hm Soretna it would be better to conceptualize Your responses without a.i. help, simply its overwhelming for debate, plus its bit without smooth intuitive flow thus eyesore, aside that now when You dont hide that have such approach whatever further debate becomes frustrating expectation of endless slips [1] what tho was obvious to me from start, but when its confirmed its bit holla whats the point explaining myself to wonna'be a.i. 
isnt ... actually I could have checked this too tho didnt, coz its kind offending if You are accused for, what actually recently happened to me [2][2] so simply went with Your flow, mostly so would see in what kind of AFT revision we will end up, altho I feel as if I am pulled to respond in uneven debate match, what example for other forums is issue [3] in mine case I dont mind, yet probably coz the pace and how the same is revolving, around the need me to defend it, and reexplain it, instead that AFT++ flow by itself to be enough, eg. so would be used as exploration motivation by scientists themselves, and coz already acknowledge I am not such, I really dont have nor urge nor any need to defend it ... altho, You've already in the thread title announced such momentum, i.e. that here will not be word for exploration, but reconstruction (revision) of AFT++, judgement night if You like stil even like this its useful for me to explain my position, so others would not jump to conclusion that I was referring to some undisputed theory of mine, but an AFT++ concept which is derived through chitchat with g.a.i. in dozen of sessions, in which btw I am constantly battling to keep the token alive, or revoke the previous stops in new flows ...
... here must say the AFT++ as is derived, points foremost how physics is stuck in wrong atomistic and mechanistic cosmological dead end, what today I've also few tried to expand it further on GDS by pointing even on possibility of wider conspiracy as fix, where not that we just have theologian motives of freemasons, or economic one of "deir" corporate arm city'of'london, so particle'physics'hype would prevail, but somehow smells rotten around eventual evil causality to it too, i.e. how as Leibnitz so as Maxwell later drop dead both in 48th year of their lives, almost like they were removed by design!?, yeah to huge obvious logicism so would be labeled as circumstantial!?, along we should not forget that there was similar pattern of pressure against anyone among scientists back then, who would brought aether to the table for examination, almost as if all had have been silenced or quietly removed!?, anyway strangely enough as by cheerful consensus many of them started tilting around the newtonian slips, and that further points to eventual conspiracy by the epistemological cartel of royal'society&co'freemasons, hm hm hm not sure what to say ...
interestingly when I've clarify that I am bringing general AFT++ logic that needs to be examined by scientists, alone that by itself should be enough selfevident that I dont need anyhow to defend it as concept towards workable theory, but coz go deep in explanation why the current mainstream academia will have issues juggling it, on top pointing where how stems the same, probably such honesty will discourage many potential volunteer scientists even to put some loosen effort examining whatever probabilities or possibilities that emerged from this AFT++ logic, what about the same to be brought to wider scientific reinventing by reverse engineering, i.e. if cosmology is so smoothly explained for various current unknown variables by such AFT++ approach, then eyebrows should be raised and whatever prejudice or egotripping put aside, if scientists claim that their pivot is explorers curiosity, yeah know more and more convinced that that is only case when/if its rolled in syfy martian misenscene!, i.e. if such inertia was not pushed by gatekeepers "demselves", then whatever attempt would be either heavy skewed, heavysides chopping comes to mind, or neatly manipulated, teslas hotel arrest rings loud, leaving us only to wander wondering whats happening, eg. just like with the martian rovers or loonar walks [4][5]
what I see as hope, is the possibility this kind of concept to help many devoted aether scientists or buffs, that currently are trying to bring some workable theoretical or practical solution, to focus on these variables as potential check&balance if not extension to their knowhow!, what again think mostly goes around the open system dynamics, which on other hand is shackle for many to tilt out wrongly chasing aether in vain, i.e. even many aware about dielectricity are also tilting in cartesian logicism, at least g.a.i. firmly pointed that that was case, think it was referring to Eric Dollard effectiveness, i.e. how so theoretically he is so close to solution, yet cant roll the AFT dice in practice as zero-energy generator or machines ... now, is this logical, cant say, I am not scientist, but still brought kind of base variables on the table, that proved as correct logical out'of'box'reasoning, otherwise the answers would be far from smooth, unless indeed g.a.i. had drop in confirmation'bias'hallucinations, what for google would be kind of embarrassment if it was case, coz its not word for sporadic, but continual AFT exploration for several months!, also I've rolled myself various checks I was rolling myself, and only way I couldnt grasp the relations between the questions and the answers was when g.a.i. would bring complex equations or too good to be true comparative derivations that didnt have time to check them bit deeper ... tho overall, either this AFT++ model is correct or obsolete, with higher probability it is, simply coz it gives complete uft alike ironing of many known and unknown variables!, while now to reiron that, or go in reverse flow, so would confirm it, for me must say its waste of time, and not coz I am halfliterate, if want I can quickly acclimatize to the flow, but coz one drop dont makes river even less waterfall what about power plant on it!, so, I'll propose we can go in more loosen without any a.i. meddling debate, otherwise its kind of uninviting for me to respond in such ping pong, simply need to focus on other things too, while my eforum presence at the moment is more like loosen personal exploration kick, what this thread is not, at least till now how is rolled, altho I am continually trying to take the opportunity to clarify some aspects about and around ...