Poll results for allplanets-hollow

The following allplanets-hollow poll is now closed. Here are the
final results:

POLL QUESTION: Significant areas of HET study, which
deserve relatively a bit more
attention, ( all areas are
significant )are:

CHOICES AND RESULTS
- Arctic evidence, e.g., Nansen's expedition, 3 votes, 12.50%
- Physical explanations, e.g., how gravity relates., 5 votes, 20.83%
- UFOs, underworld creatures and how they relate to HET., 5 votes, 20.83%
- Politics, NWO and conspiracy theories related to HET., 3 votes, 12.50%
- Folklore, i.e., Tibetan, Hindu, Etidorhpa, Olaf Jansen., 8 votes, 33.33%

For more information about this group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/allplanets-hollow

For help with Yahoo! Groups, please visit
http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/

The following allplanets-hollow poll is now closed. Here are the
final results:

POLL QUESTION: Significant areas of HET study, which
deserve relatively a bit more
attention, ( all areas are
significant )are:

CHOICES AND RESULTS
- Arctic evidence, e.g., Nansen's expedition, 3 votes, 12.50%
- Physical explanations, e.g., how gravity relates., 5 votes, 20.83%
- UFOs, underworld creatures and how they relate to HET., 5 votes, 20.83%
- Politics, NWO and conspiracy theories related to HET., 3 votes, 12.50%
- Folklore, i.e., Tibetan, Hindu, Etidorhpa, Olaf Jansen., 8 votes, 33.33%

List Members,

About the results of the poll- turnout was so-so, and the poll is not so
specific. For example, are these results representative of newer people or
older members?

One comment I'll make is that the small amount of attention given to the
Arctic area of evidence surprised me. Maybe this is because I haven't gone
over a lot of it lately and we have a lot of new people. During the last
quarter of 2000 we really went over all types of Arctic anomalies in
relation to the HE.

It's a shame because this is the area with which we have the most direct
evidence, not only in tems of anomalies such as warming, which is a matter
of indirect, deductive evidence, but there have been several sightings of
mountanous terra firme NOT covered by snow, as well as remains from the
interior, ranging from mammoths enceased in ice and pollen all over the
icebergs- and I don't mean a smudge here and there.

I put up everything polar, except the kitchen sink, on my Arctic evidences
page: http://www.skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index5.html

DD

Hi, Dean!
I'm a member for going on a year. I didn't vote. I had no opinion as I like the
forum, and the range of topics covered.
Maybe voters could now send you their status--give them the criteria you'd like
to look at--and that would help you evaluate the poll.
Blessings to all,
Nimueh

Dean De Lucia wrote:

ยทยทยท

> The following allplanets-hollow poll is now closed. Here are the
> final results:
>
>
> POLL QUESTION: Significant areas of HET study, which
> deserve relatively a bit more
> attention, ( all areas are
> significant )are:
>
> CHOICES AND RESULTS
> - Arctic evidence, e.g., Nansen's expedition, 3 votes, 12.50%
> - Physical explanations, e.g., how gravity relates., 5 votes, 20.83%
> - UFOs, underworld creatures and how they relate to HET., 5 votes, 20.83%
> - Politics, NWO and conspiracy theories related to HET., 3 votes, 12.50%
> - Folklore, i.e., Tibetan, Hindu, Etidorhpa, Olaf Jansen., 8 votes, 33.33%

List Members,

About the results of the poll- turnout was so-so, and the poll is not so
specific. For example, are these results representative of newer people or
older members?

One comment I'll make is that the small amount of attention given to the
Arctic area of evidence surprised me. Maybe this is because I haven't gone
over a lot of it lately and we have a lot of new people. During the last
quarter of 2000 we really went over all types of Arctic anomalies in
relation to the HE.

It's a shame because this is the area with which we have the most direct
evidence, not only in tems of anomalies such as warming, which is a matter
of indirect, deductive evidence, but there have been several sightings of
mountanous terra firme NOT covered by snow, as well as remains from the
interior, ranging from mammoths enceased in ice and pollen all over the
icebergs- and I don't mean a smudge here and there.

I put up everything polar, except the kitchen sink, on my Arctic evidences
page: http://www.skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index5.html

DD

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to Yahoo | Mail, Weather, Search, Politics, News, Finance, Sports & Videos

Hi, Dean!
I'm a member for going on a year. I didn't vote. I had no opinion as I

like the

forum, and the range of topics covered.
Maybe voters could now send you their status--give them the criteria you'd

like

to look at--and that would help you evaluate the poll.
Blessings to all,
Nimueh

Nimueh,

Good idea. Let's all come up with a criteria. One would be how long have you
been studying the HET, maybe how long on this list, and then maybe " do you
believe it?"

D

http://www.elo.com.br/~deaquino/

Fran De Aquino's research involves many aspects of Gravitation and
Cosmology.
After thirty years of research the professor De Aquino discovered that the
gravitational and inertial masses are correlated by a factor, which depends
on the incident radiation upon the particle. He showed that there is a
direct correlation between the radiation absorbed by the particle and its
gravitational mass, independently of the inertial mass.

Jan Lamprecht passed this one on.

DD