About the Pole results: Ten people responded. Gee whiz- At least give me
some feedback from all the work I'm doing. I am just trying to find out who
is on this list- there are over 90 of you! Where did you come from? I'm not
trying to pester people into doing stuff, or posting, or doing projects. I
never will- I'm just a bit curious and I'd like to post appropriate
material.
Four out of ten said that they were new to the HET, two have known for about
two years, two were old timers, and two have known for ten years. So maybe
the list is polarized with newbies and old hands at the HET.
A high percentage of newbies might account for the lack of interest in the
Arctic aspect of the Hollow Earth Theory ( HET ) indicated in the previous
poll. New people just haven't been exposed to much Arctic reasoning yet and
just don't realize its value.
Anyway, I just wanted to comment on the poll. We'll get Paul in next time.
Dean,
I voted as a 2-year'er, as I just couldn't relate to newcomer, though I have just
heard of HE one year ago. I am not a newcomer!
From my first exposure to this material, I have had an invincible sense of its
truth, and have studied much of what I could find in this time period.
Anyway, I support this discussion, Dean, and your prowess in keeping the topic
alive and growing. I have learned very much here in the last year, and appreciate
everyone's participation, and absolutely want this to continue!
I would like to see what poll results--if we could all learn how to access
it--would give to the subject of how much we believe the HE "theory".
Note: One must first register in Yahoo, if you haven't already, then you are
recognized there and can participate.
In friendship and support to all,
Nimueh
I didn't respond to the poll because I had trouble locating it initially and
I didn't have time to waste trying to search it out. I have been aware of
and avidly pursuing the truth about the Hollow Earth Theory for nearly 35
years. For about ten of that thirty-five years I inundated myself by reading
everything there was to read on it and any related subjects. I would guess I
am about as well read on the subject as one can be, but it is good to hear
about new efforts and books which have been written, along with the new
concepts of physics and other ideas which are now coming forth, which might
help to explain and solve the mysteries of this earth's cosmogony. It is
sometimes entertaining to see the newbies discovering the HET and getting
excited about it. That's good.
Not to put down the polling system, but you might be better off getting a
response to your information queries if you listed the questions yourself and
had list members respond directly. I would think it would get you much more
than ten responses.
Ninety is a good start. Keep up the good work and 90 will soon be 1,090 &
etc. . .
Norlan
Thank you for the kind words. The contributions from the members is really
starting to kick in significantly. If Ralph hadn't let us know about all
this stuff in Antartica, we would be clueless.
Somehow or other, we have to get in contact with some of these people, like
this Dr. Serena Serghetti. They either know what we know, or are on the
verge.
That kind of publicity can backfire though, and apparently get people
killed.
Not to put down the polling system, but you might be better off getting a
response to your information queries if you listed the questions yourself and
had list members respond directly. I would think it would get you much more
than ten responses.
Ninety is a good start. Keep up the good work and 90 will soon be 1,090 &
etc. . .
Norlan
Norlan,
Nimueh offered some helpful info about re-registering now that Yahoo owns egroups.
I will give everyone a chance to do that, but then if it doesn't work, I'll just do a poll on the list.
About Admiral Macmillan's sighting. I mentioned that it had the characteristics of an over-the-horizon mirage, and that it is probably just below the neck of the opening.
But what was I saying. The reflection disappeared when the Sun went down. Now the Sun is always rathe low on the horizon up there, its rays are always oblique. So it didn't shine into the opening, below the neck, and then somehow or other reflect back out again. That mountainous land mass is on the upper side of the neck.
Not as far to walk, right?
Since the land mass reflected over to the Canadian side, where MacMillan was, it must " sit " on the Siberian side in order to receive the oblique rays. Just a conjecture.