Polar/Arctic/Antarctic Body of Evidence

New World Thrives In
Arctic's Hidden Depths

http://www.rense.com/general67/hidd.htm

People- Wherefrom the species? Consider Gardner´s words on the
subject matter:

PHENOMENA OLD AND WELL ESTABLISHED

Another early modern writer has this to say of the animals and fish
of the North:
"It is a fact well attested by whalers and fishermen in the northern
seas, that almost every author who adverts to the northern fisheries
confirms, that innumerable and almost incredible numbers of whales,
mackerel, herring, and other migratory fish annually come down in the
spring season of the year, from the arctic seas toward the equator.
Some authors describe the shoals of herring alone to be equal in
surface to the island of Great Britain. Besides these, innumerable
shoals of other fish also come down. These fish when they first come
from the north in the spring, are in their best plight and fattest
condition; but as the season advances and they move on to the
southward, they become poor; so much so that, by the time they get'
to the coast of France or Spain, as fishermen say, they are scarce
worth catching.

IMMENSE SHOALS OF FISH

"The history of the migratory fish affords strong grounds to conclude
that the shoals which come from the north are like swarms of bees
from the mother hive, never to return. They are not known to return
in shoals; and it is doubted by some writers whether any of them ever
return north again."

To that we would simply add that a source of life so prolific and
never failing that it is likened to a hive, a place where the fish
breed and from which they come in shoal after shoal, is just what one
might expect to find in the well warmed interior of the earth. One
could never imagine such a place under a sea of solid ice. But
our authority proceeds:
"Pinkerton, in his voyages, states that the Dutch, who at various
periods got detained in the ice and were compelled to winter in high
northern latitudes, could find but few fish to subsist on during the
winter; which proves that the migrating fish do not winter amongst or
on this side of the ice."

WHERE DO THESE FISH WINTER?

It follows from that, that there must be immense fish-breeding
grounds on the other side of the socalled polar ice, for only in a
favorable location could these shoals live and breed-and it must be
remembered that they would require an immense quantity of food, and
only in a very temperate sea would enough food grow.

THE SEAL

To quote a little further:
"The seal, another animal found in cold regions, is also said to
migrate north twice each year; going once beyond the icy circle to
produce their young, and again to complete their growth, always
returning remarkably fat-an evidence that they find something more
than snow and ice to feed on in the country to which they migrate."
In "Ree's Encyclopedia" there is one of the early articles
descriptive of Hudson's Bay, and it is there stated that
reindeer "are seen in the spring season of the year, about the month
of March or April, coming down from the North in droves of eight or
ten thousand, and that they are known to return northward in the
month of October, when the snow becomes deep." The account goes on
to say:

THE REINDEER

"We are informed by Professor Adams, of St. Petersburg, that on the
northern coast of Asia, every autumn the reindeer start
northeastwardly from the river Lena, and return again in the spring
in good condition."
Short of such a hospitable country as is afforded by the interior of
the earth, where could these animals possibly find warmth and
nutriment?

MUSK-OXEN

Among early nineteenth century accounts of northern
explorations, "Hearne's journal" is one of the most interesting. In
its pages we may read that large droves of musk-oxen abound in the
arctic regions, as many as several herds each aggregating seventy to
eighty head being seen by Hearne in one day. Few of them ever came as
far south as the Hudson's Bay settlements. He also states that polar
white bear are rarely seen in the winter and that their winter
habitat is a mystery. But in the spring they suddenly appear from
some unknown place having their young with them.

Hearne goes on to tell us that white foxes are exceedingly plentiful
some years, and that they always come from the north; that the
animals which appear do not go again to the north, so that the supply
from there must be inexhaustible. Other species of animals and fish,
he tells us, are plentiful some years and very scarce in other years,
which would indicate, perhaps, that under certain conditions of
weather they migrate within the interior of the earth instead of
coming over the ice barriers to the exterior.

