Where is the Opening?

[Frode]

Frode,

At your suggestion, I went back and read Chapter 19 of The Awesome Life
Force, the part about radiation and nuclear processes. Cater says that when
the nuclei in fissionable material are bombarded by additional neutrons,
that the increased activity in the nuclei causes the photon aggregates in
the vicinity to disintegrate. This releases the hard electrons, hence the
heat and destruction, and the breakup of the photons accounts for the light.

Since the rays of the Sun contain these hard electrons, then this " suggests
" that the sun of our solar system is a nuclear process, like Norlan was
saying. Since these types of electrons do not emanate from the sun within
the Earth, then the inner sun probably is not a matter of a nuke process.

But how does this understanding tie in with the heating mechanism which
Cater mentions in Chapter 15, in relation to large globes? At one point he
says this: " The actual source of the energy that is finally radiated into
outer space is the soft particles and photons normally radiated by the atoms
of the material inside a sun. This is due to the activities of the
fundamental particles. "

I am wondering if the particles don't leave the sun as the " soft particles
and photons normally radiated by the atoms, " like Cater mentions, but
then when the soft particle reaches the atmosphere, it breaks up and
liberates the visible electron within. Cater does not seem to think that a
nuclear process is going on.

This is worth discussing and getting to the bottom of, because the model has
to be cohesive. Once we develop our thoughts on this matter, I'd even be
willing to call him up about it. Anyway, here is the whole thing that Cater
says:

There is according to Cater's theories no need for the Sun to have a nuclear process to power the Sun, as he describe in chapter 15. And there is no need for that in a central sun either. If in fact the sun in the center of Earth should be nuclear it would mean a death blow to Cater's theory of gravity and soft-particles. We would not like that, would we

So for the sake of the sake of standing up for Cater we have to weed out all contradictions by denying their existence.

Bad humor! SorryŠ

The point of my suggestion was that you look deeper at what Cater say regarding nuclear processes and soft-particles so that you might see that the soft-particles disintegration that goes on in the central sun is similar to what would happen with nuclear material disintegration. The reason that some expect that it has to be a nuclear process going on in the central sun is that that process is the "only" one known to produce the desired result, small size with great radiation. But with Cater's soft-particles we have a new option. I will suggest that an soft-particle sun will give of the necessary radiation to give the bottle effect proposed by Norlan.

Norlan, when it comes to the Van-Allan belt: Do you think that it is only the central sun that create the effect or can it be a combination of other factors too. Like cosmic dust?

Just me trying to catch up in the early morning,

Frode

[Frode]

Frode,

I called Cater again, mostly because of another issue.

But I asked him about the sun being a nuclear process because, after all, it
emits hard electrons. He confirmed what I said in the fourth paragraph down,
that the sun actually emanates soft electrons, they hit the atmosphere as
soft ones, and change into hard electrons once they hit the atmosphere.

What do you think about this? It is congruent with the rest of his scheme,
but not with NASA.

Dharma/Dean

It doesn't follow that the sun have to be nuclear just because it emits hard electrons

Frode

[Frode]

>Frode,
>
>A question just dawned on me. Do you think that the pollution in the air

has

>an impact on the process of redistribution of energy? The process depends

on

>interaction with the fundamental particles, and needs to penetrate in the
>first place to occur.
>
>Dharma/Dean
>

To some extent, yes. What is your concern in this matter?

Well, is the surface world having some impact on the inner sun by their
pollution?

Read my post about the constant radar streaming into the inner earth.

Dean

OK! I am quite sure that the part of the Sun radiation that penetrate the surface is in no way affected by the pollution in our atmosphere. If it penetrate solid rock, why should some extra gas in the atmosphere be an obstacle?

Frode

[deandddd]

There is according to Cater's theories no need for the Sun to have a
nuclear process to power the Sun, as he describe in chapter 15. And
there is no need for that in a central sun either. If in fact the sun
in the center of Earth should be nuclear it would mean a death blow
to Cater's theory of gravity and soft-particles. We would not like
that, would we

So for the sake of the sake of standing up for Cater we have to weed
out all contradictions by denying their existence.

Frode-

You should be either a scientist or polititian!

Bad humor! SorryS

The point of my suggestion was that you look deeper at what Cater say
regarding nuclear processes and soft-particles so that you might see
that the soft-particles disintegration that goes on in the central
sun is similar to what would happen with nuclear material
disintegration.

