http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast04may_1.htm?list27253
Have you ever noticed that NASA never refers to the Apollo program in
articles, particularly when discussing space radiation? In this article's
case, wouldn't information about what they did for Apollo be pertinent?
It's because they never went. Bunch of liars.
Blake
Blake,
One way to tell a liar is by what he DOESN'T say.
Dharma/Dean
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast04may_1.htm?list27253
Have you ever noticed that NASA never refers to the Apollo program in
articles, particularly when discussing space radiation? In this article's
case, wouldn't information about what they did for Apollo be pertinent?It's because they never went. Bunch of liars.
Blake
Members,
Here is something from a Hindu indology site: " Briefly, the Indus Valley is
the original home of the Aryans or Indo-europeans."
http://www.indusscript.net/index.html
The indologists from the West, however, say " Oh no, their origin is in the
Caucasians."
The Hollow Earth Theory revises the whole argument- the caucasians and their
culture migrated from the hollow portion, wherefrom it periodically
manifests on the surface:
From The Hollow Earth and The Aryan Invasion Revised:
http://www.skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/
" The Caucasian race can easily be seen to stretch from Northern India to
Scandanavia and in European Russia. How far would it be from the Artic coast
of the Siberian and European side of the polar basin to the opening
suggested by several hollow Earth researchers, which is offset from the
North Pole just above the New Siberian Islands? ( See the dot on the map
above )A hop, skip and a jump- no more than a few hundred miles. So how
difficult would it be for the Caucasian and even other human races to
re-introduce themselves to the surface of the planet from this particular
opening at the end of every Kali Yuga? It does not seem that it would be so
difficult at all.
The fact that the Caucasian race is so light skinned in Northern Europe is
indicative, also. It suggests that any migration began from that region,
then proceded downwards. This is because in the Middle East and India, the
race is a bit darker. It is easier to go from a light complexion to a darker
complexion, while is is harder to believe that darker skinned Caucasians
migrated Northwards, then became sun bleached to their present blond haired,
blue eyed state. Therefore, we can surmise that the Caucasians are not
Caucasian in origin but rather, that their surface migration began in
Northern Europe, along the Artic basin, near the opening. The reader may
keep in mind that in milleniums past, these areas were not as cold as they
are now. As an example, we'll note that Viking graves from 1,000 years ago
have been opened up in Greenland, and it was found that roots, at that time,
had penetrated the coffins. Now the graves lie under permafrost. This means
that, previously, vegetation existed in the area and that there was a
different climate."
Posted by Dharma/Dean
Re: [allplanets-hollow] Indus
valley?
Dean (from Dick Fojut .... **Just read
your email about the origin of the Aryans. This email is therefore
appropriate for the list, I think. ** I realize you'd prefer
that ALL the white, blond Aryans originated from the north polar
entrance. Maybe SOME did. Anything is possible. But James
Churchward thought differently. Read on and see if he can prove a
different origin. I said I'd get back to you (Jan and anyone else
interested) with supporting references for Churchward's notions
about the ARYANS, "The Aryan invasion," the UIGHURS,
the Brahman sect (he disliked), the NAGAS (the Naacal Priests he
liked) and the MAYAS, etc. (Mayas weren't ONLY in Central America).
After a lot of scanning of text from Churchward's book "Children
of MU." and editing, I'm back!
Left off of this stuff is his
notion (and language proofs) that SOME of the fair skinned, blond
people in Norway (Norsemen) and Scandanavia, arrived there 50,000
years past in ships from Central America fleeing an invasion by
darker haired people (forefathers of the present Latins).
According to Churchward, those fleeing in their ships were
QUETZALS, led by King Quetzal, mostly fair skinned, with many
blondes. There was a LAND BRIDGE existing then between France
and Canada. They landed there first. Any survivors, AFTER
the land bridge sank (before Atlantis did) and the earlier magnetic
cataclysm that swept down over the North pole, may have became the
Scandanavians. Others that didn't escape in the ships from
Central America, fled to the forests and were never heard from again.
(Might they be ancestors of some of the WHITE Indians supposed to
still exist in the jungles and mountains in South America?)
But there were also many light
skinned, blonds among the remnants of the twice destroyed UIGHUR
Empire (centered in the Gobi) that survived in high valleys raised up
along with the Asian and European mountains when they were violently
uplifted between before 12,000 years past. From long separated
areas of the high mountain ranges, according to Churchward, separate
streams of those Uighur survivors, thousands of years later and
multiplied in numbers, eventually worked their ways down to the
plains. Some of these Uighurs, their scientific knowledge long
forgotten, but retaining some language, became the "Aryan
invasion" of India. Other streams became the Persians and
the Medes. Some of the blonds among the former hearty, mountain
survivors, moved into Europe and Scandanavia. Blonds coming from two
directions. Maybe the Polar hole a third?
Before presenting his pertinent
Chapters on THE ORIGIN OF MAN, INDIA and THE GREAT UIGHUR
EMPIRE, I think the following comparison of MAYA - NAGA and
ENGLISH words is appropriate. In the often absence of solid physical
remains and written texts, Churchward looked to LANGUAGE,
traditions, sacred symbols and religion to provide hints and
understanding about the origins and connections of ancient
people. One interesting example is the following...
James Churchward
compares
English/Naga/Maya
NUMBERS...
from James Churchward's first book
"The Lost Continent of
Mu."
English Naga
Maya The Hidden Meaning
Hun.
Hun. The Universal One
Cas.
Ca. The Dual God
Ox.
Ox. Who by His Power
caused
San.
Can. The Four Powerful Ones
Ho.
Ho. to come
Uac.
Uac. To arrange things in order
Uuac.
Uuac. To
create, and
Uaxax.
Uaxax. to make
man. To stand erect
Bolan.
Bolan. to make
his parts revolve
on themselves
Lahun.
Lahun. He is two in
one.
The ancients counted in fives to avoid mentioning ten.
Ten was the numeral of the Deity;
therefore too sacred to
be mentioned. Ten was counted twice five, fifteen three
times five and so on up to
twenty...
The Naga Form of
Writing Numerals.
I will take one more example in numerals - the number 13.
Thirteen is always looked upon as unlucky especially
when in connection with Friday.
Mu, the
Motherland, was destroyed on a Friday, the 13th
day of the Month of Zac (the white month).
The memory of that day, the 13th, has been
carried
down as an unlucky day for
mankind.
Dean, the following FIRST chapter in his
"Children of MU" book lays a foundation for the following 2
chapters on INDIA and THE GREAT UIGHUR EMPIRE. - Dick
"Children of MU"
CHAPTER I
THE ORIGIN OF
MAN
For the benefit of those who have not read The Lost Continent of
Mu a short synopsis of its contents follows.
The Land of Mu was a large continent
situated in the Pacific Ocean between America and Asia, its
center lying somewhat south of the equator. Basing its area on the
remains which are still above water, it would have been about six
thousand miles from east to west, and about three thousand from
north to south. All the rocky islands, individually and in groups,
scattered over the Pacific Ocean were once part of the
continent of Mu. About twelve thousand years ago cataclysmic
earthquakes rent Mu asunder. She became a fiery vortex, and the
waters of the Pacific rushed in, making a watery grave for a
vast civilization and sixty millions of people. Easter Island,
Tahiti, Samoas, Cook, Tongas, Marshall, Gilbert, Caroine, Marianas,
Hawaii and the Marquesas are the pathetic fingers of that great land,
standing today as sentinels of a silent grave.
The existence of this great continent is confirmed by:
Naacal tablets, books, writings,
inscriptions and legends found in India, China, Burma, Tibet and
Cambodia.
Ancient Maya Books, inscriptions, symbols
and legends found in Yucatan and Central America.
Remains, inscriptions, symbols and legends
found among the Pacific Islands.
Stone tablets found in Mexico near Mexico
City.
Cliff dwellers' writings and inscriptions
found in Westem North America.
Books of old Greek philosophers.
Books and writings of the ancient
Egyptians.
Legends throughout the world.
These confirmations are all given in The
Lost Continent of Mu. They show that:
There was once a large continent of land in
the Pacific Ocean called the Land of Mu.
On this great continent man made his advent
on earth about two hundred thousand years ago.
The Land of Mu and the Biblical Garden of
Eden were one and the same land.
Both
the Naacal and the Mexican tablets show clearly that man is a
special creation. They also show in what way he differs from all
other creations. An account of the creation is given in both sets of
tablets which is very similar to the Biblical account.
At the time of Mu's destruction her people
were in an exceedingly high state of civilization; as regards science
she was far ahead of the present time. (No wonder! She was at
the end of two hundred thousand years of experience and
development. We today cannot claim five hundred.)
The
great civilizations of the old Oriental empires - India, Egypt,
Babylonia, etc.- were only the dying embers of Mu's great
civilization. They were her children, who withered and died without
her care.
All tablets, inscriptions and writings which
I used in The Lost Continent of Mu are accompanied by keys for
reading them. Every assertion made is accompanied by reasonable
proof. The facts are there. The theories will have to take care of
themselves.
I wish it understood that what is revealed
of the past in my writings must not be considered discoveries by me.
I am simply stating what I find in writings that run from 12,000 to
70,000 years ago if the mode of keeping time was correct. What is
disclosed in these writings is startling, yet archaeology and
geological phenomena corroborate the facts without calling to our aid
legends which also confirm them. Lao Tse, the Chinese sage 600 B. C.,
speaks of the great learning and advancement of his prehistoric
forefathers.
The ancients were wise and thoughtful for
those who were to come after them. They left indestructible
records written on clay and stone. This wisdom is spoken of by
Souchis priest of Sais to Solon the Greek, as recorded in
Plutarch. These writings have been broken up and many of them lost.
