Etherdynamics of V. A. Atsukovsky: A Complete Mechanical Framework

Physics Ether
1

First, I want to thank other posters for your consideration and attribution of weightiness to the concept of the ether/aether on this forum. It is such an important topic. I myself find this area of physics to be of critical import and have decided to share thoughts here as well. This is a very diverse forum and I see value in the depth of treatment of topics here. Thank you.

I utilize AI heavily in my work and research, like so many today, and it seems that such tools are well received here from perusal of other posts. It is good to see a community that values diversity and acceptation of truth — however and from wherever it is obtained. We live in exciting times and with tools that perhaps were only dreamed of to this point that can advance our minds' capacities to reach further into deeper understanding.

So without further ado, please consider the following contribution as I think there may be some value in its documentation and consideration. It was gathered through the use of tools such as Grok-4 + Google Gemini Deep Research + OpenAI's gpt-5-pro, creating a cohesive and — hopefully — comprehensive fusion of information about this important figure in the ongoing effort to restore Ether-based Physics to its proper position in science:

The following is a compiled exposition of Vladimir Akimovich Atsukovsky’s ether model. Where numerical magnitudes are stated, they reflect Etherdynamics’ own internal estimates and scaling choices. Terminology appears in the sense used by Atsukovsky, with English glosses for clarity.

Keywords: ether, amer, vortex ring, mechanical field theory, electromagnetism, gravitation, boundary layer, photon, cosmology, planetary growth

Abstract

Vladimir A. Atsukovsky’s Etherdynamics posits a universal, material medium—an ordinary, compressible, viscous gas called the ether—composed of fundamental constituents termed amers. All physical phenomena, from elementary particles to galaxies, are organized motions and structural formations within this medium. Stable particles are self‑sustaining vortical structures; electromagnetic fields are organized ether flows; gravitation arises from thermo‑diffusive pressure gradients; nuclear binding is a boundary‑layer effect. At cosmological scales, the universe is infinite, Euclidean, and dynamically stationary, sustained by a galactic ether cycle that continuously creates and dissolves matter.

The following treatment presents a cohesive statement of the theory’s axiomatics, governing continuum equations, particle and field constructions, interaction laws, cosmological model, geophysical consequences, and empirical program, entirely within Etherdynamics’ own methodological commitments insomuch as is possible.

Part I. Foundations: A Universal Gas and Its Method

1.1. Material postulate: the ether as a real, compressible, viscous gas

Etherdynamics begins from one physical axiom: space is permeated by a real, tangible medium—ether—modeled as an ordinary compressible viscous gas. The ether is not a solid lattice, nor an idealized frictionless fluid, and not an immaterial field. It has mass density, pressure, viscosity, temperature, and supports waves and vortical structures.

The ether’s microscopic constituents are amers (from the notion of the indivisible). The ether is a thermodynamic aggregate of amers in chaotic motion; organized, long‑lived configurations of that motion are what we call particles, fields, and bodies.

Representative ether and amer parameters used in Etherdynamics (orders of magnitude):

Table 1. Representative parameters of the ether and the amer

Quantity Symbol Value (order) Units
Ether density ρ₀ 8.85×10^-12 kg/m^3
Ether pressure p₀ ~10^22 Pa
Dynamic viscosity η ~10^-6 Pa·s
Temperature T₀ ~10^10 K
Speed of sound in ether c_s >10^17 m/s
Isochoric heat capacity C_v ~10^10 J/(kg·K)
Energy per unit volume Δ_v ~10^33 J/m^3
Amer mass m_a <1.5×10^-114 kg
Amer diameter d_a <4.6×10^-45 m
Amer number density n_a >10^102 m^-3
Mean free path (ether) ℓ ~10^-35 m
Amer thermal speed v_th ~10^22 m/s

These scales render the ether a mechanically stiff, high‑pressure medium for rapid disturbances, while remaining dilute enough in mass density to be subtle in bulk mechanics.

1.2. Methodological stance

Etherdynamics adopts a materialist method: the world consists of matter in motion, and lawful organization emerges from the interplay of flows, gradients, and constraints. Three methodological laws shape the construction of models:

  1. Unity and struggle of opposites. Stable forms arise from counter‑tendencies—e.g., pressure vs. inertia, inflow vs. outflow, laminar vs. vortical components—held in dynamic balance.