VARIOUS WILD FOWL

Hearne has also some very interesting observations about the large
numbers of swans, geese, brants, ducks, and other wild water-fowl
which are so numerous about Hudson's Bay. Of geese alone there are
ten different species, several of which he says-particularly the snow
goose, the blue goose, the brent goose, and the horned, wavy goose-
lay their eggs and raise their young in some country which to Hearne
was unknown- as indeed it has been to all explorers, for that country
is no other than the interior of the earth. Even the Indians or
Eskimos who had explored all the habitable countries in those
regions, could never tell where these fowl bred, and it was well
known that they never migrated to the south, and as many of these
fowl moulted in the season when they were visible in Hudson's Bay it
was certain that they did not breed there for a moulting bird cannot
sit on the nest-the moulting and the breeding seasons being always
separated.

Gardner´s book, online:

A Journey to the Earth's Interior, by Marshall B. Gardner

http://sacred-texts.com/earth/jei/index.htm

Gardner says that it is the unanimous testimony of explorers that " the
further north you go, the more animal life there is, a complete proof that
there is in the far north a great asylum of refuge where every creature can
breed in peace and with plenty of food. And from that region must come also
those evidences of vegetable life that explorers have repeatedly seen, the
red pollen of plants that drifts out on favorable breezes and colors whole
icebergs and glacier sides with a ruddy tinge, those seeds and buds and
branches, and most impressive of all, those representatives of races of
animals that yet live on in the interior, although they have disappeared
from the outside of the earth. ( Gardner here refers to mammoths found
frozen in ice.)

http://www.holloworbs.com/polar_warming.htm

Dean

Dean , this is very true . I wonder why National Geographic and Discovery Channel never make honest statements about such evidence , even in their own programs where they exclusively cover wildlife of the Arctic .

Regards

Sidhartha,

Yes, they do all kinds of documentaries about the plight of the polar bears, but nothing about the astounding fact that all mammals migrate northwards for the winter.

You can't win for losing, you figure it out and they ignore you.

Dean

Seigmeister/Raymond Bernard quotes Reed from The Phantom of The Poles:
WHY IT IS WARMER NEAR THE POLES.

"One of the principal proofs that the earth is hollow is that it is warmer near the Poles. If it can be shown by quoting those who made the farthest advance toward the supposed Poles, that it is warmer, that vegetation shows more life, that game is more plentiful than farther south, then we have a reasonable right to claim that the heat comes from the interior of the earth, as that seems to be the only place from which it could come.

"In Captain Hall's Last Trip,' we read: We find this a much warmer country than we expected, bare of snow and ice. We have found that the country abounds with life, and with seals, game, geese, ducks, musk-cattle, rabbits, wolves, foxes, bears, partridges, lemmings, etc. (He is speaking of the far north.)

"Nansen draws special attention to the warmth and says, `We must almost imagine ourselves at home.' This was at one of the farthest points north reached by anyone, and yet the weather was mild and pleasant.

"It will be observed that these extremely strong winds from the interior of the earth not only raise the temperature considerably in the vicinity of the Arctic Ocean , but affect it very materially four hundred and fifty miles away. Nothing could raise the temperature in such a manner, except a storm coming from the interior of the earth.

"Greely states: `Surely this presence of birds and flowers and beasts was a greeting on nature's part to our new home.' Does that sound as if he had expected to find these things there, or that their presence was an everyday occurrence? No. It was written in a tone of surprise. From what place had these birds and game come? South of them for miles, the earth was covered with perpetual snow - in many locations thousands of feet deep. They are found in that location in summer; and as it is warmer farther north, they would not be likely to go to a colder climate in winter. They seem to pass into the interior of the earth.

"The mutton-birds of Australia leave that continent in September, and no one has ever been able to find out where they go. My theory is that they pass into the interior of the earth via the South Pole. "

Reed points out that many animals inhabiting the far north, as the musk-ox, go north in winter in order to reach a warmer climate. He remarks:

"Since it becomes warmer as they go north, instinct tells them not to go south in winter. And if they do not go south, they must go into the interior of the earth."