Frode-

You got it. When I spoke to Cater, I mentioned that the Sun emits hard
particles, and that this is what we would expect of a nuclear process. I
asked " how does this correspond to the heathing mechanism which you
described in Chapter 15, that heat wells up in a body, which emanates from
the particles within?"

He nailed me and said that the Sun doesn't exactly emit straight hard
particles; rather, the Sun emits low frequency aggregates, and that the hard
particle doesn't bust out until it arrives at our atmosphere.

Dharma/Dean

The reason that some expect that it has to be a
nuclear process going on in the central sun is that that process is
the "only" one known to produce the desired result, small size with
great radiation. But with Cater's soft-particles we have a new
option. I will suggest that an soft-particle sun will give of the
necessary radiation to give the bottle effect proposed by Norlan.

Frode

Norlan, when it comes to the Van-Allan belt: Do you think that it is
only the central sun that create the effect or can it be a
combination of other factors too. Like cosmic dust?

Just me trying to catch up in the early morning,

Frode

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

[deandddd]

Frode,

Strong logic- I accept!

Dharma/Dean

···

OK! I am quite sure that the part of the Sun radiation that penetrate
the surface is in no way affected by the pollution in our atmosphere.
If it penetrate solid rock, why should some extra gas in the
atmosphere be an obstacle?

Frode

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

[deandddd]

List Members,

It has been suggested that the polar openings might be covered by a hologram
which hides it from our view. I doubt this, because there is censurship of
satellite photos, and MacMillan, Peary and Cook all saw a land mass from
Ellesmere Island. Although, if the vision was carried by thermal layers of
air, it might have punched through any hologram.

I can't speculate on the nature of such technology, but there is a narration
in the tenth canto of the Bhagavat Purana which rings a bell in this regard.
Who knows?

Here is where I got it from: http://www.krsnabook.com/ch75.html

" Once upon a time, King Yudhisthira was sitting on the golden throne in the
palace constructed by the demon Maya. His four brothers and other relatives,
as well as his great well-wisher, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Krsna,
were present and the material opulence of King Yudhisthira seemed no less
than that of Lord Brahma. When he was sitting on the throne surrounded by
his friends, and the reciters were offering prayers to him in the form of
nice songs, Duryodhana, with his younger brother, came to the palace.
Duryodhana was decorated with a helmet, and he carried a sword in his hand.
He was always in an envious and angry mood, and therefore, on a slight
provocation, he spoke sharply with the doorkeepers and became angry. He was
irritated because he failed to distinguish between water and land. By the
craftsmanship of the demon Maya, the palace was so decorated in different
places that one who did not know the tricks would consider water to be land
and land to be water. Duryodhana was also illusioned by this craftsmanship,
and when he was crossing water thinking it to be land, he fell down. When
Duryodhana, out of his foolishness, had thus fallen, the queens enjoyed the
incident by laughing. King Yudhisthira, could understand the feelings of
Duryodhana, and he tried to restrain the queens from laughing, but Lord
Krsna indicated that King Yudhisthira should not restrain them from enjoying
the incident. Krsna desired that Duryodhana might be fooled in that way and
that all of them might enjoy his foolish behavior. When everyone laughed,
Duryodhana felt very insulted, and his hairs stood up in anger. Being thus
insulted, he immediately left the palace, bowing his head. He was silent and
did not protest. When Duryodhana left in such an angry mood, everyone
regretted the incident, and King Yudhisthira also became very sorry. But
despite all occurrences, Krsna was silent. He did not say anything against
or in favor of the incident. It appeared that Duryodhana had been put into
illusion by the supreme will of Lord Krsna, and this was the beginning of
the enmity between the two sects of the Kuru dynasty. It appeared that it
was a part of Krsna's plan in His mission to decrease the burden of the
world.

King Pariksit had inquired from Sukadeva Gosvami as to why Duryodhana was
not satisfied after the termination of the great Rajasuya sacrifice, and
thus it was explained by Sukadeva Gosvami."

[deandddd]

On low frequency particles, soft particles, gyroscopic particles and wind
patterns:

Wind patterns are also explained by the hollow planet configuration. ( From
Chapter 20 of The Awesome Life Force )
" Air currents seem to be generated by electrostatic forces caused by the
presence of concentrations of hard and soft electrons in the atmosphere. The
rush of these charges towards lower potential areas creates a charged
particle stream. This stream generates wind because the ionized air
molecules tend to be drawn along with it. Since soft electrons are
continually disintegrating and releasing camouflaged hard electrons
contained inside, the electrostatic forces will primarily be the result of
hard electrons.

