Ralph,
Now I see it, the circular edge of clouds. I really don't think that the
edge is natural.
I guess that air current blowing out of the hole, with equal force on all
sides, could account for it. That type of blowing could be caused by a
buildup of soft particles in the inner cavity; they blow out with greater
force, and more sustained force, due to sunspot activity. Low frequency
particles will shoot right through the shell of the Earth because their
frequency is so different from that of the matter which comprises the Earth-
on the atomic level, there are huge spaces which exist between the
fundamental particles of the matter which make up the Earth. When the soft
particles shoot out they cause the air currents because they drag the air
with them due to ele etrostatic attraction. Cater explains the mechanism of
the electrostatic attraction in the book, I won't go off on a tangent.
In a way, it is enough to realise that air blowing out of the hole with
equal force is enough to cause the circular edge, but it is good to
understand the remote cause. Only comprehension of how soft particles
function can provide a complete understanding.
I've had trouble inserting this understanding into Hollow Earth circles, I
imagine because everyone is attached to their own theories. I am not so
resistant like that, I am rather pliable. If you figured it out, I'll go
along in good faith. That's why I've been able to assimilate Cater. I
appreciate it that you all lend an ear on this list. Until I started this
list, I felt like I was walking through a dark forest surrounded by
eyeballs.
Later,
Dean
Related thread: Earth View Circle 3 12k — Follows Ralph McCormick's Earth View satellite photos of 29 Oct 2000
I'm thinking it might just be the location of the weather satellite(s)
and that these are not actual photos. You can see the same affect today:
http://www.usatoday.com/weather/satpic/wsatusaa.htm
If it's a generated photo instead of an actual photo then anything is
possible. I realize that adding the atmosphere halo around the edge is
probably not cut & paste stuff but with the tools these days I don't
rule it out. They could be reconstructing clouds everywhere but at the
North Pole. Possibly because they aren't able or chose not to weather
satellite scan that area.
If everytime one go's to that web site you only see zero clouds in that
area then that would lend credibility to the generated photos theory.
But, who knows for sure.
Jeff
Members,
Here is something that I just got from Mr. Cater:
" Gravity in the inner Earth is about 1/3 of what it is on the outside. This
is a big reason things grow so large in the interior. One reason the giants
in the interior never venture to the outsideis because they would have
difficulty getting around since they would experience about three times the
gravity that they are accustomed to. It is strange that Olaf never mentioned
the gravity condition in the interior."
Gravity as an electrostatic charge would diminish the deeper one penetrated
the inner shell, and even as it built up heading back towards the inner
surface, it would have no cause to to build up to the same strength as it is
the rays of the sun at the initial point of contact with the surface which
cause such intense gravity.
Again, without understanding that the gravity charge is in the soft particle
frequency, there is no way that one can perceive gravity, or know how it
behaves at this depth or the other, in the first place. Soft particle
understanding is the key to vindicating the hollow Earth Theory.
Dean
I think you're right. I'd bet the circle is there because the satellites
have no data of the area. Why? Because the government can't have weathermen
spotting North Pole anomalies, can they?
Jeff Frohwein wrote:
I'm thinking it might just be the location of the weather satellite(s)
and that these are not actual photos. You can see the same affect today:
http://www.usatoday.com/weather/satpic/wsatusaa.htm
If it's a generated photo instead of an actual photo then anything is
possible. I realize that adding the atmosphere halo around the edge is
probably not cut & paste stuff but with the tools these days I don't
rule it out. They could be reconstructing clouds everywhere but at the
North Pole. Possibly because they aren't able or chose not to weather
satellite scan that area.
If everytime one go's to that web site you only see zero clouds in that
area then that would lend credibility to the generated photos theory.
But, who knows for sure.
Jeff
From the book Etidorhpa:
On page 201 we can see that, the deeper the pair penetrated the Earth's
shell, the less exhaustive was simple movement thanks to a diminuition of
gravity:
" ... we had been rapidly walking, or I should better say advancing, for we
no longer walked as men do, but skipped down into the Earth, down, ever
downward. ... I was sensible of a marked decrease of muscular energy
required to carry us onward, and I realized that my body was quite exempt
from weariness. Motion became restful instead of exhausting, and it seemed
to me that the ratio of the loss of weight, as shown by our free movements,
in proportion to the distance we traversed, was greater than formerly. The
slightest exhibition of propelling force cast us rapidly forward. Instead of
the laborious, short step of upper earth, a single leap would carry us many
yards. A slight spring, and with our bodies in space, we would skip several
rods, alighting gently, to move again as easily. I marveled, for, although I
had been led to anticipate something unusual, the practical evidence was
wonderfully impressive, and I again questioned my guide.
We are now nearing what physicists would call the center of gravity," he
replied, arid our weight is rapidly diminishing. This is in exact accordance
with the laws that govern the force called gravitation, which, at the
earth's surface, is apparently uniform, though no instrument known to man
can demonstrate its exact variation ... as we descend into the Earth."
Dharma/Dean