You might find this an interesting and useful chart to obtain:
Bathymetry of the Arctic Ocean. It shows the Arctic Ocean and
virtually all lands within the Arctic Circle on a
3-1/2' X 4' layout. Printed on the back of the chart for obverse
viewing are magnetic anomaly contours. It is a 1986 Chart: MC-56,
available from The Geological Society of America, PO Box 9140,
Boulder Colorado, 80301.
The Lomonosov Ridge, although deepening (from about 800 - 1100
meters) to 1500 near the Pole, then continues in a straight line to
the Lincoln Sea (500 meters) between Ellsmere Island and North
Greenland. Adjacent to and paralleling the Ridge is the Pole Abyssal
Plain with depths to 4400 meters (or so the chart shows).
The very center of the 'supposed opening', and I do believe there is
an opening, is according to Jan Lampreht atop the Lomonsov Ridge
(roughly 84-1/2 deg. N. Lat. and 140 deg. E Long).
The depths were measured by dozens of US, Canadian, Swedish,
Norwegian and German ships sources and at over 8000 occupied stations
from 1952 to 1982.
It would be difficult to believe there is that much collusion.
I've said it before and I'll state it again I don't believe we're
going to find an obvious 1200 mile opening curving in like a donut.
Somehow those that live inside, with their superior technology, are
able to seemingly make the opening disappear.
The curiosity continues.
See previous post about gravity.
Global,
On the inside of the gradually inward sloping, doughnut-like curve, it is
difficult to navigate because of the curvature, so they could have worked
their way around it without knowing. From either side of the doughnut
opening, because it is curved, when you look up, you can see the same polar
point over your head. So you think that your longitude and latitude
corresponds to certain coordinates, but actually, such coordinates could
correspond to the middle of the hole. But still, you say " Well, we were
there and we measured."
Add in some collusion at critical points and times, and there you have it.
The area is always foggy, so what can you see, anyway? You can't see across.
From the beginning of curvature to the other side, where the curvature there
begins, you certainly have a good thousand miles. Well, Rod says 800 miles,
I believe. The curvature seems to stretch from 80* on one side of the circle
to 80* on the other. But it is hard to talk about the exact size of the neck
of the opening, except that it should be in excess of 90 miles according to
the logic which Rod displays in his article The Location and size of the
Polar openings. He has a nice diagram:
http://www.ourhollowearth.com/PolarOpn.htm
By the way, Rod also has Smokey God/Olaf Jansen, available, with the
illustrations: World Top Secret: Our Earth Is Hollow!
Dharma/Dean
.
ยทยทยท
You might find this an interesting and useful chart to obtain:
Bathymetry of the Arctic Ocean. It shows the Arctic Ocean and
virtually all lands within the Arctic Circle on a
3-1/2' X 4' layout. Printed on the back of the chart for obverse
viewing are magnetic anomaly contours. It is a 1986 Chart: MC-56,
available from The Geological Society of America, PO Box 9140,
Boulder Colorado, 80301.
The Lomonosov Ridge, although deepening (from about 800 - 1100
meters) to 1500 near the Pole, then continues in a straight line to
the Lincoln Sea (500 meters) between Ellsmere Island and North
Greenland. Adjacent to and paralleling the Ridge is the Pole Abyssal
Plain with depths to 4400 meters (or so the chart shows).
The very center of the 'supposed opening', and I do believe there is
an opening, is according to Jan Lampreht atop the Lomonsov Ridge
(roughly 84-1/2 deg. N. Lat. and 140 deg. E Long).
The depths were measured by dozens of US, Canadian, Swedish,
Norwegian and German ships sources and at over 8000 occupied stations
from 1952 to 1982.
It would be difficult to believe there is that much collusion.
I've said it before and I'll state it again I don't believe we're
going to find an obvious 1200 mile opening curving in like a donut.
Somehow those that live inside, with their superior technology, are
able to seemingly make the opening disappear.
The curiosity continues.
See previous post about gravity.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
Global,
One more thing- I'll say that I don't think that it is so necessary, at this
point, to try to determine the size of the neck. Even if someone got it
right, there would be an element of luck and guesswork involved. We know
that there was curvature from Nansen's point of anomalies, 80* North, 138*
East- and from 80* or so North around the Ellesmere Island area, where
Greely experienced his forshortening of the horizon. The actual slope of the
curve and the breadth of the opening at the neck come after. We know that
the opening is to the Alaska side of the North pole.
The way that the Russians defined how the magnetic lines of force run in the
Arctic still makes me think that the opening might be a matter of an
elongated oval. See the attachment.
Bye, Dean