It has been demonstrated that a bar magnet which is long in proportion to
its width has a number of nodes distributed along its length. These nodes
result from magnetic lines which lines which tend to follow oval or circular
paths. The magnetic lines flow out of one pole and back into the side,
instead of flowing into the opposite pole. This point of entry generates a
node, which becomes the starting point for another flow out of the side and
back into the magnet at a second node.

Geomagnetism was explained in a previous chapter as the result of charges in
the atmosphere moving with the Earth in its rotation. In addition, the shell
of the Earth should act then as a bar magnet. It was shown that particles
bombarding the Earth tend to slow down as they penetrate the shell. A cross
section of the Earth would look like two curved bar magnets 800 miles thick
and 12,000 miles long. This configuration should result in multiple nodes
since it fits the pattern of a long, narrow bar magnet. At each nodal point
or line, there should be a magnetic flow into and out of the surface of the
shell, which carries a high concentration of soft electrons. The Earth's
gravity would then tend to repel the ejected, negative soft electrons out
beyond the confines of the magnetic flow, so that they would tend to move
North and South of the nodal line by mutual repulsion.

Magnetometers may not show great deviations in the Earth's field in these
regions, because they only measure the fields produced by hard electrons [
the recognised electrons are in the ultrahigh frequency range of gamma
rays ]. The majority of the particles ejected at these nodes will probably
be the more stable soft electrons, which do not readily disintegrate to
release the hard electrons contained inside. Sufficient groundwork has now
been laid to explain the prevailing atmospheric winds, which are broken into
six discrete bands from the North to the South Pole.

Since the Earth has polar egresses, there should be a rapid flow of
electrons of all kinds from both poles, in addition to those particles
ejected from the nodal areas. Although the magnetic flow is into the North
polar magnetic region, particles ejected out of the Northern egress tend to
spread out and flow in a Southerly direction. The Coriolis effect then comes
into play as particles move toward the South. This causes and additional
accelerating force on the particles relative to the Earth's surface because
the rotational velocity of the Earth increases as one moves towards the
Equator. The flow of the particles will be in a Southwesterly direction
since the Earth's direction is towards the East. This produces a tendency
for the Earth to move away from the particles, thus giving them a motion
relative to the surface and toward the West. The flow will tend to carry
ionized air molecules with it, creating the belt of Westerly winds in the
higher Northern latitudes.

The six prevailing wind belts suggest the existence of two magnetic nodal
lines between the North and South magnetic poles. Ejected particles at the
first nodal line below the North pole will tend to move both North and South
from the belt, as explained previously. Those that flow North will tend to
move in a Northeasterly direction because of the Coriolis effect. They will
be given an acceleration relative to the Earth's surface in an Easterly
direction because they will be going where the Earth's ratational velocity
is lower. A cancellation effect is produced between the first nodal line and
the North Pole because the air masses moving in a Northeasterly dIrection
encounter the air masses moving in a Southwest direc-tion, nearly at the
midpoint.

The particles that move South from the first nodal line produce the
Westerlies in the lower latitudes. The Coriolis effect weakens rapidly as
one moves from the higher to the lower latitudes. As a result, the
accelerating effect is less able to offset frictional forces as they
approach the Equator. This produces the doldrums or zones of calm along the
Equator. The same explanation that was mentioned above applies to the
Southern hemisphere."

http://skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index13.html

Posted by Dean

[Jeff_Frohwein]

dean wrote:

Geomagnetism was explained in a previous chapter as the result of charges in
the atmosphere moving with the Earth in its rotation. In addition, the shell
of the Earth should act then as a bar magnet. It was shown that particles
bombarding the Earth tend to slow down as they penetrate the shell. A cross
section of the Earth would look like two curved bar magnets 800 miles thick
and 12,000 miles long. This configuration should result in multiple nodes
since it fits the pattern of a long, narrow bar magnet. At each nodal point
or line, there should be a magnetic flow into and out of the surface of the
shell, which carries a high concentration of soft electrons. The Earth's
gravity would then tend to repel the ejected, negative soft electrons out
beyond the confines of the magnetic flow, so that they would tend to move
North and South of the nodal line by mutual repulsion.

