Mormonism criticisms and answers debate #3

bending arguments will not make point, I am not linking myself, again, I give directions to links in those posts on GDS ...

about the physics exactly I assume, its era of mechanistic cosmology, so I havent bother with it!, yet You dont read me again, the mechanistic cosmology brought problem especially as locked in cartesian grid system!, so eg. ...

  1. Fatio de Duillier created a mechanical corpuscular theory of gravity in 1690 that used atomistic principles to explain Isaac Newton's law of universal gravitation [1][1]

  2. Le Sage too went in the same boat [2][2]

  3. Kelvin embraced aether but sadly through cartesian mechanistic cosmology [3][3]

so now, canDance who played himself, maybe mormons coz You rush jump and roll to conclusion :slight_smile: again for me, as I've pointed coz the shallow logic about the basic tribal vision hype, which is derived as is derived, among other by some enthusiast sailor to the north pole, for me its enough argument not to bother about, now this too, what else ... I am exhausted by this empty yet rude dribble of Yours, so cantDance anymore on this topic ...

  • ... I've pointed simply, such sinking ship of genealogy [4] is wrong by all means to be used like some useful background for the rest of theological arguments, which yeah that comedian JayD is dismantling it by magnitude!, tho if its comfort, he is ironing all the protestant and catholic fallacies, earlier even didnt considered mormonism for crucial apologetic juggling, guess due to the comparably smaller believers, tho as I can see in the past few years he did start ironing mormon calls!

Please Feel Free to ignore me on this topic, it would be less annoying for reading :smiley: coz obviously as mormon You are ultra biased, and whatever I'll bring as claim, You will try to unlist it, as I can see in the other thread even with ridiculous meme, why such urge to negate something even in vain, do try examine neatly mine propositions if care what I claim!