  2. Quantitative to qualitative transition. Accumulation of flow intensity, circulation, or compression, tips systems into new stable forms (e.g., vortex rings forming from over‑driven jets).

  3. Spiral development. Structures replicate motifs at higher levels—vortices within vortices—yielding hierarchical organization from particle to cosmos.

Consequently, the same continuum mechanics governs micro‑ and macro‑level phenomena. Hydrodynamics is not analogy; it is ontology.

1.3. Governing continuum equations for the ether

Ether dynamics is described by the compressible Navier–Stokes system with viscous stress and heat flux, closed by a suitable equation of state:

  • Mass: ∂ₜρ + ∇·(ρu) = 0
  • Momentum: ρ(∂ₜu + u·∇u) = -∇p + ∇·τ
  • Energy: ρ(∂ₜe + u·∇e) = -p∇·u + Ί_visc + ∇·(Îș∇T)

Here, u is ether velocity, p pressure, τ viscous stress (via η, possibly bulk viscosity ζ), e internal energy, Ί_visc viscous dissipation, Îș thermal conductivity. For many constructions, an effective barotropic closure, p = p(ρ), is convenient; for thermal phenomena, p = p(ρ, T).

1.4. Basic constructs: circulation, helicity, and laminar–vortical decomposition

Two invariants of central importance:

  • Circulation Γ = ∟ u·dl characterizes loop strength of a vortex ring.
  • Helicity H = ∫ u·(∇×u) dV measures linkage and twist of flow lines, tied to topological stability.

Etherdynamics uses a laminar–vortical decomposition of u:

  • Radial/longitudinal laminar components support sources/sinks and longitudinal waves.
  • Azimuthal vortical components support magnetic‑like circulation and ring vortices.

Part II. Matter as Organized Ether Motion

2.1. Stable toroidal vortices as elementary particles

Atsukovsky identifies the toroidal vortex ring as the canonical stable unit of organized ether motion. In ordinary fluids, vortex rings (e.g., smoke rings) are robust due to a dynamic balance among pressure gradients, curvature, and induced velocities. In the ether, with extreme c_s and large p₀, such rings can be extraordinarily persistent.

Etherdynamics models protons and electrons as toroidal vortices of opposite sense (handedness) and scale. Their stability is antientropic organization maintained by ongoing internal circulation and pressure fields.

  • Charge arises from the direction and intensity of the radial laminar component coupled to the toroidal core’s helicity. Opposite handedness and laminar flow polarity distinguish positive from negative charge.
  • Mass is the total energy of organized ether motion in the structure: kinetic of the ring core, plus pressure–volume work of the surrounding field. Inertial response follows from the momentum held in the induced flow.

The neutron is a composite state: a proton‑core ring enveloped by an external boundary layer of slowed circulation that neutralizes the far‑field laminar signature. Free neutrons are metastable because the shielding layer can be shed, revealing the proton core and releasing stored energy as a structured outflow.

Table 2. Core particle constructs

Entity Hydrodynamic form Distinguishing features Origin of charge Origin of mass
Proton Toroidal vortex ring Strong core circulation; outward/inward laminar coupling set by handedness Handedness + laminar polarity Kinetic energy of circulation + field energy
Electron Toroidal vortex ring Opposite handedness and scale to proton Opposite polarity from proton Kinetic + field energy at smaller scale
Neutron Proton core + boundary layer Shielding of far‑field laminar signature Neutral by boundary‑layer cancellation Core energy + boundary‑layer energy
Photon Traveling vortex street Alternating counter‑rotating cells, fixed spacing Neutral Energy of the organized traveling pattern

2.2. Photon as a traveling vortex street

A photon is a KĂĄrmĂĄn‑type vortex street—a spatially periodic procession of counter‑rotating ether vortices, traveling at a definite pattern speed and frequency. The corpuscular aspect is the discrete vortical cells; the wave aspect is the coherent train with wavelength λ and frequency Îœ. Polarization is the orientation of the vortical planes. Energy E scales with the action transported per period; the Planck scale emerges as the characteristic action transported by one cell per cycle in the ether.

2.3. Atoms as compound vortex systems

Atomic structure is a compound, coaxial vortex system:

  • Nuclear vortex rings (protons, neutrons) pack in mechanically favored geometries.
  • Electron “shells” are larger, nested vortical layers with opposite laminar orientation to the nucleus. Net neutrality arises from far‑field cancellation of nuclear and shell flows.