Another animal that goes north in winter is the auk. Schwatka saw a flock of four million auks, which darken the sky, going north as winter approached. Nansen says of the extreme north that a land which teems with bears, auks and black guillemots "must be a Canaan , flowing with milk and honey."
Members,
This migration Northwards as winter approaches is amazing. The significance in relation to an opening to the inner world is obvious.
The warming phenomenon is widespread and typical, take my word for it.
Dean

Gardner says that it is the unanimous testimony of explorers that " the
further north you go, the more animal life there is, a complete proof that
there is in the far north a great asylum of refuge where every creature can
breed in peace and with plenty of food. And from that region must come also
those evidences of vegetable life that explorers have repeatedly seen, the
red pollen of plants that drifts out on favorable breezes and colors whole
icebergs and glacier sides with a ruddy tinge, those seeds and buds and
branches, and most impressive of all, those representatives of races of
animals that yet live on in the interior, although they have disappeared
from the outside of the earth. ( Gardner here refers to mammoths found
frozen in ice.)

http://www.holloworbs.com/polar_warming.htm

WHY IT IS WARMER NEAR THE POLES.

"One of the principal proofs that the earth is hollow is that it is
warmer near the Poles. If it can be shown by quoting those who made
the farthest advance toward the supposed Poles, that it is warmer,
that vegetation shows more life, that game is more plentiful than
farther south, then we have a reasonable right to claim that the heat
comes from the interior of the earth, as that seems to be the only
place from which it could come.

"In Captain Hall's Last Trip,' we read: We find this a much warmer
country than we expected, bare of snow and ice. We have found that
the country abounds with life, and with seals, game, geese, ducks,
musk-cattle, rabbits, wolves, foxes, bears, partridges, lemmings,
etc. (He is speaking of the far north.)

"Nansen draws special attention to the warmth and says, `We must
almost imagine ourselves at home.' This was at one of the farthest
points north reached by anyone, and yet the weather was mild and
pleasant.

"It will be observed that these extremely strong winds from the
interior of the earth not only raise the temperature considerably in
the vicinity of the Arctic Ocean, but affect it very materially four
hundred and fifty miles away. Nothing could raise the temperature in
such a manner, except a storm coming from the interior of the earth.

"Greely states: `Surely this presence of birds and flowers and beasts
was a greeting on nature's part to our new home.' Does that sound as
if he had expected to find these things there, or that their presence
was an everyday occurrence? No. It was written in a tone of surprise.
From what place had these birds and game come? South of them for
miles, the earth was covered with perpetual snow - in many locations
thousands of feet deep. They are found in that location in summer;
and as it is warmer farther north, they would not be likely to go to
a colder climate in winter. They seem to pass into the interior of
the earth.

"The mutton-birds of Australia leave that continent in September, and
no one has ever been able to find out where they go. My theory is
that they pass into the interior of the earth via the South Pole. "

Reed points out that many animals inhabiting the far north, as the
musk-ox, go north in winter in order to reach a warmer climate. He
remarks:

"Since it becomes warmer as they go north, instinct tells them not to
go south in winter. And if they do not go south, they must go into
the interior of the earth."

Another animal that goes north in winter is the auk. Schwatka saw a
flock of four million auks, which darken the sky, going north as
winter approached. Nansen says of the extreme north that a land which
teems with bears, auks and black guillemots "must be a Canaan,
flowing with milk and honey."

From the chapter on Reed's book, in turn quoted in the book The
Hollow Earth, by Raymond Bernard/Siegmeister.

Peary also makes mention of the higher temperature. On pages 214 and 215, he
says: "I expected to hear later of our February fohn in other parts of
Greenland, and I was not disappointed. Lieutenant Ryder was living for nine
months at Scoresby Sound, on the coast of East Greenland, while we were at
McCormick Bay. He was about four hundred and fifty geographical miles south
of us. The maximum temperatures he recorded occurred in February and May. He
says (Petermann's Mittheilungen, XI, 1892, page 256) that these high
temperatures were clue to severe fohn storms, one of which, in February
(date not given), suddenly raised the thermometer to 50 deg. F., 8½ deg.
higher than my instrument had recorded."

It will be observed that these extremely strong winds from the interior of
the earth, not only raise the temperature considerably in the vicinity of
the Arctic Ocean, but affect it very materially four hundred and fifty miles
away. Nothing could raise the temperature in such a manner, except a storm
coming from the interior of the earth.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/potp/potp16.htm

CLOUDS, FOGS, AND VAPORS.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/potp/potp22.htm

The anomalies which Nansen encountered in the high Arctic could best be accounted for by the
existence of an opening nearby. Remember that there was no land for hundreds
of miles around, and that even that land is nothing but a wasteland anyway. How could land
birds be flying around in the middle of the Arctic ? And the pollen?

