June 17-19, 2001 Aurora Gallery

ALLPLANETS-HOLLOW Yahoo Group (Old Posts)
,
1

Check out the second pic down--it is what our sky looks like these days in Washington. Pretty is an understatement. Today there was a huge ring around the sun also. Leslee

Hope this comes through, I have not received any posts or private email for over 12 hours now---but outgoing seems to work OK.

Yahoo Groups removed 1 attachment from this message (1 executable file, removed as unsafe)

2

Leslee, I think I saw Mars last night, it was like a large orange glowing ball, fantastic, I wish I had a telescope. But although I can never claim to have seen a UFO, I have seen the 'chemtrails' not a pretty sight! Hazel

3

Leslee,

Nice aurora pics. What you are seeing are soft particles shooting out thorough the orifice and breking up into the photons of light of which they are comprised.

The aurora are so wide and huge that the orifice cannot be too small.

I think we've been getting your postings.

DD

Subject: [allplanets-hollow] June 17-19, 2001 Aurora Gallery

Check out the second pic down--it is what our sky looks like these days in Washington. Pretty is an understatement. Today there was a huge ring around the sun also. Leslee

Hope this comes through, I have not received any posts or private email for over 12 hours now---but outgoing seems to work OK.

4

***Hazel,

Make a trip to Seattle, we have it all. UFO's, black helicopters, chemtrails, bottomless lakes, and a wonderful view of Mars------we even have Big Foot! :wink:

Nice to finally see a post---strange things, all go out, none are coming in. This one took 17 hours. Only received 2 posts from APH, and about 4 from Fantasticreality....and zero from my other groups.....so, if I have not responded to anyone, it is because I have not received them. I guess I could go to My Groups Yahoo and look them up.

Les

5

Ralph,

Nice info on the hollow Moon. I don't know if anyone " hollowed " it out, but it does seem to be hollow.

I have some info up in this regard about the lunar polar crater Malapert: HugeDomains.com

Dharma/Dean

6

Dean, I think the theory for it being hollowed-out is because the surface soil on the moon is more consistent with minerals one would find in lower stratum, therefore it has mined out from the inside. Hazel

7

surface soil on the moon is more consistent with minerals one
would find in lower stratum, therefore it has mined out from the
inside. Hazel

Members, here is a related cross-post from June 5, from
fantasticreality.

--M.

0108 wrote:

One conclusion that we might want to entertain is that the
photography was
planned on purpose to dupe the public. We cannot trust our
notions about
the planets and the Moon. They are hollow, for one thing.

Oh Dean,

Christ on a bike...no, they are not... how can you possibly
assert that?
Well, maybe Phobos, but that's it, tops.

warm (and friendly) regards
Brian

Phobos has been verified as hollow, of course!

The theory for a hollow moon was brought up in modern times
by two Russian Space Agency scientists, who calculated that the
mass of the moon, given its relative size and distance from the
Earth, was not great enough. They combined this hard
mathematical data with observations of seismic recordings
(from radio seismometers left by Apollo) which had picked up
meteor impacts and a strange metallic "echo" or ringing within
the moon which went on for hours. This is discussed with great
detail and documentation in Lamprecht's book, HOLLOW
PLANETS.

More information is here, under Greg's website (written by
researcher Dennis Crenshaw):

http://www.onelight.com/thei/hollowmoon.html

Crenshaw's paper states:

Hollow Moon?

or
From Where The Bells Toll by Dennis Crenshaw

  •   Another piece of evidence pointing towards the theory that all

heavenly bodies are hollow is that, as you would expect with a
hollow sphere, both the Earth and our moon are known to "ring
like a bell" when hit with a shock wave.

In "Moongate: Suppressed findings of The US Space Program"
(1982), Nuclear Engineer and researcher/writer William L. Brian
II presents evidence proving that the moon, as any hollow
sphere would, "rings" when hit by asteroids or heavy space junk.
And that's not all. According to Dr. Brian, "the evidence provided
by Apollo seismic experiments also points to the conclusion that
the moon is hollow and relatively rigid." (1)
He also reports:

"It is not commonly known that the Earth displays the same
bell-like ringing or reverberations as the moon. Since the Earth
is 81.56 times more massive than the moon, it takes a much
larger explosion or shock wave to generate this effect.
"Joseph Goodavage referenced such occurrences in his book,
"Astrology: The Space Age Science". He mentioned that the
ringing effect was recorded during the May 22, 1960 Chilean
earthquake. This was supposedly the most violent earthquake
that had been recorded since the establishment of official world
records in 1881. Goodavage provided a description of the effect
which was given at the 1961 World Earthquake Conference, held
at Helsinki, Finland.
The description stated that the shock was so severe that the
"entire planet rang like a bell". The ringing continued for a
considerable length of time in a regular series of slow impulses
which were recorded at various independent seismic stations.
Goodavage also noted that the planet rang again as a result of
the Anchorage, Alaska earthquake of March 27, 1964. It seems
hard to believe that scientists were so appalled in finding that the
moon rang like a bell. After all, the Earth displays the same
characteristic". (2)

Proof that the "ringing" of the moon is common knowledge in the
scientific and NASA communities is presented in
communications between Mission Control and the men aboard
the Apollo 17 moon mission on December 29, 1972.