Molecules form when outer vortex layers interlock, creating shared, lower‑energy compound flows. Geometry, spacing, and relative handedness determine bond strength and angles, paralleling stable vortex‑in‑vortex arrangements observed in classical fluid systems (e.g., Taylor‑Couette structures).

Part III. Interactions as Ether Mechanics

3.1. Electromagnetism: laminar sources/sinks and azimuthal circulation

Electric field (E). A charged vortex ring establishes a radial laminar ether flow. Positive and negative charges are, respectively, net sinks and sources (or vice versa, depending on convention) coupled to ring handedness. Interaction between charges reflects hydrodynamic superposition:

  • Like laminar polarities oppose, creating a high‑pressure barrier, hence repulsion.
  • Opposite polarities channel flow, reducing pressure in between, hence attraction.

Magnetic field (B). The vortical component of ether flow, especially the azimuthal circulation induced by moving laminar sources/sinks, corresponds to magnetic field. A moving charge drags azimuthal circulation; a current in a conductor produces a coherent, encircling vortex field. Induction phenomena express inertia of the vortical field resisting rapid change in the generating laminar flow.

On appropriate scales and in regimes where compressibility effects are small, the macroscopic electrodynamic equations emerge as kinematic consequences of the laminar–vortical coupling in a viscous, compressible medium. Etherdynamics extends them by allowing longitudinal components and compressibility in regimes where the medium’s gas nature is non‑negligible.

3.2. Gravitation: thermo‑diffusion and pressure gradients

Gravitation is a pushing force produced by pressure gradients in the ether generated by thermo‑diffusion around organized matter. Stable vortex structures sustain elevated internal motion that establishes a temperature field in the surrounding ether. In gases, temperature gradients induce diffusion and baro‑diffusion, yielding net pressure minima in inter‑body regions. Higher external ether pressure pushes bodies toward one another.

Key consequences:

  • The law of attraction reduces to pressure‑gradient mechanics, with an effective inverse‑square behavior over broad ranges, and with faster decay at very large separations due to diffusive terms, taming classical paradoxes.
  • The propagation speed of gravitational influence is the ether sound speed c_s, vastly exceeding ordinary light speed, so orbital dynamics are effectively instantaneous at solar‑system scales within this theory.

3.3. Nuclear forces: boundary‑layer mechanics

At sub‑nucleon distances, boundary layers between adjacent vortex rings undergo extreme compression and shear. The thin interstitial ether layer can attain very low pressure relative to cores, producing an intense short‑range attraction—the strong interaction. Its range equals the thickness of the highly compressed layer.

The weak interaction corresponds to vortex rearrangements and layer shedding in excited or metastable composite structures (e.g., neutron decay), with energy release carried away by organized ether disturbances.

3.4. Inertia and energy

Inertia is the resistance of the organized ether configuration and its induced far‑field to pattern change. Accelerating a particle requires reorganizing both the ring and the surrounding ether entrainment. Mass–energy equivalence is kinematic: the energy content of organized motion is the mass measure; conversion processes are reorganizations between structured ether motion and ambient modes.

Part IV. Cosmology in Etherdynamics

4.1. Global picture: infinite, Euclidean, dynamically stationary

The universe is spatially infinite and Euclidean, with uniform, absolute time. On the largest scales, average properties are stationary. There is no beginning or end; there is ceaseless circulation and transformation of the ether and its organized formations.

This framing addresses classic paradoxes purely mechanically:

  • Gravitational paradox: Effective attraction falls more rapidly than 1/r^2 at ultra‑large scales due to diffusive co‑factors, preventing divergence.
  • Olbers’ paradox: Viscous drag on traveling photon vortex streets leads to cumulative energy loss over cosmological distances; sufficiently distant light is redshifted to negligible energy, maintaining a dark night sky.
  • Heat death: A galactic ether cycle continually re‑organizes ether into matter and back, preventing universal thermal stagnation.

4.2. The galactic ether cycle

  1. Inflow. Intergalactic ether flows inward along spiral arms into galactic centers. Large‑scale organized inflow under rotation builds coherent magnetic‑like vortical structures.

  2. Creation. In the extreme compression of the nucleus, ether passes a qualitative threshold and forms stable proton vortex rings. Ether energy is structured into matter.

