Clear Day
It just occurs to me with Dean's explanations, that the inner sun emits ions which, as we know improve the content of our air like after a rain shower washing the positive charged heavy particles from the air. Plants grow better, explaining the giant grapes and other fruits and vegetables. And just the entire ecosphere would be a healthier atmosphere. Creativity is enhanced by an atmosphere of negative ions. That is why we feel better next to water falls and rapidly moving water. You can feel the ions in the air.
I'm not sure I understand the "Smoky" atmosphere relating to the soft particle theories, unless of course, there is the possibility that it is like a sauna.
Clear Day
Dean,
You have convinced me of the relativity and necessity to read Cater's book.
···
----- Original Message -----
From:
Dean
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 3:41 PM
Subject: [allplanets-hollow] Soft Particle atmosphere
Michael-Jon wrote:
It just occurs to me with Dean's explanations, that the inner sun emits ions which, as we know improve the content of our air like after a rain shower washing the positive charged heavy particles from the air. Plants grow better, explaining the giant grapes and other fruits and vegetables. And just the entire ecosphere would be a healthier atmosphere. Creativity is enhanced by an atmosphere of negative ions. That is why we feel better next to water falls and rapidly moving water. You can feel the ions in the air.
I'm not sure I understand the "Smoky" atmosphere relating to the soft particle theories, unless of course, there is the possibility that it is like a sauna.
Dean Writes:
Michael-Jon,
I think that in the " Smokey-God atmosphere " is a matter of negative ions building up within the cavity:
" The Smoky God ', in its clear white light, looked calmly down. There was an intoxication in the electrically sucharged air that fanned the cheek as softly as a vanishing whisper. " Olaf
What is maybe even more astounding is Cater's explanation about how the soft particles become transformed and pass through the shell of the Earth in the first place. Astronomer's tell about how charged particles from the Sun become stored up in magnetic bottles and then experience a discharge all at once to cause the aurora, but they have no basis to make such statements. They admit that they still don't have a handle of the so-called acceleration mechanism. The " acceleration " occurs because the low frequency electrons build up within the cavity and then, as a result, begin to flow out more rapidly, they begin to spurt.
The folly for us is that some schools of hollow Earth thought accept such parameters given to us by the wolves in charge of the chicken coup and then try to substantiate the HET and aurorae from that point onwards. There is no reason to accept that the charged particles enter through the polar orifices, Cater gives a different and very congruent explanation. As far as the acceleration of the particles is concerned, there is no reason to invent that the particles run in and out and back around through the hollow portion and that, somehow or other, they get accelerated in the process.
Once you accept the flawed parameters of modern scientists you end up arguning from a shakey platform- the more phenomena you address, the more dead ends you hit. With Cater's theories, it is the opposite. The more phenomena you address, the more congruency you encounter.
I'm happy to see that you all are picking up on Cater's soft particle explanation- I'd hate to see it get lost.
Dharma/Dean
` To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
`
