Hi all,
The following mail on a hollow earth email group made me curious:
Hello. My name is Norlan Jacobs. I am a professional educator. I have
researched the Hollow Earth Theory for over 30 years. I have discovered some
amazing facts and deduced some very interesting conclusions on the scientific
support for the Hollow Earth concept. I have often lectured on the topic to
gatherings of science and physics students and instructors. I have debated
with physicists on the instability and improbability of Newtonian Laws on
which modern physics is based. I have researched out scientific defenses for
the Hollow Earth Theory from discoveries in Quantum Mechanics to the
discoveries in global catscans. I have deduced and predicted phenomena which
have puzzled even the chairman of M.I.T.'s Physics Department. And I have
woven the facts and mysteries of dozens of disciplines and resources into a
fascinating scenario, of just what we are dealing with in the actual
cosmogony of the earth and its inhabitants.
I must say that I had great hopes in discovering a Hollow Earth web site, but
I am disappointed in the simplistic and carnival nature of what I have seen
so far on the site. Although there is much to be said on the subject of
telepathic communication, it is not the main process by which communication
or discussion can take place with those who might be located within, or know
about, a Hollow Earth reality.
I wish there were a more serious and professional approach to the discussion
of this topic at this site. The H.E.Theory is very defendable and arguable
at the highest level of education. Unfortunately, it appears to be the
astral plane headquarters of a great many individuals who don't take the
concept seriously, and only use it for the basis of self-gratification and
charlatan propaganda. Would serious investigators please respond to this
observation to let me know that there are others who have approached this
topic with a sincere scientific yearning for truth. Thank you.
Norlan Jacobs, [email protected]
···
___________
I asked for more information and here is his very interesting reply:
Thank you Frode for responding to my plea. I am not informed enough about
the soft-particle theory to be able to comment on its validity at this time.
So, I would appreciate more information on it or resources which will allow
me to study it further.
However, it is not necessary to develop a "new" approach or concept of matter
to come to the conclusion that planets are created hollow, including earth.
The answer lies in the well-documented discovery that Newton's Laws are
wrong. Isaac Newton took Kepler's Laws of the Universe as the basis for his
work on gravity and its relationships. Kepler's six formulas were equations
that simply explained the balance of all things and their relationships. In
the process of deciphering Kepler's laws, Newton made a fatal error. He
dropped a square sign, either intentionally or by accident, on one of the
factors on one side of one of the equations which pertained to his work. The
book "Newton's Laws Are Full of Flaws" by Cluff, gives a complete account of
this discovery, written by a Physics Teacher who got tired of having his
students come up to him asking why Newton's Formulas didn't work! He decided
to research it out and came to this conclusive discovery! All of modern
physics are based on Newtonian Law, and academic physicists treat it as
gospel. They ignore the contradictions it presents and go on trying to
blissfully explain it away. They have also based their entire focus of
research and dedication to proving and adhering our understanding of why
things are the way they are to fit Newtonian Law.
The assignment given to the mass of the earth and the power of gravitational
force are all derived from, and are in keeping with Newtonian Laws. (Which
are wrong) Thus, the conclusions that gravity is of a lesser strength, and
that this solid massive mass of this concocted cosmogony of the earth that is
required to support the incorrect notions of Newton, was all derived from an
incorrect formula. THE CART BEFORE THE HORSE syndrome. It has led to the
"let's create the facts to support the theory" approach to explaining the
structure of our earth. It is fascinating to follow this domino effect
through the discoveries of mankind, and to see how the information we have
has been molded into the model we have of the earth's cosmogony to fit the
Newtonian theory rather than fit the facts.
Cluff writes his book from a purely mathematical approach, while using his
correctly discovered Kepler formula to prove his deductions he comes up with
some amazing conclusions that are so astonishingly applicable to the H.E.
Theory. The brief and basic conclusions he draws flow in this manner:
Newtonian Law worked fine here on this earth until we started exploring
space. Then this completely accepted basis for our understanding of physics
started to become exposed. According to Newton's Laws, the Sun has more
gravitational pull on the Moon than does the Earth. Of course, this is
impossible. Tidal influences, the high and low tides of our oceans, as they
actually are, don't fit Newtonian formulas at all.
