List Members,
here is that drawing by Cater depicting the capture of hard particles by the soft ones.
DD
Dean, Does this imply that cavities would be created within the Earth, charged with 'orgone'? I think I'll need a degree in physics to understand some of these concepts. Hazel.
···
----- Original Message -----
From:
Dean De Lucia
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 2:08 AM
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Capture drawing
List Members,
here is that drawing by Cater depicting the capture of hard particles by the soft ones.
DD
` To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]`
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the [Yahoo! Terms of Service](http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/).
Dean, Does this imply that cavities would be created within the Earth, charged with 'orgone'? I think I'll need a degree in physics to understand some of these concepts. Hazel.
Hazel,
Yes, that cavern worlds characterized by some amount of orgone exist below us. The orgone breaks up at some depths and disintegrates into its constituent light, i.e., visible light, and releases " warm " hard particles. That it how warm, illuminated cavern worlds can exists deep within the Earth's shell. Just imagine such worlds, with rivers, great lakes and vegetation. Nobody cares to really entertain the idea that the Aztecs and Incas went underground because nobody can imagine how a habitat could be possible.
I think that these tribes came from underground, or were manipulated from undergrounders, conquered the indians on the surface, and took in lots of grain produced on the surface. Just a speculation of mine.
Yes, in order to understand wha't is poosible, you have to know a little science. Really, if you can't fend off a few physicists or geologista or astronomers, one day they will pop us with opposing arguments and make you look foolish and tear down anything that you have tried to build up. So you have to apply yourself to some science and know how the phenomena, which we purport to exist, is possible. Only Cater's understanding explains such phenomena, conventional science and gravity concepts do not easily permit the existence of cavern worlds or hollow cavities in the middle of planets.
With knowledge come responsibility, kid. Get reading.
Dharma/Dean
Dean, I felt Sadek's 'Hollow Earth Authentic' provided some sound scientific reasoning and as I told him, it would make an excellent reference book for secondary schools, introducing the HET......when hell freezes over! Hazel.
···
----- Original Message -----
From:
Dean De Lucia
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: [allplanets-hollow] Capture drawing
Dean, Does this imply that cavities would be created within the Earth, charged with 'orgone'? I think I'll need a degree in physics to understand some of these concepts. Hazel.
Hazel,
Yes, that cavern worlds characterized by some amount of orgone exist below us. The orgone breaks up at some depths and disintegrates into its constituent light, i.e., visible light, and releases " warm " hard particles. That it how warm, illuminated cavern worlds can exists deep within the Earth's shell. Just imagine such worlds, with rivers, great lakes and vegetation. Nobody cares to really entertain the idea that the Aztecs and Incas went underground because nobody can imagine how a habitat could be possible.
I think that these tribes came from underground, or were manipulated from undergrounders, conquered the indians on the surface, and took in lots of grain produced on the surface. Just a speculation of mine.
Yes, in order to understand wha't is poosible, you have to know a little science. Really, if you can't fend off a few physicists or geologista or astronomers, one day they will pop us with opposing arguments and make you look foolish and tear down anything that you have tried to build up. So you have to apply yourself to some science and know how the phenomena, which we purport to exist, is possible. Only Cater's understanding explains such phenomena, conventional science and gravity concepts do not easily permit the existence of cavern worlds or hollow cavities in the middle of planets.
With knowledge come responsibility, kid. Get reading.
Dharma/Dean
` To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]`
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the [Yahoo! Terms of Service](http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/).
Dean, I felt Sadek's 'Hollow Earth Authentic' provided some sound scientific reasoning and as I told him, it would make an excellent reference book for secondary schools, introducing the HET......when hell freezes over! Hazel.
hazel,
Yeah, that's when it'll be introduced into the curriculum.
But it is true that Sadek's book provides a good intro to the HET, it has lots of diagrams and such.
Sadek's book is on the right-hand side: http://www.healthresearchbooks.com/categories/hollowearth.htm
DD
--- In allplanets-hollow@y..., "Dean De Lucia" <0108@t...> wrote:
But it is true that Sadek's book provides a good intro to the
HET, it has lots of diagrams and such.
Sadek's book is on the right-hand side:
http://www.healthresearchbooks.com/categories/hollowearth.ht
m
DD
Sadek's book is a good one.
Now, I'm looking forward to seeing the collected musings and
ruminations of Dharmapada Dhasa!
--Mike
List Members,
I think that the biggest hurdle that hollow Earther's face ( you all ) is
that they can't explain why the inner sun's beam are not seen shining out
through the polar openings. You have to admit- it doesn't look good if we
can't explain this.
Some writers have tried to explain this by saying that clouds must clogg the
opening, which means that the opening must be narrow, or maybe even crooked,
and which also means that the curvature anomalies shouldn't start very far
out, which means that some of the good evidence which we DO have, i.e.,
curvature anomalies, gets discarded and interpreted somehow. Clouds are
going to hug the ground anyway because of gravity, so that would have to be
SOME narrow opening- maybe a tunnel even.
Not!
Mr. Cater's hollow Earth model provides a congruent explanation. Remember
that, according to Mr. Cater, the Sun's rays cause a disturbance to the
ether flow through the planet when they strike the Earth's surface, and then
react with the fundamental particles of matter ( electrons down there in the
Earth's shell ) to produce soft particles which pass through the Earth's
shell. They pass right on into the cavity and characterise the atmosphere
there, to make a long story short. At the same time, the inner sun is
comprised of soft particles which break up into their constituent light
particles and release hard particles which give off heat. The light from the
inner sun, however, isn't really seen to come out through the opening. This
is the vexing part- If you can't explain this, people just think that you
are a sentimentalist. This is especially so given the fact that the inner
sun gives off light in the visual band.
But remember that the role of soft particles is that they reflect light.
They flow out through the openings unseen because they are not light in and
of themselves, they reflect it. So the soft particles, " bottlenecking " at
the Polar openings, reflect light from the inner sun DOWNWARDS! The soft
particles themselves flow outwards, but are mostly unseen unless they break
up into light in the visual band. This happens during the auroras. At that
time, the flow is sped up by sunspot activity which seeps through the
Earth's shell at a faster rate and " pushes " the soft particles out through
the polar orifices faster. This faster flow of soft particles causes them to
break up further up in the atmosphere into the constituent photon particles
of light which we see as the aurora. But there are always soft particles
bottlenecking and flowing outward, and there is always light from the inner
sun reflected downwards, back into the cavity.
Even so, let me pass on that favorite comment of mine: " H.D. Northrop
further notes that the light of the aurora is continuous during the Arctic
night ..." This either means that, when the aurora happens, it goes on all
night, or that when one gets close enough, one sees some kind of luminosity
way off over the horizon from the direction of the opening. This would
suggest that not all of the light is reflected downwards, that when one gets
close enough, some kind of luminous, hazy dome or oval area seen.
Soft particles explain why the inner sun's light is not seen.
To me, soft particles ar ethe heart of the Earth, its life force. Learn more
about them in Cater's book:
http://www.healthresearchbooks.com/Authors/joseph_cater.htm
Dharma/Dean