For those who are interested, I have a new article up at:
http://www.davidicke.net/emagazine/vol21/articles/demonseed.ht
ml
Thanks to those who supplied corroborating accounts or
material, and for your kind permissions to quote.
--Mike
I've finally put something new up on my Lunar pyramids page:
http://skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index3.html
" The image above is not directly related to the Hollow Earth Theory. It
does, however, suggest something about the credibility of NASA.
Notice the three different shadows being reflected on the face plate of the
" astro-not's " helmet. They each have a slightly different angle. This
would be impossible given a single light source, the Sun.
What to speak of the fact that two astro-nots are shown on the face plate,
making the owner of the face-plate the third- he is supposed to be up in the
command module!
Not/not/not! "
I think that, in order to make the mental adjustments necessary to fairly
consider the Hollow Earth Theory, it is really important not to be a NASA
worshipper. Of course there are things which NASA is going to hide and some
disinformation which they are going to put out. Take it for granted that you
have to scratch the surface and connect and conspiracy in relation to the
hollow Earth theory to other conspiracies, it doesn't help to see things
piecemeal.
The image is attached.
Dharma/Dean
Dean wrote:
I've finally put something new up on my Lunar pyramids page:
http://skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index3.html" The image above is not directly related to the Hollow Earth Theory. It
does, however, suggest something about the credibility of NASA.Notice the three different shadows being reflected on the face plate of the
" astro-not's " helmet. They each have a slightly different angle. This
would be impossible given a single light source, the Sun.
Impossible if the face-plate is flat I would think. I'm thinking
the face plate is acting like a fish-eye lense here. So the shadows
may not be all that unusual.
What to speak of the fact that two astro-nots are shown on the face plate,
making the owner of the face-plate the third- he is supposed to be up in the
command module!
I have no idea on that one.
Jeff
Here is some more reporting from Dr. Fridtjof Nansen, an Arctic explorer who
seemed to have grazed the Arctic opening to the hollow Earth where the city
of Shambhala lies. His expedition was the subject of our VNN article Seven
Days North of Tibet:
http://www.skyboom.com/hollowearthpuranas/index5.html
Members,
The polar anomaly of warming suggests that warmer air from a warmer interior
escapes from within the planet and, at times, affects the temperatures in
the Arctic. This phenomenon was well represented and categorized in the book
of Marshall B. Gardner: A JOURNEY TO THE EARTH'S INTERIOR.
This warmer air couldn't originate along the equatorial band, travel to the
polar area in convection currents, and drop down to affect the temperatures
at certain points. Stratospheric air becomes frigid even in the warmer
latitudes, what to speak of after a stratospheric journey to the poles!
Consider the words of Doctor Fridtjof Nansen from Gardner's book:
By the beginning of 1894, Nansen was between 79 and 80 degrees north,not too
far from the North Pole, but not making very rapid progress as they were
shut in by the ice and dependent on the drift. And then Nansen noticed that
whenever the wind blew from the north the temperature rose considerably. He
says
WARMTH WITH NORTHERN WINDS
" It is curious that there is almost alwavs a rise of the thermometer with
these stronger winds . . . . A south wind of less velocity generally lowers
the temperature, and a moderate north wind raises it. Payer's explanation of
this raising of the temperature by strong winds is that the wind is warmed
by passing over large openings in the ice. This can hardlv be correct, at
any rate in our case, for we have few or no openings."
Nansen's own idea was that the heat was caused by winds from the higher
reaches of the atmosphere where it had not been cooled by contact with the
ice. But in trying to explain the high temperatures in this way he forgot
that it was only the north winds which raised the temperatures and not the
south winds. And where would the higher air get its heat from in any case?
The heat must come from a definite source and in the far north the only
possible source is the one which we have pointed out.
[ At this point, he was just below 85* latitude, mucho close to the Pole
itself! ]
" On May 4th, the explorer is again found commenting on
the mild weathe. One night he says he could hardly sleep for the heat. In
the day time he can lie in the tent basking in the heat of the sun. ' Last
night,' runs anothe entry, it was almost too warm to sleep.' "
[ Now here is something that Gardner compiled from Lt. Greely's book ]
TEMPERATURE RISES CONSIDERABLY
At about this time, by the way, the temperature had gone up to 74 degrees
Farenheit-a very high summer temperature which made marching uncomfortable.
