Mirrors experiment

I thought I'd mention that I've tried the experiment
on page 187 of The Ultimate Reality without any luck:

    "It follows that repeated reflections of a light source
    such as the Sun would result in a highly lethal laser-like
    beam."

For my experiment I used 10 first-surface glass mirrors.
These were flat mirrors and not concave. They were not optically
flat to a high degree since those tend to be very expensive.
I also didn't apply voltage to them to help increase the reflective
ability. I used the Sun as a light source.

My results indicated that repeated reflections grew more dim
in nature.

     For p.188, "The type of mirrors used in such an experiment must
    be metallic and preferably concave. Glass mirrors will not work.
    Much of the incoming light energy is lost during passage through
    the glass before it reaches the reflecting surface."

He indicates, here, that standard glass mirrors won't work but there
is no mention about whether glass first-surface mirrors (FSMs) will work.
FSMs tend to be aluminum coated glass with often a thin protective
coating on top to resist scratching. In the case of a FSM, there is no
glass surface to distort or lose energy. The protective coating may not
help out much for a successful experiment, though.

Anyone know of any source for metallic mirrors? I got my FSMs
from http://www.surplusshed.com for $1 each but I didn't see any
metallic mirrors.

Thanks,

Jeff

Jeff,

I imagine that a concave surface would be a major element.

How many surfaces did Cater use?

Dean

Jeff,

It is interesting to me to look at the way in which you and Frode see Cater.
You both seem to see him more in terms of how soft particles relate to
experiments and such, whereas I zero in on the Hollow Earth Theory and how
soft particles relate to a hollow Earth geological model.

Dean

Members,

Should I bother putting up Etidorhpa on my site? It is over three hundred
pages, and you kind of have to read one section to follow the next part.
What do you all think? I am thinking that nobody is going to read a whole
book on my site.

Dharma/Dean

I for one will read the book if you decide to post it. I eat these books up like candy when I can find them. I haven't gotten to my rare books source for a while. Etidorhpa is on my list of books to find and read. I tried a couple of years ago, but gave up after too much run-around. Of course I will get Cater's book also, but I am more into the idea of the hollow earth. Like with chemistry, I love the models in space and the theory but I am slower with the computations. It takes time to makes sense of the soft particle theory. I don't disbelieve you, I read everything with an open mind. I for one, appreciate all that you do to perpetuate knowledge. Your website is excellent and your explanations are well conceived

Your version of "The Smoky God", had color pictures, mine, a reprint with other stories, had black and white pictures. Had I not read it previously, I would have read your posting.

As a side note, "Journey to the Center of the Earth" is on TV in the middle of the night.

···

----- Original Message -----

From:
Dean

To: [email protected]

Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 12:23 PM

Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Etidorhap?

`
Members,

Should I bother putting up Etidorhpa on my site? It is over three hundred
pages, and you kind of have to read one section to follow the next part.
What do you all think? I am thinking that nobody is going to read a whole
book on my site.

Dharma/Dean

`

` To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

`

Dean,

I would say emphatically yes!

I for one would reference it and most likely read it there. Put
it up even if only for a limited time.

Thanks, I have been looking for something like that.

Roy

Dean wrote:

···

Members,
Should I bother putting up Etidorhpa on my site? It is over three hundred

pages, and you kind of have to read one section to follow the next part.

What do you all think? I am thinking that nobody is going to read a whole

book on my site.

Dharma/Dean

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

[email protected]

MJ,

Thanks for the advise.

I have found several editions of Etidorhpa for around $10.00, as little as $4.00, through www.bibliofind.com Etidorhpa is actually easy reading and fascinating.

Dean

I for one will read the book if you decide to post it. I eat these books up like candy when I can find them. I haven't gotten to my rare books source for a while. Etidorhpa is on my list of books to find and read. I tried a couple of years ago, but gave up after too much run-around. Of course I will get Cater's book also, but I am more into the idea of the hollow earth. Like with chemistry, I love the models in space and the theory but I am slower with the computations. It takes time to makes sense of the soft particle theory. I don't disbelieve you, I read everything with an open mind. I for one, appreciate all that you do to perpetuate knowledge. Your website is excellent and your explanations are well conceived

Your version of "The Smoky God", had color pictures, mine, a reprint with other stories, had black and white pictures. Had I not read it previously, I would have read your posting.

