Yeah, I didn't realize that it talked about the infamous Byrd diary, if I did I wouldn't have posted it.. I should have read the whole article before posting it. Gary
[Yahoo removed the non-text portions of this message]
Good thing you didnt read it. Because the geodetic surveys from the tamarack mines change the whole concept of gravity and confirm what has been always my opinion that is the planet and his visible crust is taken in an invisible mold.Far away in space gravity (which is an effect and not the cause) is set up maintaining the "different spheres" so to speak together.Gravity is space borne.
thanks anyway because I wasnt aware of that experiment.
Joe
silopanna wrote:
Gary,
I only have some vague rememberance of this article. Where do these un-named writers come from and disappear to?
The part about Byrd's diary doesn't seem plausible, to make a long story short. Otherwise, the article is full of good info.
As far as Byrd's diary being "implausible," I would suggest that the truth is rarely plausible and that it is your tunnel vision that makes it appear so. It is such folly that finds "science" changing the facts to fit with their new stories.
silopanna wrote:
Gary,
I only have some vague rememberance of this article. Where do these un-named writers come from and disappear to?
The part about Byrd's diary doesn't seem plausible, to make a long story short. Otherwise, the article is full of good info.