The average weight of the earth, terra firma, dirt and rocks, averages 5.5
grams per cubic centimeter. This we know as fact. However, with the actual
size that we know the earth to be this is not nearly enough weight to support
Newtonian Theory. Thus, when seismographic studies revealed the three layers
of the earth's cosmogony, physicists jumped at this opportunity to interject
their suppositions to fit their gospel.
The three layers were designated as the mantle (dirt), the inner layer, and
the central core. The inner layer was a puzzlement. According to the
science of seismology, seismographic waves do not travel through liquid. The
entire inner layer of the earth does not reflect these waves, thus indicating
it's liquid (or gaseous) nature. But water, which weighs less than dirt does
not work for physicists because it's not nearly heavy enough. Thus the
molten lead concept was derived! Not based on any shred of fact that the
earth is full of molten lead, but based only on the notion of preserving
Newtonian Law. The molten lead would satisfy the liquid nature of the inner
layer, while providing the weight needed to help satisfy Newtonian formula
requirements. However, this assignment of molten lead still did not
completely satisfy the weight requirement. The out, was that the inner core
would make up for that shortfall. It would have to be impervious to the some
4000 degrees required to liquefy lead, and be heavy enough to make up for the
weight needed to balance the Newton formula. Thus, the infamous Titanium
ball at the central core of our planet concept. Nothing like it in the
universe that we've observed, but here is this 600 mile diameter titanium
ball bearing floating around in space, collecting molten lead around it, and
then this comfortable layer of insulative dirt gets attracted to it, which in
turn attracts this thin layer of gas to create our atmosphere. What a bunch
of BUNK. But, it satisfies Newton's Laws so it has been presented as fact
from the scientific world and crammed down our throats throughout our
education systems ever since it was spawned by the Newtonian loyalists. We
observed the formulation of planets in the universe. We see the steps the
process takes, which starts with a smaller central star that attracts gaseous
and particulate matter around it in a spiral nebula, which eventually
condenses around the star, and eventually solidifies into a planet structure.
We observe these phases in the heavens, the Lira Nebula being one of those
phases which has this smaller central star that can be occasionally seen
through the naturally formed polar openings of its solidifying crust. This
process is observed and documented as the birth of a planet, yet it does not
fit our Newtonian demagoguery, and so, it does not apply to how our planet
Earth must have been formed.
Now, getting back to the Cluff book. His discovery and application of the
corrected Law of Kepler, and the corrected Newtonian Law, rectifies the
incongruities of the applied law to actual facts. Tidal influences exactly
correspond, the Earth has more gravitational pull on the Moon than does the
Sun and so forth and so on. Cluff's calculations also show that the Force of
Gavity has also been shortchanged by the Newtonian Physicists. Gravity is a
much stronger force than we think, because the influence that the mass of
objects has on one another requies much less mass for the same influence than
previously surmised. In fact, the amazing conclusion that Cluff derives from
his discoveries, is that the 5.5 grams per cubic centimeter that we know the
mantle of the earth to weigh, is way to heavy to comply with the newly
corrected formula. Cluff concludes that the gravitational influence of the
Earth's mass that fits perfect inot all the new calculations would require
that the EARTH MUST BE HOLLOW. The known mantle of the Earth's mass is
sufficient for the weight required to comply with the new formulaic
calculations. The earth's inner core is not molten lead, nor is it required
to be so according to some misconception. It is a gaseous atmosphere, and
gas has the same properties as liquid, because gas is just a finer, lighter
liquid. The central core is not a sudo-required ball of titanium, but a
central sun which was the core of forming our Earth as are all other planets
formed.
A new physics is not required to perfectly explain the Hollow Earth Theory,
only a corrected understanding of the knowledge we've already been given.
Hope this helps to explain my approach an understanding of the issue.
Norlan Jacobs
______________________
I asked if he knew about Cater, but he didn't. It will be interesting to see if his and Cater's work confirm with each other. I will keep you updated.
Frode