As they were universal among the ancients, scraps and fragments
of them are found in all quarters of the earth. When put together
they supplement one another to a great extent, so that by combining
them we can make a beginning towards unraveling the wonders of the
earth's First Great Civilization.
For over fifty years I have been hunting
these scraps and putting them together so as to form the
beginning of an intelligent tale of the Creation and Man.-It rests
with those who come after me to complete the tale.
ANCIENT RELICS
- Relics that can be traced back as coming
directly from Mu, the Motherland, are extremely rare. During
the past few years I have been singularly fortunate in finding
two that are at least intimately connected with Mu. Both are symbolic
figures in bronze. They were either made in the Motherland or in one
of the ancient Uighur cities before the eastern half of that
great empire was destroyed by the north running wave of the
last Magnetic Cataclysm which was the Biblical "Flood."
This wave destroyed all the country over which it ran, the
people were drowned and the cities washed away or buried under the
drift. The Uighur Capital City today lies under fifty feet of
boulders, gravel and sand. It is situated in the Gobi Desert,
which today has large areas of rock only, the soil and everything
with it having been washed away by the "Rood."
I am using one of these relics in my
possession for interpretation. It is, without question, one of
the two oldest bronzes in existence. If Uighur, it is about
18,000 or 20,000 years old. If from Mu, the age cannot be estimated.
This figure is a symbol of Mu as the great ruler. The fineness of the
workmanship is not to be found surpassed, and very seldom equaled in
any of the prominent jewelry stores in our big cities today. Both
symbols have been in America for about 150 years. I know their
history, but the less said about it the better since, in the
Oriental home from which they were taken, they were without question
sacred relics.
The British Museum has three scepters which
undoubtedly were manufactured in Mu before she went down.
In Mu,1 the
Motherland, there were ten distinct tribes. Although they were
physically easily differentiated, there were few variations in
language, and these only of a minor character. A greater change is
seen in their glyphs or writings.
In the Motherland each of her people
occupied its own territory; and, when various tribes took part in the
colonization of a new country, they did not settle down
indiscriminately, but each tribe took its own land and built its own
cities as their fathers did in Mu. They settled down adjoining each
other and formed a homogeneous whole. This original form of isolation
grew with time so that the tribes eventually became separate peoples,
and finally nations. And as the isolation became greater, changes in
language crept in.
Dean, following are Churchward's two
chapters on INDIA and THE GREAT UIGHUR EMPIRE, the Naga-Mayas,
the Aryans, etc. Years back I scanned (or redrew) many of his
illustrations and reference maps. IF I get time, I'll try to convert
a few to JPEGs and attach to this. But for the moment this text is
all I can offer. Many JPEGs later (if interested). I used big
type for easier readability. This is long text and you probably won't
read it all. Just skim around and see if any parts interest
you... - Dick Fojut
"Children of
MU"
Chapter 11
INDIA
India, the land of mystery and
mysterious sciences, the cradle of the philosophy of the old Greek
sages. Bharata (the ancient name of the Deccan), glorious,
magnificent Bharata carried on and maintained the civilization
and learning of the Motherland for nearly eight thousand
years after the great volcanic forces had torn her body
asunder and the ocean waters had swallowed up the fragments. It
was India who stood foremost for thousands of years, holding together
and carrying on the earth's first great civilization
after the destruction of the Motherland. Other nations held the
civilization for a time but all except India soon began to fall
back and many disappeared. It was India that stood foremost in
religion, philosophy, astronomy, sciences, music, art and medicine
from the time of the destruction of the Motherland down to about 500
B. C. No other nation could stand as her rival or compete with
her in all branches of knowledge. The world generally knows nothing
of this. Historians have utterly failed to show and to credit India
with a civilization of ancient date, yet the Akkadians,
Sumerians, Babylonians and Upper Egyptians were her
offspring.
It is
not necessary to quote ancient writings or bring forward traditions.
We have only to examine the western shores of India to prove the
extreme age of her civilization; for here, lying Off the bed of the
Indian ocean a few miles from the present shore line, are to be seen
beneath the waters remains of great imposing structures. History does
not relate this submergence, yet here it is, an incontrovertible fact
that in bygone times India enjoyed a high civilization.The physical
proofs are there. How does this compare with the nonsensical
histories of India, that say India's civilization only dates back
4000 or 5000 years?
**SUBMERGED LANDS, WEST COAST OF INDIA.** - In the Indian Ocean, adjoining the West
Coast of India, there exists a large area of submerged lands with
structures showing thereon. Like the remains of the South Sea Islands
these structures are prehistoric. These submerged lands commence at
about 21 degrees north latitude, or just below the mouth of the river
Indus, and extend south to about the equator.
These submerged lands are apparently of an
elongated oval shape. The Lacadive and Maldive groups of low-lying
islands are within the boundaries of this ova. Although I have
several times passed quite close to them, I have never been on any of
them, so cannot say whether they are parts of the sunken land still
above water, or whether they are the subsequent work of coral
insects. There is a.long stretch of very shallow water both north and
south of these islands with various channels of deeper water crossing
them, through which ships have to pass going to or from India.
This geological phenomenon has never been noted by
any geologist or archaeologist as far as I can ascertain or by any
historian. On days when conditions are favorable - that is, water and
sky -- imposing remains of ancient structures are clearly to be seen
on the shallow water within the oval mentioned. These submerged lands
are well known to the fisherman along the coast; as a matter of fact,
it was through them that I became aware of this submersion. Hindu
scientists also know of them; no one, however, can account for
structures being at the bottom of the ocean as the submergence is not
spoken of in Hindu history no matter how far one goes back. This is
not at all to be wondered at as Hindu history does not go further
back than 3000 B. C. In India, at various spots, there are hundreds
and maybe thousands of old tablets dating from some 15,000 to 35,000
years ago. The possibility is that if these old tablets were brought
out and deciphered, an account of this submersion might be
forthcoming.
The loss of the Mother Tongue and the
Motherland's form of writing was the result of the Ayran domination.
From the time the Aryans controlled the civilization of India, it
has gradually gone down to where it was found two hundred years ago.
It fell from the highest to almost the lowest rung in the ladder;
and, strange as it may appear, historians have placed the
commencement of the Hindu civilization at the. point where the actual
decline commenced about 4000 years ago.
What a travesty on facts and truth! These
submerged lands with their great structures are positive proof of
India's high civilization tens of thousands of years before the
rough, coarse Aryan hilimen of the Hindu Koosh trod the soil of the
Saraswatti Valley in India. Against the modern histories of India,
the ancient temple records carry the civilization of India, India the
Mother of Babyloma and Upper Egypt, back beyond 35,000 years.
I have never come across any references to
this submersion either in India or elsewhere, so the probability
remains that it took place during those five to seven thousand years
when apparently no history was being written in any part of the
world. Yet this submergence is a fact because the submerged
structures can be seen. To my mind, there is not the slightest doubt
what caused this submergence and that the present island of Ceylon
was raised through it.
ANCIENT INDIA. -India was not always called India. As a
matter of fact, India is a modern name for the peninsula; it has only
been called India for about 2300 to 2400 years. What the ancient name
of the Hindu peninsula was, or whether there was a name embodying the
whole of the peninsula, I do not know. In all the ancient records
which I have read, the Naga Empire, the Maharalta Kingdom and Dravida
are only mentioned. The name India came out of the Greek. When
the Greeks under Alexander the Great invaded India 325 B. C., they
found in the northwestern parts a large river which the natives
called Sindhu. The Greeks transformed the name, first to Indu,
afterwards to Hindu. Finally the river became known as the Indus and
the people as Hindus and Indians. This section of India is called
Sind today.
Ramayana***,** from Hippolyte
Fauche's translation: "The first people in India were Mayas who
had left the Motherland; they first went to Burma and there became
known as the Nagas. From Burma they established themselves in the
Deccan, India, and in India subsequently became known as the
Danavas.1
"The Mayas were mighty navigators whose
ships passed from the eastern to the western oceans and from the
southern to the northern seas in ages so remote that the sun had not
yet risen above the horizon.2
"That being learned architects, they
built great cities and palaces." This shows the exceedingly high
civilization of the Hindus at this very remote date.
"The Mayas likewise being great warriors, they conquered the
southern parts of the Hindustani Peninsula." This victory was
over the Tamils who called their country Dravida. This war took place
ten of thousands of years before the Aryans entered India. When,
thousands of years afterwards, India was split up into a number of
little kingdoms, the Taniils again gained their independence and
formed monarchies.
"The Maya adepts, the Naacals or Holy
Brothers, started from the land of their birth in the
east as missionaries of the religion and learning of the
Mother- land. They first went to Burma where they taught the 1 Naacal
writings in a Tibetan monastery state that the Mayas settled in India
over 70,000 years ago and were of a swarthy complexion with dark
piercing eyes.
"Had not risen above the horizon"
is a symbolical sentence. It does not refer to the celestial orb but
to the turning of the Hindu Maya colony into a colonial empire. With
the crown it had an escutcheon bestowed on it-a rising sun with rays
coming up on the horizon, showing the Empire to be under the
suzerainty of the Motherland-The Empire of the Sun. INDIA
155 Nagas. From Burma they established themselves in the
Dec- can, India, from whence they carried their religion
and learning to the colonies of Babylonia and
Egypt."
I never think of the Ramayana without
feeling that I am about to shake hands with an ancient friend.