"LUNAR MODULE PILOT (LMP): Was there any indication on the
seismometers on the impact about the time I saw a light flash
on the surface? CAPCOM: Stand by. We'll check on that.
LMP: A UFO perhaps, don't worry about it. It could have been one
of the other flashes of light
CAPCOM: Jack, just some words from the back room for you.
There may have been an impact at the time you called, but . So it
would mask any other impact." (3)

Research/Writer Don Wilson presents other well-documented
evidence supporting the Hollow Moon Theory.

"The moon has only 60% of the density of Earth. The improbable
fact that an equal amount of earth material seemed to weigh
almost twice as much as moon matter mystified everyone. Why
the difference? The actual answer, some scientists felt, pointed
to the possibility that part or all of the moon's interior was
hollow!" (4)

Then there's a report in the July 1962 issue of Astronautics by Dr.
Gordon McDonald, a leading scientist at the Nation Aeronautics
and Space Administration in which he states that "according to
an analysis of the moon's motion, it appears that the moon is
hollow: if the astronomical data are reduced, it is found that the
data require that the interior of the moon is less dense than the
outer parts. Indeed, it would seem that the moon is more like a
hollow than a homogeneous sphere.'" (5)

In 1959 eminent scientist Professor Iosif Shklovsky put forth his
findings in relation to the "moons" circling Mars. "After carefully
weighing up the evidence he concludes that they are both
hollow" (6)

While some "orthodox" scientists will quietly admit that some
earthly bodies are probably hollow, they steadfastly refuse to
accept the fact that ALL planets and moons are NATURALLY
hollow and hurry to add they must be "artificial" satellites.

For instance:
"The moon seems to be a comparatively light world in contrast
with the planet Earth. The fact that the moon is only about 60%
as dense as our planet has led scientists to two theories: that
the moon is without an iron core, and/or, that it is partially hollow.
"Data and computations – among them, Dr. McDonald's motion
studies, – point to the conclusion that our moon is internally
hollow to a great extent.
Since most scientists claim there is no natural explanation for
such peculiar phenomenon (because satellite worlds are not
naturally hollow), the inevitable conclusion indicates that the
moon is artificially hollow." (7)

Once again, the "establishment" scientists are trying to "fit" the
facts to their "sacred cow" theory. In no way will they "buck" the
system and admit the obvious. The facts, once again, support
the theory laid out by Gardner and Reed all heavenly bodies are
hollow.

(1) "Moongate: Suppressed findings of the US Space Program".
William L. Brian II. Portland, OR: Future Research Publishing Co.
1982. (page 126). (2) Ibid. (page 126-127).
(3) "Our Mysterious Spaceship Moon. Donald K. Wilson. New
York, NY: Dell Publishing Co. 1975. (page 60).
(4) Ibid. (page 71).
(5) Ibid. (page 73).
(6) Ibid. (page 82).
(7) Ibid. (page 89).

------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Hollow Earth Insider Research Report
(c) 1995 by D. G. Crenshaw
-------------------------------------

I believe there is a book of ufology called Alien Agenda which
contains some documentation about the recorded "moon ringing
like a bell" phenomenon.

From
Yahoo | Mail, Weather, Search, Politics, News, Finance, Sports & Videos :

  1. Hollow Moon: The moon's mean density is 3.34 gm/cm3
    (3.34 times an equal volume of water) whereas the Earth's is
    5.5. What does this mean? In 1962, NASA scientist Dr. Gordon
    MacDonald stated, "If the astronomical data are reduced, it is
    found that the data require that the interior of the moon is more
    like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere." Nobel chemist Dr.
    Harold Urey suggested the moon's reduced density is because
    of large areas inside the moon where is "simply a cavity." MIT's
    Dr. Sean C. Solomon wrote, "the Lunar Orbiter experiments
    vastly improved our knowledge of the moon's gravitational field . .
    . indicating the frightening possibility that the moon might be
    hollow." In Carl Sagan's treatise, Intelligent Life in the Universe,
    the famous astronomer stated, "A natural satellite cannot be a
    hollow object."
  2. Moon Echoes: On November 20, 1969, the Apollo 12 crew
    jettisoned the lunar module ascent stage causing it to crash
    onto the moon. The LM's impact (about 40 miles from the Apollo
    12 landing site) created an artificial moonquake with startling
    characteristics—the moon reverberated like a bell for more than
    an hour. This phenomenon was repeated with Apollo 13
    (intentionally commanding the third stage to impact the moon),
    with even more startling results. Seismic instruments recorded
    that the reverberations lasted for three hours and twenty minutes
    and traveled to a depth of twenty-five miles, leading to the
    conclusion that the moon has an unusually light—or even
    no—core.
  3. Unusual Metals: The moon's crust is much harder than
    presumed. Remember the extreme difficulty the astronauts
    encountered when they tried to drill into the maria? Surprise!
    The maria is composed primarily illeminite, a mineral containing
    large amounts of titanium, the same metal used to fabricate the
    hulls of deep-diving submarines and the skin of the SR-71
    "Blackbird". Uranium 236 and neptunium 237 (elements not
    found in nature on Earth) were discovered in lunar rocks, as
    were rustproof iron particles.
    --------
    As recounted here, these various discrepancies in the mass of
    the moon led to several early lunar crashes due to
    miscalculations:

http://keelynet.com/unclass/luna.htm

So there's an actual basis for this suspicion....

--Mike

8

Interesting.

We do have to brain-storm.

DD