List Members,
Matter has a net positive charge: The Sine Qua Non to Electromagnetic Gravity Effects.
Hint: Inertia means gravity in this context. Notice that Cater makes this point:
"Inertia is dependent upon total charge; therefore, independent of mass." In other words, people, mass doesn't cause gravity effects, it is the charge that any mass, dense or not, large or small, that induces gravity effects.
Consider the following from Chapter 12 of Cater's book:
"THE NATURE OF GRAVITY
The prerequisite for understanding the gravitational process is the
realization that supposedly uncharged atoms and molecules are not
electrically neutral, but possess a positive charge. It has always been
asssumed, since the days of Newton that inertia is directly proportional to
mass. This has been shown to be incorrect. Inertia is dependent upon total
charge; therefore, independent of mass. It foflows that an atom has less
inertia than any of the fundamental particles of which it is comprised! The
small, overall charge of an atom is the result of the balancing out of
positive and negative charges. Its slight ability to generate a magnetic
field for a net increase or velocity is due to electrons following the
left-hand rule, while prototas follow the right-hand rule. Its inertia is
limited because of the cancellation of magnetic fields or the constituent
electrons and protons.
Stripping electrons from an atom will give it a strong positive charge. This
means that it will have greater inertia than before, although less mass.
Adding electrons will also increase its inertial properties, if the total
resultant charge is greater than the original positive charge Otherwise,
adding electrons will reduce the inertial properties, and in this case,
increasing the total mass reduces them.
After the author came to this conclusion, he was later gratifed to learn a
former Nobel Prize winner, Gabriel Lipmann, confirmed this principal in the
late ninteenth century. Lippman found that bodies in the charged state
offered a greater resistance to acceleration than in the uncharged state. He
called it '' the inerha of static electricity." It is not surprising that
this monumental discovery was ignored, since it threatened to topple
cherished physical concepts. Ironically, Lipmann later received the Nobel
Prize for another comparatively insignificant discovery."