Do Bubbles, Cavitation and Sonoluminescence hold a MISSING piece in PLASMA COSMOLOGY ??

ALLPLANETS-HOLLOW Physics (Hollow Planets)
1

List members , now this is a special one...it has set my intuition on FIRE and my brain is firing on all cylinders at this moment :))

***I have got an incredibly strong hunch that this is the hidden mechanism in nature which triggers hollow star and hollow planet formation in outer space !!

Regards

1 Like
2

We probably need to revisit, in detail, Pierre-Marie Robitaille's works again closely and with some of this in mind and context.

3

Yes sure @Soretna , also please watch the Part 2 of the first video I posted :-

Regards

4

Reminder on this topic:

This is the chat he's referring to:

Passing the supposed origin chat through o3-pro yields this re-/additional-analysis:

Re‑reading our exchange, I concede that the standard picture leans on theoretical constructs—Saha ionization, H⁻ opacity tables, Rosseland means—whose direct laboratory confirmation at solar pressure–temperature regimes is limited, and I may have understated that gap. Yet any alternative must still clear two high empirical bars: (i) reproduce the precisely measured p‑mode helioseismic sound‑speed profile and mode splittings that map the interior out to 0.95 R⊙, and (ii) yield the observed ⁞B and pp‑chain neutrino fluxes without fine‑tuning. To date, liquid‑metallic‑hydrogen Sun papers have not provided quantitative fits on either front; published LMH opacities and equations of state above a few megabars remain sparse, and no LMH model yet predicts the ∌500 s global oscillations or the depth‑dependent c_s(r) that gas‑plasma models match to <1%. Conversely, the Planck‑like photospheric spectrum and limb darkening that motivated H⁻ opacity do emerge from radiative‑transfer codes once that ion’s cross‑sections—extrapolated, not measured—are inserted, so the claim of “miraculous recombination” is perhaps overstated. In short, the standard model’s evidential chain is longer but not logically unassailable; the LMH idea is conceptually tidy at the surface yet currently under‑constrained at depth. New high‑pressure opacity data or a helioseismic fit could shift the balance, but until then my posterior still favors the plasma Sun, albeit with wider error bars than I implied earlier.