
example. And there have been misinformation campaigns also scattered
throughout history. It was ultimately decided (and the powers that be make
sure that this continues) that we should shift gears to a solid earth model
and all of science and all research has been bent to this.
In reality this is no different than the flat earth model that was held so
vigilantly for so very long. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a modern
heretic. The solid earth model is not much, if any (likely worse
intellectually), better than the flat earth model, but I digress even
though there is much to write about this...
The concept of the flat earth can be argued relatively well by proponents
of it today. Eric Dubay is a strong and well spoken proponent of a flat
earth, but he himself is distracted and in actuality is being used as a
tool by those very powers that he professes to fight against. He's being
led along paths of logic that are not congruent with actual reality.
I do not want to get into all of the technicalities of why on the list
here. This is not a format that is conducive to debate and argumentation
of such broad and lengthy discussions that require a lot of detail. I'm
also not convinced that such a broad discussion would be ultimately a
fruitful use of time.
The bottom line is that the flat earth model is being used as a distraction
very similarly as to how it was used in ancient times. While it is not a
waste of time to try to come to the truth, it is a waste of time if one has
not already processed existing knowledge that may eliminate the need for
such an investment of time. The more the research of the hollow earth is
fragmented, the longer the powers that be will hold a monopoly on the
truth. Having a grand unified theory of physics is greatly affected by the
concept of hollow vs flat vs solid earth. No one wants us to have such a
workable theory that has any degree of holistic influence on society.
I have been involved in some cutting edge research. I know several
theorists and engineers who have done remarkable work in the GUT (Grand
Unified Theory) area. Each of them has shown in various and many ways how
Quantum Physics and the past 100 years have been effectively a stagnation
of science with no sincerely true breakthroughs; only minor iterations that
have been perceived to have lead to better living conditions and superior
entertainment (distraction).
While I have great respect for each of these brilliant researchers, each of
them falls short of the necessary truth at the end of the day because each
one uses data and information based on a solid earth. They would get
further along if they used the flat earth model in some ways as it would
break the mold and allow them to think outside of the box, BUT I have been
able to clearly see that if they used the hollow planet model there would
be an explosion of fruit in their efforts. Each of them are married to
their theories and one cannot penetrate certain concepts in their mental
fortresses, but as an observer, I can clearly see the differentials that
would make a difference.
So again, I have observationally concluded that both solid and flat planet
concepts are distractive in nature. They are meandering paths that have
been very well constructed so as to keep great minds tied up in mental
orchards that will bear very little, if any, real fruit.
Another thing to remember: a theory does not have to be perfect in order to
lead to some level of progression. This is why we have seen iterative
improvements in society over the last couple centuries. But when we do
finally recognize a planetary theory, and by extension a GUT, that is much
closer to the truth we will finally see societal improvements and progress
that will be multiplied by orders of magnitude - we will see things
progress 10, 100 and 1000 times faster and in better ways than any of us
have seen in modern history.
Suffice it to say: please read Joseph Cater's works, particularly the one
noted above.
I am completely convinced that there is a very subtle and powerful effort
underway to distract us from the truth and everyone that I have spoken to
and all of the research on the flat earth concept so far is readily cleared
up with proper context. Even the concept of additional dimensions is
cleared up in a remarkable fashion by Mr. Cater.
Yes, we all want to see what's at the poles, but it's going to be more
along the lines of hollow planet theories. I'm not even convinced that it
is a singular large hole as Mr. Cater and others have proposed; I
personally believe that it is a thinned crustal zone that has many
entrances that are both submerged in the ocean and some smaller holes that
have full atmosphere and this explains many incongruencies in various
recountments.
At the end of the day seek truth, but seek it out of the very best books
that we can find. Do not discount Joseph H. Cater's very unique and very
well founded logical progression on physics and natural phenomena that have
been hitherto unexplainable.
Related thread: Flat Earth & Byrd — Related to the September 2017 'Flat Earth & Byrd' thread