Hi,
There are some major breakthroughs in science pending and rather than
attach the two web pages I thought I would cut and paste the text to
this email. The free energy device can be built at home and as for the
antigravity device, anyone with a tesla coil, sold through beauty supply
stores as a 'violet ray' electronic ionic ultraviolet high frequency
high voltage low amperage skin stimulator for around 50 dollars. Having
myself seen several flying saucers close up, I have seen that they are
metal, yet surrounded in the air by a glow ranging from orange to red or
pink and blue depending on the saucer; suggesting that they create high
voltage ionized fields around the power source. If magnetism is really
gravity looked at differently, not only might energy be free, but
transportation independent of internal combustion engines may be
possible.:s well.
Gordon
http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-000021224mar24.story?coll=la-news-science
Up, Up and Away
Defying the shackles of
gravity is a dream enshrined in myth and the human psyche. Now NASA will
test a machine to determine if it is also real science.
By MARGARET WERTHEIM, Margaret
Wertheim is curating a show on the
work of "outsider physicist" James
Carter, at the Santa Monica Museum
of Art, opening April 20. In
Carter's theory of physics, gravity does not
exist at all
Laws are made to be broken. Or so
the National
Aeronautics and Space
Administration seems to
think. After an almost two-year
wait, the agency's
Marshall Space Flight Center in
Huntsville, Ala., is
poised to take delivery of a
machine that proponents
hope will counteract the laws of
gravity.
At the heart of the device is a
purported effect so
radical it could change the way we
interact with one
of nature's most fundamental
forces. We're talking
revolution, not evolution. A
revolution in spaceships
would be just one spinoff. Back
here on Earth, the
internal combustion engine could
become an
endangered species, replaced by
gravity-powered
cars, planes and elevators.
The dream of defying gravity has a
long and ignoble
history. From Icarus on, the road
is littered with failed attempts to unbind our feet
from the shackles of nature's most
seemingly inexorable force. But the team
behind the NASA project say they
are basing their efforts on real science, and
NASA has paid almost $600,000 to
have the machine custom-built by
Ohio-based Superconductive
Components, Inc. (SCI), a company that specializes
in high-tech ceramics and
superconducting materials. Says SCI Vice President
James R. Gaines Jr.: "If it works,
what a hoot!" Revolutions are usually bloody
affairs, and this one is no
exception. Many physicists believe the whole project is
a waste of time based on
unsubstantiated research of dubious origin. Gravity,
they contend, is in no danger of
diminution--the only thing they see at stake is
NASA's credibility.
The story begins soberly enough,
in the pages of the respected science journal
Physica C. There, in 1992, Russian
physicist Evgeny Podkletnov published the
results of an experiment in which
he claimed to have discovered a
"gravity-shielding" effect.
According to the article, Podkletnov had managed to
reduce the force of gravity on a
small object by up to 2%--in effect, he had
reduced its weight. Now 2% may not
sound like much, but to the physics
community, it was like a bomb
blast. The law of gravity is one of science's most
sacrosanct principles; any
breaching of its walls would represent a major threat
to the current theoretical
framework. If verified, such a finding would bag its
discoverer a Nobel Prize.
But here's the rub: Podkletnov's
paper was hazy on the details. He worried that
his ideas would be taken by
others, that he would not be given proper credit, and
he refused to allow anyone into
his lab to see his apparatus. Incomplete
disclosure, coupled with the
outlandish nature of the claim itself, left most
physicists scoffing with derision.
As a result, Podkletnov was thrown out of his
job at the Tampere University of
Technology in Finland.
Since his paper appeared a decade
ago, Podkletnov says, many people have
successfully replicated his
results, but if so, they have yet to report them in a
peer-reviewed journal. All those
who have published have failed to detect any
clear results. One of them is
Marshall Space Flight Center researcher Ron
Koczor, who spent two years
investigating various aspects of Podkletnov's
experiments, and eventually gave
up. But Podkletnov insists the gravity-shielding
effect only occurs when all the
experimental conditions are precisely right.
Koczor decided it was a job for
the professionals, and in 1999 he persuaded
NASA to commission SCI to build a
facsimile of Podkletnov's original apparatus.
The details might be sketchy, but
the basic idea behind the device is fairly simple.
It begins with a disc, about six
inches in diameter and a quarter of an inch thick,
made out of a superconducting
material whose recipe Podkletnov has carefully
kept secret. The disc is cooled to
below -233 degrees centigrade and levitated
using a magnetic field. Then an
electric field is applied to make the disc spin. So
far, all we have is a variation on
an electric motor, but Podkletnov claims that
when the disc rotates at more than
5,000 revolutions per minute, an object placed
above it begins to lose weight.