Valmiki, the Hindu Herodotus, appeals to me more than any other Hindu
writer, possibly because it has been my fortunate lot to see so many
of the ancient writings from which his were taken. I can
mentally bridge the gulf of time between us and picture him sitting
at the feet of the old master, Narana, and like myself later
from another great master, deriving pearls of wisdom from the
ancient teachings. The Ramayana was written from temple
records and temple histories, dictated from the originals by
Narana to Valmiki. When Valmicki turned the tale of Rama and
Sita into verse he used poetic license. Thoroughiy to
understand it and to appreciate it, it should also be read in the
prose. To make things perfectly clear, I quote:
"Then Valmiki went to Narana, a Rishi,
one of the seven principal priests of India, and asked for the
history of Rama and Sita. Then Narana from the temple histories read
it to Valimiki."
From the history given him by Narana,
Valmiki wrote the verses forming the life of Rama and Sita, one
of the greatest epics ever penned by man. Valimiki would make
it appear in his verse that Rama was the son of the celestial
orb, but in his prose writings he carefully shows that
"Son of the Sun" does not mean a son of the celestial
orb but a son of the Motherland, The Empire of the Sun, a
colonial designation to which he was entitled being of the
royal family of the Motherland.
Although Rama and Sita is the
principal theme in Valmiki's writings, it is not the only one.
There is a great deal of history in prose. I quote from two
translations, the historical parts from Hippolyte Fauche, and Rama
and Sita from Romesh Dutt's.
"The synopsis of Rama and Sita is the
celebration of the life, wanderings, exploits of Rama, the love
of Rama for Sita his wife, the abduction of Sita by Ravana, the
demon king of Ceylon, the final overthrow of Ravana by Rama and
the return of Sita to Rama." Valmiki has indulged in a
great deal of symbolical writings in the poem which are fully
explained in other Hindu texts.
From Rama and Sita (Romesh Dutt's translation):
"Vain her threat and soft entreaty, Raven held her in
his
wrath,
As the planet Buddha, captures, fair Rokini in his path.
By his left hand, tremor shaken, Raksha held her streaming
hair,
By his right, the ruthless Raksha lifted high the fainting
fair.
Unseen dwellers of the woodland watched the dismal deed
with shame.
Marked the mighty armed Ra.ksha lift the poor and
helpless dame,
Seat her in his car celestial yoked with asses winged with
speed,
Golden in its shape and radiance, fleet as Indra's heavenly
steed.
Angry threat and sweet entreaty Raven to her ears
addressed,
As the struggling, fainting woman still he held upon his
breast.
Vain his threat and vain entreaty, "Rama! Rama!"
still she
cried,
To the dark and dismal forest where her noble lord had
hied.
Then arose the car celestial o'er the hill and wooded vale,
Like a snake in eagle's talons, Sita writhed with piteous
wail.3
"Still the dubious battle lasted, until Rama in his
ire,
Wielded Bralimin's dreadful weapon flaming with celestial
fire.
Winged as lightning, dart of Indra, fatal as the bolt of
heaven,
Wrapped in smoke and
flaming flashes, speeding from the
circle bow,
Pierced the iron heart of Raven, laid the lifeless
hero low."
3. Romesh Dutt evidently ran up against
the same obstacle in translation of this poem as everyone else has
who has tried. The passage "yoked to asses" involves
in the original a word hard to translate, because apparently we
have no corresponding word in our language. Romesh Dutt used
the word asses" but calls attention to it in the type. The
word used in the original evidently means a majestic power, or
force. Notwithstanding Romesh Dutt's masterly and wonderful
translation, there is a something insinuative in the original
that apparently cannot be translated into another language. By
translation the poem loses some of its beauty. Romesh Dutt's
translation is, however, the best ever written.
Hindu Manuscript, Date unknown
(B. C.): "When morning dawned, Rama, taking the celestial
car which Pushpaka had sent to him by Vivpishand, stood ready
to depart. Self-moving was that car; it was large
and finely painted. It had two stories and many chambers
with windows and was draped with flags and banners. It
gave forth a melodious sound as it coursed along its airy
way."
Hindu Manuscript, Dated 500 B.
C.: "Rawan, King of Ceylon(?), flew over the enemy's army
and dropped bombs, causing many casualties. Eventually Rawan was
captured and slain and his flying machine fell into the hands
of the Hindu chieftain Ram Chandra who flew it all the way back to
his capital Adjudhia in Northern India."
Without question both of these manuscripts
were taken from the same temple records at Ayhodia, as was the
Rama and Sita poem, referring back 20,000 years
ago.
Maha Bharata (1000 B. C.): Mention is made in this
ancient book of the "gift of a flying machine" by a king to
a brother monarch as a token of friendship. These are the most
detailed accounts I have found about airships of the Hindus
15,000 to 20,000 years ago, except one which is a drawing and
instructions for the construction of the airship and her
machinery, power, engine, etc. The power is taken from the
atmosphere in a very simple inexpensive manner. The engine is
somewhat like our present-day turbine in that it works from
one chamber into another until finally exhausted.
When the engine is once started it never stops until turned
off. it will continue on if allowed to do so until the bearings are
worn out. These ships could keep circling around the earth
without ever once coming down until the machinery wore out. The power
is unlimited, or rather limited only by what metals will stand. I
find various flights spoken of which according to our maps would run
from 1000 to 3000 miles. All records relating to these airships
distinctly state that they were self-moving, they propelled
themselves; in other words, they generated their own power as they
flew along. They were independent of all fuel. It seems to me, in the
face of this, and with all our boasting, we are about 15,000 to
20,000 years behind the times. Dropping bombs from airships is a new
sport with us, less than twenty years old; yet here we see that it
was done 15,000 to 20,000 years ago. Rawan was shot down with a
circular gun that spit fire and made thunder which is uncommonly like
some of our machine guns today. Yet the world is flattering itself
today that never before during the history of man has there ever been
such a brainy lot of scientists as are with us at the present time.
Pure egotism crowned with ignorance. I feel like the sage of old who
said: "There is nothing new under the sun." There are many
Chinese records of about the same date regarding these ancient flying
machines.
While modem Hindu historians look upon the
Ramayana and some other Hindu writings as myths, the Hindus
themselves do not: they know better; so do I. We know their
origin and from what they were taken. They are not myths; they are
histories written in the usual style of their time. They are,
generally speaking, extremely symbolical, and because historians have
failed to understand these symbolical writings, they have classed
them as myths.
Wheeler, "History of
India" (Vol. 3, pp. 56, 57), says: "Ihe Mayas became known
in after times as Nagas and Danavas." Wheeler might have been
more explicit and have said the Mayas came to India as Nagas and
afterward became known as Danavas.
"The traditions of the Nagas are
obscure in the extreme. They point, however, to an ancient Maya or
Naga Empire in the Deccan where the modem city of Nagpoor
stands."
The traditions of the Nagas are not so very
obscure. The Nagas formed the first Hindu Empire. Their first king
was called Ra Ma.4 At what date
the Empire commenced or at what date it ended, only traditions remain
and these, as Wheeler says, are obscure.
Tradition says that the Naga Empire commenced more than 35,000 years
ago. From various other legends I think this is conservative.
An empire followed the Naga and lasted 10,000 years. Some of the
temple records say that this empire ended about 3000 B. C., or
5000 years ago. Wheeler has fallen into the same error as
Chandler about the Nagas being serpent worshipers. Naga was the name
of the cobra de capella in the Motherland and was selected by these
people as their symbol of the Creator. They gave it seven heads to
correspond with the seven commands of the Creation and adopted
the name of Nagas for their distinction among the other people
of the Motherland whose symbol for the Creator was different
from their own.
***H. T. Colebrook,*** "Asiatic
Research" (Vol. 2, pp. 369, 476), says: "Maya (Prince
Maya) is considered the author of Souyra Siddhanta. Souyra
Siddhanta is the most ancient treatise on astronomy in India. Prince
Maya is represented as receiving his science from a partial
incarnation of the Sun."
Prince Maya was the son of one of the early
kings of the Naga Empire. Tradition says "he lived more than
20,000 years ago and when a young man went to the
Motherland to attend her colleges where he learnt his
sciences." This would account for the representation that he was
"A partial incarnation of the Sun." The word
"incarnation" is the wrong word.
"This work on which all Indian
astronomy is founded was discovered in Benares by Sir Robert
Chambers. It is a work of great antiquity, since it is attributed to
a Maya author whose astronomical rules show that he was well
acquainted with trigonometry, proving that obtuse sciences were
cultivated in these remote ages."
My personal opinion regarding the original
Souyra Siddhanta is that it was written in the
Motherland and brought to India by Prince Maya when he returned
from his studies.
**
The Rig Veda**. The Rig Veda is one of the old
Hindu books and is supposed to have been written about 1500
B.C. The meaning of the name is: Rig-verse, and Veda-
knowledge. Knowledge given in verse. The Rig Veda is
unquestionably written from two sources, namely, temple
histories and legends; therefore, the Rig Veda tells of the
then past and not of the then present, 1500 B. C. Some
of it unquestionably refers back tens of thousands of years as
it is found in the writings of the Motherland.
There are several remarkable passages in the
Rig Veda which correspond with the Sacred Inspired
Writings. As an example: "Desire was formed in His mind."
This refers to Creation. In the Popol Vuh, the
Quiche Sacred Book, written in Guatemala, Central America, also taken
from the Sacred Writings, it appears as: "First desire was
formed in His mind to create." In the Nahautl
writings of Yucatan it is given as "He expressed a desire to
create."
In the
Rig Veda is written: "He who measures out the light in
the atmosphere." In the Nahantl it is given: "In the
atmosphere which contains the light." In the Sacred
Writings: "The arrows of the Sun met the arrows of the earth in
her atmosphere and gave life to light."
