Re: [allplanets-hollow] Seth-Jane Roberts
List Members,
Now that I have finished the Danile Ross book, I can say that it is definitely one of the books which has most inspired me. He offers lots of evidence to disprove the model of the solar system, the other planets, which we have been given. He also offers positive evidence to establish a different concept, one of civliisation on the other planets. he doesn't talk about hollow worlds, though. it might be beyond his purview, but his purview will certainly help us to wipe the slate of our minds clean of the false concepts which we have been given by Never A Straight Answer, ( NASA ).
One level at which he does this is in relation to the space probes. We have some kind of absolute idea about the info sent back by the probes, but it is not like that at all. The following is not all he says on the matter, but it gives you all a taste. Get his book, UFOs and the complete Evidence from Space. You can get it used through www.bibliofind.com . It only costs about $15 used.
Here are some of his comments-
" Because the public only sees the end results of a space mission as a series of photographic images in a magazine article, people are very apt to think of a planetary encounter as a live broadcast from space by the spaceprobe. Actually, the probe is exploring in the dark, and its various instruments have uncertain sensitivities to atmospheric frequencies, radar waves, solar intensity, magnetic fields, and cosmic radiations. Photography is nothing more than limited electronic detection of surface illumination contrasts, which must be interpreted by computer imaging back on Earth. The various instruments send their non‑absolute indications millions of miles to Earth in the form of very faint radio signals. These signals are barely discernible from the constant radio noise coming to Earth from space itself, and sometimes indistinct from the high frequency noise of the components used to receive the signals.
For example, eight scans by an ultraviolet spectrometer on Mariner 10 were sent back, and initially the signals were interpreted as Mercury having a moon, or satellite. Project scientists thought that they had discovered a moon circling Mercury. The readings were later identified as radio emissions from a 5th magnitude star that was light‑years away! And is this not the same type of instrument as the mass spectrometer ‑ that device which has always been the instrument for subjective analysis of planetary atmospheres?
Our space probes operate in unknown zones, pick up some type of frequency, from some type of emission, in a vast and complex planetary field. Something registers, and a feeble signal is transmitted to an Earth‑based receiver. Schooled in orthodoxy, project scientists try to interpret the signal. Our space probes are exploring and groping in the dark, so to speak. Their capabilities at present are like looking at a drop of water with a magnifying glass. Compare that with looking at a drop of water with an electron microscope, and you realize what stage of confirmative knowledge we are at in planetary exploration."
Page 213, UFOs and the Complete Evidence from Space
Posted by Dean
