Back to the basics ... Cater!

ALLPLANETS-HOLLOW
1

List Members,

I know that some of you have seen this before, but this Cater quote is worth keeping around.

Page 259, 3rd paragraph of The Awesome Life Force:

"Geomagnetism was explained in a previous chapter as the result of
charges in the atmosphere moving with the Earth in its rotation. In
addition, the shell of the Earth should act then as a bar magnet. "

Page 140: GEOMAGNETISM

Another incredible demonstration of inconsistencies and
contradictions in conventional physicists' thought processes is the
case of Saturn and its magnetic field. For them, an iron core is
essential for explaining a significant, magnetic field around a
planet. According to astronomical data, Saturn is supposed to have a
very low mass in proportion to its size Yet all the evidence,
including probes sent to its outer atmosphere, shows it has a
powerful magnetic field. To account for its relatively low mass,
physicists conclude the core must consist of liquid hydrogen.
Evidently, the art of doublethink has come to the rescue again. The
threat of this speculation to geomagnetic theory has apparently been
ignored.

A great wealth of evidence supports the conclusion that geomagnetism
is produced by the earth's rotation. The intensity of the field is
dependent on the concentration of negative charges in the atmosphere
and the crust, and also the rotational velocity. As the earth
rotates, it carries the charges along with it. This is equivalent to
a myriad of electrical currents, all moving in the same direction.
This effect is identical to that of a great solenoid. Interestingly
enough, the polarity of the earth's field corresponds to that of a
solenoid with a current flowing in the direction of the earth's
rotation. The charges in the atmosphere and crust are predominately
soft electrons. Soft electrons, without the specialized shape of hard
electrons, have no preferred direction of spin. However, hard
electrons are continually being released by the soft particles and,
especially, at the magnetic poles where the giant egresses into the
earth's interior are located. The hard electrons set the pattern of
spin for all the other particles. Thus, the left hand rule is
followed by all the particles moving with the earth's rotation.
Physicists have always assumed a magnetic field is apparent only when
a charge is moving relative to an observer. This is very bad
reasoning. It actually violates the laws of electromagnetic
induction. It is a well known fact that a conductor that moves
perpendicular to the magnetic lines produced by a permanent magnet or
a solenoid will have an EMF induced in it. The EMF is directly
proportional to the velocity."

At the top Cater comments "Geomagnetism was explained in a previous chapter as the result of
charges in the atmosphere moving with the Earth in its rotation." A solenoid is a round and hollow orb, such as a particle or a planet. In other words, the Earth is a spinning solenoid having a north polar charge and a southern polar charge, and orifices at these extremes. A spinning solenoid generates a magnetic canopy.

Our planet's magnetic canopy certainly isn't generated through the Earth's crust from a supposed core, because the Earth has super hot stratas (molten rock) and heat destroys magnetism.

Posted by Dean

2 Likes
2

List Members,

Do you want more proof that the magnetic canopy is generated by spin rate; which is something that would prove that the Earth is a solenoid; which is something that has to be hollow in order to generate this effect?

Then let's start here, the logic is super simple, and thus hard to defeat.

One Venusian day equals 243 Earth days, and this is stated in the article "Venus spinning slower than Thought - Scientists Stumped." This is a very, very slow spin rate!

Here is the article. No conclusions, but a nice observation is given:

And what is the result? If there is no spin, and the planet is a hollow solenoid, then there is not magnetosphere generated, and this is the case with Venus:

Why Doesn't Venus Have a Magnetosphere?

You don't have to read their logic, but the title just confirms to you that Venus has no magnetic canopy.

And remember that when a hollow solenoid doesn't spin, there is no magnetic canopy; and that when a hollow solenoid spins, there is a magnetic canopy. Thus, the opposite behaviors of the almost rigor mortis Venus and the spinning planets indicate that the planets are hollow.

Don't go looking for magnetic rock at the polar extremes of every planet because that is a little far-fetched, isn't it?

But the truth is easy-peasy to understand, and makes sense to the mind.

Posted by Dean