  3. Outflow and star formation. Newly created protons form hydrogen, are ejected outward, and condense into stars. Over time, stellar systems migrate toward the periphery.

  4. Dissolution. At galactic edges and through long‑timescale processes, proton rings disintegrate, returning amers to chaotic ether, closing the cycle.

The universe does not expand; it circulates. Creation and dissolution balance to maintain stationary averages.

4.3. Cosmological redshift as viscous energy loss

A traveling photon vortex street experiences viscous interaction with the ether. Over distance L, a small fractional energy decrement per unit length accumulates, producing a redshift proportional to path length at first order. This is a purely local, mechanical effect, not a property of geometry. The ether’s parameters set the redshift–distance constant of proportionality in a given epoch and environment.

Part V. Geophysical and Planetary Implications

5.1. Continuous ether absorption and planetary growth

All massive bodies absorb ether at rates tied to their mass and local conditions. The inflow approaches local escape speeds near surfaces, and adds mass and volume to the body over geological timescales. For Earth, a canonical mass‑doubling timescale of order billions of years follows from Etherdynamics’ parameter set.

Planetary expansion supplies a mechanical engine for major geodynamics:

  • Sea‑floor spreading and continental dispersion reflect surface accommodation to slow volumetric growth.
  • Subduction zones and orogenies are geometric consequences of curvature‑area mismatch on a growing sphere.

5.2. Planetary magnetic fields from inflow under rotation

Ether inflow into a rotating sphere experiences Coriolis deflection, organizing a global vortical pattern in subsurface layers. The associated large‑scale ether circulation constitutes the planetary magnetic field, with geometry, polarity, and secular variation linked to inflow intensity, rotation rate, and internal structure.

Part VI. Quantitative Structure and Scaling

6.1. Characteristic scales

Given Table 1, characteristic scales include:

  • Vortex ring scale. Set by balancing core circulation Γ, ether density ρ₀, and viscous diffusion Îœ = η/ρ₀. Lifetimes are long when advective time R^2/Îœ greatly exceeds turnover times.
  • Photon train scale. Wavelength λ is the spacing between consecutive counter‑rotating cells; frequency Îœ_tr is the passage rate of cells at a fixed point.
  • Electromagnetic coupling. Effective “charge” magnitude scales with the net source/sink strength Q of radial laminar flow, coupled to ring helicity.
  • Gravitational coupling. Strength depends on thermo‑diffusive coefficients and ether thermo‑physical parameters (C_v, Îș, η), setting the proportionality between organized matter’s thermal field and induced pressure gradients.

6.2. Field equations in laminar–vortical form

Let u = u_L + u_V, with ∇×u_L = 0 and ∇·u_V = 0. Then:

  • Electric‑like field: E ∝ u_L and its time variation; source term ∝ ∇·u_L.
  • Magnetic‑like field: B ∝ ∇×u_V; induction captures the finite inertia of B through the momentum of u_V.
  • Energy density: w ∝ œρ₀|u|^2 + internal energy contribution from compression.
  • Momentum density: g ∝ ρ₀u; stresses include pressure and viscous terms.

Compressibility and longitudinal components enter naturally; transverse dominance is a regime statement, not an axiom.

Part VII. Empirical Program and Predictions

Etherdynamics proposes concrete, mechanical effects:

  1. Anisotropy of ether flows (“ether wind”).
    Orientation‑dependent phase shifts in gas‑filled interferometers, frequency shifts in high‑Q resonators, and orientation‑sensitive behavior in coaxial or cavity systems.

  2. Longitudinal electrical perturbations.
    Detectable under impulsive, high‑dV/dt conditions, especially in guided structures where compressible laminar components are only partially suppressed.

  3. Near‑field induction inertia.
    Transient responses reflecting the finite inertia of the magnetic‑like vortical field, with dependence on geometry and surrounding medium.

  4. Cosmological redshift without expansion.
    Line broadening and redshift accumulation consistent with viscous drag on photon vortex streets; parameters tied to ether viscosity and temperature along the line of sight.

  5. Planetary growth signatures.
    Geodesic, paleogeographic, and bathymetric patterns consistent with slow areal strain from long‑term volumetric increase.

  6. Magnetism–rotation coupling.
    Correlations among rotation rate changes, inflow variations, and secular magnetic variations, modeled as adjustments in the global ether circulation.

