David Wilcock - Wed., 9/21 Update

[Brel]

Hi Gary,
This has echoes of 911, from a technology point of view.
Most of the public who know some details about 911 may not be aware that up to half a kilometer away from the site
of 911, vehicles were destroyed, but where newspapers etc were left on the drivers seat, were left untouched,
which speaks of technology, with very specific capabilities.

If this latest info from David is correct, then the owners of similar technology, may have been used again.

Once again, it would be very interesting to have a view from space of a period 24hrs either side of the events,
in order to see what was actually going on.
Bre.

···

----- Original Message -----
  From:
  To: [email protected]
  Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 10:31 AM
  Subject: [Share11] David Wilcock - Wed., 9/21 Update

  UPDATE WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 2011

  Nineteen years ago today, I stopped using all intoxicating substances... and never went back. In much the same way, it would appear that a worldwide "addiction" is finally breaking.

  The negative elite have hit bottom. What happens from here is anyone's guess, but let us all hope for a quick surrender so that more lives are not lost.

  Unfortunately, their tendency has been NOT to surrender, and we cannot expect they will. Additional destruction may be required.

  IT WAS NOT A NUCLEAR ATTACK

  I am happy to report that the highest-level intelligence sources we have on this subject have now informed us that NO radioactivity was detected in either of the destroyed areas.

  What they DID find is now considered a baffling mystery. It appears both bases were destroyed by an instantaneous twenty-fold increase in air pressure.

  Let me spell it out for you in plain terms. There is nothing left in either of these areas. Everything in them has been crushed to tiny particles of rubble. There is no point in ever trying to access them again or redevelop. The damage is total.

  No one knows how such an event is even possible. There is no record of any attack like this ever having been done before within the insider world.

  Fulford's sources seem very clear about who did this and why it was done. Nonetheless, this attack does not resemble any known terrestrial classified technology.

  THIS MAY HAVE BEEN ET-ASSISTED

  Therefore, this may have been an ET-assisted attack -- consistent with the China's October Surprise series I've been documenting here.

  It may be that a massive quantity of air was "portaled" into either base. Portal technology does exist, in various capacities, but certainly has never before been used like this.

  It is also possible that some unknown technology was used to expand the size of the air molecules within the bases by a factor of twenty.

  Russian "scalar" technology can make things get much hotter or much colder, and can create destructive impulses, but there is no record of anything like this ever having been done.

  If ETs were responsible, and used advanced portal technology, it may also be that at least some, if not all of the personnel in these facilities were moved to a safe area before the attack was conducted.

  If this is the case, none of them have been able to or allowed to make contact as of yet.

  http://www.divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/975-undergroundbases

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Eric_C]

Actually that does have a scientific answer. A large electromagnetic pulse can destroy metal while leaving other objects untouched.. This is consistent with conspiracy theories that a small nuke was used to bring down the towers - because nukes do product an em pulse.

···

--- In [email protected], "Brel" <brel@...> wrote:

Hi Gary,
This has echoes of 911, from a technology point of view.
Most of the public who know some details about 911 may not be aware that up to half a kilometer away from the site
of 911, vehicles were destroyed, but where newspapers etc were left on the drivers seat, were left untouched,
which speaks of technology, with very specific capabilities.

If this latest info from David is correct, then the owners of similar technology, may have been used again.

Once again, it would be very interesting to have a view from space of a period 24hrs either side of the events,
in order to see what was actually going on.
Bre.

  ----- Original Message -----
  From:
  To: [email protected]
  Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 10:31 AM
  Subject: [Share11] David Wilcock - Wed., 9/21 Update

  UPDATE WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 2011

  Nineteen years ago today, I stopped using all intoxicating substances... and never went back. In much the same way, it would appear that a worldwide "addiction" is finally breaking.

  The negative elite have hit bottom. What happens from here is anyone's guess, but let us all hope for a quick surrender so that more lives are not lost.

  Unfortunately, their tendency has been NOT to surrender, and we cannot expect they will. Additional destruction may be required.

  IT WAS NOT A NUCLEAR ATTACK

  I am happy to report that the highest-level intelligence sources we have on this subject have now informed us that NO radioactivity was detected in either of the destroyed areas.