Somehow, he says, the force of gravity is being
counteracted--the trick is, you
have to get the setup exactly right.
"I wish it was as simple as baking
a cake," says SCI's Gaines. Even with the
company's expertise it has not
been easy. Indeed, the project is a year behind
schedule. But Gaines says his team
are almost there, and they should be handing
over the device to NASA soon.
Will it work? Gaines' technicians
are not gravity experts; their field is materials
science. They have simply built
the machine to agreed specifications. But, of
course, they would be thrilled if
it did work; success would ensure an enormous
boost to superconducting research.
Testing of the device will be NASA's
responsibility, and he awaits
their results with great expectation.
Personally, I am thrilled to hear
my tax dollars are hard at work subverting the
laws of nature. Or attempting to,
at any rate. Who knows what conceptual
mountains we might demolish if our
imaginations aim high enough? Johannes
Kepler, the founding father of
modern astrophysics, saw science as a form of
play--empirical data set an
irrevocable boundary to this play, but within its arena
the imagination must be free to
roam.
This is not NASA's first attempt
to look for the Podkletnov effect. Last year,
Marshall Space Flight Center
funded a different experiment in which a very
sensitive Cavendish balance was
used to try and detect a change of weight in a
superconducting apparatus. Results
of that study were "inconclusive."
Randall Peters, a physicist at
Mercer University in Macon, Ga., was a consultant
to that project--he helped to
customize the balance for this unorthodox use. "My
own position," Peters says, "is
that I'd be greatly surprised if the effect being
sought was actually found." Like
most physicists, he feels confident that gravity
will withstand the Podkletnov
test. Nonetheless, he adds that "physics is full of
surprises," and he believes that
scientists need to maintain an open mind. Gaines
agrees, defending NASA's
willingness to go out on such a speculative limb: "The
upside potential is so huge, they
really couldn't afford to miss out if it is true."
NASA's interest in circumventing
gravity is not theoretical. The agency is
reaching for the stars. Literally.
Even in the zero-gravity environment of outer
space, you still need to
accelerate a ship to extremely high speeds to get to the
stars in any viable framework,
something that cannot be done with conventional
rocket technology. The Podkletnov
effect suggests it may be possible to
effectively reduce the mass of the
ship, thereby reducing the overall energy
needed for acceleration.
The authors of the July paper
introduced their experimental analysis with a
wistful discussion on the
limitations of rocket propulsion. "Using current rocket
technology," they note, "a trip to
the next star would easily consume the
mass-energy equivalent of a planet
in order to arrive within a reasonable
lifetime." Technologies like
nuclear fission and fusion offer some hope, "but still
will not support the 'Star Trek'
vision of space exploration." In short, if we are
serious about space travel, we
need a quantum leap forward in propulsive power.
Investigating potential options is
the task of NASA's Breakthrough Propulsion
Physics Project, which funded last
year's Cavendish balance experiment. Then
headed by aerospace engineer Marc
G. Millis, the BPP group has license to
boldly go where no man has gone
before--to the outermost limits of current
scientific understanding. Speaking
by phone from his office at the John H. Glenn
Research Center in Ohio, Millis
insists that "we're not asking anyone to develop a
warp drive." NASA understands, he
says, that this is going to take time, and he
stresses that they are "interested
in developments of short increments." Giant
spikes of speculation are to be
sheathed in favor of careful step-by-step
progress.
Specifically, the BPP is seeking
projects that can be feasibly achieved in two to
three years. Already, the office
has funded five projects that investigate
anomalous physical effects. Most
do not deal with gravity per se; as Millis notes,
"modifying gravity" is just one
possible direction from which to approach the
propulsion problem. The group has
also funded work on reducing the effect of
inertial mass, on quantum
tunneling and on the relationship between
electromagnetism and space-time.
Well aware of the threat to NASA's
reputation, he is determined to
encourage only the most clean-cut suitors, people
with university affiliations and
the like.
But lightness of being is a dream
that transcends institutional boundaries and
beyond the ivory towers of academe
an unheralded army of amateurs are
beavering away in their basements
against the unbearable restraints of Isaac
Newton's laws. Go online and the
virtual ether fizzes with a thousand competing
propulsion systems. James Cox,
editor of AntiGravity News, lists no less than
seven major classifications of
anti-gravity devices, from those based on
superconductivity, to those that
exploit properties of gyroscopes and purported
anomalies in nuclear physics or
quantum mechanics. Cox himself is working on
an anti-gravity backpack that he
claims is nearing the patent stage. He is
currently seeking funding to
develop a commercially viable prototype.