I am definitely sure, although without
proof, that the original Rig Veda was composed by a Naacal
poet and was stolen by the Aryans who afterwards claimed it as their
own production. At the time the Rig Veda was written, the
Aryans were neither highly educated nor competent to write such
verse. The Naacals were. They were the adepts of the wisdom and
sciences of the Motherland.
I am not criticizing histories on modern
India. I am simply attempting to throw light on the writers of
the ancient history of India who have all, except Robertson,
evaded details about ancient India. They go back to the first
settlement of Aryans in India and make that the start of
India's civilization. When Indianologists decided on writing
histories of India, why did they base their history on myths
which are self-evident, instead of facts? The temples, most of them,
have some sort of records of the ancient past, some more, some less,
and a few none at all, so they say, but this is open to doubt. There
are numerous figures and bas-reliefs carved on walls throughout
India. Nearly every figure and group of figures is a tableau
describing some historical event. All these are lines in
history.
The foregoing is all sufficient to show
where the expressions found in the Rig Veda came from.
A. E. Smith, commenting on the
Vedic literature, says: "The age of the Vedic Literature
is unknown but it is exceedingly remote."
Here Smith is absolutely correct, for it is
"exceedingly remote," being translations from the
literature written in the Motherland and brought to India by the
Nancals, tens of thousands of years before. Historians say that the
Vedic literature was written by the Aryans. This is
impossible.The Aryans were not sufficiently cultivated and
advanced to compose such verse at the time the Rig Veda was
written. The Aryans did not become known as scholars until a sect
known as Brahmins began to form colleges of their own based on the
teachings they had received from the Naacals before they drove them
out of India. And what extravagances did these Brahmins introduce
into the pure religion taught by the Naacals? Let us
read:
***Vamana,*** one of the Hindu
Sages. Vamana has many scornful and bitter words for the Brahrnin
ritualists and ascetic devotees who set their hopes of
salvation upon formal ceremonies. "What are you better for
smearing your body with ashes? Your thoughts should be set on
God alone; for the rest, an ass can wallow in the dirt as well as
you." "Oh, ye asses! Why do you make balls of food and give
them to the crows in the name of your ancestors? How can a
dung-eating crow be an ancestor of yours?"
W. Robertson, "An
Historical Disquisition, India," published 1794, page 247,
says: "While among the Greeks and Romans the only method used
for the notation of numbers was by the letters of the alphabet,
which necessarily rendered arithmetical calculations
extremely tedious and operose. The Indians had from time
immemorial employed for the same purpose the ten cyphers, or,
figures, now universally known, and by means of them performed every
operation in arithmetic with the greatest facility and
expedition.
"The Arabians (Moors) introduced the
mode of notation into Europe. Men of business relinquished the
former method of computation by letters, and the Indian arithmetic
came into general use in Europe."5
Page 249: "The epoch of these
astronomical tables is of high antiquity and coincides with the
beginning of the celebrated era of the Calyouhan or Collee
Jaque which commenced according to the Indian account 3102 B.
C."6 of cosmogony and acquired the knowledge of
astronomy.
"The Brahmins, it is well known,
borrowed their system as well as all other sciences of
civilization, from the highly civilized Nagas, whom
afterwards they relentlessly persecuted." Page 254. Here
Robertson again refers to "The early and high civilization of
India. It is accordingly, for those very remote ages, about
5000 years distant from the present time, that their astronomy
is most accurate and the nearer we come to our time, the
conformity of its results with ours
diminishes."
Here it is plainly seen that the Brahmins
were responsible for dragging India down from her foremost place
among nations. It is here illustrated that when the wisdom and
teachings of the Nagas were withdrawn the Brahmins at once
commenced a downward fall in the sciences, giving evidence that
is incontrovertible that the persecution and driving out of the
Naga scientists, the teachers of the Brahmins, was the death knell to
India's supremacy in the sciences and her high position among
nations. When the Nagas could stand the persecution no longer, those
who could took their books and records and went into the mountains on
the north, settling in monasteries on the southern slopes of
the Himalayas. Subsequently they were forced to take another
step further north. They then settled in Tibet on the northern slopes
of the Himalayas. Very few remained in the south.
Page 298: "From this long induction,
the conclusion which seems obvious is that the Indian astronomy is
founded on observations which were made at a very early
period, and when we consider the exact agreement of the
places which they assign to the sun, moon and other heavenly bodies
at that epoch with those deduced from the tables of De La Caille and
Mayer, it strongly confirms the truth of the position which I have
been endeavoring to establish concerning ***the early and high
state of civilization in India." ***
The foregoing confirms my own research work.
It is clearly and distinctly shown that the civilization of India
ranked amongst the foremost in the world, thousands and tens of
thousands of years ago, tens of thousands of years before the
Aryans made a settlement in India; it clearly and distinctly shows
that the Aryans were inferior in civilization, arts and sciences to
the highly civilized Nagas into whose country they entered; it is
clearly and distinctly shown that the Aryans obtained their
civilization and what arts and sciences they knew from the Nagas. The
Brahmin priesthood first learnt what they could and then
persecuted the Nagas to extinction.
M. De Voltaire, "The Hist. & State of all
nations," A. D. 1758, Vol. 3, page 13: "The school of the
ancient gymosophists was still subsisting in the great city of
Benares on the banks of the Ganges. There the Brahmins
cultivated the Sacred language, which they call Hanferit, and
look upon it as the most ancient of all the east. They
admit of genii, like the primitive Persians. They tell their
disciples that idols are made only to fix the attention of the
people and are different emblems of the deity; but as
this sound theology would turn to no profit they
concealed it from the people and leave them in their ignorance in
which they find their own account. It seems as the heat of southern
climates rendered the inhabitants more inclined to superstition and
enthusiasm than other countries."
This needs no further comment on my part
having heretofore shown what the Brahminitical Priesthood were. It,
however, strongly confirmed Robertson and my own
researches.
The
Manava-dharma Sastra, according to Chezy, was written
130O B. C. from very ancient works of the Brahmins. To me it
seems unquestionable that Chezy is wrong about its being written from
"very ancient works of the Brahmins." This is
without question another Naacal work. The work refers to times
thousands upon thousands of years before the Brahmins developed in
India. Competent Hindu sages tell me that this book refers to times
more than 20,000 years ago. This I have corroborated by tablets
found in temples. The Brahmins may have stolen it and published it as
their own.
The Maha Bharata is one of the
great Hindu epics. Apparently it was written about 1000 B. C. Its
author is unknown. I have been unable to find any temple
histories from which this may have been taken. In all
probability the basis of it was legendary. It recounts the
great war the Bharatas fought during the 13th and 14th
Centuries B. C. between Kurus, whose ancient kingdom was situated
along the Upper Ganges, and Panchatas of a neighboring tribe.
Kaurarus and Pandavas fought for the capital city of Hastinapur. The
following is another headline which I have found condensing the
details of the Bharata war: "The Kavarus, the 100 sons of
Dhritarashtra, led by Durgodhana, made war against the Pandavas, the
5 sons of Pandu, the brother of Dhritarashtra, who was led by
Yudhishthira."
***The Maha Bharata*** having been
written 1000 B. C. and the Bharata war having occurred 1400-1500 B.
C. shows the book to have been written 500 years after the event,
therefore upon legendary records. The Maha Bharata like
the Ramayana has not remained in its original form.
Alterations have been made and many additions to the original
writings. It would seem that, although the great theme of the Maha
Bharata was the Bharata war, it includes other events as
well.
Omen's translation, page 118,
says: "Now Maya was the chief architect of the
Danavas." Maya, the great architect and scientist, was a Prince
of the Nagas, subsequently call Danavas, of the First Colonial
Indian Empire dating back for over 20,000 years.
Page 133: "Arjama carried war against a
tribe of the Danavas, the Nivata-Kavachas, who were very
powerful numbering 30,000,000 people whose principal city was
Hiranypura."
As these date back to very ancient times
they are in all probability two of the additions made to the
original. The Nivata-Kavachas being Danavas, were Nagas; and being
Nagas they were Mayas.
Hiranypura is a word composed of
Naga-Maya vocables and means "the home of those who dwell on the
ocean," navigators and sailors. One of the western seaports of
the Motherland was called Hiranypura. The remains of this city
are still to be seen on the Caroline Islands. This city was
lost some 12,000 to 13,000 years ago with the destruction of the
Motherland. I have added this note to carry recorded Indian
history back over 10,000 years beyond the date of Hindu
authorities. As a matter of fact, written records in a northern
monastery carry the civilization of India back more than 50,000
years. This corresponds with what is found written in Yucatan. Like
Egypt, "there never was a time of savagery in India from
which civilization might have been developed." India was the
pearl on the brow of the Motherland. This does not entirely agree
with many Hindu historians, so I must disagree with them on the
grounds that I have studied the subject before writing about
it.
The Dzyan is a Hindu book written in Sanskrit about
1500 B. C. The book is accredited to the Brahmins and it
certainly looks like their work. In this book the Naacal copies of
the Sacred Inspired Writings of the Motherland have been taken
as a base to work on. The Dzyan is the worst incomplete and the most
ambiguous ancient work I have ever come across. It takes the Sacred
Writings and with evident deliberateness misinterprets and adds to
them. Misstatements permeate the whole text. The book reads as if it
had been designed to breed distrust, fear and superstition in the
people. There is very little symbolism in it. It is, rather, filled
up with comparisons, unphilosophical and absolutely one-sided.
No point is proven. Most sentences read like the headline of a
chapter, leaving the chapter unwritten. There is no continuity
of subjects, which leaves the whole thing indefinite. If the writer
was only committing stray thoughts to writing, he admirably
succeeded, but to follow the workings of his mind by his writings is
absolutely impossible. If it was a work written with a view to
breeding schisms and sects, without doubt it is
admirable.
