@Pelin, the post you're responding to here covers Orson Pratt's shell theorem objection, the Le Sage pushing-gravity tradition running from Fatio de Duillier through Lord Kelvin, Lamprecht's borehole gravitational constant anomalies, Cater's gravity-as-radiation model, and Harrigan's surface-attraction thesis. That is a specific physics discussion with named authors, cited works, and testable claims.
Your entire contribution to this thread is a link to your own post in another thread and the line "maybe some expedition racketeering was in question so jewish bankers would be appeased." You didn't address a single physics argument. Not the shell theorem. Not pushing gravity. Not the borehole data. Not a single one.
I've responded to your cross-posted material at length in the Culmer thread.
The short version: your sources are forum posts you wrote yourself, a YouTube comedian with no history credentials, and a man who claims to have been a vampire. If you wanna know about vampires, go watch some of Harry Hubbard's videos and read the Encyclopaedia Judaica. Seriously good shit there. But none of that touches the physics models @GeorgePlymale2 laid out here.
If you want to engage this thread, engage the physics. Pick an argument from the post and show where it breaks.
That's what this forum is for man!