  What they DID find is now considered a baffling mystery. It appears both bases were destroyed by an instantaneous twenty-fold increase in air pressure.

  Let me spell it out for you in plain terms. There is nothing left in either of these areas. Everything in them has been crushed to tiny particles of rubble. There is no point in ever trying to access them again or redevelop. The damage is total.

  No one knows how such an event is even possible. There is no record of any attack like this ever having been done before within the insider world.

  Fulford's sources seem very clear about who did this and why it was done. Nonetheless, this attack does not resemble any known terrestrial classified technology.

  THIS MAY HAVE BEEN ET-ASSISTED

  Therefore, this may have been an ET-assisted attack -- consistent with the China's October Surprise series I've been documenting here.

  It may be that a massive quantity of air was "portaled" into either base. Portal technology does exist, in various capacities, but certainly has never before been used like this.

  It is also possible that some unknown technology was used to expand the size of the air molecules within the bases by a factor of twenty.

  Russian "scalar" technology can make things get much hotter or much colder, and can create destructive impulses, but there is no record of anything like this ever having been done.

  If ETs were responsible, and used advanced portal technology, it may also be that at least some, if not all of the personnel in these facilities were moved to a safe area before the attack was conducted.

  If this is the case, none of them have been able to or allowed to make contact as of yet.

  Disclosure Imminent? Two Underground NWO Bases Destroyed | Divine Cosmos

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Gary]

Hi Bre, exactly, many people, unfortunately, get much of their news from the main stream media (which is bought and paid for by vested interests)... and, don't realize that there is a mostly hidden ongoing war between various factions in the government/military/alphabet agencies... 9-11 was one aspect of this war, this was apparently another incident in this process. The incident you mention of the use of exotic technology didn't appear in the MSM... there were many vehicles blocks away from the towers which had their engine blocks melted into a pile of slag, yet the back half was completely untouched/like new. And, obviously didn't happen by fire. Gary

···

--- In [email protected], "Brel" <brel@...> wrote:

Hi Gary,
This has echoes of 911, from a technology point of view.
Most of the public who know some details about 911 may not be aware that up to half a kilometer away from the site
of 911, vehicles were destroyed, but where newspapers etc were left on the drivers seat, were left untouched,
which speaks of technology, with very specific capabilities.

If this latest info from David is correct, then the owners of similar technology, may have been used again.

Once again, it would be very interesting to have a view from space of a period 24hrs either side of the events,
in order to see what was actually going on.
Bre.

  ----- Original Message -----
  From:
  To: [email protected]
  Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 10:31 AM
  Subject: [Share11] David Wilcock - Wed., 9/21 Update

  UPDATE WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 2011

  Nineteen years ago today, I stopped using all intoxicating substances... and never went back. In much the same way, it would appear that a worldwide "addiction" is finally breaking.

  The negative elite have hit bottom. What happens from here is anyone's guess, but let us all hope for a quick surrender so that more lives are not lost.

  Unfortunately, their tendency has been NOT to surrender, and we cannot expect they will. Additional destruction may be required.

  IT WAS NOT A NUCLEAR ATTACK

  I am happy to report that the highest-level intelligence sources we have on this subject have now informed us that NO radioactivity was detected in either of the destroyed areas.

  What they DID find is now considered a baffling mystery. It appears both bases were destroyed by an instantaneous twenty-fold increase in air pressure.

  Let me spell it out for you in plain terms. There is nothing left in either of these areas. Everything in them has been crushed to tiny particles of rubble. There is no point in ever trying to access them again or redevelop. The damage is total.

  No one knows how such an event is even possible. There is no record of any attack like this ever having been done before within the insider world.

  Fulford's sources seem very clear about who did this and why it was done. Nonetheless, this attack does not resemble any known terrestrial classified technology.

  THIS MAY HAVE BEEN ET-ASSISTED

  Therefore, this may have been an ET-assisted attack -- consistent with the China's October Surprise series I've been documenting here.

  It may be that a massive quantity of air was "portaled" into either base. Portal technology does exist, in various capacities, but certainly has never before been used like this.