Let us be generous. Did the writer know
himself what he meant? What he was driving at? I doubt it. To me it
looks like the writings of a disordered brain, wandering about in a
fog. There is a fantastic tendency throughout with mythical thoughts
ruling the mind and a leaning towards the Cosmic Sciences which he
did not understand in the least, as is shown by the following: Sloka
9: "Light is a cold flame, a flame is fire, fire produces heat,
and heat produces life." In the Sacred Writings it is
particularly shown that light is an earthly force, not an
element. Flames are superheated elements passing off in the form of
gases after an analysis of the material by the earth's heat force.
Life is produced by the combination of two forces working on an
elementary body. Another paragraph: "Heat produces
water." Heat is a force, water is composed of two elements,
forces do not make or produce elements.
Pages of such nonsense can be taken from the
Dzyan equaling in absurdity the foregoing Sloka.
THE SACRED INSPIRED BOOKS: THE BOOKS OF THE
GOLDEN AGE.
-"The Books of the Golden
Age" is an Oriental name given to "The Sacred
inspired Writings" of Mu, the Motherland. Among all
ancient people and people of great antiquity they were also
called The Sacred Mysteries. The reading of these books was known
only to masters, high priests, and some selected priests. Neither the
lower members of the priesthood nor the people could read them.
Many chapters in these books or writings have been
horribly mutilated by unscrupulous priests for purposes of their own,
so that misconceptions and inventions have been handed down for
thousands of years. Sir Edwin Arnold in the opening
chapter of his charming epic, The Light of Asia, hit the
nail squarely on the head where he says: "The extravagances
which disfigure (religions) are to be referred to that
inevitable degradation which priesthoods always inflict upon great
ideas committed to their charge." "Religions
invariably become discordant in frequent particulars and sorely
overlaid by corruptions, inventions and
misconceptions."
Had Sir Edwin been capable of deciphering,
translating, and reading The Books of the Golden Age which he
refers to as "The Books" he would without question have
expressed his feelings in still stronger language. The Hindu
priesthood were not alone and some were even worse, we have
only to look at the records of the Egyptians, Phoenicians and Aztecs
to see this confirmed. In many cases it is very apparent that the
Hindu priesthood's object was to breed mystification superstition and
awe in the hearts of the people and so bring them, body and
soul, under priestly control. The priesthood would give a part only
of what was written on a tablet, declaring it to be the Sacred
Inspired Writings.
I have made an accusation against the
priesthood, it is, therefore, only right that I should prove my
assertion. To do this I will give a few examples of what is actually
written in the Sacred Writings and what the priesthood,
subsequent to the driving out of the Naacals, have
given out to the people. My first example will be an extract
from the Section on Creation:
"Let us make man after our own fashion
and let us' and endow him with powers to rule the earth."
Created man and placed within his body a living imperishable
part or spirit, and man became like the Creator in
intellectual powers." Thus showing that man is a special
creation.
I must now take another extract from the
Sacred Writings, also coming out of the Section on Creation.
MAN'S LENGTH OF LIFE.
-- Extravagant lengths of lives have been doled
out by the priesthood for the purpose of accomplishing their own
ends; which was, receiving payment from those who wished to prolong
their lives beyond the ordinary period assigned to man. It worked
well, fortunes rolled into the priesthood's coffers, and if the man
did not live as long as paid for, it was his own fault because he did
not follow implicitly the priestly instructions.
"Man may live a thousand
years." This extravagance was handed out to the people
thousands of years ago and has been religiously brought down to
present time. The people have been taught that it was their material
body that could be made to thus survive if they would follow
the instructions of the priesthood and pay a little for it-just a
little, only all the worldly wealth they possessed. The complete
translation of this tablet reads: "Man may live a thousand
years. It is The Man, the Divine Spark which thus survives but
not his material body; that returns to mother earth." When Moses
translated this sentence he put the right construction on it. He
translated it as: "The span of man's life is three score and ten
years," etc., etc
When Valmiki, the Hindu Herodotus,
wrote his wonderful epic the Ramayana, he made omissions from
the original which entirely changed the meaning. I refer to the
passage where he says: "And Rama reigned 10,000 years."
Valmiki left out the preceding words "the descendants of."
The old Rishi and I deciphered either the original tablet or an old,
old copy of it. This tablet says: "And the descendants of Ram
Chandra sat upon his throne for 10,000 years." In other words,
it was the Rama Dynasty that lasted 10,000 years and not the reign of
the first Rama.
"By His will the Almighty created all things." Upon
this passage they advanced and taught the theory that Every thing
was a part of the Creator Himself, which naturally means there is
no God when everything is God. This being the case the worship of a
piece of wood or stone is not idolatry because the piece of
wood or stone is God. And the cannibalistic savage when worshiping
his fetish is all right because his fetish is our God! Can a more
horrible conception be conceived?
The
Sacred Inspired Writings distinctly state and frequently reiterate
that Man only has been made a part of the Creator; then,
not the material body but the soul or the Divine Spark
that exists within the material body. All creations, other than
man, are mere works or products of the will of the
Creator. A picture is the product of the artist, but not a part of
the artist himself. A box is the product of the carpenter, but not a
part of the carpenter himself. A seed sown in the ground by the
gardener, germinates, shoots up and bears flowers and fruit.
The flowers and fruit are not a part of the gardener, they are the
product of his work. A tree sends forth leaves and flowers,
these leaves and flowers are a part of the tree. So here
on earth, all and everything except man are products of the
Creator's work and not parts of the Creator himself. Man only is the
leaf upon the tree.
**AN
INVENTION.**
One of the
rankest of the early Brahminitical teachings was: "Man
started from nothing, then became a grass, then followed to a
fish, from a fish he became an amphibian, from the amphibian he
advanced to the reptile, from a reptile he became a mammal and
from a mammal man was produced." The passage from the
Sacred Inspired Writings from which this invention was
worked out reads: "From Mother Earth the material body
comes and to Mother Earth it returns." In these teachings they
do not show how man became possessed of a soul-they could
not.
A careful comparison of the old
Brahminitical books and writings with the Sacred Inspired Writings
dearly shows why there are so many sects and divergent
religious opinions in India. Most of them widely different from
the religion brought to them by the Naacals. It generally
arose from their taking sentences out of paragraphs. Tens of
thousands of years have passed since the original Sacred
Writings were etched on clay tablets. Each time they have been
translated since leaving the hands of the Naacals, greater and
more numerous inventions, extravagances, additions, omissions
and misconceptions have been engrafted into the translations by the
cunning, unscrupulous priesthoods. Another example of priestly infamy
is shown in the early Buddhist priesthood of Northern
India.
**THE EARLY
BUDDHIST PRIESTHOOD OF NORTHERN INDIA**.
With a view to enslaving the people, both
body and soul, to the aggrandizement of the priesthood, further
to gain absolute control over the minds and worldly possessions, the
priesthood invented obtuse doctrines and used them in place of
the simple, pure and plain teachings of Guatama Buddha. They
turned the Buddhist religion in Northern India into a
metaphysical, mystical, mythical doctrine which not one in a
thousand could understand.
The
priesthood invented a succession of earthly Buddhas with a series of
counterparts called Dhyani Buddhas with spiritual emanations called
Dhyani Bodhisattvas. Later to complete their program by adding fear
and dread to awe and superstition, they introduced into the
Buddhist religion the degrading worship of Siva, the mythical
man-devil in connection with a mythical hell. Egypt had taught
India a great lesson with its man-devil Set and his mythical hell.
The Hindus were not slow in any way to see the great advantage a
devil and a hell would be to them.
**THE ORIGIN
OF VIRGIN BIRTH.**
The
origin of an immaculate conception and virgin birth is to be
found in the Sacred Inspired Writings. It originates from the
5th Command in Creation, "From these cosmic eggs life
came forth as commanded." In a subsequent chapter
explaining Creation, cosmic eggs are referred to as "the
Virgins of Life." The sentence reads: "Hol Hu
Kal." Hol: closed. Hu: virgin womb. Kal: to open. Free reading:
to pierce or open the virgin womb; and by extension: to pierce or
open the virgin womb of Life. For this reason the ancients called the
waters "The Mother of Life," for up to this period of
the earth's development the womb of Life had been closed.
The advent of Life had opened the virgin womb in the
waters.
Later,
when the Four Great Primary Forces were given the names of Gods
by the ancients in their theogony, they made them of immaculate
birth to correspond with the teachings of the Sacred Writings;
namely, that first life, either of the gods or nature, came from the
result of Hol Hu Kal.
Upon this ancient conception modem
priesthoods have invented immaculate conceptions and virgin births
for various men who have lived. Our learned scholars tell us that the
ancient kings claimed virgin birth because they called
themselves "Son of the Sun." These kings claimed
nothing of the kind, they were emperors of colonial empires
under the suzerainty of Mu, the Empire of the Sun, and "Son of
the Sun" was a title bestowed on these kings by Mu, thus
showing their allegiance to her. "Son of the Sun" meant son
or child of the Empire of the Sun.
**THE FIRST
RELIGION.**
****The
Sacred Inspired Books were written for the purpose of teaching
early man religion; therefore, man's first religion was the
teachings of the Sacred Books. The basis of this religion was
Love. Man's Love for the Heavenly Father and His works. The
Divine Love of the Heavenly Father for His son Man.
Every
teaching was plain and simple without a particle of theology. The
most ignorant could understand every phrase in it. There was nothing
of any kind indefinite. It was impossible not to understand it
thoroughly. Man was taught to approach the Heavenly Father, not
with fear or dread, but with confidence, and above all, Love: as a
child would run to its earthly father who is standing
with outstretched arms to receive it. Love stood at the head
of the 12 great virtues, because Love governs the
Universe and the Heavenly Father is The Great Love.