From Seven Days North of Tibet :
http://www.holloworbs.com/Seven_Days.htm

Towards the end of winter, on May 13, 1894, more wildlife anomalies began,
still in the middle of an Artic wasteland. They can be best explained by a
polar opening nearby.

Page 192: We had not expected to meet with much bird life in these desolate
regions. On May 13, 1894, a gull paid a visit ... After that date, we
regularly saw birds of different kinds in our vicinity until it became a
daily occurence.

On July 18th Doctor Nansen brings our attention to other polar anomalies
quite noticed and well documented by other explorers- at this point the ship
was just above 81* North.

Page 201: Wednesday, July 18th. " Went on an excursion with Blessing in the
forenoon to collect specimens of the brown snow and ice. ... The upper
surface of the floes is nearly everywhere a dirty, brown color, or, at
least, this sort of ice preponderates, while pure white floes ... are rare.
...; but the specimens I took today consist, for the most part, of mineral
dust mingled with diatoms and other ingredients of organic origin. [ Dr.
Nansen mentions in the footnotes that ] larger quantities of mud, however,
are also often to be found on the ice ... but are doubtlessly more directly
connected with land."

Page 488: " Siberian driftwood, ... as well as the mud found on the ice ...
even when we were as far North as 86*."

The question always goes back to the manner in which one interprets such
data. The sediment types from the mud typically found on the ice floes
seemed to correspond to Siberian rivers, wherefrom some ice could have
broken off. But the sediment types also correspond to Alaskan sediments-they
did not correspond to European sediments. Driftwood found near Greenland was
definitely of Siberian and Alaskan origin, not European. A Hollow Earther
would ask why couldn't such evidence also correspond to a land mass at the
entrance to the hollow world? The problem is that we have no sediment
samples from such a place to compare with the mud from the floes, but since
the suspected entrance lies on the same side of the polar basin as Siberia
and Alaska , why wouldn´t such a place provide a more likely explanation for
the mud found on the ice floes at that very point? Such a place would be a
closer source.

Granted that sediment types from the mud found on the icebergs do not
constitute absolute evidence of a hollow Earth. But what about the pollen
dust which covered huge expanses of ice? There may have been land masses
which could have accounted for the existence of a bit of mud on the ice, but
there was certainly nothing in the way of vegetation which could have
produced pollen which blew about and settled all over the ice. Has any
observer ever noticed huge clouds of pollen dust traveling across the
Northern parts of continents and the Artic Ocean in order to deposit
themselves on the ice up at 82* North? Nansen was not the only Arctic
explorer to note pollen on the ice, it is a typical phenomenon. Since the
ice has movement, such clouds of pollen would have to be typical in order to
regenerate their dusty cover on the ice. Would not a polar opening, through
which the winds of a continent are funneled, better account for such an
observation?

Pollen dust was not the only dust encountered by the Fram and its crew.
Clouds of volcanic dust were found, too, consisting of iron and carbon
particles. These huge clouds descended on the Fram and settled everywhere
and enveloped eveything, causing discomfort and irritation. Nansen noted: "
Let us go home. What have we to stay for? Nothing but dust, dust, dust. "
There were no active volcanoes at this time, certainly not for thousands of
miles. But the Fram wasn't the only ship to encounter such dust, so any
source for the volcanic dust found in the Artic would have to be typically
active. A polar opening to the interior of our planet, with an associated
land mass, provides a plausible explanation.

"The Norwood Review of England, in its issue of May 10, 1884,
reported: " We do not admit that there is ice up to the Pole- once
inside the great ice barrier, a new world breaks upon the explorer, the
climate is mild like that of England, and afterwards, balmy like that
of the Greek isles."

There had already been word about the hollow nature of the planet from
the Arctic seamen and explorers that had gone up that way and poked
around. Just look at the Frobsiher map:

http://www.holloworbs.com/Frobisher.htm