When the BPP's next casting call
goes out in the fall, Millis says the agency will
keep an open mind. The message of
history, he says, is that new insights can
come from the most seemingly
unlikely directions. By definition, no one can
predict from whence the next
revolution will arise. Gentleman, start your engines.
If you want other stories on this
topic, search the Archives at Archives. For information
about
reprinting this article, go to
www.lats.com/rights.
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/meg.htm
The
Motionless Electromagnetic Generator,
Extracting Energy from a Permanent Magnet with
Energy-Replenishing from the Active Vacuum from Thomas E. Bearden, Ph.D.
James C. Hayes, Ph.D. James L. Kenny, Ph.D. Kenneth D. Moore, B.S.
Stephen L. Patrick, B.S.
"..This one works beautifully and produces
COP=5.0..." has said Tom Bearden - ( COP=5 is equal to an efficiency of
500% )
Created on 10-06-00 - JLN Labs - Last update 03-29-02
All informations in this page are published free and
are intended for private/educational purposes and not for commercial
applications
The MEG diagrams published in these pages are currently under test
by JL Naudin and may be subject to modifications after that they have
been
published on this site. They are the result of some attempts of a
private and fully independant replication by the author. These diagrams
are not the
original MEG diagrams being tested by the Bearden's teamwork or some
accredited labs.
Disclaimer: The author assumes no liability for any incidental,
consequential or other liability from the use of this information. All
risks and damages, incidental or
otherwise, arising from the use or misuse of the information
contained herein are entirely the responsibility of the user. Although
careful precaution has been taken in
the preparation of this material, I assume no responsibility for
omissions or errors in the diagrams or measurement datas published here.
United States Patent
6,362,718
Patrick , et al.
March 26, 2002
US Patent 6,362,718 : Motionless Electromagnetic
Generator
Abstract
An electromagnetic generator without moving parts includes a permanent
magnet and a magnetic core including first and second magnetic
paths. A first input coil and a first output coil extend around
portions of the first magnetic path, while a second input coil and a
second output
coil extend around portions of the second magnetic path. The input
coils are alternatively pulsed to provide induced current pulses in the
output
coils. Driving electrical current through each of the input coils
reduces a level of flux from the permanent magnet within the magnet path
around
which the input coil extends. In an alternative embodiment of an
electromagnetic generator, the magnetic core includes annular
spaced-apart
plates, with posts and permanent magnets extending in an alternating
fashion between the plates. An output coil extends around each of these
posts. Input coils extending around portions of the plates are pulsed
to cause the induction of current within the output coils.
Inventors:
Patrick Stephen L; Bearden Thomas E.; Hayes
James C.; Moore Kenneth D.; Kenny James L.
Appl. No.:
656313
Filed:
September 6, 2000
4 July, 2001 : Message from Tom Bearden ( Circulate Widely )
This review by Myron Evans is fantastic, and it places EM
energy from the vacuum very solidly into the literature. It will be
published in the forthcoming three volumes of M.W. Evans, ed.,
Modern Nonlinear Optics, Second Edition, Wiley, 2001.
I have the permission of Myron Evans to post the paper until
the publication of the book toward the end of this year.
Cheers,
Tom Bearden
The Link Between the Sachs and O(3) Theories of
Electrodynamics by M.W. Evans ( PDF document 409 Kb )
Website address: http://www.cheniere.org/references/index.html
Foundations of Physics Letters, Vol. 14., No. 1, 2001
EXPLANATION OF THE MOTIONLESS ELECTROMAGNETIC GENERATOR WITH
0(3) ELECTRODYNAMICS
P. K. Anastasovski, T. E. Bearden, C. Ciubotariu, W. T.
Coffey, L. B. Crowell, G. J. Evans, M. W. Evans, R. Flower, A.
Labounsky, B. Lehnert,
M. Mészáros, P. R. Molnar, J. K. Moscicki, S. Roy, and
J.P. Vigier.