After studying the teachings of these
writings, if I were asked, "Where is God's greatest temple on
earth?" I should answer: "In the heart of man; the perfect
temple for the adoration of God; the perfect temple for silent
meditation and Love; the temple available at all times and in
all places, any hour of the day or night, whether it be in crowded
city or desert plain, for the Love and Adoration of the
Heavenly and the temple where man can become at one with the Heavenly
Father." Tell me, what other temple can fill its
place?
**THE TWO
GREAT SYMBOLS.** There were many symbols for the various
attributes of the Deity, but only two for the full Godhead. The
perfect understanding of these two great symbols is an
important factor in tracing the various lines of colonization
from the Motherland. The Sun and the adorned Serpent were the two
symbols.
The Sun was the most sacred because it was
the collective or monotheistic symbol. The adorned Serpent was
the symbol of the Deity as the Creator only. As the monotheistic
symbol of the Deity, the Sun was called Ra and sometimes written La.
When the Sun was spoken of and referred to as the celestial orb
it was given its name according to the language of the country.
Originally the Sun was pictured as a plain circle. Later the circle
was used for other symbolizations such as The Universe,
Infinity, etc; then, to specialize it as the monotheistic symbol,
additions were made to it. The Nagas added a dot in the center and
the Uighurs, their northern neighbors, a smaller circle instead of a
dot.
The adorned Serpent as before stated was the
symbol of the Deity as the Creator. The Nagas selected the
cobra de capella and gave it 7 heads to correspond with the 7
Commands in Creation. This symbol was apparently used from the
southern half of the western shores of the Motherland, inland
how far there is no telling. To the north of the Naga region, a
conventional form of the QuetzacoatL was used which they called Khan
or King. This form is known as the Dragon. On the eastern central,
and to the north, the venomous feather-covered serpent,
Quetzalcoatl, was the symbol. Among the people who settled in
western North America we find many variations in the
conventional forms of Quetzalcoatl.
Following the two Suns mentioned and the
forms of Serpents, goes a long way in telling us who any particular
ancient people were originally. It is a foundation to work on and
distinctly shows us where they commingled.
**THE ARYAN
INVASION OF INDIA**.
AIl
historians speak of "The Aryan Invasion of India."
This has been misleading to the public, for the public
generally has been left with the idea that the Aryans sent an army of
soldiers into India and conquered the country. This was not so. The
same misconceptions have been taught about the Incas of Peru
who superseded the Aymaras. Instead of the word invasion being used,
the more appropriate word would have been infiltration which would
have given a correct explanation.
The first Aryans in India were a small
company who left the bleak mountain valleys of the Hindu Koosh and
came down into India. They settled among the Nagas 7 in
the valley of the Saraswatti River in the Punjab. They were received
kindly by the Nagas and made welcome, so they sent back word to
the mountains for their relatives and friends to come. They
came, not a laggard among them; and they kept coming for hundreds of
years, by families, by scores, and by hundreds; and as they came, the
newcomers settled to the east of the previous ones until they
had completely overrun the land and settled themselves
through out the whole of the northern parts of India.
Hindu historians disagree as to the date
when the Aryans fist came to India. B. G. Tillac says:
"The Aryan Invasion of India took place 6000 B. C. to 4000
B. C.," a slight difference of 2000 years. V. A.
Smith entirely disagrees with Tillac and says: "The
Aryans first commenced to come to India 1500 B. C." For certain
rea sons hereafter given, I believe that Smith is much nearer
right than Tillac.
These Aryans subsequently became known as
the Hindu Aryans. The Medes and the Persians commenced to
leave their mountain homes in the neighborhood of about 1800 B.
C. to 1600 B. C. and completed their exodus about 1500 B. C. The
Hindu Aryans were the descendants of a company of Uighurs who
were marooned in the mountains of Afghanistan near the Hindu Koosh
when the mountains were raised. The Medes and Persians were a
continuation of these in the north.
For thousands of years they had existed in
these bleak, inhospitable parts. During this time they had so
multiplied that these mountain valleys could not sustain the
ever increasing population. Then they followed down the
mountains until they came to the fertile plains and valleys of India.
Being well received by the inhabitants, they stayed and sent
for the rest to come along. Owing to their hand-to-mouth existence in
the mountains, they were exceedingly hardy but low in education. In
their bitter struggles to sustain life, all learning and
sciences were neglected. Apparently they retained the art of
reading and writing only, so that on their arrival in India, they
were only rough, uncouth, hardy mountaineers.
As the
migrations of the Aryans streamed down into the plains of India
through Afghanistan and Kashmir, continuing for hundreds of years,
they gradually obtained possession of the land along the whole of
Northern India. Thus they crowded out the aborigines, the Nagas. This
meant a displacement of population because there was no war or
slaughter. The aborigines had to clear out. What became of
them? Where did they go? A great many intermarried with the Aryans so
that there was a mixture and produced a type which is very prominent
in India today. This mixture is now classed among the Aryans.
What became of those who did not marry and were crowded out? I
can find neither record nor legend that is acceptable. I will give
what appears to be a reasonable deduction. It must, however, be
thoroughly understood that these are deductions, not assertions. They
may or may not be correct.
The ancient Maharatta Kingdom first extended
from the northern boundary of India to an unrecorded point south. The
next time the Maharattas appear on the stage of India's history is
when they are located in what is now called Central India, having
been crowded out this far south by the encroaching Aryans. At
this time the Maharatta Kingdom had as its capital city Gwalior.
Rajputana the Kingdom extended down to Goa. There is a Sanskrit
writing saying that the Maharattas were driven thus far south
by the Aryans. I think the word "driven" is an error, and
the words "crowded out" would better convey the actual
meaning. I think as the Aryans crowded in from the Hindu Koosh,
the Maharattas gradually went farther south. The Maharattas
again come into prominence A. D. 1650 to A. D. 1680 when they
broke the power of the Mongul conquerors of India. From the time of
Savaji, the Mohammedan power declined.
The Maharattas were in India when the Aryans
first began to arrive. Their traditions say they were among
the first corners to India. The Maharattas are not of the Aryan
stock but belong to the Nagas, so that in the Maharattas we find the
descendants of the first people who occupied Northern India.
Intermarriages may have changed much of their blood but the stock is
Naga. No date can be given of the first Maharatta Kingdom. It was,
however, back beyond 10,000 years ago. Legends seem to indicate
that the first Maharatta Kingdom was contemporary with the
adjoining Ra Ma Empire which apparently succeeded the Naga
Empire.
Another
small Hindu colony found in the Madras Presidency at Gotakamund in
the Nilgiri Hills has all the earmarks of the ancient Nagas. They are
known as Tudas. Their number is small, less than 2000, and they
are steadily disappearing. They are a white, handsome race,
tall and athletic, with Roman noses, beautiful teeth, large
full expressive eyes. They never wear any head covering but let the
hair grow six to seven inches long so that it forms a thick,
bushy mass of curls around the head. They are honest, brave,
inoffensive and live as herdsmen. They have a temple which is
dedicated to Truth. They look upon the Brahmins with scorn and
contempt; probably on account of the past.
In the
Kashmir Valley there is a secluded people known as Nayas who still
worship the Deity through the symbol Naga, the seven-headed
Serpent. Are these Nayas of Kashmir a still surviving,
pure-blooded remnant of the ancient Nagas? I have never had the
opportunity of getting their history or legends. These people
may be the descendants of a small company who left India under the
persecution of the Aryans and took refuge in the Kashmir Mountains.
It would be interesting to know their origin.
As previously stated, the Brahmins, after
gaining what knowledge they were capable of absorbing from the
Naacals, persecuted them. Robertson says "to extinction."
This is only partially true. It is true that they drove them out of
all temples, colleges and educational institutions but not to
absolute extinction, for many went north into the Himalayan
Mountains and to the mountains beyond in Central Asia, and these
formed colleges of their own out beyond the world, so to speak. The
descendants of a few, very few, are still in existence. Among these
very few there are those who have managed to maintain and retain some
of the sciences and learning of the Earth's First Civlization. Those
retained have been principally about the science of man's great
Divine Force; the other sciences have either been neglected or
forgotten.
**PATALA.** ***Pundit Dayanand Saraswatti and Swami
Vive Kananda*** in their writings assert that the Nagas came to
India from Patala and that Patala means antipodes, directly opposite,
on the other side of the earth. I must take exception to this
definition of the word Patala by these learned Hindus. Without doubt
the Nagas came from Patala, but Patala does not mean antipodes. The
word Patala, is composed of three Naga vocables. Two are of the
Motherland's vocabulary and the third is a Naga modification of
the Motherland's.
Pa or Paa-cover over, extend over-by extension- shine
over.
ta-ground, place,
where.
La-the Sun. Both the Nagas and the Mayas occasion ally called
the Sun La instead of Ra. Pata1a, therefore, means "The
Land of the Sun" which was one of the names given to Mu,
the Motherland.
When the capital city of Babylonia was built
by the Akkadians and Sumerians, they called it La Ka
which means The City of the Sun and, by extension, The City
of the Lord. When Alexander the Great was compelled to turn
back from his intended conquest of India, he built a port for
reentry at the head of the Indus Delta and called it Patala.
This city still remains but modernized in both structure and
name. It is now called Tatta.
Footnotes...
Naacal writings in a Tibetan Monastery
state that the Mayas settled in India over 70,000 years ago and were
of a swarthy complexion with dark piercing eyes.