And even on hills two thousand feet high there was not a trace of snow.
GENERAL RESULTS OF EXPEDITION
Greely ends the account of these summer explorations by telling the general
results obtained by himself and his party. He says he has ascertained beyond
any doubt that the interior of North Grinnell Land is not what it had always
been supposed, but was a fertile land, filled with rich pasturage for
musk-oxen, and that, like it, Greenland, was also only an ice-girt and not
an ice-covered land; that-in conjunction with other explorers'
observations-it was safe to say that in north Greenland also there was
abundant pasturage and fertility. Such fertility, he adds, Nordenskiold had
looked for, but he had looked seven hundred miles too far south. In other
words Nordenskiold found only the icy desolation which is usually thought to
characterize the poles, but he found it not because he got too near the pole
but because he was not near enough.
Impossible if the face-plate is flat I would think. I'm thinking
the face plate is acting like a fish-eye lense here. So the shadows
may not be all that unusual.
Jeff,
I think that the shadows, given a curved face plate, could curve outwards,
but in that pic they curve inwards. What do you think?
Members-
I will confirm to you all that the astro-nots being reflected are not the
same one that the face plate belongs to, getting somehow reflected back to
his own face plate- their hands are all in different positions.
Dharma/Dean
List Members,
I might be off line all day Tuesday, I am switching locations and I don't
know if the telephone service will actually be turned on when I asked for
it.
If not, I'll be on Wednesday or Thursday.
Dharma/Dean
Dean wrote:
> Impossible if the face-plate is flat I would think. I'm thinking
> the face plate is acting like a fish-eye lense here. So the shadows
> may not be all that unusual.Jeff,
I think that the shadows, given a curved face plate, could curve outwards,
but in that pic they curve inwards. What do you think?
I think they would curve inward. I tried this for myself. To repeat
my test, set a clear, round water glass on a light or tan surface.
Put the glass between you and a light source. (The sun or a lamp.)
Hold a pencil on your side of the glass. View the shadow of the
pencil on the reflected glass surface.
Jeff
Mike,
You are on the cutting edge and really know what is going on. Do keep us in
mind, school us and let us know what you find out.
Dharma/Dean
···
For those who are interested, I have a new article up at:
http://www.davidicke.net/emagazine/vol21/articles/demonseed.ht
mlThanks to those who supplied corroborating accounts or
material, and for your kind permissions to quote.--Mike
--- In allplanets-hollow@y..., "Dean" <0108@t...> wrote:
Mike,
You are on the cutting edge and really know what is going on.
Do keep us in
mind, school us and let us know what you find out.
Dharma/Dean
Thanks Dean, you make my skull swell painfully.
Seriously, you are as knowledgeable as anyone as to what is
and has always been going on. Remember the activities of the
rakshasas and other types of Hindu "demons," who were
believed to haunt graveyards, engage in ghoul-type activities,
and in cannibalism or else necrophagia. Different names
everywhere, but the same old clowns and perpetrators. Masks
and names just change, from culture to culture.
Best,
Mike
p.s., If you received my off-list e-mail, please drop me a note at
my earthlink account and let me know.
Jeff,
I thin that you are right on that one, and the shadows do curve inwards. So
the shadows on the face plate aren't good evidence of fraude.
Of course, there is still the matter of three astro-nots appearing in the
pic at the same time, simultaneously!
# ; ^ )
Dharma/Dean
···
I think they would curve inward. I tried this for myself. To repeat
my test, set a clear, round water glass on a light or tan surface.
Put the glass between you and a light source. (The sun or a lamp.)
Hold a pencil on your side of the glass. View the shadow of the
pencil on the reflected glass surface.Jeff
Thanks Dean, you make my skull swell painfully.
Seriously, you are as knowledgeable as anyone as to what is
and has always been going on. Remember the activities of the
rakshasas and other types of Hindu "demons," who were
believed to haunt graveyards, engage in ghoul-type activities,
and in cannibalism or else necrophagia. Different names
everywhere, but the same old clowns and perpetrators. Masks
and names just change, from culture to culture.Best,
Mike
You got it!
Dean