  It is also possible that some unknown technology was used to expand the size of the air molecules within the bases by a factor of twenty.

  Russian "scalar" technology can make things get much hotter or much colder, and can create destructive impulses, but there is no record of anything like this ever having been done.

  If ETs were responsible, and used advanced portal technology, it may also be that at least some, if not all of the personnel in these facilities were moved to a safe area before the attack was conducted.

  If this is the case, none of them have been able to or allowed to make contact as of yet.

  Disclosure Imminent? Two Underground NWO Bases Destroyed | Divine Cosmos

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Gary]

Yes, but, a large electromagnetic pulse would have taken out electrical wiring/computer chips first (which I don't believe happened) and would not have melted engine blocks several blocks away. Although mini-nukes may have been used as part of the process, they wouldn't have pulverized most of the concrete in the towers. That would have required exotic beam weapons as mentioned by Dr. Judy Wood. Gary

http://www.drjudywood.com/

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Where+Did+the+Towers+Go%3F+&aq=f

···

--- In [email protected], "zenalpha" <zenalpha@...> wrote:

Actually that does have a scientific answer. A large electromagnetic pulse can destroy metal while leaving other objects untouched.. This is consistent with conspiracy theories that a small nuke was used to bring down the towers - because nukes do product an em pulse.

--- In [email protected], "Brel" <brel@> wrote:
>
> Hi Gary,
> This has echoes of 911, from a technology point of view.
> Most of the public who know some details about 911 may not be aware that up to half a kilometer away from the site
> of 911, vehicles were destroyed, but where newspapers etc were left on the drivers seat, were left untouched,
> which speaks of technology, with very specific capabilities.
>
> If this latest info from David is correct, then the owners of similar technology, may have been used again.
>
> Once again, it would be very interesting to have a view from space of a period 24hrs either side of the events,
> in order to see what was actually going on.
> Bre.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From:
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 10:31 AM
> Subject: [Share11] David Wilcock - Wed., 9/21 Update
>
>
>
> UPDATE WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 2011
>
> Nineteen years ago today, I stopped using all intoxicating substances... and never went back. In much the same way, it would appear that a worldwide "addiction" is finally breaking.
>
> The negative elite have hit bottom. What happens from here is anyone's guess, but let us all hope for a quick surrender so that more lives are not lost.
>
> Unfortunately, their tendency has been NOT to surrender, and we cannot expect they will. Additional destruction may be required.
>
>
> IT WAS NOT A NUCLEAR ATTACK
>
> I am happy to report that the highest-level intelligence sources we have on this subject have now informed us that NO radioactivity was detected in either of the destroyed areas.
>
> What they DID find is now considered a baffling mystery. It appears both bases were destroyed by an instantaneous twenty-fold increase in air pressure.
>
> Let me spell it out for you in plain terms. There is nothing left in either of these areas. Everything in them has been crushed to tiny particles of rubble. There is no point in ever trying to access them again or redevelop. The damage is total.
>
> No one knows how such an event is even possible. There is no record of any attack like this ever having been done before within the insider world.
>
> Fulford's sources seem very clear about who did this and why it was done. Nonetheless, this attack does not resemble any known terrestrial classified technology.
>
>
> THIS MAY HAVE BEEN ET-ASSISTED
>
> Therefore, this may have been an ET-assisted attack -- consistent with the China's October Surprise series I've been documenting here.
>
> It may be that a massive quantity of air was "portaled" into either base. Portal technology does exist, in various capacities, but certainly has never before been used like this.
>
> It is also possible that some unknown technology was used to expand the size of the air molecules within the bases by a factor of twenty.
>
> Russian "scalar" technology can make things get much hotter or much colder, and can create destructive impulses, but there is no record of anything like this ever having been done.
>
> If ETs were responsible, and used advanced portal technology, it may also be that at least some, if not all of the personnel in these facilities were moved to a safe area before the attack was conducted.
>
> If this is the case, none of them have been able to or allowed to make contact as of yet.
>
> Disclosure Imminent? Two Underground NWO Bases Destroyed | Divine Cosmos
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

[Eric_C]

Well, that is what I heard on video and what some people are saying:

"EMP from a nuclear device will do those things. Create high currents in conductive material oriented at proper angles to the EMP wave. High currents with high voltage and electrical arcing to complete the circuit.
That's what brought both the towers down and why ZERO people survived-they were milling around, trying to find a way out when the micro-nukes were detonated, turning them into dust.
"

I don't know if this was the cause, but I suspect it was.