"Had not risen above the
horizon" is a symbolical sentence. It does not refer to the
celestial orb but to the turning of the Hindu Maya Colony into a
colonial empire. With the crown it had an escutcheon bestowed on it
-- a rising sun with rays coming up on the horizon, showing the
Empire to be under the suzerainty of the Motherland -- The Empire of
the Sun. 3. Footnote (in copy above) 4 See footnote page
5 The ten cyphers, figures or glyphs did
not originate in India. They originated in the Motherland and
were there known as the "cardinal numbers" and also
carried an esoteric meaning which translated was "The
Creation of Man by the One God." 6 The year 3102 B.C., or
about 5000 years ago, is one hundred years at least BEFORE the
Aryans made their first small settlement in the Saraswatti
Valley.
7.Maharatta Nagas.
Dean... Following is the specific chapter
on the destroyed UIGHUR EMPIRE, whose remnants thousands of years
later came down from the mountains to become the ARYANS, the MEDES,
the PERSIANS and other peoples, different streams leaving the
mountains at different times going to different locations, according
to Churchward....
****CHAPTER 13 "Children of
MU"
THE GREAT UIGHUR
EMPIRE
The Great Uighur Empire was the largest and
most important colonial empire belonging to Mu, The Empire
of the Sun. Next to Mu herself, the Uighur Empire was the
largest empire the world has ever known.
The eastern boundary of the Uighur Empire
was the Pacific Ocean. The western boundary was about
where Moscow in Russia now stands, with outposts
extending through the central parts of Europe to the Aflantic
Ocean. The northern boundary is undefined by record but probably
extended to the Arctic Ocean in Asia. The southern boundary was
Cochin China, Burma, India and a part of Persia.
The history of the Uighurs is the history of
the Aryan races, for all of the true Aryan races descended
from Uighur forefathers. The Uighurs formed chains of
settlements across the central parts of Europe back in Tertiary
Times. After the Empire was destroyed by the great magnetic
cataclysm and mountain raising, the surviving remnants of humanity or
their descendants again formed settlements in Europe. This was during
the Pleistocene Time. The Slavs, Teutons, Celts, Irish,
Bretons and Basques are all descended from Uighur stock.
The Bretons, Basques, and genuine Irish are the descendants
of those who came to Europe in Tertiary Times. The
descendants of those who survived the magnetic cataclysm and
mountain raising.
At the
time the Uighur Empire was at its peak, the mountains had not
been raised and what is now the Gobi Desert was a rich well-watered
plain. Here the capital city of the Uighurs was situated,
almost due south from Lake Baikal. In 1896 a party of
explorers, upon information received in Tibet, visited the site
of the ancient city of Khara Khota. They had been told that the
Uighur capital city lay under the ruins of Khara Khota. They
dug through these ruins and then through a stratum of boulders,
gravel and sand fifty feet in thickness, and finally came upon the
ruins of the capital city. They unearthed many relics but, their
money giving out, they had to abandon their enterprise. They met the
Russian archaeologist Kosloif and told him of their find.
Subsequently, Kosloff formed an expedition and continued their work
at Khara Khota. Kosloff gave a report of his findings which I have
already given in The Lost Continent of Mu.
Legends all through Oriental countries say:
"The whole of Central Asia including the Himalayan Mountains was
at one time a fiat, cultivated land of fertile fields, forests, lakes
and rivers, with magnificently constructed roads and highways
connecting the various cities and towns with each other. These were
well built cities, huge temples and public institutions, elaborate
private houses and palaces of the rulers." Today are to be
distinctly seen in the Gobi Desert the dried-up beds of rivers,
canals and lakes in those parts of the Desert where the cataclysmic
waters did not wash away all the soil down to bare rocks. There are
several of these washed-off areas in the Gobi Desert.
Legendary history gives all sorts of
conflicting dates as to when the Uighurs were in power. Fortunately,
we do not need to rely on legends, for in one of the Tibetan
monasteries are some Naacal writings. I quote from one: "The
Naacals, 70,000 years ago, brought to the Uighur capital cities
copies of the Sacred inspired Writings of the Motherland."
Legendary history states that the Uighurs from the Motherland made
their first settlement in Asia, somewhere on the coast of the Yellow
Sea of today. "From there they extended themselves inland. Their
first exodus was to a flat well-watered plain (the Gobi)." After
this records are found of them all through Central Asia to the
Caspian Sea. Then through Central Europe to the Atlantic Ocean.
Written records tell us that the Uighurs had
many large cities. Today these are either washed away or buried under
the sands of the Gobi and surrounding lands.
Some Chinese records, bearing a date of 500
B. C., describe the Uighurs as having been "light-haired,
blue-eyed people." "The Uighurs were all of a light
complexion, milk-white skins, with varying color of eyes and hair. In
the north blue eyes and light hair predominated. In the south were
found those with dark hair and dark eyes."
I will now consider the following: The cause
and date of the destruction of the Uighur capital city.
The cause of the rich, fertile Gobi becoming
a desert, and at what period in the earth's history it became a
desert of sand and desolation.
An ancient record in a monastery states:
"The capital city of the Uighurs with all its people was
destroyed by a flood which extended throughout the eastern part of
the Empire, destroying all and everything." This ancient record
is absolutely corroborated by geological phenomena:
From
the roofs of the capital city up to the foundations of an ancient
Khara Khota the stratum is composed of boulders, gravel and sand, the
work of water as acknowledged by all geologists throughout the world.
This flood unquestionably was the north running wave of the Last
Magnetic Cataclysm, the Biblical "Flood." Back in the 80's
I was with an expedition making a geological investigation from a
point south of Lake Baikal to the mouth of the Lena River and to the
islands beyond in the Arctic Ocean. Our examinations along the route
disclosed the fact that some thousands of years before a huge
cataclysmic wave of water without ice had passed over this area,
traveling from south to north. We found no traces of this flood
beyond the 110� East of Greenwich, but we found the evidences of
this wave to the limit of our easterly travels. We did not find a
single ice marking in any part of Siberia that we covered, that could
in any way be connected with this wave. Everywhere the proofs were
positive that the wave had passed from south to north. The valley of
the Lena appeared to be the main course of the water.
Off from the mouth of the Lena is Llakoff's
Island. This island is composed of the bones and tusks of mammoths
and other forest animals which had been swept up from the Mongolian
and Siberian plains by the flood and carried to this, their final
resting place. In these bones we find a confirmation that no ice
accompanied the wave, for had there been, their bodies and bones
would have been mashed into a pulp, and as in eastern North America,
no remains of them would be found and Liakoff's Island never
formed.
Geologically this flood occurred at the time
that geology claims that there was a glacial period in the Northern
Hemisphere. The records tell us that the eastern half of the Uighur
Empire, including the capital city and all of the living things on
the land, were destroyed and wiped out, but that the western and
southwestern parts were left untouched.
Mountains intersect Central Asia in all
directions and are especially numerous around and through the parts
which comprised the Uighur Empire. Sometime after the flood, I have
found no record telling us how long the mountains were raised. As the
mountains went up, the land was literally shaken and torn to pieces
by earthquakes when the rocks were raised out of the bowels of the
earth, with here and there volcanoes belching out their fiery streams
of lava thus adding to the general destruction. How many of the
remaining Uighurs, after the flood, survived the destruction caused
by the raising of the mountains, cannot be estimated, but very few.
This has always been the case in all areas where mountains have been
raised in all parts of the earth. The history of a few remnants of
the Uighurs that survived, that escaped with their lives in the
mountains as they went up, is told in another chapter. The various
mountains running through and around the Gobi changed its watersheds.
The broken condition of the rocks underneath drained the water from
the surface and formed underground rivers. With all water gone from
the surface, the Gobi became what we find it today, a sandy, rocky,
inhospitable waste. Without question water can be found today within
a few feet of the surface in the sandy areas. We found water from 7
to 10 feet below the surface.
Legendary history states that the Uighurs
extended themselves all through the central parts of Europe.
The Book of Manu, an ancient Hindu book, says:
"The Uighurs had a settlement on the northern and eastern shores
of the Caspian Sea." This was probably the migration spoken of
by Max Muller as having taken place during the
Pleistocene, the second migration of Uighurs into Europe. It
seems to me unquestionable that the early settlers in eastern Europe,
as they are called by scientists, were remnants of Uighurs that found
their way out from the inhospitable mountains. This seems verified by
Max Miller, who wrote: "The first Caucasians were a small
company from the mountains of Central Asia." He further states
that they came to the Caucasian plains during the Pleistocene,
therefore, after the mountains were raised. As before stated,
the Uighurs were in Europe before the raising of the
mountains. Many of the Central Asiatic tribes today count their time
from the raising of the mountains.
In
The Last Continent of Mu I have shown some symbolical pictures
photographed by Kosloff at Khara Khota. I also give their
decipherings.
TIBET
-Tibet lies in Central Asia. It is bounded on the
east by China, on the north by Mongolia, on the south by India, and
on the west by Kashmir and Turkestan. The Gobi Desert is a part of
the northern boundary.
Tibet was once a part of the great Uighur
Empire. This was before the mountains were raised. The country then
was flat and fertile. Now it is one of the highest plateaus in the
world with masses of high mountain ranges, most of which run from a
westerly to an easterly direction. In the south is the highest
mountain range in the world'-the Himalayas. Mount Everest, the
world's highest mountain, is in this range and lies within the
boundaries of Tibet. Tibet has been called "the roof of the
world."
While India has been called "the land
of mystery and mysterious sciences," Tibet is her twin sister,
if not her rival, in this respect. In Tibet, in the most inaccessible
parts of the mountains, are many monasteries, lamaseries and temples.