These nodal points sound like they tie in with the world grid system
that Bruce L Cathie discusses in the book "The Energy Grid". This is a
very interesting book that shows one of these major grid points being
located in the bermuda triangle as well as others that are evenly spaced
around the globe.
I wonder if Cater has done any research into this grid system?

Does anyone remember the popular news article several years (~5 years)
ago where scientists dug a 15? mile hole and discovered that gravity falls
off much faster than expected? To account for it they are trying
to come up with another force to explain it. (Rather than even
consider a HE theory.)
Please let me know if someone knows where I can get another copy of
this news article.

Here is a few of the hollow earth books I've located. Use your
own judgment whether they are truthful or not:

"Etidorpha or the End of Earth" by John U. Lloyd
"Etidorpha" by John U Lloyd
"Hollow Earth Enigma (Mysteries of the Universe)" by Alec MacLellan
"Journey to the Earth's Interior" by Marshall B. Gardner
"King of the World and the Subterranean Kingdom or the Earth Is Hollow at the Poles" by Lena E. Rudder
"Lost Continents & the Hollow Earth" by David Hatcher Childress, Richard S. Shaver
"Subterranean Worlds Inside Earth" by Tim Beckley
"The Hollow Earth" by Raymond Bernard
"The missing diary of Admiral Richard E. Byrd" by Richard E. Byrd
"Undeground Alien Bases" by Commander X
"World Top Secret: Our Earth Is Hollow!" - http://www.ourhollowearth.com

Jeff

[deandddd]

These nodal points sound like they tie in with the world grid system
that Bruce L Cathie discusses in the book "The Energy Grid". This is a
very interesting book that shows one of these major grid points being
located in the bermuda triangle as well as others that are evenly spaced
around the globe.
I wonder if Cater has done any research into this grid system?

Jeff,

I don't recall Cater mentioning the grid per se, but he does give more
information about magnetic points which affect weather and atmospheric
conditions. In relation to vortices, such as the Oregon Vortex, Cater
explains that low frequency particles/photons/electrons build up along fault
lines and within underground caverns. At some point these energies flow out,
which is not very surprising. Because they possess a negative charge, and
because air naturally possesses a positive charge, some typical attractions,
i.e., wind currents occur. This is my understanding. I'll attach that page
of Cater's book, and reproduce the paragraph right here:

" The apparent conclusion is that the vortex energies are somehow con-nected
with the bombardment of energies from the Sun There are great fault lines in
the region of Alaska and the Aleutian Islands which have also been a region
of great volcanic activity. The solution is not difficult considering the
discussion of the origin of earthquakes and related phenomena. It is
possible that the alternate charging and discharging of energies in
underground faults creates the oscillatory pattern. The presence of giant
underground caverns may also contribute to the periodic discharge of soft
particles [ negative charge ] through certain relief points on the
surface. The discharged particles are readily conducted away by underground
channels which come close to the surface in the vortex area. Apparently,
the entire Earth pulsates in response to the cyclical pattern of the Sun,
much like the nature of the fundamental particles. The hermetic axiom
necessarily connects the phenomena."

The negatively charged particles attract humidity also, as water possesses a
positive charge. Also, water molecules have a lot of space between them, so
they accomodate the water particles of humidity all the better. This is why
rain storms ande clouds and humidity can build up over land locked areas,
seemingly on their own. It is not that clouds only form over the oceans;
sometimes they seem to materialise over continents. The humidity may drift
over from oceans, but the question is, what makes clouds materialise, and
why do they discharge their water. Cater expalins all this by means of low
frequency/invisible/soft particles. Rod calls them gyroscopic particles.

The point is that, without understanding the role of invisible, low
frequency particles, we cannot even begin to understand the geological
mechanisms around us, what to speak of piecing together a hollow Earth
model.

Does anyone remember the popular news article several years (~5 years)
ago where scientists dug a 15? mile hole and discovered that gravity falls
off much faster than expected? To account for it they are trying
to come up with another force to explain it. (Rather than even
consider a HE theory.)

Well, if gravity is a matter of an electrostatic force/negative charges,
then gravity is going to be limited by the penetration of such charges. The
further down you go, the more the charge diminishes. Of course science is
not going to admit that gravity is not caused by mass because then, there
goes every cherished theory. What to speak of control over the population,
et cetera.

I think that our academic and scientific institutions have been infiltrated
to a large degree.