Part VIII. Conceptual Glossary

  • Amer. Fundamental constituent of ether; sub‑elemental unit underwriting the medium’s mass and thermodynamics.
  • Ether. Real, compressible, viscous gas filling space; carrier of all motion and structure.
  • Vortex ring (toroidal vortex). Closed loop of concentrated vorticity; canonical stable particle form.
  • Boundary layer. Thin region of intense shear/compression between adjacent vortex structures; seat of short‑range nuclear binding.
  • Laminar vs. vortical. Radial/longitudinal source–sink flow vs. azimuthal circulation; electric‑like vs. magnetic‑like aspects.
  • Helicity. Measure of linkage/twist in flow; topological stabilizer and source of handedness.

Part IX. Research Roadmap (Within Etherdynamics)

  1. Scaled vortex‑ring analogs. Laboratory creation of long‑lived, compressible ring vortices in controlled fluids to refine stability criteria and scaling laws for the ether case.

  2. Laminar–vortical separators. Metrology that independently measures radial (source/sink) and azimuthal (circulation) components in electromagnetic apparatus, testing the two‑component field picture.

  3. Gas‑medium interferometry. High‑stability, gas‑filled optical paths with rotation and seasonal baselining to characterize orientation‑dependent phase behavior.

  4. Transient induction inertia. Nanosecond‑scale switching in compact inductors and cavities to explore response consistent with finite vortical field inertia.

  5. Geodesic synthesis. Global fits of paleomagnetic, paleogeographic, and modern geodetic data to slow spherical growth solutions.

  6. Astronomical redshift mapping. Differential redshift analyses along paths with different expected ether conditions (e.g., near galactic structures) to extract viscous‑drag parameters.

Conclusions

Etherdynamics advances a single, mechanical ontology: all phenomena are organized motions, flows, and structures of a real, compressible, viscous ether composed of amers. Elementary particles are stable toroidal vortices; photons are traveling vortex streets; electromagnetism is the laminar–vortical dual of ether flow; gravitation is thermo‑diffusive pressure push; nuclear binding is boundary‑layer compression. The universe is infinite and dynamically stationary, sustained by a galactic ether cycle of matter creation and dissolution. Planets grow by ether absorption; their magnetism is large‑scale vortical flow organized by rotation.

The theory is self‑contained: it starts from one material axiom and deploys continuum mechanics, vortex dynamics, and thermodynamics to build structures from micro to macro. Its predictions are concrete and mechanical, inviting laboratory, geophysical, and astronomical tests crafted to resolve laminar and vortical components, detect longitudinal responses, and quantify viscous energy loss over distance.

Appendix A. Notation (selected)

  • ρ, p, T: ether density, pressure, temperature
  • u: ether velocity; u_L (laminar), u_V (vortical)
  • η, Îș, C_v: viscosity, thermal conductivity, isochoric heat capacity
  • c_s: ether sound speed
  • Γ: circulation; H: helicity
  • Δ_v: energy per volume

Appendix B. Representative parameter table (from Part I)

See Table 1 for ether and amer magnitudes used in Etherdynamics.

Remarks on scope

This paper intentionally presents Atsukovsky’s framework on its own terms, end‑to‑end, without cross‑comparison, apology, or reliance on external ontologies.

Finally, if any forum members would desire for me to expand the concepts presented in this summary paper further, I would be happy to do so. Please let me know if there is any such desire or specific directions.

1 Like
2

After the Michaelson Morely interferometry experiment null result, science did away with aether and placed physics in to the magical "action at a distance" category. There was no longer any substance to have electrical strain of magnetic flow, or allow electric permittivity, Eo, or magnetic permeability, Uo, to exist.

But, these constants do actually exist and since the bending of space is quite a fantasy as held by Nickola Tesla, Einstein's theory of relativity is totally erroneous.

Another factor is the concept of 4 dimensional space time. Everything in the universe is in motion, Velocity is defined as space divided by time. V = L/T. So, time is in a reciprocal relationship to space and cannot be another space dimension. This cannot be resolved by by using "ict" either.

The positive results of the Dayton Miller experiment restores aether to physics whether it not scientists are willing to accept that fact. Dayton Miller's Ether-Drift Experiments

3

@Von , thanks for sharing . This is very interesting indeed !