Shut in from the outside world these monastic orders live their quiet
secluded fives, away and aloof from the rest of 186 THE
CHILDREN OF MU
mankind, unknown to all except a
few herdsmen who live in their valleys. Some of the monks in some of
these Himalayan and Tibetan monasteries claim that they are the
descendants of the Naacals who were driven out of India by the
Brahmins about 3000 years ago. These appear to have preserved the
Original Religion and some of the Cosmic Sciences of the Earth's
First Great Civilization. I have emphasized the word "some"
because these monasteries out of the hundreds in Tibet can be counted
on the fingers of one hand. I know of only three. Most of the
monasteries follow a form of Buddhism.
*Some years ago Schliemann* found *in
the Old Buddhist Temple at Lhassa a writing relating to the
destruction of Mu.* This record is a translation from an old
tablet written in Pali and Tibetan mixed. The whereabouts of the
original is unknown; probably, however, it is lying amongst hundreds
of others in one of the rooms of the temple; lying on the floor, dust
covered, with a corner or an end peeping through its foul blanket of
temple germs.
In the
depths of the mountains, on one of the head waters of the Brahmaputra
River, are some temples and monasteries. I cannot recollect the exact
number now. In one of these monasteries are preserved what is said to
be a complete Naacal Library-many thousands of tablets. It was
stated to me that this was the Naacal Library which had belonged to
the Uighur capital city. They have a weird, legendary history
connected with these tablets. I mentioned this fact to my old Rishi
and asked him if ever he had heard of them and their weird history.
He told me he had in his younger days visited this monastery and was
told the history of the tablets. I will repeat it as given to
me.
***The Legend of the Naacal
Library*** as told by the old Rishi.
"When the great flood swept up over
eastern and northeastern Asia, it destroyed the Uighur capital city,
drowning all of the inhabitants, and buried a great library which had
been brought there by the Naacals from the Motherland. Many years
afterwards the Naacals of the west, whom the flood did not reach,
went to the ruins of the capital city, dug the tablets out and
carried them to a THE GREAT UIGHUR EMPIRE 187
temple in the west. There they remained until the mountains were
raised which destroyed the temple and buried them again. Many, many
years afterwards the descendants of the Naacals who survived the
mountain raising, went and dug them out again and brought them to the
temple where they now repose."
Neither this monastery nor the tablets are
unknown; they are well known to Oriental scholars. To my own personal
knowledge, three Englishmen and two Russians have visited this
monastery.
After recounting this legend, I asked the
Rishi whether this library was the only complete one in existence.
His answer was, "I think not, my son. We have a legend which
states that when our Rishi City, Ayhodia, was sacked and burnt by the
invading army, the Naacal library was in the secret archives of the
temple and never discovered by the enemy. So that if our tradition is
correct, buried beneath the ruins of the temple the Naacal Library
still remains intact, as it has never been dug out."
It has been suggested to me that in my
writings I withhold all names of places, routes, passes, etc., in
Tibet. Kashmir and Northern India generally, which might be of value
in a political sense. The reason given for withholding this
information is a perfectly valid one. I feel it my duty and pleasure
to comply with the suggestion.
**
CHINA.**
-The Chinese
civilization is referred to and looked upon as one of the very old
ones. As a Chinese civilization it dates back only about 5000 years.
It is popularly believed that the Chinese themselves developed their
civilization. They did not. The Chinese civilization was inherited
from their father's side. Again, the Chinaman is looked upon as a
Mongol; he is only half Mongol, his forefathers were white Aryans.
During the time of the Uighur Empire, many of the white Uighurs
intermarried with yellow Mongols whose country lay to the south of
the Uighur Empire, and the descendents of these intermarriages formed
the first Chinese Empire. The record reads: "Uighur men married
the best of the yellow savages." This without question is a
mistranslation, for at the time these marriages were taking place,
savagery had 188 THE CHILDREN OF MU
never been known on the face of
the earth, so that what was meant was unquestionably "the yellow
inferior race." This is borne out by traditions which say that
"the yellow Mongols were much inferior to the Uighurs, their
civilization was below that of the Uighurs." Many of the Chinese
today, especially the high class, have quite white skins. This is the
Uighur blood showing in their veins. The regular Chinese coolie, the
Lower classes of the Chinese today, have no Uighur blood in them.
They are the descendants of the ancient yellow Mongols.
The Uighur parents of these intermarriages
were very careful to have their children educated up to the Uighur
standard, so that when the Chinese Empire was first formed it was by
those having Uighur blood in their veins and educated in the Uighur
great civilization. The Chinese~ civilization, therefore, was the
Uighur civilization handed to them by their fathers. There are many
writings in the Chinese Tao temples confirming the foregoing and any
Chinese scholar can without question confirm it. Another tradition
prominent in China is: "The Chinese did not always live in Asia.
They came to Asia from a far-off country towards the rising
sun."
I have endeavored to find a collection of
the numerous Chinese legends in the form of a Chinese Legendary
History-it may exist but I have been unable to find it. I take from
China by E. H. Parker, page 17, the
following:
**
EARLY CHINESE DYNASTIES**
NAME
OF NUMBER
OF DURATION OF
DYNASTY
RULERS
DYNASTY
"Five
Monarchs"
Nine 2852-2206 B.C.
Hia
Eighteen
2205-1767 "
Shang
Twenty-eight 1766-1122 "
Chow
Ten 1121-
828 "
Chow
Twenty-five 827-
255 "
According to this, the average reign in each dynasty was:
"Five Monarchs"-each reigned
7l 7/9 years.
Hia
"
" 24
1/3
Shang
"
" 23
Chow
"
" 29 3/10
Chow
"
" 22 22/25
Parker says: "The Five Monarchs are altogether mythical. The Hia
dynasty is legendary and largely mythical. The Shang dynasty is
chiefly legendary. The Ten Chow is semi-historical and the
Twenty-five Chow historical."
From the foregoing one must infer that
Parker believes only what he sees and nothing that he hears. It would
appear that it matters not how true a legend may be, it is a myth
unless he sees writings which he can believe in. It has been one of
my hobbies to trace myths back to see what they come out of. Ninety
times out of a hundred I have found that the myth has its origin in a
tradition or legend. The tradition or legend has been so garbled that
it has become a perfect myth. It should be remembered that there is
no smoke without a fire. I do not doubt for a minute that in many
cases what Parker calls myths are really legends slightly garbled.
They are traditions only to the people, for behind them in the old
Tao temples are to be found written records of the various
phenomena.
Parker gives a good and very exhaustive
history of China from about 200 B. C. down to present time. He shows
the rise and fall of the various Mongol tribes and nations. He is,
however, absolutely wrong about the Japanese; and, being wrong about
them, other assertions of his are left open to doubt. From his style
of writing he would be one to put poor old Marco Polo in prison
because he did not bring back a big-horn sheep to show. How Parker
accounts for the Gobi ruins and other great prehistoric ruins, I do
not know. Apparently, such things mean nothing to him.
Some
seven or eight thousand years after the destruction of the Uighur
Empire, innumerable little nations came into existence in Eastern
Asia. All, apparently, were of the Mongoloid type. The most prominent
of these Mongol nations was a Tartar race of which Genghis Khan and
Kublai Khan were the principal figures. Kublai Khan lived A. D. 1277,
about 600 years ago. Confucius, the great Chinese scholar and
philosopher, lived from 551 B. C. down to 480, about 300 years after
Chinese history commenced to be recorded in China. The Emperor Che
Hwang-te, 214 B. C., ordered all books and literature relating to
ancient China to be burnt. A vast amount was seized by him and burnt.
Some of the works of Confucius and Mencius were included in this
conflagration. It was this king who built the great wall of China to
keep back the Heung Noo Tartars from constantly raiding northern
China. Che Hwang-te did not succeed in burning all of the ancient
writings, for many were saved and hidden in the Tao temples where
they are now religiously kept and on no account shown to anyone
outside of the priesthood of the temple.
This completes my chapter on Eastern Asia.
The next will be on Western Asia. This closes the coffin lid of the
Great Uighur Empire as far as Eastern Asia and their capital is
concerned.
THE TERTIARY UIGHUR EMPIRE.
-When I say the
Uighur Empire of the Tertiary Era, I mean the Uighur Empire of 20,000
years ago-before the Magnetic Cataclysm which was the Biblical
"Flood," before the mythical geological "Glacial
Period," and before the time when the mountains were
raised.
The map
on page 179 (not shown) is simply a sketch, adapting present land
areas to show the extent and size of the Great Uighur Empire. Since
20,000 years ago, many lands have been submerged and many emerged. I
have shown a line running across the central parts of Asia and Europe
from the Pacific to the Atlantic Ocean. This line is also about the
center of the Empire.
Remains of Uighurs have been found in the
Balkans. The last western outposts were Ireland, Breton in France and
Basque in Spain. How far north in Asia the Empire ran is not
known-ancient Uighur cities have been found far into
Siberia.
The shaded parts on the map represent
questionable boundaries. The only two well-defined boundaries are the
Pacific Ocean on the east and the Naga Empire on the south. Whether
the Uighurs extended clear across the center of Europe to the
Atlantic Ocean, or only outposts were established, is a riddle yet
unsolved. Today, however, we find their descendants on the Atlantic
Coast, whose origins no one has attempted to tell.
In an old Oriental document it is stated
that the Uighur Empire was made up of something such as petty
kingdoms, principalities or states, each having its own head or ruler
yet all forming but one empire under one supreme head or emperor who
in turn was under the suzerainty of Mu, the Empire of the Sun.
Looking at our own form of government, it is not a difficult
proposition to imagine the Uighur Empire to have been an enlarged
Unlted States. Mu herself was only the United States of the
world.
Dean, Got lots more stuff about EGYPT, the
ancient Greeks, Babylonia, Western Europe, etc. And MANY Churchward
maps of the ancient
world. Later IF still interested.