Here is a few of the hollow earth books I've located. Use your
own judgment whether they are truthful or not:

"Etidorpha or the End of Earth" by John U. Lloyd
"Etidorpha" by John U Lloyd

The concept of gravity as a negative charge supports all the phenomena of
Etidorhpa with cohesive physics. The book comes to life and becomes a joyfyl
confirmation of Cater's pressentation at every step, once you have
assimilated Cater's concepts.

That last book and site belong to Rod M. Cluff. He is on this list. His
downloadable book is chalkful of good material.

Bye now,

Dharma/Dean

"Hollow Earth Enigma (Mysteries of the Universe)" by Alec MacLellan
"Journey to the Earth's Interior" by Marshall B. Gardner
"King of the World and the Subterranean Kingdom or the Earth Is Hollow at

the Poles" by Lena E. Rudder

"Lost Continents & the Hollow Earth" by David Hatcher Childress, Richard

S. Shaver

···

"Subterranean Worlds Inside Earth" by Tim Beckley
"The Hollow Earth" by Raymond Bernard
"The missing diary of Admiral Richard E. Byrd" by Richard E. Byrd
"Undeground Alien Bases" by Commander X
"World Top Secret: Our Earth Is Hollow!" - http://www.ourhollowearth.com

Jeff

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

[deandddd]

Members,

I don't even remember where this drawing is from. It might be from the book
The Hollow Earth.

Dean

[deandddd]

Frode,

Have you followed up much on the orgone accumulator?

Dean

[Jeff_Frohwein]

dean wrote:

Frode,

Have you followed up much on the orgone accumulator?

I remember talking to a guy, years ago, where he mentioned you
could do weather control using just an orgone accumulator and
an antenna. His version of an orgone accumulator was just a small
cardboard box surrounded by alternating layers of aluminum foil
and an insulator. (The energy would tend to be absorbed by the
center of the box where the antenna was attached.)

I read one book (by W. Reich I think) where it was mentioned that
you should be careful where you drain off the energy captured.
In some cases, water that was contaminated by the energy would
kill grass (or something like that..)

Jeff

[deandddd]

Hey folks,

I've inserted some really good NASA photos of Jupiter's aurora. Second
picture down.

http://skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index15.html

Dharma/Dean

[deandddd]

Jeff,

Yes, this is what Reich called his Cloud Buster. I'd be more interested in
an orgone accumulator that I could use at home in relation to my body. The
orgone list, whose address I passed around, has samples and models and such.
I just haven't gotten into it yet.

Here is one reason why: I was told by Michael Mannion that the site:
www.orgone .org had pictures posted of orgone energy, low frequency
particles, taken by some laboratory in Britain. But I can't find them, and
I've asked on their list. Right now, that is what I am trying to do, just
get together some kind of substatiation of the low frequency particle. I've
always said that it is very difficult to substantiate the hollow Earth
Theory by staying within the parameters of recognised physics. Only when we
take into consideration the low frequency particles/orgone can we
substantiate a hollow configuration and hollow planet geological processes,
etc., etc.

So, if there is a picture of the stuff, somebody ought to post it and bring
it to everyones attention.

Cater is wonderful, but he is getting too old to carry the torch, and Reich
is, of course, gone. For example, Cater doesn't mess with computers. So
somebody has to stand up and do a great service and carry the awareness
forward.

Besides that, I've had to fine tune my web site, but I really am interested
in the accumulator. Soft particles are the key to so much.

Dean

···

dean wrote:
>
> Frode,
>
> Have you followed up much on the orgone accumulator?

I remember talking to a guy, years ago, where he mentioned you
could do weather control using just an orgone accumulator and
an antenna. His version of an orgone accumulator was just a small
cardboard box surrounded by alternating layers of aluminum foil
and an insulator. (The energy would tend to be absorbed by the
center of the box where the antenna was attached.)

I read one book (by W. Reich I think) where it was mentioned that
you should be careful where you drain off the energy captured.
In some cases, water that was contaminated by the energy would
kill grass (or something like that..)

Jeff

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

[Frode]

Re: [allplanets-hollow] Orgone = low frequency
particl

Frode,

Have you followed up much on the orgone accumulator?
Dean

Dean,

Nope! Not so fare. It is
not really the first experiment I want to do. I am now trying to
collect the parts necessary to do the transformer experiment that is
described below.