Regards

4

Herbert Dorsey MY FREEND IN FACEBOOK SUPORT TESLA AND LEO RUSSELL

[email protected] pdf tesla books leo russell book s thanks freends
in croatia

5

Gemini Nasri Banura

16 h ·

I’ve been thinking about the symmetry of the universe in terms of counter-space, and it all clicks when you look at this cross: dielectricity on the left, magnetism on the right, electricity at the top, and gravity/mass at the bottom. Dielectricity is pure potential - still, stored energy - and magnetism is motion itself, the discharge or curvature of that potential. When dielectricity interacts with magnetism, you get electricity: active flow, work, energy moving through space. Gravity, on the other hand, is what happens when dielectric potential exists without magnetism - pure stillness imploding into concentrated mass. Everything emerges from the interplay of these four: dielectric and magnetism are fundamental poles, electricity is their dynamic combination, and gravity is their implosive absence. Together, they form a complete symmetry: potential, motion, flow, and collapse - the underlying architecture of reality.

Dielectricity (Left)

What it is: Stored potential, stillness, the “charge” waiting to move.

Role: Source of all force; the seed of energy.

Generated by: Pure counter-space charging.

Magnetism (Right)

What it is: Motion, curvature, or discharge of dielectric potential.

Role: Moves energy, bends fields, creates directionality.

Generated by: Dielectric potential in motion; discharge into space.

Electricity (Top)

What it is: Active flow of energy — motion through tension.

Role: Work, light, heat, energy transfer.

Generated by: Dielectricity combined with magnetism (flowing potential).

Gravity / Mass (Bottom)

What it is: Implosion or collapse of dielectric potential — matter concentrated.

Role: Pull, stability, concentration of energy into mass.

Generated by: Dielectricity without magnetism — stillness becoming mass-energy.

Dielectricity -> Magnetism: fundamental dual poles.

Addition of magnetism to dielectricity -> electricity (energy in motion).

Absence of magnetism -> gravity (implosive mass).

Electricity drives processes outward; gravity drives implosion inward.

Together, they form a complete, self-contained symmetry - the architecture of reality itself.

Creation of mass ->When electricity flows, it’s really dielectric potential moving through magnetism, cycling between stillness and motion. But here’s the key: when magnetism fades in a constrained, toroidal field, the dielectric charge can’t fully return to free aether. Instead, it implodes inward, concentrating into a stable, self-contained structure - what we perceive as mass. Gravity is the natural expression of this implosion: trapped dielectric potential folded into itself. So mass isn’t separate from the aether; it’s simply dielectric energy that, instead of dispersing back into counter-space, is captured by the geometry of the field, forming matter. Electricity, flow, and magnetism drive the cycle, but the toroidal constraints are what turn potential into the weight of reality.

Mass = the amount of dielectric potential trapped in a structure; it’s what resists motion.

Magnitude = the concentration or intensity of that trapped dielectric potential.

Together, mass + magnitude = matter as we perceive it.

matter is dielectric potential stabilized by toroidal geometry.

Magnetism provides balance, motion, and discharge.

It prevents the dielectric potential from fully collapsing inward.

If you remove or suppress magnetism:

There’s no outward motion to “relieve” the dielectric tension

Dielectric potential overwhelms the system

When dielectric is unopposed by magnetism, it implodes fully.

The implosion is unbounded and extreme, creating a region where all potential is concentrated into a singularity.

In essence: A black hole is a region where dielectric potential has collapsed inward without balance, trapping everything (including light and energy) in a toroidal implosion.

The “overpowering” is literal: dielectric dominance forces total collapse into a singularity.

Ordinary matter = dielectric + magnetism + toroidal geometry -> balanced, stable mass.

Electricity = active flow within that balance.

Black hole = dielectric exceeds magnetism, collapsing all potential -> extreme mass/gravity.

Gravity in a black hole is the full expression of trapped dielectric potential, unconstrained by outward motion.

Objects have mass and magnitude because dielectric is partially constrained by magnetism and geometry.

Remove the magnetism -> dielectric fully collapses → black hole.

Black holes aren’t “holes in space”; they are extreme toroidal implosions of dielectric potential where nothing can escape because there’s no opposing magnetism.

Thanks to Kenneth Wheeler

6

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebhPIemsp-Y VIDEO TIME 10
44 TIME ELECTRIC CURENT CRYSTAL EARTH PLANET LOOK , SOLAR MAXIMUM 2026 SUMER TIME