Institute for Advanced Study, Alpha Foundation - Institute of
Physics, 11 Rutafa Street, Building H - Budapest, H-1165, Hungary
The MEG paper : Extracting Energy from a Permanent
Magnet with Energy-Replenishing from the Active Vacuum, a PDF
document ( 69 pages 1,29 MB), by T.E. Bearden
MEG patent status, manufacturing update. Literature
update. October 30, 2001
The Motional Electromagnetic Generator ( MEG ) from Thomas
Bearden
Information letter from Tom Bearden ( posted on 12-10-00 )
The MEG project by
J-L Naudin ( updated 03-27-02 )
Good advices for the MEG builders : The MEG Notes by
Jon Flickinger
The MEG v4.0 with the cross-flux magnetic gates setup by JL
Naudin
Throughts about the MEG principle ( part1 ) by Cyril Smith (
updated 11-01-00 )
Throughts about the MEG principle ( part 2 ) by Cyril Smith (
updated 11-12-00 )
The MEG, Why its works, The simple explanation... by Dave
Squires ( updated 11-09-00 )
The Magnetic Transistor Theory by Dave Squires ( updated
11-05-00 )
The Magnetic Amplifier Experiment v1.0 by J-L Naudin
Interesting papers and documents about the project :
The MEG paper : Extracting Energy from a Permanent
Magnet with Energy-Replenishing from the Active Vacuum, a PDF document (
69 pages 1,29 MB), by T.E. Bearden
The MEG paper by T.E. Bearden ( alternate site )
Giant Negentropy from the Common Dipole By T. E. Bearden (PDF
Format 86 KB)
On Extracting Electromagnetic Energy from the Vacuum By T. E.
Bearden (PDF Format 160 KB)
Link to the main Tom Bearden Web site : http://www.cheniere.org/
The Worldwide MEG replications (03-29-02)
Interesting patents to explore which have some similarities or
interesting characteristics :
Electromagnetic switches by A.T.Starr (1957) : US2802170
Magnetic frequency changer by H.T.Mortimer (1959) : US2883604
Flux switching transformer by D.S Toffolo (1963) : US3087108
Transformer in combination with permanent magnet by C.S.Garron
(1968) : US3368141
"Dispositif statique générateur de courant électrique" by P.
Galley (1975) : FR2312135
Electromagnetic generator by E.V. deRivas (1977) : US4006401
Electromagnetic convertor with stationary variable-reluctance
members by F.B.Richardson (1978) : US4077001
Procedures and devices for energy production by H. Kunel (
1982) : DE3024814
Energy converter having a magnetic-core intermediate store by
W. Volkrodt (1986) : DE3501076
Magnetic Amplifier by D.Bramanti (1987) : US4675615
Apparatus for release of Magnetostatic Energy of permament
magnets by A.Boday (1997) : CA2172240
Static magnet dynamo generating electromotive force based on
changing flux density of an open magnetic path by A.Keiichiro (1999) :
US5926083
METHODS FOR CONTROLLING THE PATH OF MAGNETIC FLUX FROM A
PERMANENT MAGNET AND DEVICES
INCORPORATING THE SAME
http://l2.espacenet.com/dips/viewer?PN=WO0007285&CY=ep&LG=en&DB=EPD
Patent Number:
WO0007285
Publication date:
2000-02-10
Inventor(s):
FLYNN CHARLES J
Applicant(s)::
MAGNETIC REVOLUTIONS LIMITED L (US)
Abstract : A permanent magnet device (110) includes a
permanent magnet (112) having North and South pole faces with a first
pole piece (114) positioned
adjacent one pole face thereof and a second pole piece (116)
positioned adjacent the other pole face thereof so as to create at least
two potential magnetic
flux paths (130, 132). First control coils (122, 124) are
positioned along one flux path (130) and second control coils (126, 128)
is positioned along the other
flux path (132), each coil being connected to a control
circuit (not shown) for controlling the energization thereof. The
control coils (122, 124, 126, 128) may be
energized in a variety of ways to achieve desirable motive and
static devices, including linear reciprocating devices, linear motion
devices, rotary motion
devices and power conversion.
Link to the Flynn's web site : About the Flynn's Parallel Path
Technology
January 20th, 2001 : Interesting papers and patents :
"Overunity device installed in Minuteman Missile - patented by
Westinghouse" by Tom Bearden
H. Andreatta, "High Power Switching Amplifier Wherein Energy
is Transferred to a Tuned Circuit During Both Half Cycles,"
U.S. Patent No. 3,239,771, Mar. 8, 1966;
Tom L. Dennis, Jr., "Highly Efficient Semiconductor Switching
Amplifier," U.S. Patent No. 3,239,772, Mar. 8, 1966;
Heber J. Morrison, "Square Wave Driven Power Amplifier," U.S.
Patent No. 3,815,030, June 4, 1974.
Email : [email protected]
Return to the JLN Labs home page
Related thread: NASA Developing Antigravity Device — Covers the same NASA antigravity device discussed on the list two days earlier