Frode

  SOFT PARTICLE PHYSICS

EXPERIMENT

                                    by

Richard L. Clark

                             1

September, 1982

   Below, are two  experiments 

that may be performed, at small cost in

   time and materials, to grasp Soft

Particle Physics as a reality.

   The first experiment is simply a

unity electrical transformer test.

   Obtain two nearly identical 60

Hz hollow wire coils (relay coils

   will work).  Make a square

open frame transformer to mount the coils

   upon, as a standard primary and

secondary winding arrangement.

   Plug the primary into a standard

household wall outlet, then compare

   the power input and power output

of the transformer.

   The input to output power ratio

will be less than unity, due to eddy

   currents, hysterisis and  

other minor transformer losses,
as

   expected.

   Now make a  

completely enclosing shield of copper
or aluminum

   sheeting (non magnetic) 

for the secondary coil winding of
the

   transformer.  Place the

shield over the secondary.

   You will observe an immediate,

drastic reduction in the output of

   secondary coil of  the 

transformer. You have Soft Particle STARVED

   the secondary of  the 

transformer. Remove the shield
and the

   operation of the transformer

return to normal conditions.

   Now let us   construct 

a different passive enclosure for
the

   transformer, a Phi  ratio,

pyramid shaped Reich Accumulator. I will

   not digress into why the Phi

ratio is used, other than that it is a

   critical angle to passive Soft

Particle structures such as pyramids.

   The outside face dimensions for a

6 inch base Phi pyramid has two

   5.7 inch sides, and for a 12 inch

base has two 11.4 inch sides. You

   will need four  faces 

and a square base for each lay
of the

   Accumulator, proportioned to

nest.

   Alternate enclosed pyramids of

organic and metal material complete

                                  Page 1

   the Pyramid Reich 

Accumulator. Now measure the input power to the

   output power of the transformer. 

The ratio of power in this mode of

   transformer operation is greater

than the unity standard before.

   Can you now maintain that current

Physics knows what it is talking

   about, even at this elementary

level?

   Let us now advance to the Reich

Cloudbuster and nuclear radiation

   systems.  There are  

several independent Cloudbuster
Weather

   Modification businesses in 

operation in the United States. The

   services of a Cloudbuster and a

trained operator can thus be openly

   obtained with little effort by

the serious researcher.

   Obtain a nuclear radiation sample

and expose it as the target of an

   operating Cloudbuster. 

Since the Cloudbuster is a passive (sink)

   particle beam weapon functioning

as a Soft Particle Physics device,

   it will DEACTIVATE the nuclear

radiation sample.

   The reason that the Cloudbuster

deactivates the sample (or reactor,

   or weapon) is  that 

they are dependent on Soft Particle electron

   concentrations to function as a

nuclear radiation items.

   The Cloudbuster's drain  

(sink) action greatly
reduces this

   concentration of Soft Particle

Electrons in the sample, thus

   deactivating it.

   Joseph Cater, author  of 

"The Awesome Life Force", states that
a

   maximally efficient Cloudbuster 

would have solid aluminum or copper

   barrel tubes to

AID soft particle electron CONDUCTION.

   Copies of Joseph Cater's

publications, may be obtained from :

Tri State Press,

                                PO Box 150,

                            Long

Creek Highway,

                           Long Creek,

SC 29658

                        Telephone (803)

647-2020

[deandddd]

List Members,

http://ufos.about.com/science/ufos/library/weekly/aa100200a.htm

Where do you all think it lives?

Dharma/Dean

[deandddd]

Here is a nice Uranus pic- Any comments?

Anything hollow Earthy about it?

It is a nice pic, isn't it?

[deandddd]

Re: [allplanets-hollow] Orgone = low frequency particl
Forde,

Very interesting experiment. So the idea is what: that soft particles exist everywhere and the transformer simply taps into the hard particle which they harbour within, and that's where electricity comes from, right?

I am still going to try to get my hands on that picture of soft particles taken by that lab in Britain.

Dharma/Dean

[deandddd]

Doctor De Meo has some orgone accumulators available in Californi, I
believe.

Dharma/Dean

http://www.orgone.org/orgonacc00.htm

[Frode]

Re: [allplanets-hollow] Soft particle
experiment

Forde,
Very
interesting experiment. So the idea is what: that soft particles exist
everywhere and the transformer simply taps into the hard particle
which they harbour within, and that's where electricity comes from,
right?
Right!

Frode