As a side note, "Journey to the Center of the Earth" is on TV in the middle of the night.

I got on bibliofind and found myself confused. I was wondering if anyone knew the differences?

There are so many titles:

ETIDORHPA

Etidorhpa or the End of the World

Etidorhpa, the End of Earth, the strange history of a mysterious being

Etidorhpa or The End of Earth/The Strange History of a Mysterious Being and The Account of a Remarkable Journey

Are they allthe same? Is one a more illustrated version of the story?

Michael-Jon,

There have been various printings- I think that this accounts for the differences in title.

Dharma/

Here is something from Cater's chapter on Metoerology:

" Air currents seem to be generated from electrostatic forces caused by the presence of concentrations of hard and soft electrons in the atmosphere. The rush of these charges toward lower potential areas creates a charged particle stream. This stream generates wind, because the ionized air molecules tend to be drawn along with it. Since soft electrons are continually disintegrating and releasing camouflaged hard electrons contained inside, the electrostatic forces will primarily be the result of hard electrons."

Air molecules tend to follow the flow of soft ( invisible ) electrons because the electrons possess a negative charge while the air molecules have a positive one. The origin of the soft electrons is the inner sun. Soft particles not only explain the connection between hollow Earth and surface phenomena, but hitherto unknown causes of surface phenomena, too:

" Tornadoes are more widespread and frequent than cyclones, and can be either clockwise or counterclockwise. The major cause, as with cyclones, is an extremely rapid discharge of soft electrons to ground. A cloud with an abnormal accumulation of relatively stable soft electrons will seek out a channel of least resistance to ground. The flow of soft electrons through this channel produces a vortex consisting of a combination of highly ionized air molecules and soft electrons. This is ac

companied by the rapid disintegration of soft electrons, which results in electrical discharges and lightning. A number of witnesses have seen the inside of a twister and attest to the continuous lightning discharges. Tornadoes occasionally lift off the ground when they encounter an area with a strong negative charge. This repels the concentration of negative charges in the vortex. Once a tornado starts, the cloud that feeds it receives an increased flow of orgone energy from all directions, which perpetuates it. The tornado will burn itself out when it cannot draw in enough soft electrons from the ground"

This is why it is so important to learn soft particle physics. Unless we do, we cannot defend, very well, the HE Theory nor phenomena connected with the hollow Earth. Certainly the phenomena presented in Etidorhpa would be beyond our comprehension without an understanding of the existence of soft particles.

Dharma/Dean

Here is something from my site on volcanoes; from Cater, really:

[ Cater on volcanoes ]:

“ The academic explanation for volcanic activity is somewhat vague. Since the temperature of molten lava disgorged by volcanoes is so great, the orthodox viewpoint is that the molten lava would have to originate at levels hundreds of miles below the surface surface. It has not been made clear how lava could find its way to the surface from such depths, since the Earth is supposedly a solid ball.”

This is interesting because in a solid Earth model, there would be such immense pressures at great depths that any opening for lava to flow through would be closed shut. And if the lava actually originated at the depths which they say, then it would cool by the time it reached the surface.

Cater attributes the heat which accounts for volcanic activity to the soft particles which penetrate the Earth much easier than regular photons. Cater tells us:
“ This process [ redistribution/penetration of low frequency light ] continues as the radiation from the Sun penetrates the Earth's crust. The lower frequencies [ of light ] are readily transformed into infrared radiations which produce increases in temperature. ... Most of the soft particles that disintegrate [and therefore radiate ] during this interval are comprised of photons below the visible range of the electromagnetic spectrum.”

As we have just mentioned in relation to earthquakes, it is the soft particles concentrated along plates and fault lines which act in condeser-like fashion, i.e., build up and store electricity/heat. This then, is the mechanism for heating the rock and producing lava."

Geological phenomena, not only from a hollow Earth standpoint but from a solid model standpoint, too, can only be explained once we leave the limiting parameters of modern physics and accomodate soft particles into our understanding.

They are the same as the orgone of William Reich, so the proof that the orgone people present can be used to substantiate soft particles:

http://www.orgone.org/

Dharma/Dean