Gary,
I watched that video of the Moon you posted, but it does not
look real to me. I am not a photo shop expert, but just the
idea there wasn't a cloud in the sky for the entire Luna cycle
makes me question the video, because that's just exactly
what it looks like to me, a simple video, where they are
rotating a 3-D image/photo of the Moon slightly as they move
it back and forth while they are creating the shadows on the
opposite side of a black background with a hole in it. I notice
when you look up at the Moon, sometimes it is more
overhead than other times, even within just a few days,
and that is not expressed at all. If it is an authentic work, it is
amazing how the edges remain so round, almost perfect. I
don't know a thing about editing, but as they the old schoolers
say "something stinks in Denmark." No reflection on you, no
pun intended, it is still a good find. But, like I said in a previous
email, I am beginning to re-think my original position that the
shadows you see on the corners of the Moon were polar
entrances, because when I last looked up just before the past
New Moon, it looked more like two fingernail clippings at the
top point, rather than a dull and blunt shadow rounder in shape,
that you see more when the Moon is at its half point. Leading
me to believe that it is some kind of reflection caused by Rahu.
Like I said, back to the drawing board for me. Friday I went and
spoke to the Optometrist who renewed my reading glasses. He
told me what other people in his field told me "it is impossible
for you see a double image like you are explaining if you still
see it when you have one eye covered.
Mike, NYC
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]