···

--- In [email protected], "Gary" <g.fleck@...> wrote:

Yes, but, a large electromagnetic pulse would have taken out electrical wiring/computer chips first (which I don't believe happened) and would not have melted engine blocks several blocks away. Although mini-nukes may have been used as part of the process, they wouldn't have pulverized most of the concrete in the towers. That would have required exotic beam weapons as mentioned by Dr. Judy Wood. Gary

http://www.drjudywood.com/

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Where+Did+the+Towers+Go%3F+&aq=f

--- In [email protected], "zenalpha" <zenalpha@> wrote:
>
> Actually that does have a scientific answer. A large electromagnetic pulse can destroy metal while leaving other objects untouched.. This is consistent with conspiracy theories that a small nuke was used to bring down the towers - because nukes do product an em pulse.
>
>
> --- In [email protected], "Brel" <brel@> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Gary,
> > This has echoes of 911, from a technology point of view.
> > Most of the public who know some details about 911 may not be aware that up to half a kilometer away from the site
> > of 911, vehicles were destroyed, but where newspapers etc were left on the drivers seat, were left untouched,
> > which speaks of technology, with very specific capabilities.
> >
> > If this latest info from David is correct, then the owners of similar technology, may have been used again.
> >
> > Once again, it would be very interesting to have a view from space of a period 24hrs either side of the events,
> > in order to see what was actually going on.
> > Bre.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From:
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 10:31 AM
> > Subject: [Share11] David Wilcock - Wed., 9/21 Update
> >
> >
> >
> > UPDATE WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 2011
> >
> > Nineteen years ago today, I stopped using all intoxicating substances... and never went back. In much the same way, it would appear that a worldwide "addiction" is finally breaking.
> >
> > The negative elite have hit bottom. What happens from here is anyone's guess, but let us all hope for a quick surrender so that more lives are not lost.
> >
> > Unfortunately, their tendency has been NOT to surrender, and we cannot expect they will. Additional destruction may be required.
> >
> >
> > IT WAS NOT A NUCLEAR ATTACK
> >
> > I am happy to report that the highest-level intelligence sources we have on this subject have now informed us that NO radioactivity was detected in either of the destroyed areas.
> >
> > What they DID find is now considered a baffling mystery. It appears both bases were destroyed by an instantaneous twenty-fold increase in air pressure.
> >
> > Let me spell it out for you in plain terms. There is nothing left in either of these areas. Everything in them has been crushed to tiny particles of rubble. There is no point in ever trying to access them again or redevelop. The damage is total.
> >
> > No one knows how such an event is even possible. There is no record of any attack like this ever having been done before within the insider world.
> >
> > Fulford's sources seem very clear about who did this and why it was done. Nonetheless, this attack does not resemble any known terrestrial classified technology.
> >
> >
> > THIS MAY HAVE BEEN ET-ASSISTED
> >
> > Therefore, this may have been an ET-assisted attack -- consistent with the China's October Surprise series I've been documenting here.
> >
> > It may be that a massive quantity of air was "portaled" into either base. Portal technology does exist, in various capacities, but certainly has never before been used like this.
> >
> > It is also possible that some unknown technology was used to expand the size of the air molecules within the bases by a factor of twenty.
> >
> > Russian "scalar" technology can make things get much hotter or much colder, and can create destructive impulses, but there is no record of anything like this ever having been done.
> >
> > If ETs were responsible, and used advanced portal technology, it may also be that at least some, if not all of the personnel in these facilities were moved to a safe area before the attack was conducted.
> >
> > If this is the case, none of them have been able to or allowed to make contact as of yet.
> >
> > Disclosure Imminent? Two Underground NWO Bases Destroyed | Divine Cosmos
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>